Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Donalds Father, Fred Trump, was diagnosed with Alzheimers at 65.  He slowly and incrementally declined mentally until dying of the disease at 93.

In his 80's, Family members set up a "pretend office" at the organizations offices in Brooklyn, so he could continue to go to "work" signing and organizing blank pieces of paper to maintain the illusion of productivity and keep him calm.

Now, his son, is facing the same demon, and the World is noticing.

Observers and medical experts have noted several behavioral and physical indicators they suggest point toward cognitive decline or dementia.

While the White House maintains donald is in "excellent health," critics and health professionals have highlighted the following signs: 

Donald has been observed appearing disengaged or slow to respond to emergencies, such as failing to react when a guest fainted in the Oval Office. He has also reportedly confused names and events, such as a bizarre 2026 claim about a looming ice storm.

Experts have noted "phonemic paraphasia," where he starts words but cannot finish them, and a decline in the complexity of his vocabulary. His speeches have been described as increasingly rambling, lacking focus, and filled with incoherent segues on unrelated topics.

Donald has reportedly fallen asleep multiple times in public view during his second term, including during Cabinet meetings, high-level diplomatic signings, and even a military parade.

Observers point to increased irritability, paranoia, and "lashing out" at critics or staff as signs of deteriorating impulse control.

 

Physicians have noted a "gingerly" or cautious gait when walking, as well as visible signs like swollen ankles, which some suggest could be linked to broader health issues.

Some experts, including psychologist Dr. John Gartner, argue that donald's repeated use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) suggests he is being monitored for, rather than just screened for, dementia. 

The question is, as donald falls deeper and deeper into mental decline, how far will the White House go in covering up his decline?

I guess we're going see.

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
  • Haha 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

I guess we're going see.

Last time I asked you for cites you insulted me and posted slop sources.

 

If I say 'please' maybe you will just be nice and provide something to back this up? 

 

Like a doctor's opinion?

 

Thank you in advance 🙂

  • Like 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Last time I asked you for cites you insulted me and posted slop sources.

 

If I say 'please' maybe you will just be nice and provide something to back this up? 

 

Like a doctor's opinion?

 

Thank you in advance 🙂

She cant Mike. This is all just TDS tripe from a Crack hoe.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

She cant Mike. This is all just TDS tripe from a Crack hoe.

Give a Barbie a chance, yo.

You're supposed to be a conservative, ie. Chivalrous 

  • Haha 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
15 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Give a Barbie a chance, yo.

You're supposed to be a conservative, ie. Chivalrous 

Being chivalrous is good.

One of the 4 rules of chivalry "Thou shalt make war against the infidel without cessation and without mercy".

The rule that mostly applies in this case.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Give a Barbie a chance, yo.

You're supposed to be a conservative, ie. Chivalrous 

She has had several chances.

She is what she is im afraid.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
44 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Donalds Father, Fred Trump, was diagnosed with Alzheimers at 65.  He slowly and incrementally declined mentally until dying of the disease at 93.

In his 80's, Family members set up a "pretend office" at the organizations offices in Brooklyn, so he could continue to go to "work" signing and organizing blank pieces of paper to maintain the illusion of productivity and keep him calm.

Now, his son, is facing the same demon, and the World is noticing.

Observers and medical experts have noted several behavioral and physical indicators they suggest point toward cognitive decline or dementia.

While the White House maintains donald is in "excellent health," critics and health professionals have highlighted the following signs: 

Donald has been observed appearing disengaged or slow to respond to emergencies, such as failing to react when a guest fainted in the Oval Office. He has also reportedly confused names and events, such as a bizarre 2026 claim about a looming ice storm.

Experts have noted "phonemic paraphasia," where he starts words but cannot finish them, and a decline in the complexity of his vocabulary. His speeches have been described as increasingly rambling, lacking focus, and filled with incoherent segues on unrelated topics.

Donald has reportedly fallen asleep multiple times in public view during his second term, including during Cabinet meetings, high-level diplomatic signings, and even a military parade.

Observers point to increased irritability, paranoia, and "lashing out" at critics or staff as signs of deteriorating impulse control.

 

Physicians have noted a "gingerly" or cautious gait when walking, as well as visible signs like swollen ankles, which some suggest could be linked to broader health issues.

