gatomontes99 Posted Tuesday at 11:25 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 11:25 PM (edited) AND SOME OF THEM VOTED! Called it. We told you! Errr.... We informed you thusly. Edited Tuesday at 11:29 PM by gatomontes99 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Barquentine Posted Tuesday at 11:29 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 11:29 PM 3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: We informed you thusly. Geez, if it's on X it's GOTTA be true! 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Tuesday at 11:30 PM Author Report Posted Tuesday at 11:30 PM Just now, Barquentine said: Geez, if it's on X it's GOTTA be true! Ah, rule #1. You must not be able to refute the topic. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Barquentine Posted Wednesday at 12:10 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 12:10 AM 39 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Ah, rule #1. You must not be able to refute the topic. Rule # 1 for Magats: Believe every lie you're fed. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 12:14 AM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 12:14 AM 3 minutes ago, Barquentine said: Rule # 1 for Magats: Believe every lie you're fed. Oh ok, we are moving on to rule #2. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Legato Posted Wednesday at 01:07 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 01:07 AM 56 minutes ago, Barquentine said: Rule # 1 for Magats: Believe every lie you're fed. Do you have fries with yours? Quote
robosmith Posted Wednesday at 01:25 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 01:25 AM 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: AND SOME OF THEM VOTED! Called it. We told you! Errr.... We informed you thusly. That chart means nothing because it comes from a LIAR Muskrat. You need some REAL DATA from someone with CREDIBILITY. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 01:35 AM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 01:35 AM (edited) 10 minutes ago, robosmith said: That chart means nothing because it comes from a LIAR Muskrat. You need some REAL DATA from someone with CREDIBILITY. The data came from the SSA. Who would you consider more reliable? And why should we believe you? FoxNews covered Biden's dementia (which is now widely accepted as true by all media) and your favorite news said was a conspiracy theory. But you've made it a habit of calling all news you don't like FOS News. You have a track record of being wrong about the obvious. Why should we accept your challenge of this data? If you don't believe the data, disprove it. Edited Wednesday at 01:36 AM by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Aristides Posted Wednesday at 01:36 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 01:36 AM https://www.thebalancemoney.com/how-to-get-a-social-security-number-for-non-us-citizens-2064264 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 01:40 AM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 01:40 AM 1 minute ago, Aristides said: https://www.thebalancemoney.com/how-to-get-a-social-security-number-for-non-us-citizens-2064264 2 minutes ago, Aristides said: https://www.thebalancemoney.com/how-to-get-a-social-security-number-for-non-us-citizens-2064264 Illegal aliens can't get SSN because they aren't allowed to work, even if seeking asylum. Further, these numbers were used to get voter IDs because some states didn't require proof of eligibility. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted Wednesday at 03:50 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 03:50 AM 4 hours ago, Barquentine said: Geez, if it's on X it's GOTTA be true! Do you watch CNN, dumbass? CTV? Global? CBC? MSNBC? Do you look to the pictures in WashPo or NYT? Do you listen to Fauci? Maybe you should just keep quiet and make people guess how stupid you are. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
robosmith Posted Wednesday at 05:55 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 05:55 AM 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Do you watch CNN, dumbass? CTV? Global? CBC? MSNBC? Do you look to the pictures in WashPo or NYT? Do you listen to Fauci? Maybe you should just keep quiet and make people guess how stupid you are. No need to guess about your stupidity when you believe random tweets with single charts and NO OTHER EVIDENCE from Muskrat. Are you even aware of how many bogus claims he's made on the web? Not to mention all the mistaken firings which had to be rescinded. Quote
Nationalist Posted Wednesday at 10:23 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 10:23 AM 4 hours ago, robosmith said: No need to guess about your stupidity when you believe random tweets with single charts and NO OTHER EVIDENCE from Muskrat. Are you even aware of how many bogus claims he's made on the web? Not to mention all the mistaken firings which had to be rescinded. Goin' for another crow dinner I see. Good...good. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
