Supreme Court OKs Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for kids, a setback for transgender rights

[Deluge]

But a win for kids, and those who actually care about kids, which is all that matters. 

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-transgender-health-care-trump-79fc6f3bbdab2e92d6f0184201a468a9

 

[taxme]

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

But a win for kids, and those who actually care about kids, which is all that matters. 

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-transgender-health-care-trump-79fc6f3bbdab2e92d6f0184201a468a9

 

I am wondering as to how long it will be before we get to celebrate a trans gender holiday and parade one of these days? Won't that be exciting to want to watch. Ha-ha-ha. 

What i have been really wanting to see and have for years now is to have a White Pride History Month. Seeing that we have so many non-white months to have to celebrate when can we get to celebrate a White Pride Month? Just wondering? 

[Deluge]

26 minutes ago, taxme said:

I am wondering as to how long it will be before we get to celebrate a trans gender holiday and parade one of these days? Won't that be exciting to want to watch. Ha-ha-ha. 

What i have been really wanting to see and have for years now is to have a White Pride History Month. Seeing that we have so many non-white months to have to celebrate when can we get to celebrate a White Pride Month? Just wondering? 

The trannies/democrat party have already been trying to make June 100% woke, and they would've succeeded if Harris had gotten in power. 

I want to see that too - we could tie it in with the holiday season - Oct 31, through Jan 1. 

[Michael Hardner]

Is strange that people have actually decried decisions that take away parents rights, when it comes to some aspects of trans politics. 

 

Seems to me that parents rights have been taken away in this case no? 

 

I'm just asking. 

 

If you care about parents rights, shouldn't you care when the government takes the way for any reason? 

https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/54465-are-you-a-man-or-a-woman/page/59/#findComment-1795594

 

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Is strange that people have actually decried decisions that take away parents rights, when it comes to some aspects of trans politics. 

 

Seems to me that parents rights have been taken away in this case no? 

 

I'm just asking. 

 

If you care about parents rights, shouldn't you care when the government takes the way for any reason? 

https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/54465-are-you-a-man-or-a-woman/page/59/#findComment-1795594

 

Parents' rights in what way, Mike? Parents' rights to give their kids gender-affirming care? Are you trying to say that you support parents' rights to give their kids gender-affirming care? 

[Michael Hardner]

Just now, Deluge said:

Parents' rights in what way, Mike? Parents' rights to give their kids gender-affirming care? Are you trying to say that you support parents' rights to give their kids gender-affirming care? 

Yes.  And yes I do.  I think parents should be consulted for some decisions also.

If you don't, then you can't really claim that you support parental authority to make these choices.

You're either for parents rights or against.  If you support parents right to deny gender care but not to provide it, you're not in favour of parents rights you're just against trans care.

[Deluge]

9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Yes.  And yes I do.  I think parents should be consulted for some decisions also.

If you don't, then you can't really claim that you support parental authority to make these choices.

You're either for parents rights or against.  If you support parents right to deny gender care but not to provide it, you're not in favour of parents rights you're just against trans care.

You don't think gender-affirmation is the result of a stupid and corrupt society? I do. I don't think gender-affirmation would've lasted more than 5 minutes 50 years ago, and it wouldn't have lasted at all 100 years ago. I think that tells you how unimportant gender confusion really is. 

[Michael Hardner]

6 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. You don't think gender-affirmation is the result of a stupid and corrupt society?

2.I do.

3. I don't think gender-affirmation would've lasted more than 5 minutes 50 years ago, and it wouldn't have lasted at all 100 years ago.

4. I think that tells you how unimportant gender confusion really is. 

1. No.

2. Ok.

3. That's obvious.

4. It doesn't make sense to me that you think current moral attitudes are validated by past attitudes.  Why?  And why 50 or 100 years? Why not 200 or 500?

Also you avoided responding to my point about parents' rights, which was why I posted a response.

