Charlie Kirk shot!

[gatomontes99]

Just now, Chrissy1979 said:

So all your evidence is the word of lying politicians who won’t back up their statements and a random guy who claims to be his best friend in the whole world. And, like you, none of them can define leftism beyond your idea that it might have something to do with being trans.

So, given we know that he was an extremist Utah-resident gamer with a strong conservative background who wore alt-right Halloween costumes, and that there was a feud between Fuentes and Kirk, my point stands. There is no way you can be any more sure he’s a leftist than I can be he’s a groyper. But I’m more likely to be right.

Ok. You are going to maintain the sever disconnect from reality. I quoted an article from a progressive news site that quoted the best friend (in high school) of the a-hole saying that the a-hole was a leftist and you go back to politicians. Let's face reality here. You have a problem. You are not willing to accept reality. I assume you won't accept reality because you cannot handle the cognitive dissonance that is created when your actions are meet with consequences. That is something for which you should help. 

I gave you every opportunity to be normal. You rejected those opportunities. There is nothing more I can do here.

[Chrissy1979]

7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ok. You are going to maintain the sever disconnect from reality. I quoted an article from a progressive news site that quoted the best friend (in high school) of the a-hole saying that the a-hole was a leftist and you go back to politicians. Let's face reality here. You have a problem. You are not willing to accept reality. I assume you won't accept reality because you cannot handle the cognitive dissonance that is created when your actions are meet with consequences. That is something for which you should help. 

I gave you every opportunity to be normal. You rejected those opportunities. There is nothing more I can do here.

You said you had evidence but all you have is vague statements from a lying politician and a guy who claims he was his friend but may well be just a fame seeker (and who might just think leftism is the same as queerness, like you). Unless you present a manifesto saying he was trying to overthrow capitalism, there is no “reality” to deny. The only objective reality is he had all the hallmarks of a second amendment nut with extremist tendencies from being online too much. Those guys are typically far right conservatives.

[robosmith]

IF Robinson loved his trans-girlfriend, it is more likely that he just hated Kirk's anti-LGTBQ bigotry and the loss of equal rights championed by Kirk and Trump.

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You said you had evidence but all you have is vague statements from a lying politician and a guy who claims he was his friend but may well be just a fame seeker (and who might just think leftism is the same as queerness, like you). Unless you present a manifesto saying he was trying to overthrow capitalism, there is no “reality” to deny. The only objective reality is he had all the hallmarks of a second amendment nut with extremist tendencies from being online too much. Those guys are typically far right conservatives.

LOL he's totallhy proved you wrong 100 percent,  and as always you try to deny the truth rather than cope with it

This is just like when you fully supported Clinton for his sex crimes and got mad at people who supported trump  

We should call you hypoChrissy   

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

IF Robinson loved his trans-girlfriend, it is more likely that he just hated Kirk's anti-LGTBQ bigotry and the loss of equal rights championed by Kirk and Trump.

You mean it was political. 

Yeah.  We know. 

[Chrissy1979]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

LOL he's totallhy proved you wrong 100 percent,  and as always you try to deny the truth rather than cope with it

This is just like when you fully supported Clinton for his sex crimes and got mad at people who supported trump  

 

So you have nothing to add? You could have spent that time finding evidence that the person who accused Trump of raping her when she was a child recanted her story. Imagine your glee if you were able to back up your defence of his paedophilia with actual evidence.

But if being gay equals leftist, does bring a paedophile equal right-wing? 😆 

[User]

3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Cite?

“There clearly was a leftist ideology with this — with this assassin,” he said, citing the suspect’s family and romantic partner as sources of that information.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

FBI Director Kash Patel, on Fox & Friends: "His [the suspect's] family have collectively told investigators that he subscribed to left-wing ideology and even more so in these last couple of years."

https://www.newsweek.com/tyler-robinson-note-charlie-kirk-fbi-kash-patel-2129976

[Shady]

1 minute ago, Chrissy1979 said:

So you have nothing to add? You could have spent that time finding evidence that the person who accused Trump of raping her when she was a child recanted her story. Imagine your glee if you were able to back up your defence of his paedophilia with actual evidence.

But if being gay equals leftist, does bring a paedophile equal right-wing? 😆 

Being gay doesn't equate to being a leftist, however, being in a relationship with a trans person provides him with a motive as to why he hated Charlie Kirk.

[Chrissy1979]

5 minutes ago, Shady said:

Being gay doesn't equate to being a leftist, however, being in a relationship with a trans person provides him with a motive as to why he hated Charlie Kirk.

I agree. When vulnerable people are singled out and persecuted for who they are, it often turns out badly for all sides.

8 minutes ago, User said:

“There clearly was a leftist ideology with this — with this assassin,” he said, citing the suspect’s family and romantic partner as sources of that information.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

FBI Director Kash Patel, on Fox & Friends: "His [the suspect's] family have collectively told investigators that he subscribed to left-wing ideology and even more so in these last couple of years."

https://www.newsweek.com/tyler-robinson-note-charlie-kirk-fbi-kash-patel-2129976

Again, being queer does not make someone “leftist.” Repeating the same lie from various sources doesn’t make it so.

[User]

1 minute ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Again, being queer does not make someone “leftist.” Repeating the same lie from various sources doesn’t make it so.

Nowhere did they say that being queer made someone a leftist. I guess you are just going to make up crap now to argue against?

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

So you have nothing to add? 