WestCanMan Posted Wednesday at 12:17 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 12:17 PM 6 hours ago, robosmith said: No need to guess about your stupidity when you believe random tweets with single charts and NO OTHER EVIDENCE from Muskrat. Are you even aware of how many bogus claims he's made on the web? Not to mention all the mistaken firings which had to be rescinded. Stop telling us what you saw on the cartoon channel, robo. No one gives a crap. The world has moved on from the CNN era. Just sit back and be thankful that you have a president who's actually working for your country. We'd give anything for a leader like that in Canada. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Deluge Posted Wednesday at 02:10 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 02:10 PM 14 hours ago, Barquentine said: Geez, if it's on X it's GOTTA be true! One reason it's true is because degenerates like you are trying to use humor to cover it up rather than blow the argument to smithereens with cold hard facts. 1 Quote
Deluge Posted Wednesday at 02:14 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 02:14 PM 8 hours ago, robosmith said: No need to guess about your stupidity when you believe random tweets with single charts and NO OTHER EVIDENCE from Muskrat. Are you even aware of how many bogus claims he's made on the web? Not to mention all the mistaken firings which had to be rescinded. Robowoke, are you even aware of how many illegal alien criminal invaders YOUR party let into the country under Biden's watch? The answer is no, you have no idea how many illegal alien criminal invaders YOUR party let in, so why are you spewing your nonsensical bullshit all over this thread? You know that nobody believes you degenerates, right? 1 Quote
Deluge Posted Wednesday at 02:18 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 02:18 PM 14 hours ago, Barquentine said: Rule # 1 for Magats: Believe every lie you're fed. That would mean the democrats would have our support 100% of the time, and we both know that is 100% bullshit - you don't even have our support 1% of the time. In fact, you NEVER have our support at ANY time. Quote
Barquentine Posted Wednesday at 03:30 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 03:30 PM 11 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Do you watch CNN, dumbass? CTV? Global? CBC? MSNBC? Do you look to the pictures in WashPo or NYT? Do you listen to Fauci? https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1747290488 Elon Musk’s Grok AI chatbot brought up ‘white genocide’ in unrelated queries Some X users on Wednesday asked Grok – the AI chatbot available through Elon Musk’s social media platform – questions about simple topics like baseball players or videos of fish being flushed down toilets. One user just asked Grok to talk like a pirate. In response, they got replies about the theory of “white genocide” in South Africa, puzzling some X users as they tried to engage with what has largely been seen as Musk’s answer to ChatGPT. HURRAY for X! Elon to the rescue! 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted Wednesday at 03:50 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 03:50 PM (edited) 20 minutes ago, Barquentine said: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1747290488 Elon Musk’s Grok AI chatbot brought up ‘white genocide’ in unrelated queries Some X users on Wednesday asked Grok – the AI chatbot available through Elon Musk’s social media platform – questions about simple topics like baseball players or videos of fish being flushed down toilets. One user just asked Grok to talk like a pirate. In response, they got replies about the theory of “white genocide” in South Africa, puzzling some X users as they tried to engage with what has largely been seen as Musk’s answer to ChatGPT. HURRAY for X! Elon to the rescue! Before the 2024 election, if you asked Alexa why you should vote for Trump, the response was "I don't engage in the political process", and if you asked it why you should vote for the dumb ho the response was just a litany of lies about her qualifications, successes, how much more she cares about people, etc. Remember when that AI tool recently started depicting significant historical Europeans as blacks? Congrats on finally learning that internet technology isn't the personification of science, it's just a high-tech perversion of truth, history, and facts. Google has been slanting searches and filtering out unwanted truths for years, and even though that's common knowledge now, their goal is just to get better at it. Don't act like you haven't supported disinformation all this time, cult-monkey. Book-burning is old-school, and just led to ignorance. Control over internet searches and the supposed factual results is like 'the ability to change what's in the books instead of burning them', and it leads to mind control, which you're a victim/supporter of. Edited Wednesday at 03:54 PM by WestCanMan Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
robosmith Posted Wednesday at 05:34 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 05:34 PM 7 hours ago, Nationalist said: Goin' for another crow dinner I see. Good...good. That would be you. Quote
