Canadian Forest Management Fails, Fueling Massive Wild Fires.

[eyeball]

On 6/1/2025 at 7:10 PM, CdnFox said:

You knew that it was trudeau, who said we could beat climate change if we paid a carbon tax right?

Cite. No one has ever said this except you.

While your expectations are usually out to lunch it's a little suspicious how high they get when holding them against Liberals and other putatively left wing parties.

 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...are you sure you're a male of the species?

Since I'm 6'6" 240lbs, I'm sure I  can kick your ASS grandma.

Are you sure you've not already started drinking heavy this morning? LMAO

You're posts aren't making any sense.

[User]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Since I'm 6'6" 240lbs, I'm sure I  can kick your ASS grandma.

Are you sure you've not already started drinking heavy this morning? LMAO

You're posts aren't making any sense.

You can't even stand up to someone commenting here you coward. You hide from me and run away from just about any thread you have been in with me after I clearly destroy your lies and falsehoods. 

 

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, Aristides said:

Most of these large fires in remote areas are caused by lightning strikes. Higher temperatures also make thunderstorms more common and violent. That's why we don't have them in winter. Smoke from the Sask and Man fires is now blanketing the north east US. They also massively increase CO2 emissions while destroying the forests that absorb them. 

Then maybe we shouldn't have been wasting our time with an expensive carbon tax and instead been building a fleet of fire bombers. 

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

Cite. No one has ever said this except you.

Justin said it everywhere.  

• "We know it, leaders know it, scientists know it and the private sector knows it: putting a price on pollution is the most efficient and powerful way to keep 1.5 alive": (referring to the push to limit global temperature increases to 1.5 degrees Celsius). 

He said it a billion times, Carbon tax is the best way to fight cilmate change, i'll meet our goals, it will keep climate change under control

Sooooo.... we paid the tax,  SO climate change must be solved, 

Turns out it wasn't. Thats why you're sea lioning. You know you're wrong so you're trying to delay and derail the conversation. 

You promoted carbon tax as the be all and end all  and you YOURSELF said it was critical

And it wasnt. It failed utterly.  And you yourself have been unable to provide even a single scrap of scientific evidence to show that the climate change issue is a 'crisis'. 

 

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Justin said it everywhere.

"We know it, leaders know it, scientists know it and the private sector knows it: putting a price on pollution is the most efficient and powerful way to keep 1.5 alive"

I'm quite certain Justin knew what he was told to know. In any case Scott Moe came to the same conclusion and you can be sure Carney knows it too.  In fact I pointed to the deceit in his announcement months ago as being his first official lie.

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Sooooo.... we paid the tax,  SO climate change must be solved,

LMAO!

The neural pathway conveying your expectations must be the same one conveying your sense of being lied to. They probably have a pill for that you know, something to help reduce the inflammation and swelling.

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

I'm quite certain Justin knew what he was told to know.

 

Are you saying he deliberately lied to the public? I mean, i think we all know that at this point but he was far from the only person claiming that .

 

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

In any case Scott Moe came to the same conclusion and you can be sure Carney knows it too.  In fact I pointed to the deceit in his announcement months ago as being his first official lie.

Then why were you sealioning for a cite?

Quote

LMAO!

 

Ahh yes, your traditional admission of defeat   

 

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

The neural pathway conveying your expectations must be the same one conveying your sense of being lied to. They probably have a pill for that you know, something to help reduce the inflammation and swelling.

 

So  you just admitted they claimed that carbon tax was an amazing tool for fighting climate change, and now claim that my expectation that carbon tax was an amazing tool for fighting climate change is nuts   LOLOLOL

well your long standing tradition of proving you're a dishonest schmuck by contradicting yourself in the same post is alive and well i see  

You spent 10 years promoting the hell out of the carbon tax as an effective tool for fighting climate change, you've mentioned that and always defended it since i've known you. Now you're forced to admit it was NOT and the people who saiid it was  have faulty neural pathways   LOLOLOL

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously   THis is as bad as you clearly supporting the terrorists  while claiming to not support the terrorists   

[eyeball]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Are you saying he deliberately lied to the public?

You don't? Go ask JWR or anyone who thought FPTP might become a thing of the past.

16 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Then why were you sealioning for a cite?

I wasn't, I was simply mocking your ridiculous expectations. I know you've got squat 

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So  you just admitted they claimed that carbon tax was an amazing tool for fighting climate change,

Yup.

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

and now claim that my expectation that carbon tax was an amazing tool for fighting climate change is nuts 

I said your expectation was ridiculous. You don't even know what climate change is.

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

well your long standing tradition of proving you're a dishonest schmuck by contradicting yourself in the same post is alive and well i see

That's just your own reflection talking that you're listening too.

22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You spent 10 years promoting the hell out of the carbon tax as an effective tool for fighting climate change, you've mentioned that and always defended it since i've known you.

Yup I sure did. Nothing has changed.

24 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Now you're forced to admit it was NOT and the people who saiid it was  have faulty neural pathways

I haven't admitted anything of the sort.

