CdnFox Posted October 16, 2025 Report Posted October 16, 2025 (edited) 16 hours ago, brett 1 said: not a bot lol Well that's what a bot would say wouldn't it. And if you were talking about the first hospital strike then it was a stray rocket. So it sounds like your story is made up. Nor is it plausible that a police officer would suggest that they would send the police in to investigate deep inside enemy territory. I need a blood sample before I would be willing to believe you aren't a bot Edited October 16, 2025 by CdnFox 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Nationalist Posted October 16, 2025 Report Posted October 16, 2025 12 hours ago, brett 1 said: not a bot lol the news clip we watched isreal said there was a command center in the basement , it was not a stray rocket, it was aimed at the hospital on purpose. yes there were stray rockets but not the one in the news segment we watched .. yes the cop pointed out that why not send in the troops if you know they are in the basement.. Israel's army had no problem going in immediately after they bombed hospitals , they weren't afraid of rockets or snipers. one israel soldier pointed to a list of hamas members names on a hospital wall ,,, was later found out that the arabic names were simply names of months of the year that someone had stuck to the wall , so yes Israel soldiers can go into hospitals during the heat of war to point out their false claims for propaganda use,. But seem like Israels crack top notch billion dollar army cant send in its troops to hunt Hamas for intel on where the hostages are kept because a hospital in Israel controlled region is for this kind of mission is too dangerous , , ,..for propaganda Netanyahu will send the troops to the moon, but for intel on hostage locations its too dangerous for his billion dollar troops to step foot out the front door. as the war has progressed Hamas has had less hold on many regions, in fact israel army has been in control in these hospital regions ...yet Israel up till recently still sends bombs at hospitals instead of troops to capture Hamas and intel ... they dont want to weed out hamas leaders or comanders to find out where hostages are at all,,, Lesson to be learned... Don't start wars you cant win. Hamas obviously started this war, hoping the entire Muslim world would come to their aid. A few tried and the results were spectacularly inadequate. War is not a nice thing. If you think it should be... You're just as stupid as Hamas. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted October 16, 2025 Report Posted October 16, 2025 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Lesson to be learned... Don't start wars you cant win. Hamas obviously started this war, hoping the entire Muslim world would come to their aid. A few tried and the results were spectacularly inadequate. War is not a nice thing. If you think it should be... You're just as stupid as Hamas. I honestly think they thought the entire world would come to their aid, presumably after a week or so as the world has always done. We've seen many times Hamas attacks Israel, Israel retaliates and because Hamas hides behind its population there are civilian casualties and then the rest of the world screams about how unfair that is and give Hamas a bunch of goodies. But this time they went too far and the rest of the world didn't show up when it was supposed to. They sided with Israel instead and suddenly Hamas realized it had a tiger by the tail but there was nothing it could do. So here we are. They effed around and found out 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
SpankyMcFarland Posted October 16, 2025 Report Posted October 16, 2025 I have argued this from the other side in other forums. For me, this isn’t genocide but I grew up with a different understanding of the word than the one often used today. It really depends on what proportion of a population needs to be targeted to qualify as genocide. Few genocides have killed everybody. Quote ‘How small we make our worlds. Gather them in, tighten them up into little castles of fear.’
CdnFox Posted October 16, 2025 Report Posted October 16, 2025 34 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: I have argued this from the other side in other forums. For me, this isn’t genocide but I grew up with a different understanding of the word than the one often used today. It really depends on what proportion of a population needs to be targeted to qualify as genocide. Few genocides have killed everybody. For me the distinction would be the intention to destroy the population. I differentiate this from simply attacking the population we're having the population die as an unfortunate side effect of other military actions. The allies bomb Dresden with the specific intent of killing civilians. Today that would be considered a war crime but I still don't think it would be considered a genocide. Their goal was still military it wasn't to kill all of the german people, it was to severely disrupt the germans ability to conduct war by creating a national catastrophe that they had to address and spend resources on and clogging the roads with civilians. With today's expanded definition there still appears to be some intent necessary to specifically target the ethnic group for non-military purposes. And I just don't see that happening a lot in this conflict. There may be individual cases, and there may be war crimes where populations were targeted when they shouldn't be, but I've never gotten the feeling that the end result or goal was to completely displaced the Palestinians. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
carepov Posted October 17, 2025 Author Report Posted October 17, 2025 On 10/16/2025 at 12:30 PM, SpankyMcFarland said: I have argued this from the other side in other forums. For me, this isn’t genocide but I grew up with a different understanding of the word than the one often used today. It really depends on what proportion of a population needs to be targeted to qualify as genocide. Few genocides have killed everybody. I can think of no example in history where victims of a genocide have the ability to stop the genocide. From the beginning, Israel was clear: return the hostages and disarm, then the war will end. 1 Quote
August1991 Posted October 18, 2025 Report Posted October 18, 2025 On 9/6/2025 at 10:04 PM, carepov said: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/leading-genocide-scholars-organization-says-israel-is-committing-genocide-in-gaza It seems like more and more people are calling the war in Gaza genocide. I should know better by now, but the mass stupidity out there still flabbergasts me. This is war. Israel has the capability to do a lot more harm. If they had intent they would have done it. Also, while it is not part of the legal definition, when the "victims" have the agency to stop a so-called genocide, then it is not a genocide. Simple solution for Gazan leadership: release the hostages and surrender. carepov is an AI poster. Ignore. Quote
carepov Posted October 18, 2025 Author Report Posted October 18, 2025 10 hours ago, August1991 said: carepov is an AI poster. Ignore. I am certainly not, why would you say this? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.