robosmith Posted Wednesday at 05:41 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 05:41 PM 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Stop telling us what you saw on the cartoon channel, robo. No one gives a crap. The world has moved on from the CNN era. Just sit back and be thankful that you have a president who's actually working for your country. Trump is a conman and you've been thoroughly CONNED. Trump is working for himself and you would understand that IF you knew about the $2B he's made from foreigners "investing" in his crypto businesses. As Trumps Monetize Presidency, Profits Outstrip Protests The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics 2 days ago — The Trump family and its business partners have collected $320 million in fees from a new cryptocurrency, brokered overseas real estate deals ... How Donald Trump's Crypto Dealings Push the Bounds of ... The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com › Culture › Cryptocurrency May 14, 2025 — With the meme coin $TRUMP and the company World Liberty Financial, the President is using an underregulated industry to enrich himself and court ... Missing: grifts | Show results with: grifts Trump's Crypto Grift Is the Latest Corruption Mike Johnson ... Yahoo https://www.yahoo.com › news › trump-crypto-grift-lat... 3 days ago — “President Trump held a closed-door event Thursday night for top investors in his private cryptocurrency. We do not know who was there. The list ... 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said: We'd give anything for a leader like that in Canada. Because you don't have an emoluments clause in your Constitution that PROHIBITS accepting gifts from foreigners? Seems you want a leader who's NOT working for YOUR COUNTRY. 🤮 We DO NOT. Duh Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 05:50 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 05:50 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, Barquentine said: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1747290488 Elon Musk’s Grok AI chatbot brought up ‘white genocide’ in unrelated queries Some X users on Wednesday asked Grok – the AI chatbot available through Elon Musk’s social media platform – questions about simple topics like baseball players or videos of fish being flushed down toilets. One user just asked Grok to talk like a pirate. In response, they got replies about the theory of “white genocide” in South Africa, puzzling some X users as they tried to engage with what has largely been seen as Musk’s answer to ChatGPT. HURRAY for X! Elon to the rescue! Dude...come on man. Is this like the Twitter is putting white supremacy ads next to....? You know, where they searched for white supremacy over and over and over until the algorithm started pulling in adds next to the white supremacy posts? This is what Grok 3 Beta gives you if you ask if there is white genocide in South Africa. Quote The claim of a "white genocide" in South Africa, particularly targeting white farmers, has been widely debated and is often associated with controversial narratives. Based on available evidence, this claim does not hold up under scrutiny and has been repeatedly debunked by experts, fact-checkers, and official sources. Here’s a clear and concise examination of the situation:Crime Statistics and Context: South Africa has one of the highest murder rates in the world, with 26,232 murders recorded in 2024, of which only 44 were linked to farming communities. Of these, eight were farmers, and the racial breakdown shows no evidence of disproportionate targeting of white farmers. For instance, in the last quarter of 2024, 12 farm murders were recorded, with only one victim being a white farmer, while five were black farm dwellers and four were employees, likely black. Overall, white individuals, who make up about 7-8% of the population, account for roughly 1.8-2% of murder victims, indicating they are less likely to be murdered compared to other racial groups.Farm Attacks: Violent crimes, including murders, robberies, and assaults, do occur on South African farms, but these are part of the country’s broader crime problem, not a racially motivated campaign. Experts, including the Institute for Security Studies, note that farm attacks are often driven by economic motives like greed, targeting farmers perceived as wealthy, regardless of race. Two independent inquiries (2000 and 2015) found no evidence of a political or racial campaign to drive white farmers off their land.Genocide Claims Debunked: The term "genocide" is defined by international law (1948 Genocide Convention and 1998 Rome Statute) as acts intended to destroy a group based on ethnicity or other protected characteristics. South African courts, such as in a February 2025 ruling, have dismissed "white genocide" claims as "clearly imagined and not real," blocking a donation to a white supremacist group promoting this narrative. Fact-checking organizations like Africa Check and reports from the U.S. State Department (2020) confirm there is no evidence of systematic, race-based targeting of whites.Land Reform and Misinformation: Claims of "white genocide" often tie to South Africa’s land reform policies, particularly the 2024 Expropriation Act, which allows land expropriation without compensation in rare cases to address historical disparities from apartheid. These policies are not confiscatory but follow a legal process, and no