Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Pretty hard to take you seriously when you can't even tell what you're talking about. What files are missing?

Read the POST AGAIN. CdnLIAR.

 

FBI Interviews with Underage Trump Accuser, Epstein Data Shows

Quote

The FBI spoke at least four times with a woman who credibly accused Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was a minor, Epstein files show. That document is no longer accessible on the DOJ website.

On Sunday, I reported that the FBI interviewed a victim who accused President Donald Trump of sexually and violently assaulting her when she was 13-15 years old. I also reported that some of the Justice Department’s case files for this woman — who later sued and reportedly received a settlement from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate for sexual abuse allegations in the same timeframe — appear to be missing from the government’s publicly searchable Epstein database.

However, I have now found DOJ records showing that the FBI did not just interview this woman once. The FBI interviewed this woman — who claimed that Trump forced her to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens, then punched her in the head after she bit his penis and kicked her out — at least four times.

But the DOJ’s file associated with those records — a document cataloguing information that the government provided counsel for convicted Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell during her trial — has apparently been removed.

This revelation adds to the mounting pile of evidence undermining statements from Attorney General Pam Bondi and other senior administration officials assuring the public that the Epstein file release has been transparent, complete, and bereft of any evidence implicating Trump in wrongdoing.

But my initial report also raised questions about files associated with the victim’s case number — 3501.045 — that do not appear to be in the Epstein database. In other words, the case seems to be incomplete.

Quick background on my first report about the accuser, if you need it; if not, feel free to skip this paragraph. My reporting showed the FBI found this woman’s allegations credible enough to warrant a formal interview, which she gave with her attorney present in July 2019 — and now, as I have just learned, credible enough for three other interviews. The woman’s attorney told agents in that first interview that she would only speak to them at the time about Epstein, and not any other people — including, by name, Donald Trump — specifying the reason as a “fear of retaliation.” But “credible” doesn’t mean the woman’s claims were verified, or even that they could be independently verified — which her initial interview suggests may be impossible, since she did not memorialize the abuse in writing when it happened to her, as early as age 13. And it doesn’t mean the DOJ believed it could seek charges because of her claims alone, especially since they’d need her to cooperate as a witness if they did want to bring charges. We don’t even know if the DOJ arrived at any final disposition regarding this woman’s allegations against the president. It just means the FBI found her to be credible in 2019, and six years later included her allegation as a bullet point in a comprehensive internal presentation about the Epstein and Maxwell case history, assembled last summer.

Today, I searched for the victim’s case in an AI-powered database (epstein-data.com) of files that have been downloaded at some point from the DOJ’s public released data. That turned up a document I hadn’t seen before, showing that the FBI conducted not one but four interviews with this victim. The four interviews took place in the summer of 2019, after the initial tip was given in the days following Epstein’s arrest. The document also accounts for FBI “interview notes” associated with three of those four interviews. Here’s a screenshot of the records.

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F29148b48-ab92-48d6-937e-c68206c3a1c7_2324x652.png

The only reason the public can see that screenshot today is because in late January, this Epstein database document happened to get saved in the Wayback Machine, a webpage archiving service.

Here is the link to that archived record of the document.

The AI database also saved this file before the document was taken offline, and the database associates that file with a DOJ internet address. This is the address: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00095751.pdf

But as of this writing today, that address returns “page not found.”

 

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Ok.  Here's the post i replied to in it's entirety:

"No kidding. Well that IS a surprise. Lol. ":

that's it. That's all the first post in this thread says.

But you had to lie and pretend it said something else

Thanks for proving you have no moral standards and lie about everything yet again Robotwat :) 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Ok.  Here's the post i replied to in it's entirety:

"No kidding. Well that IS a surprise. Lol. ":

that's it. That's all the first post in this thread says.

But you had to lie and pretend it said something else

Thanks for proving you have no moral standards and lie about everything yet again Robotwat :) 

Thanks for proving you're IN DENIAL. Everyone is talking about the missing files detailed in MY THREAD: 

FBI Interviews with Underage Trump Accuser, Epstein Data Shows

and the post in it which I reposted HERE.

YOUR FAILURE TO UNDERSTSTAND that doesn't make me a LIAR, it makes you an lDIOT.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for proving you're IN DENIAL. Everyone is talking about the missing files detailed in MY THREAD: 

FBI Interviews with Underage Trump Accuser, Epstein Data Shows

and the post in it which I reposted HERE.

YOUR FAILURE TO UNDERSTSTAND that doesn't make me a LIAR, it makes you an lDIOT.

Thanks for proving you're STILL A LIAR!

NONE OF THAT was in THE ORIGINAL POST which YOU LIED ABOUT!!! 

Why do you lie so much? Is it because you've got bupkis?

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted

And now the Trump-Epstein files start to come into sharper focus...

Curiouser and curiouser... the plot thickens...

When do these pedophile protectors start cutting bait? 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Thanks for proving you're STILL A LIAR!

NONE OF THAT was in THE ORIGINAL POST which YOU LIED ABOUT!!! 

Why do you lie so much? Is it because you've got bupkis?

The Walls start to come crumbling down, it was only a matter of time anyway,  now the Un-cover up begins. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, John Johnston said:

And now the Trump-Epstein files start to come into sharper focus...

Curiouser and curiouser... the plot thickens...

When do these pedophile protectors start cutting bait? 

Regular bait or jailbait?

  • Haha 2
Posted

"WE GOT 'IM THIS TIME!"

You stupid fcks. How many times are you dumb little sh1ts gonna do this?

You look like the twits you are.

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

"WE GOT 'IM THIS TIME!"

You stupid fcks. How many times are you dumb little sh1ts gonna do this?

You look like the twits you are.

As many times as it takes to your serial predator and Ultra creep out of service I guess. 😎

Posted
2 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

As many times as it takes to your serial predator and Ultra creep out of service I guess. 😎

Enjoy the losing. We'll just watch and make fun of you.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

"WE GOT 'IM THIS TIME!"

You stupid fcks. How many times are you dumb little sh1ts gonna do this?

You look like the twits you are.

Thanks for demonstrating that NO ONE will EVER convict Trump IN YOUR MIND.

Of course, you being a Canuck renders your "mind" irrelevant. LMAO

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, John Johnston said:

The Walls start to come crumbling down, it was only a matter of time anyway,  now the Un-cover up begins. 

You're being very weird, normal people that are having intelligent rational thoughts are able to clearly articulate what they're talking about so that the people they're talking to can understand their point of view and reflect on it

Weirdos who have no firm grip on reality talking strange cryptic platitudes that don't actually say anything.It would be great if you could be more of the former and  less of the latter

Edited by CdnFox

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Enjoy the losing. We'll just watch and make fun of you.

OH NO! An IRRELEVANT Canuck "making fun" because she's DESPERATE to defend EVERY CRIME Trump commits. LMAO

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, robosmith said:

OH NO! An IRRELEVANT Canuck "making fun" because she's DESPERATE to defend EVERY CRIME Trump commits. LMAO

OH NO!!   A ZUCHINNI SUCKING YANK WITH NO EDUCATION is "feeling butthurt" because it's DESPERATE to LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING TRUMP DOES to excuse it's echo chamber fantasies!

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...