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

4. It doesn't make sense to me that you think current moral attitudes are validated by past attitudes.  Why?  And why 50 or 100 years? Why not 200 or 500?

Also you avoided responding to my point about parents' rights, which was why I posted a response.

4. Because gender-affirmation is non-essential. You don't need it. It's the product of a bored and corrupt society. If the country ever hits hard times, gender-affirmation will be among the first to get shit canned. 

Parents' shouldn't have the right to tell their kids that they're anything other than a boy or girl - same goes for schools, lawmakers and tranny activists. NO ONE should have the right to feed into the bullshit that a boy is really a girl, or vice-versa. If the kid's a hermaphrodite, then you get with professionals and figure out the best course of action. 

[User]

Oh come on, I already had a thread created!

[User]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

You're either for parents rights or against.  If you support parents right to deny gender care but not to provide it, you're not in favour of parents rights you're just against trans care.

Sorry, but no. You are trying to make an absolute argument that is absurd on its face. 

Do parents have the right to starve their kids? To rape them? To chop their legs off because they think they should be in a wheelchair?

No. No. No. No.

There is no you either support parents rights 100% or you don't position here. 

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Is strange that people have actually decried decisions that take away parents rights, when it comes to some aspects of trans politics. 

 

Seems to me that parents rights have been taken away in this case no? 

No. Parents have never had the right to mutilate their children

[Nationalist]

Physical alteration of children under the age of 18, in which said alteration is executed in order to change a natural hormonal state, or actual outwardly physical changes via operation...

Is a monstrous idea an should be completely illegal.

[User]

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No. Parents have never had the right to mutilate their children

An excellent point. Up until about 5 years ago in all of human history before, those thousands of years, there was no such thing as so-called "gender affirming care" the trans madness folks were pushing on kids. 

Do you think anyone anywhere would have tolerated a parent having their childs breasts cut off when they were 15 just so they could look more like a boy?

Of course not. 

@Michael Hardner is complaining about something being a "right" that was only just invented yesterday. 

[Michael Hardner]

19 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No. Parents have never had the right to mutilate their children

This is about puberty blockers, not mutilation.  The fact that you have to abuse language shows that your point is weak.

And in fact, parents are free to approve mutilation of their children.  It's just when the spectre of transgender people arises that they get upset...

[CdnFox]

59 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

This is about puberty blockers, not mutilation. 

Sorry but puberty blockers are mutilation. Mutilation by definition Refers to actions which damage to figure or render inoperative parts of the body in a way that reduces a person's quality of life.

"Mutilation or maiming is severe damage to the body that has a subsequent harmful effect on an individual's quality of life."

Puberty blockers destroy the child's ability to have children. It renders their reproductive system inoperable. It permanently and drastically alters their life.  And many regret it later when they're adults. It has a negative impact with little positive impact to offset it.  It is mutilation. 

Now, an adult can chose that kind of thing for themselves if they wish. 

But child mutilation has always been frowned upon. 

[User]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

This is about puberty blockers, not mutilation.  The fact that you have to abuse language shows that your point is weak.

No, the law was about more than just puberty blockers. It outlined surgical "transition" procedures as well. 

The fact that YOU have to abuse language shows your point is weak.

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

And in fact, parents are free to approve mutilation of their children.  It's just when the spectre of transgender people arises that they get upset...

No, they most certainly are not free to approve mutilation. Be more specific. 

 

[Michael Hardner]

42 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

1. Sorry but puberty blockers are mutilation. Mutilation by definition Refers to actions which damage to figure or render inoperative parts of the body in a way that reduces a person's quality of life.

"Mutilation or maiming is severe damage to the body that has a subsequent harmful effect on an individual's quality of life."

2. Puberty blockers destroy the child's ability to have children.  

3. But child mutilation has always been frowned upon. 

1. Sure... look at you citing the dictionary and all that...
2. I didn't know that so I googled it and it seems wrong: https://scienceforgeorgia.org/knowledge-base1/dispelling-myths-around-puberty-blockers/
3.  No.  Lots of wealthy Republicans buy boob jobs for their kids but that's ok because they're your tribe.