Some experts, including psychologist Dr. John Gartner, argue that donald's repeated use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) suggests he is being monitored for, rather than just screened for, dementia. 

The question is, as donald falls deeper and deeper into mental decline, how far will the White House go in covering up his decline?

I guess we're going see.

There's always Barron, so we should have a Trump in the WH until Jesus comes to vaporize all the left-wing cultbangers. ;) 

Posted
40 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Last time I asked you for cites you insulted me and posted slop sources.

 

If I say 'please' maybe you will just be nice and provide something to back this up? 

 

Like a doctor's opinion?

 

Thank you in advance 🙂

For you my friend, 

No problem. 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi_suLw1aSSAxUUKUQIHVB-EpwQFnoECGoQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fas.cornell.edu%2Fnews%2Ftrumps-abrupt-decision-play-dj-sign-accelerating-cognitive-decline-says-cornell-expert&usg=AOvVaw0ZK0Lo3MWfuatn7CxdDgiv&opi=89978449

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi_suLw1aSSAxUUKUQIHVB-EpwQFnoECGYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Farticles%2FPMC6145972%2F&usg=AOvVaw0cw7oAR5G9F1YpGRbh_Q6K&opi=89978449

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi_suLw1aSSAxUUKUQIHVB-EpwQFnoECGgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.penncerl.org%2Fnews%2Fdoes-trump-show-signs-of-cognitive-decline%2F&usg=AOvVaw0umffs2_PxNen6pmm86sxU&opi=89978449

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwipk56_1qSSAxXIJkQIHYX3AKI4FBAWegQILxAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheins.ru%2Fen%2Fsociety%2F281495&usg=AOvVaw009i0jRg4Ws_eDaE1M0vub&opi=89978449

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwipk56_1qSSAxXIJkQIHYX3AKI4FBAWegQIKBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Facademic.oup.com%2Fbook%2F36813%2Fchapter%2F321970787&usg=AOvVaw3OrFnZGe6DOWjDjQrNUMml&opi=89978449

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwipk56_1qSSAxXIJkQIHYX3AKI4FBAWegQILBAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Farticles%2FPMC8763223%2F&usg=AOvVaw2eijh9i1R2hrSZ6uU_1STI&opi=89978449

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Legato said:

Being chivalrous is good.

One of the 4 rules of chivalry "Thou shalt make war against the infidel without cessation and without mercy".

The rule that mostly applies in this case.

You should stop the angry whining.

It releases cortisol which is very detrimental to one's mental and physical health.

Look what its done to the leader of your cult.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiU3evc16SSAxUNB7wBHc9dAxgQFnoECDMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fabs%2Fpii%2FS0301051112001135&usg=AOvVaw1wjFJzJkMEjIninie8FVBS&opi=89978449

 

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
Posted
3 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Are these the same people that told the world that Joe Biden had no cognitive issues?

Yet, when we realized just how far Joe had declined, we refused to nominate him for another term.

Y'all just love little donny sooooo much, that Y'all will keep supporting him, even as the eggplant he is now becoming.

Isn't that a hoot?

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Yet, when we realized just how far Joe had declined, we refused to nominate him for another term.

Y'all just love little donny sooooo much, that Y'all will keep supporting him, even as the eggplant he is now becoming.

Isn't that a hoot?

This is a lie. He was nominated and your heros just ignored the nomination and forced Brandon out.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

Give a Barbie a chance, yo.

You're supposed to be a conservative, ie. Chivalrous 

Right wing xenophobes have never been chivalrous here.

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Being chivalrous is good.

One of the 4 rules of chivalry "Thou shalt make war against the infidel without cessation and without mercy".

The rule that mostly applies in this case.

Of course you have NO EVIDENCE for ^this because you never do.

1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

The problem is, they never see any of ^this on FOS LIES.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

This is a lie. He was nominated and your heros just ignored the nomination and forced Brandon out.

It was Joe's decision, lDIOT. He knew he could not compete when the mega-donors abandoned him.

That is NOT "forced out," it is donors choosing to stop backing him.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Right wing xenophobes have never been chivalrous here.

Of course you have NO EVIDENCE for ^this because you never do.

 

Do what

 

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Names or ^it didn't happen.