I simply pointed out your expectations were out to lunch if you thought the carbon tax could solve climate change. You're simply exaggerating what was said and calling it a lie to produce s strawman to argue against. Your posts are always filled with them.

36 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously

No I don't.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

You don't? Go ask JWR or anyone who thought FPTP might become a thing of the past.

oh I already conceded you had a point, he's a liar.  But as i said he's not the only one who made claims about the carbon tax. 

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

I wasn't, I was simply mocking your ridiculous expectations. I know you've got squat 

But i provided a cite so they weren't rediculous at all.  Were they    So all you proved is that you were wrong, 

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yup I sure did. Nothing has changed.

Agreed, you're still as dishonest as trudeau.

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I haven't admitted anything of the sort.

You absolutely did. I pointed out that the claim was that the carbon tax would be an effective tool to stop climate change. You then claimed that that was an unrealistic expectation. now you're claiming you did, no wait you didn't. No wait you did. 

 

You big problem in life is that you have trouble keeping your lies straight.

We paid our carbon tax and it did nothing. Which means you were probably lying about the whole climate crisis all the way along. Would you explain to you why you can't provide any research from a scientist

Well you've painted yourself into a corner again and demonstrated that the carbon tax wasn't completely why and that you've been lying as well. So you'll understand why we don't take you seriously on the subject

[eyeball]

22 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But i provided a cite so they weren't rediculous at all. 

Sure kid.

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I pointed out that the claim was that the carbon tax would be an effective tool to stop climate change.

LMAO! You've implied everyone promised you it would cure climate change the way vaccine would cure COVID.

It was never more than one tool...the most effective for sure but it was never sold the way you peddle it.

30 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You big problem in life is that you have trouble keeping your lies straight.

Stop talking to yourself.

30 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

We paid our carbon tax and it did nothing. Which means you were probably lying about the whole climate crisis all the way along. Would you explain to you why you can't provide any research from a scientist

Meta-analysis of Carbon Pricing Schemes:

A meta-analysis of carbon pricing schemes found that the policy has reduced emissions by an average of 10.4%, with a highly statistically significant effect, according to a study published in Nature. 

40 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you'll understand why we don't take you seriously on the subject

Sure kid.

[Nationalist]

15 hours ago, robosmith said:

Since I'm 6'6" 240lbs, I'm sure I  can kick your ASS grandma.

Are you sure you've not already started drinking heavy this morning? LMAO

You're posts aren't making any sense.

Oh my! You found an ounce of testosterone. 

Did you have to borrow it?

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Oh my! You found an ounce of testosterone. 

Did you have to borrow it?

No, grandma. I work out hard for my testosterone.

Have you ever lifted a weight in your LIFE? LMAO

[CdnFox]

11 hours ago, eyeball said:

Sure kid.

ahhh so you're just resorting to banality and childishness in the face of facts.  well.... it IS your 'thing'. 

 

11 hours ago, eyeball said:

LMAO! You've implied everyone promised you it would cure climate change the way vaccine would cure COVID.

You literally claimed the vaccine would cure covid  

Like i said your biggest problem is that you can't keep your lies straight. 

But at least we could say legitimately that covet appears to have been beaten. While some might argue that it was the vaccine or something else we can point to results. Climate change not only didn't get better it's gotten worse. It was billed as an effective tool for fighting climate change, so your comments might have some validity if things had gotten a lot better but weren't perfect but in fact it had no effect at all and things got worse

 

11 hours ago, eyeball said:

Meta-analysis of Carbon Pricing Schemes:

A meta-analysis of carbon pricing schemes found that the policy has reduced emissions by an average of 10.4%, with a highly statistically significant effect, according to a study published in Nature. 

And you obviously didn't read the article or actually look at the publication. That is NOT what the publication said, 

From the report you didn't read:

Statistically significant emissions reductions range between –5% to –21% across the schemes (–4% to –15% after correcting for publication bias). Our study highlights critical evidence gaps with regard to dozens of unevaluated carbon pricing schemes and the price elasticity of emissions reductions. More rigorous synthesis of carbon pricing and other climate policies is required across a range of outcomes to advance our understanding of “what works” and accelerate learning on climate solutions in science and policy.

They go on to elaborate. Your article took the average of those two numbers but the vast majority of the studies were closer to the 4 percent. BC for example was at 5 percent. (yes we made the report)  There is no 'canada' figure because THE LIBERALS NEVER THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY STUDY IF IT WAS WORKING OR NOT. 

HOWEVER, despite the wording if you continue to read it's not a 4 percent permanent reduction overall, it's 4 percent reduction of the INCREASE. 

So, as was the case in british columbia, it was estimated that the carbon tax slowed the growth of carbon emissions by 5 percent or thereabouts.  But carbon out put still went up. Climate change still got worse. The carbon tax was entirely ineffective at addressing climate change, it just meant that we hit the same level of carbon out put about 2 months later than we would have without it. 

Further as they note the studies are poorly done, they're often bias, and they are unable to describe HOW carbon taxes did anything, they just noticed that there was a reduction in output around the time the tax was implimented.  But we all know that commonalty is not causality. 

