Supreme Court OKs Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for kids, a setback for transgender rights

[Deluge]

But a win for kids, and those who actually care about kids, which is all that matters. 

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-transgender-health-care-trump-79fc6f3bbdab2e92d6f0184201a468a9

 

[taxme]

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

But a win for kids, and those who actually care about kids, which is all that matters. 

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-transgender-health-care-trump-79fc6f3bbdab2e92d6f0184201a468a9

 

I am wondering as to how long it will be before we get to celebrate a trans gender holiday and parade one of these days? Won't that be exciting to want to watch. Ha-ha-ha. 

What i have been really wanting to see and have for years now is to have a White Pride History Month. Seeing that we have so many non-white months to have to celebrate when can we get to celebrate a White Pride Month? Just wondering? 

[Deluge]

26 minutes ago, taxme said:

I am wondering as to how long it will be before we get to celebrate a trans gender holiday and parade one of these days? Won't that be exciting to want to watch. Ha-ha-ha. 

What i have been really wanting to see and have for years now is to have a White Pride History Month. Seeing that we have so many non-white months to have to celebrate when can we get to celebrate a White Pride Month? Just wondering? 

The trannies/democrat party have already been trying to make June 100% woke, and they would've succeeded if Harris had gotten in power. 

I want to see that too - we could tie it in with the holiday season - Oct 31, through Jan 1. 

[Michael Hardner]

Is strange that people have actually decried decisions that take away parents rights, when it comes to some aspects of trans politics. 

 

Seems to me that parents rights have been taken away in this case no? 

 

I'm just asking. 

 

If you care about parents rights, shouldn't you care when the government takes the way for any reason? 

https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/54465-are-you-a-man-or-a-woman/page/59/#findComment-1795594

 

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Is strange that people have actually decried decisions that take away parents rights, when it comes to some aspects of trans politics. 

 

Seems to me that parents rights have been taken away in this case no? 

 

I'm just asking. 

 

If you care about parents rights, shouldn't you care when the government takes the way for any reason? 

https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/54465-are-you-a-man-or-a-woman/page/59/#findComment-1795594

 

Parents' rights in what way, Mike? Parents' rights to give their kids gender-affirming care? Are you trying to say that you support parents' rights to give their kids gender-affirming care? 

[Michael Hardner]

Just now, Deluge said:

Parents' rights in what way, Mike? Parents' rights to give their kids gender-affirming care? Are you trying to say that you support parents' rights to give their kids gender-affirming care? 

Yes.  And yes I do.  I think parents should be consulted for some decisions also.

If you don't, then you can't really claim that you support parental authority to make these choices.

You're either for parents rights or against.  If you support parents right to deny gender care but not to provide it, you're not in favour of parents rights you're just against trans care.

[Deluge]

9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Yes.  And yes I do.  I think parents should be consulted for some decisions also.

If you don't, then you can't really claim that you support parental authority to make these choices.

You're either for parents rights or against.  If you support parents right to deny gender care but not to provide it, you're not in favour of parents rights you're just against trans care.

You don't think gender-affirmation is the result of a stupid and corrupt society? I do. I don't think gender-affirmation would've lasted more than 5 minutes 50 years ago, and it wouldn't have lasted at all 100 years ago. I think that tells you how unimportant gender confusion really is. 

[Michael Hardner]

6 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. You don't think gender-affirmation is the result of a stupid and corrupt society?

2.I do.

3. I don't think gender-affirmation would've lasted more than 5 minutes 50 years ago, and it wouldn't have lasted at all 100 years ago.

4. I think that tells you how unimportant gender confusion really is. 

1. No.

2. Ok.

3. That's obvious.

4. It doesn't make sense to me that you think current moral attitudes are validated by past attitudes.  Why?  And why 50 or 100 years? Why not 200 or 500?

Also you avoided responding to my point about parents' rights, which was why I posted a response.

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

4. It doesn't make sense to me that you think current moral attitudes are validated by past attitudes.  Why?  And why 50 or 100 years? Why not 200 or 500?

Also you avoided responding to my point about parents' rights, which was why I posted a response.

4. Because gender-affirmation is non-essential. You don't need it. It's the product of a bored and corrupt society. If the country ever hits hard times, gender-affirmation will be among the first to get shit canned. 

Parents' shouldn't have the right to tell their kids that they're anything other than a boy or girl - same goes for schools, lawmakers and tranny activists. NO ONE should have the right to feed into the bullshit that a boy is really a girl, or vice-versa. If the kid's a hermaphrodite, then you get with professionals and figure out the best course of action. 

[User]

Oh come on, I already had a thread created!

[User]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

You're either for parents rights or against.  If you support parents right to deny gender care but not to provide it, you're not in favour of parents rights you're just against trans care.

Sorry, but no. You are trying to make an absolute argument that is absurd on its face. 

Do parents have the right to starve their kids? To rape them? To chop their legs off because they think they should be in a wheelchair?

No. No. No. No.

There is no you either support parents rights 100% or you don't position here. 

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Is strange that people have actually decried decisions that take away parents rights, when it comes to some aspects of trans politics. 

 

Seems to me that parents rights have been taken away in this case no? 

No. Parents have never had the right to mutilate their children

[Nationalist]

Physical alteration of children under the age of 18, in which said alteration is executed in order to change a natural hormonal state, or actual outwardly physical changes via operation...

Is a monstrous idea an should be completely illegal.

[User]

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No. Parents have never had the right to mutilate their children

An excellent point. Up until about 5 years ago in all of human history before, those thousands of years, there was no such thing as so-called "gender affirming care" the trans madness folks were pushing on kids. 

Do you think anyone anywhere would have tolerated a parent having their childs breasts cut off when they were 15 just so they could look more like a boy?

Of course not. 

@Michael Hardner is complaining about something being a "right" that was only just invented yesterday.