White House Officials and Staff 

Karine Jean-Pierre (White House Press Secretary): Frequently defended Biden’s health, stating she saw "no such decline" in her daily interactions with him and that he was "sharper than ever".

Jeff Zients (White House Chief of Staff): Testified that he had full confidence in Biden’s ability to serve and, prior to the June 2024 debate, defended his cognitive state.

Andrew Bates (Deputy Press Secretary): Argued that officials meeting with Biden frequently spoke to his "sharpness and command".

Anita Dunn (Senior Advisor): Reports indicated she was part of an inner circle that maintained Biden did not need a cognitive exam.

Mike Donilon (Senior Advisor): Swore he never saw the president mentally diminished.

Annie Tomasini (Deputy Chief of Staff): Described as part of the inner circle that managed and defended his schedule and capabilities.

Anthony Bernal (Senior Aide to First Lady): Part of the team that defended his cognitive state. 

Cabinet Members and Officials

Merrick Garland (Attorney General): Stated in April 2024 that based on his interactions, Biden had "no impairment" and showed "no signs of cognitive impairment".

Alejandro Mayorkas (Secretary of Homeland Security): Stated in 2024 and 2025 that he had "full confidence" in Biden’s mental acuity, describing him as "detail-oriented, probing, and exacting".

Gina Raimondo (Secretary of Commerce): Described Biden as an "incisive and extraordinary leader" in meetings.

Lloyd Austin (Secretary of Defense): Through a spokesperson, expressed "total confidence" in the Commander-in-Chief's mental fitness.

Neera Tanden (Domestic Policy Advisor): Defended Biden's condition against allegations of a cover-up. 

Democratic Politicians and Allies

Elizabeth Warren (Senator): Defended Biden’s mental acuity during the 2024 campaign, stating she witnessed him being "sharp" in meetings.

Josh Shapiro (Governor of Pennsylvania): Publicly dismissed concerns about Biden's cognitive decline in 2024.

Pete Buttigieg (Secretary of Transportation): Defended Biden as a "focused and disciplined leader" during the 2024 campaign.

Ro Khanna (Representative): Stated in mid-2024 that he found Biden "completely mentally sharp".

Chris Murphy (Senator): Defended Biden’s mental readiness in early 2024.

Jaime Harrison (Former DNC Chair): Declared that Biden remained "mentally sharp, fully engaged".

Susan Wild (Representative): Stated after meeting with Biden that he was "very sharp, no memory issues".

Joe Scarborough (MSNBC Host): Stated he "did not see" mental decline in meetings with Biden. 

Family

Jill Biden (First Lady): Fervently believed in her husband's ability to serve and win re-election. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It was Joe's decision, lDIOT. He knew he could not compete when the mega-donors abandoned him.

That is NOT "forced out," it is donors choosing to stop backing him.

LOL, that is literally his being forced out. 

 

 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Names or ^it didn't happen.

Here you go.

https://www.newsweek.com/what-top-democrats-said-then-now-about-joe-bidens-decline-2073468

They had no issue lying about his cognitive state until it reached the point where they just couldn't hide it anymore from the public.

Typical robosmith rebuttal: "it didn't happen"

Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...

Posted
13 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Here you go.

https://www.newsweek.com/what-top-democrats-said-then-now-about-joe-bidens-decline-2073468

They had no issue lying about his cognitive state until it reached the point where they just couldn't hide it anymore from the public.

Typical robosmith rebuttal: "it didn't happen"

I see.

So, in your mind, because the Biden administration hid Joe's decline from the public, that somehow justifies donald regime doing the same thing?

Really?

This is pretzel logic.

Its childlike acquiesce.

Leaders experiencing cognitive decline need to be removed from service immediately. 

That is the objective reality here.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Give a Barbie a chance, yo.

You're supposed to be a conservative, ie. Chivalrous 

Michael, 

Never assume a red hat will ever stop attacking the truth.

You cant fact check someone out of a cult. The red hats political beliefs isnt about truth, its about identity. 

This is evident in how they dress to flaunt their tribalism. 

      You'd think that if you show them the facts, that theyre going to wake up. 

Thats not going to happen. 

Remember, you're not challenging their opinion, your challenging their identity.

 So when confronted, they double down. 

Even when the evidence is undeniable. Even if the lies are obvious. In their minds, any views that differ must be fraudulent. 