 

So you looked up an article that got the facts wrong and didn't actually read the source.

 

This is why you're wrong so often and you get so mad on this board. You take less than half a second to educate yourself and then speak like you're an expert and get called on it. 

The carbon tax did nothing to fight climate change 

 

LOL You are never more pathetic than when you try to pretend that you know what you're talking about

[User]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

No, grandma. I work out hard for my testosterone.

Have you ever lifted a weight in your LIFE? LMAO

Are you still shit talking when you are too big of a coward even to face me on a forum with words?

ROFL

[gatomontes99]

21 hours ago, robosmith said:

Since I'm 6'6" 240lbs, I'm sure I  can kick your ASS grandma.

Are you sure you've not already started drinking heavy this morning? LMAO

You're posts aren't making any sense.

 

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

No, grandma. I work out hard for my testosterone.

Have you ever lifted a weight in your LIFE? LMAO

 

This is pure comedy gold. If I was trying to write the dialog of some pathetic, political forum loŝer that was trying to convince people he was big bad and tough, I'd write this word for word. 

I have a challenge for you robo...put your money where your mouth is. Post a verification photo. You can crop out your face and cover up anything identifying. But it most show you holding a piece of paper with your username hand written in sharpie. 

Similar to this:

[CdnFox]

20 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

 

This is pure comedy gold. If I was trying to write the dialog of some pathetic, political forum loŝer that was trying to convince people he was big bad and tough, I'd write this word for word. 

I have a challenge for you robo...put your money where your mouth is. Post a verification photo. You can crop out your face and cover up anything identifying. But it most show you holding a piece of paper with your username hand written in sharpie. 

Similar to this:

Are YOU kidding?  Haven't you seen @robosmith 's  video from his latest fight?!?!? It's all over the internet.  He goes by "Steve the Iron Man"  And as you can see he did win the fight! tecnically. 

 

 

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You literally claimed the vaccine would cure covid

No doubt everything else you wrote is a bunch of hooey too.

[Legato]

On 6/5/2025 at 4:51 PM, robosmith said:

Since I'm 6'6" 240lbs,

Is that your ass?

[Legato]

On 6/5/2025 at 3:48 PM, eyeball said:

Cite. No one has ever said this except you.

While your expectations are usually out to lunch it's a little suspicious how high they get when holding them against Liberals and other putatively left wing parties.

 

Heres a good one for your perusal...From your mentor.

There is no rhyme or reason to the Trudeau government’s climate spending. It will spend massive sums on anything and everything in the name of climate change, from $104 million for home energy efficiency subsidies in British Columbia to a new project costing over $20 million “that will focus on improving gender-responsive and climate-resilient agricultural practices” in Tanzania, to take two examples just from last week. What “gender-responsive and climate-resilient agricultural practices” in Tanzania are the Liberals did not explain. How gender-responsive Tanzanian climate action will benefit Canadian taxpayers who are being made to pay more than $20 million for it, they did not say, either.

 

Article content

Are there such things as “gender-unresponsive” climate-resilient agricultural practices? How do agricultural practices, climate-resilient or not, “respond” to gender anyway? And if climate change is an existential crisis, as the prime minister says, doesn’t that mean it will wipe everyone out, regardless of gender? In which case, why does a policy trying to fight climate change have to consider gender at all?

https://financialpost.com/opinion/trudeau-160-billion-carbon-tax-pitch

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No doubt everything else you wrote is a bunch of hooey too.

Oh look who's rewiting what he's written before because he realized it's stupid  

You spend almost as much time denying things you say as you do saying them, which pretty much means you spend a lot of time saying you've never said anything worth keeping  

 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Heres a good one for your perusal...From your mentor.

Not my mentor but that's a good one, thanks!

I've long acknowledged Trudeau was pretty useless at anything he did.

He certainly did his bit to help keep concern for climate change on its ass.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Not my mentor but that's a good one, thanks!

I've long acknowledged Trudeau was pretty useless at anything he did.

 

Actually you praise most of the things he did. Then you say he's pretty useless. Then you go back to praising what he did

Sometimes you alternate. In this threat alone you've said that the carbon tax was very good and very bad and very good and very bad.

The nice thing about you is if I don't like your opinion I only have to wait a couple minutes and check again    

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Actually you praise most of the things he did.

No I just enjoy mocking the quality and silliness of the criticisms you people level against him because you can't do so without associating anyone else you don't like with him.

 

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

No I just enjoy mocking the quality and silliness of the criticisms you people level against him because you can't do so without associating anyone else you don't like with him.

 

No you don't.  That's just your traditional stock reply when you get busted for your stupidity. 

I'm sure you think you're really bright and you're somehow fooling us etc etc but most of the people here can see through your silly childish stupidity. I mean, not roblesmith obviously. But most of the others.

You are as predictable and vacuous as Trudeau himself. No wonder you like the guy

[Nationalist]

21 hours ago, robosmith said:

No, grandma. I work out hard for my testosterone.

Have you ever lifted a weight in your LIFE? LMAO

As you can see...nobody thinks you're anything more than a joke. A sad little being with an identity crisis...and a zucchini...