What would be the point? You have brought zero so far and zero times anything is still 0  

You didn't honestly think we take you seriously did you? I mean you haven't said an intelligent thing since the day you got here, and your hypocrisy is insane. If you hear anything you don't like you just simply deny it despite the evidence of facts so it's not like it's possible to have a reasonable conversation.

But if you want me to give you something, here. Enjoy this

 

You liberals are VASTLY more into political violence than the right

2 minutes ago, User said:

Nowhere did they say that being queer made someone a leftist. I guess you are just going to make up crap now to argue against?

Now????

Did you just meet her?   LOLOL 

[gatomontes99]

17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL he's totallhy proved you wrong 100 percent,  and as always you try to deny the truth rather than cope with it

This is just like when you fully supported Clinton for his sex crimes and got mad at people who supported trump  

We should call you hypoChrissy   

You mean it was political. 

Yeah.  We know. 

 

11 minutes ago, User said:

“There clearly was a leftist ideology with this — with this assassin,” he said, citing the suspect’s family and romantic partner as sources of that information.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

FBI Director Kash Patel, on Fox & Friends: "His [the suspect's] family have collectively told investigators that he subscribed to left-wing ideology and even more so in these last couple of years."

https://www.newsweek.com/tyler-robinson-note-charlie-kirk-fbi-kash-patel-2129976

The reality we have to accept is the @Chrissy1979 is not going to accept reality. Since chrissy is not talking about reality, nothing she says is relevant and we don't need to address her fantasies. 

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, Shady said:

Being gay doesn't equate to being a leftist, however, being in a relationship with a trans person provides him with a motive as to why he hated Charlie Kirk.

You mean because of Kirk's anti-LGBTQ bigotry and opposition to equal rights?

[User]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

You mean because of Kirk's anti-LGBTQ bigotry and opposition to equal rights?

What biotry, what equal rights?

 

[Shady]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You mean because of Kirk's anti-LGBTQ bigotry and opposition to equal rights?

No.  Because he doesn't agree that men can become women.  Which they can't.  Biological men also don't belong in women's sports etc, if you believe that they do, you're anti-woman.

[robosmith]

13 minutes ago, Shady said:

No.  Because he doesn't agree that men can become women.  Which they can't.  Biological men also don't belong in women's sports etc, if you believe that they do, you're anti-woman.

Where/when did you get your PhD in physiology?

IOW you don't know your ASS from a hole in the ground because you don't understand the role that the BRAIN plays in GENDER.

 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Where/when did you get your PhD in physiology?

 

 

The fact that you think you need a degree in physiology to tell the difference between a man and a woman is why you wound up living at home alone with a zucchini.

[Chrissy1979]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

The fact that you think you need a degree in physiology to tell the difference between a man and a woman is why you wound up living at home alone with a zucchini.

The fact that you guys can’t talk about anything without making it about trans people is telling.

[LinkSoul60]

16 minutes ago, Shady said:

No.  Because he doesn't agree that men can become women.  Which they can't.  Biological men also don't belong in women's sports etc, if you believe that they do, you're anti-woman.

So besides the 10 NCAA trans athletes that competed amongst the total of the 550,000 athletes, what particular problem do you have with transgenders?  Are you phobic, insecure, curious, or is it because Trump made this a narrative?  

I personally don't agree with their choice if you can call it that, but I'm also secure enough in my own skin to say live and let live.  Why aren't you?

[CdnFox]

12 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The fact that you guys can’t talk about anything without making it about trans people is telling.

It's pretty telling that so many of today's violent actions  involve trans people

[Shady]

24 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Where/when did you get your PhD in physiology?

IOW you don't know your ASS from a hole in the ground because you don't understand the role that the BRAIN plays in GENDER.

 

I don't need a PhD in anything, it's basic high school biology.

[Chrissy1979]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's pretty telling that so many of today's violent actions  involve trans people

Is it telling that this long list of shootings involved far-right people?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOg7kpggVfP/?igsh=aTlidjF4cnR4NWhw

[User]

32 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

The fact that you guys can’t talk about anything without making it about trans people is telling.

That is not a fact... 

 

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Is it telling that this long list of shootings involved far-right people?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOg7kpggVfP/?igsh=aTlidjF4cnR4NWhw

Probably not, you make up most of your own crap so it's probably fake data designed to distract. 

So nice try but can you explain why so many shooting recently involve trans people? There's been a number done by trans people and this one seems to be at least in part due to the shooter's trans lover, so why is that?  YOU were the one who brought it up, so lets hear it, 

6 minutes ago, User said:

That is not a fact... 

 

It's YOUR fault that you mention trans people when a shooting involves a trans person!!  YOUR fault! 

I mean seriously, how do you get to that kind of logic?

[Chrissy1979]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Probably not, you make up most of your own crap so it's probably fake data designed to distract. 

So nice try but can you explain why so many shooting recently involve trans people? There's been a number done by trans people and this one seems to be at least in part due to the shooter's trans lover, so why is that?  YOU were the one who brought it up, so lets hear it, 

It's YOUR fault that you mention trans people when a shooting involves a trans person!!  YOUR fault! 

I mean seriously, how do you get to that kind of logic?

Maybe because when you persecute people, some of them will fight back. So for you it’s win-win. You get to spread hatred and then you get to play the victim, which all of you love to do more than anything.

[Shady]

5 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Maybe because when you persecute people, some of them will fight back. So for you it’s win-win. You get to spread hatred and then you get to play the victim, which all of you love to do more than anything.

Sorry, but you have no right to "fight back" by killing someone just because they don't go along with your nonsense.