 They need to believe it, because believing the lie makes them feel safe. Their tribe is where they feel safe. Their tribe is where they belong.

In their minds, belonging always beats being right. 

Its almost as if the more logical and evidence based an arguments is, the more desperate they become to hold onto their delusions. Which is overwhelmingly obvious of many of the posters here.

 

Nothing will change in the minds of the red hats, until the cost of the lies become more costly than the comfort the lies bring.

They can lose all humanity,  all empathy. Remember, empathy and compassion are evolved states of being. They require the mental capacity to step past our most primal urges.

 In the last few years, the red hats have come to believe that weaponized cruelty is part of some well-thought out Master plan. Cruelty is seen by some as an adroit cudgel to gain power.

Empathy and kindness are considered weak.  I'm here to tell you that when someone's path through this world is marked with acts of cruelty, they have failed the first test of an advanced society.

They never forced their animal brain to evolve past its first instinct.

They never forged new mental pathways to overcome their own instinctual fears. And so their thinking and problem solving lacks the imagination and creativity that emotionally mature people have in spades.

Over my many years in politics and business, I have found one thing to be universally true.

The most evolved folks in the room are the most empathetic,  emotionally mature, and humane.

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Yet, when we realized just how far Joe had declined, we refused to nominate him for another term.

OMG

You pushed this same stupid argument last year... WHEN HE WAS STILL PRESIDENT.

The fact that he was no longer a candidate doesn't discount that HE WAS STILL PRESIDENT.

None of you clowns were demanding he step down and be replaced at the time. 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

You should stop the angry whining.

It releases cortisol which is very detrimental to one's mental and physical health.

Look what its done to the leader if your cult.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiU3evc16SSAxUNB7wBHc9dAxgQFnoECDMQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Farticle%2Fabs%2Fpii%2FS0301051112001135&usg=AOvVaw1wjFJzJkMEjIninie8FVBS&opi=89978449

 

Angry? Not really, just mildly amused by the display of rampant TDS.

The whine that you hear emanates from within the space between your ears.

The opinion pieces that you present are just that, opinions from those "angry" people you mention.

 

Posted
27 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

So, in your mind, because the Biden administration hid Joe's decline from the public, that somehow justifies donald regime doing the same thing?

Comparing how Trump speaks and engages with others and a usually hostile press gallery to the way Biden did, it's not even remotely close. 

Biden was constantly fumbling words, had very long pauses when speaking, and he did not engage with the mostly supportive press gallery anywhere near as often as Trump routinely does. Trump does get names wrong sometimes as most of us do from time to time, but when he speaks, he does not come across as elderly and confused like Biden clearly was. Look at any interview Trump does. While you may not like any of his answers, he is responding quickly and clearly.

But it's good that you openly admit that the Biden administration chose to try and hide the obvious cognitive decline of the most powerful man on earth.

Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Legato said:

Angry? Not really, just mildly amused by the display of rampant TDS.

Screenshot_20260110_120340_Chrome.thumb.jpg.1dd40eb322101a397c7ef14fb4c368e0.jpg

3 minutes ago, Legato said:

The whine that you hear emanates from within the space between your ears.

 

Well, according to my doctor,  its tinnitus. 

Oh.... I forgot.... you dont believe "doctors".

4 minutes ago, Legato said:

The opinion pieces that you present are just that, opinions from those "angry" people you mention.

 

Those "angry people" you're referring to are professionals,  experts in their fields.

Oh, sorry, i forgot you dont believe in "experts" nor "doctors"..

Silly me.

2 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Comparing how Trump speaks and engages with others and a usually hostile press gallery to the way Biden did, it's not even remotely close. 

Biden was constantly fumbling words, had very long pauses when speaking, and he did not engage with the mostly supportive press gallery anywhere near as often as Trump routinely does. Trump does get names wrong sometimes as most of us do from time to time, but when he speaks, he does not come across as elderly and confused like Biden clearly was. Look at any interview Trump does. While you may not like any of his answers, he is responding quickly and clearly.

But it's good that you openly admit that the Biden administration chose to try and hide the obvious cognitive decline of the most powerful man on earth.

Great.

Wallow in your red hatted ignorance. 

After all, its who you are.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...