 

I'll show myself out...

[User]

10 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

2. I didn't know that so I googled it and it seems wrong: https://scienceforgeorgia.org/knowledge-base1/dispelling-myths-around-puberty-blockers/

Sigh... so dishonest. 

That was a study focused only on girls. I guess you don't care about boys?

There is a reason the pro Trans-Madness link you cited included that little statement last. 

13 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

3.  No.  Lots of wealthy Republicans buy boob jobs for their kids but that's ok because they're your tribe.

"Lots" huh?

How many do you define as "lots"

14 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I'll show myself out...

You must have me on ignore again after I tore apart all your bogus trans madness arguments the last time. 

 

[CdnFox]

32 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Sure... look at you citing the dictionary and all that...

Sure.... look at you failing to actually know what you were talking about but talking anyway   and now it's my fault for citing a dictionary (wikipedia actually i think but whatever)

 

Quote

2. I didn't know that so I googled it and it seems wrong: https://scienceforgeorgia.org/knowledge-base1/dispelling-myths-around-puberty-blockers/

The problem is you search for things to confirm your bias. In the case of transgender kids they are ALWAYS used in conjunction with hormone replacement therapy.  Otherwise it  really does nothing for them.  And that leaves them infertile. 

So you either lied knowing the truth and deliberately omitting it or just did 3 second of googling and pretended you were educated. 

Gender affirming medical care of transgender youth - PMC

Gender affirming care in youth leads to permanent disability. 

43 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

3.  No.  Lots of wealthy Republicans buy boob jobs for their kids but that's ok because they're your tribe.

Well that's a lie.  Who gets a boob job for a child  Name a few who had their children's boobs done. I mean there's lots so you must be able to point to a few. right? Mike? right? There's lots right?

Also boob jobs don't make the boobs stop working. They're just bigger (or smaller) and they still work just fine. 

People get boob jobs when they're adults. And adults are welcome to get trans gender affirming treatments. 

Can't you have at least ONE conversation without just out and out lying to try to justify your left wing tribe?

[User]

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Can't you have at least ONE conversation without just out and out lying to try to justify your left wing tribe?

Yeah, he obfuscates in plenty of threads, too!

 

 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

This is about puberty blockers, not mutilation.  The fact that you have to abuse language shows that your point is weak.

And in fact, parents are free to approve mutilation of their children.  It's just when the spectre of transgender people arises that they get upset...

That's because trannies are behind this shit. Banish the trannies to the underworld and normalcy will reemerge.  

[taxme]

23 hours ago, User said:

Sorry, but no. You are trying to make an absolute argument that is absurd on its face. 

Do parents have the right to starve their kids? To rape them? To chop their legs off because they think they should be in a wheelchair?

No. No. No. No.

There is no you either support parents rights 100% or you don't position here. 

 

MH is our local resident Marxist. MH supports all lieberal Marxist woke programs and agendas. Trying to transition boys into girls is a crime. This is all just more globalist Zionist bull chit. Eventually, if that communist ilk can get their way, they want to make pedophilia legal. Something tells me that they just get their way some day soon, especially with their control of the MSM which will help them in their plans to get pedophilia legal? Just saying. 

[taxme]

On 6/18/2025 at 12:42 PM, Deluge said:

The trannies/democrat party have already been trying to make June 100% woke, and they would've succeeded if Harris had gotten in power. 

I want to see that too - we could tie it in with the holiday season - Oct 31, through Jan 1. 

With Trump now being the President, he pretty much has nixed the trannie revolution that was going on during Bidumb's communist regime in America. Now if only Canada had a real and true conservative leader like Trump in Canada. But for the next 4 more years, it will become an even more trannie world here in Canada. Canada is so dead. I just hope that Alberta decides to separate from Canada. That should be the end of this globalist Marxist Canada for good. RIP Canada. 😂