widespread land seizures have occurred. Misrepresentations, such as images of white crosses falsely claimed to be graves (actually from a 2020 protest) or unrelated footage from the Democratic Republic of Congo, have been used to fuel this narrative, notably by figures like Donald Trump and Elon Musk.Political and Social Context: The "white genocide" narrative has been amplified by far-right groups globally, including in South Africa (e.g., AfriForum, Suidlanders) and the U.S., often tied to white supremacist ideologies like the "white replacement theory." These groups point to inflammatory rhetoric, such as the song "Kill the Boer" by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), but South African courts (2022) have ruled it as protected speech, not incitement to violence, when considered in its historical context. Experts argue that focusing on white victims distorts the broader crime issue, which disproportionately affects black South Africans.Sentiment on X: Some X posts reflect the polarized views on this issue. For example, @MrPitbull07 claimed in May 2025 that white farmers are disproportionately murdered, citing unverified statistics, while others like @RobynPorteous, @RenaldoGouws, and @UlrichJvV explicitly reject the "white genocide" narrative, emphasizing that crime affects all South Africans, not just whites. These posts highlight the contentious nature of the debate but are not conclusive evidence.Conclusion: There is no credible evidence supporting the claim of a "white genocide" in South Africa. Farm attacks and murders occur within the context of the country’s high violent crime rates, which affect all racial groups, with no data indicating a systematic targeting of whites. The "white genocide" narrative is largely a politically motivated myth propagated by fringe groups and amplified by misinformation. South Africa faces significant challenges with crime and historical inequalities, but these are not equivalent to genocide. For further details, official crime statistics from the South African Police Service or reports from organizations like the Institute for Security Studies provide reliable data. The fact that Grok says that White Genocide is not happening in South Africa kind of debunks your unsourced assertion that Grok is promoting the theory. Edited Wednesday at 05:50 PM by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted Wednesday at 06:01 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 06:01 PM (edited) 20 minutes ago, robosmith said: Trump is a conman and you've been thoroughly CONNED. Trump is working for himself and you would understand that IF you knew about the $2B he's made from foreigners "investing" in his crypto businesses. As Trumps Monetize Presidency, Profits Outstrip Protests The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics 2 days ago — The Trump family and its business partners have collected $320 million in fees from a new cryptocurrency, brokered overseas real estate deals ... How Donald Trump's Crypto Dealings Push the Bounds of ... The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com › Culture › Cryptocurrency May 14, 2025 — With the meme coin $TRUMP and the company World Liberty Financial, the President is using an underregulated industry to enrich himself and court ... Missing: grifts | Show results with: grifts Trump's Crypto Grift Is the Latest Corruption Mike Johnson ... Yahoo https://www.yahoo.com › news › trump-crypto-grift-lat... 3 days ago — “President Trump held a closed-door event Thursday night for top investors in his private cryptocurrency. We do not know who was there. The list ... Because you don't have an emoluments clause in your Constitution that PROHIBITS accepting gifts from foreigners? Seems you want a leader who's NOT working for YOUR COUNTRY. 🤮 We DO NOT. Duh Trump lost wealth from 2016 to 2020. Meanwhile, nearly every congressmen and senator gained wealth that outpaced their income by 40%+. Now, tell me again how it is Trump profiting off the office. https://ballotpedia.org/Personal_Gain_Index_(U.S._Congress) Donald Trump's Net Worth Fell by a Third During His Presidency, Forbes Says Edited Wednesday at 06:02 PM by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted Thursday at 12:49 AM Author Report Posted Thursday at 12:49 AM 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Trump lost wealth from 2016 to 2020. Meanwhile, nearly every congressmen and senator gained wealth that outpaced their income by 40%+. Now, tell me again how it is Trump profiting off the office. https://ballotpedia.org/Personal_Gain_Index_(U.S._Congress) Donald Trump's Net Worth Fell by a Third During His Presidency, Forbes Says Weird. @robosmith didn't want to try to refute that. Does that mean even he knows his point is invalid? Maybe I should add rule #9. When you are proven wrong, disengage and pretend it never happened. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Barquentine Posted Thursday at 11:50 AM Report Posted Thursday at 11:50 AM 19 hours ago, WestCanMan said: internet technology isn't the personification of science, it's just a high-tech perversion of truth, history, and facts. Basically what I said, isn't it? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.