Legato Posted January 16 Report Posted January 16 27 minutes ago, robosmith said: You're really good at ^inane ramblings. 💡 I don't think you know what a ramble is. Quote
robosmith Posted January 16 Author Report Posted January 16 1 hour ago, Legato said: I don't think you know what a ramble is. I know yours are INANE, CLOWN. Quote
Legato Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 3 hours ago, robosmith said: I know yours are INANE, CLOWN. Most of mine are outane, you must be a closet turnip. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 23 hours ago, eyeball said: If there was ever a time and a place for a statute of limitations not to mention outright amnesty it's the case of immigrants that have been here so long they have kids in schools. Then Biden should have done it. In fact Obama should have done it. But instead they made the situation worse. And then they spent their energy lying about trump during his first term and claiming he was some sort of terrorist for doing exactly the same things they did. Now the time for discussion is over. A shame you didn't listen or care when it mattered Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CdnFox Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 4 hours ago, Legato said: I don't think you know what a ramble is. Sure he does. He's got a picture right here.... Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted January 17 Author Report Posted January 17 1 hour ago, Legato said: Most of mine are outane, you must be a closet turnip. You don't even know that's not a real word, CLOWN Quote
eyeball Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: Then Biden should have done it. In fact Obama should have done it. That's no excuse for Trump being an asshóle about it. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 2 hours ago, eyeball said: That's no excuse for Trump being an asshóle about it. It is absolutely an excuse. In fact it's inevitable. As I have said before quoting JFK if you make peaceful Revolution impossible you make violent revolution inevitable. The democrats and the left refused to do it and blocked it at every turn with religious fervor and benefitted from it. Now... no more mr nice guy. That's how it works. I hope you're paying attention, sooner or later Canada will face a similar correction. You keep saying you wish that the right would just finally do something about you lefties instead of complaining ha ha haWell, you're getting what you wish for and you'll get it in Canada too it's only a matter of time. The pendulum always swings Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
John Stone Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 On 1/15/2026 at 3:38 PM, robosmith said: Lawyer Rep Dan Goldman grills Kristi Noes while she tries to filibuster by blaming Biden. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1093899209417827 "Why Are You Filibustering? Why Can't You Answer The Question?" On 1/15/2026 at 3:38 PM, robosmith said: Lawyer Rep Dan Goldman grills Kristi Noes while she tries to filibuster by blaming Biden. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1093899209417827 "Why Are You Filibustering? Why Can't You Answer The Question?" ............ all these folks are within the law claiming asylum The backlog of asylum cases awaiting a hearing is over 2000000. This backlog to receive mentioned 'hearings' to determine legitimacy has led to delays of over 6 years. Are those claiming asylum breaking any law? No Is there a National feeling of being punked? YES! Who is to blame? Political hacks. Justin Trudeau, although criticizing the U.S. for denying immigration was very quick to implement the so-called, 'safe- third-country-agreement'. The Quebec immigration crossing ( Roxham Road) in Quebec was closed, March 2023, by the Federal Government citing the STCA - in response to Quebec political pressure. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 17 hours ago, Deluge said: Nope. Your LOVER Dan Goldman is an open borders slut and he needs to be disbarred. It is funny how @robosmith could see all my posts until I posted definitive proof that Mr. Goldman was wrong. Then, magically, he just stopped responding. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
eyeball Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: You keep saying you wish that the right would just finally do something about you lefties instead of complaining ha ha haWell, you're getting what you wish for and you'll get it in Canada too it's only a matter of time. The pendulum always swings Sure, I guess that explains why Trump is musing about suspending mid-term elections. It's almost like he's saying voting is a waste of time. "If conservatives become convinced they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy," Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
robosmith Posted January 17 Author Report Posted January 17 4 hours ago, John Stone said: ............ all these folks are within the law claiming asylum The backlog of asylum cases awaiting a hearing is over 2000000. This backlog to receive mentioned 'hearings' to determine legitimacy has led to delays of over 6 years. Are those claiming asylum breaking any law? No Is there a National feeling of being punked? YES! Who is to blame? Political hacks. Justin Trudeau, although criticizing the U.S. for denying immigration was very quick to implement the so-called, 'safe- third-country-agreement'. The Quebec immigration crossing ( Roxham Road) in Quebec was closed, March 2023, by the Federal Government citing the STCA - in response to Quebec political pressure. How did YOU determine a "National feeling of being punked"? Quote
User Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: It is funny how @robosmith could see all my posts until I posted definitive proof that Mr. Goldman was wrong. Then, magically, he just stopped responding. He is a coward. He will cherry-pick the lowest-hanging fruit he comes across from me, like once a week, to respond to, and even then, he shuts up and runs away after I respond to him. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 49 minutes ago, User said: He is a coward. He will cherry-pick the lowest-hanging fruit he comes across from me, like once a week, to respond to, and even then, he shuts up and runs away after I respond to him. We've seen him before. He has ideals that he wants to protect. Those ideals must stand, so all information to the contrary is a lie. Anyone that delivers that information is [insert derogatory term] in his eyes. That allows him to dismiss anything and everything in support of his ideals. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
CdnFox Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 5 hours ago, eyeball said: Sure, I guess that explains why Trump is musing about suspending mid-term elections. It's almost like he's saying voting is a waste of time. Perhaps he reads your posts That's certainly has been your position for years Quote "If conservatives become convinced they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy," Just like you and the left did. Probably, sooner or later the right has to ask itself if you don't respect democracy why should we? Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 41 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Probably, sooner or later the right has to ask itself if you don't respect democracy why should we? Go ask Plato. In The Republic, written some time around 375 BC, Plato argued that despite its many benefits, democracy had inherent flaws that would lead to its downfall. He theorized that democracy’s emphasis on freedom and equality created conditions for a demagogue to spring forth and establish autocratic rule. In Plato’s mind, a republic, at its zenith, would celebrate enormous freedoms and reject forms of authority and self-restraint, which eventually would sow rampant public disorder. Plato imagined a would-be dictator promoting himself as a protector of the values many in the country held dear. He would use lies and over-the-top rhetoric to bolster his views and positions. And he would incite foreign conflicts to distract the population and create a perception of strength and respect abroad. https://archive.ph/7jZ6U Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
herbie Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 What's within the law is illegal because I think it should be illegal so therefore it is illegal. Good reasoning people. 1/2 an IQ point better than Trump says it's illegal so therefore it is. Quote
User Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 4 minutes ago, herbie said: What's within the law is illegal because I think it should be illegal so therefore it is illegal. Good reasoning people. 1/2 an IQ point better than Trump says it's illegal so therefore it is. Another fine strawman! Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 13 minutes ago, herbie said: What's within the law is illegal because I think it should be illegal so therefore it is illegal. Good reasoning people. 1/2 an IQ point better than Trump says it's illegal so therefore it is. Are you not restating the case for blocking ICE? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
herbie Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 No need to even mention ICE, they're managing to fall on their ass all by themselves. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 3 hours ago, eyeball said: Go ask Plato. I'm asking you. If you don't know then you're basically admitting you're full of shit. Although that would make you the last person on this board to point it out all the rest having done so ages ago Quote In The Republic, written some time around 375 BC, Plato argued that despite its many benefits, democracy had inherent flaws that would lead to its downfall. Utterly irrelevant. First off what we have isn't a democracy. So it's kind of a stupid thing to bring up. And secondly he had never seen anything remotely close to what we have. So his thoughts aren't directly relevant to what we're doing today. Would it be possible to ask you to get your head out of your ass and have your own opinion? Or are you only able to regurgitate irrelevant opinions that are 2,000 years out of date? 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 36 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I'm asking you. You asked yourself dummy. 37 minutes ago, CdnFox said: First off what we have isn't a democracy. Is that why voting is so precious to you? LMAO! Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 Just now, eyeball said: You asked yourself dummy. Is that why voting is so precious to you? LMAO! I said "i'm asking you". that means i'm asking you. I'm sorry that english is hard for you. 1 minute ago, eyeball said: Is that why voting is so precious to you? LMAO! Voting is precious to me because it allows us to select our representation. But that does not mean that we have a democratic government. Sigh. Is this going to be yet ANOTHER case where i have to explain how our gov't works to you? FFS did you not attend school AT ALL??? We have democratic representation but we do not have a democracy. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 2 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I said "i'm asking you". Sure kid, Probably, sooner or later the right has to ask itself... 3 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Voting is precious to me because it allows us to select our representation. But that does not mean that we have a democratic government. Yup, you couldn't tell your own shit from Shinola if your dumbass depended on it. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
eyeball Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 (edited) 10 minutes ago, CdnFox said: We have democratic representation but we do not have a democracy. Then what's the point? Especially when all you do shit on anyone who doesn't vote with you? The only point to voting that is to prevent any one party from having to much power. Again, you're welcome, you fùcking ingrate. Edited January 18 by eyeball Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.