Hodad Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 On 5/3/2025 at 1:40 PM, gatomontes99 said: So he signed it and it helped. All your story tells us is that he's willing to listen and change. When did any democrat ever do that? No. Opportunity zones were areas that gave property tax breaks for placing good paying jobs in low income neighborhoods. Like Amazon building a fulfillment center in Queens. Oh, that's right, they couldn't because that dùmb asṣ bìtch, AOC fought against it to keep her district poor. So what you are saying is that it went up under Trump. Except they aren't. As before, it's manifested almost entirely as government subsidized real-estate grabs. Quote Yes...DEI is racist Do you think DEI is anti-discrimination? Because it's really state sponsored racism. DEI is not racist. That's some completely fictional bullshit they sold to you. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the superiority of any race. Race is, in fact, just one component, and even then the intention is to encourage organizational populations that are more representative of our broader population. You can't make the argument plausible, but you can repeat the nonsense you've seen on twitter. Sorry that you're so threatened by an inclusive environment and the erosion of privilege. You chickenshits simply know that you can't compete on a level playing field, so will fight tooth and nail to prevent any leveling. Quote Didn't happen: “The Greensboro, NC, lunch counter is not leaving the Smithsonian. It is on display at the National Museum of American History where it has been for many years," St. Thomas said. "The National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC) also has two stools from the original counter; one is on exhibit at all times, the other rotates in so that they can be properly preserved." "The Bible and book belong to Rev. Brown of San Francisco who generously loaned them to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture for an exhibition," St. Thomas continued in her statement. "The loan agreement expires in May and the items are being returned to the owner which is standard museum practice. The curator called and wrote to Rev. Brown." Again, complete bullshit. You know full well--okay, maybe not you, but the architects of project 2025--that erasing political power of marginalized groups starts with erasing their history. It's not an accident or a small thing that Trump has inserted himself at the Kennedy Center or Vance at the Smithsonian. This vile administration is actively waging war against arts, culture and history to establish an American Gleichschaltung. Quote What's laughable is your unsubstantiated claims. They were easily refuted. You have an infantile understanding of what constitutes refutation. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 On 5/1/2025 at 11:50 AM, Nationalist said: Actually...I do get it. YOU, however, do not. See...A true Republican...or Conservative...would not spend the nation into a pit of dispare. A true Republican would not finance the nation's enemies. A true Republican would never just open the borders. And a true Republican would never impose restrictions on our primary source of power and energy...ESPECIALLY when the economy and every citizen, is trying to recover from a global pandemic! Real Patriots...do what's best for the nation...not silly freaks with green hair who like to set cars on fire. What you laughingly call "a hateful agenda" is doing what's best for the American citizens. But I do understand you. It must be hard to see that when you're very soul is poisoned by hatred. Black like tar. Rotten with the stench of lies and deceit. Oh...and ya know...every time I read one of you freaks use the word "democracy", I wanna laugh and scream at the same time. You don't like "democracy". You actually have shown that you much prefer a dictatorship...to lie to the citizens...to control the media...to warp the laws EXACTLY like the Soviets did last century...to impose on personal lives and liberties with a regularity that is now expectable and predictable. You have, by your own actions...forfeited your right to even speak of "democracy". Now Libbie...run along and show the world the "lawlessness" of Republicans... By setting a Tesla on fire... Too bad you don't get to define "true Republican." LMAO It was defined by the American Republicans who were voted into the OFFICES for MANY YEARS. And your FANTASIES are NEVER going to change that. 🤮 On 5/1/2025 at 12:58 PM, Nationalist said: I consider Reagan mostly Republican. The Bush boys...not so much. Bob Dole was nothing more than a big business crony and McConnell...is obviously bought and paid for. The real Republicans emerged as a direct result of the public realizing both parties had been screwing America. Using it instead of serving it. So save your arrogance and your velcro. The uni-party is dying fast and all the pork and abuse is dying with it. And nothing you do or say can stop it.' What ^some outlier Canuck "considers" means NOTHING HERE. LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 12 minutes ago, Hodad said: Except they aren't. As before, it's manifested almost entirely as government subsidized real-estate grabs. Only because Biden ended it before it got going 12 minutes ago, Hodad said: DEI is not racist. That's some completely fictional bullshit they sold to you. I Ok. What would you call a program that considers race as an important factor in hiring? Is it not racist to discriminate based on skin color? And no one had to sell me on anything. It is quite obvious that any program that biases decisions based on skin color is racist. 25 minutes ago, Hodad said: Again, complete bullshit. You know full well--okay, maybe not you, but the architects of project 2025--that erasing political power of marginalized groups starts with erasing their history. No one is erasing history. One thing was on loan and its time had run. The other is in a different spot. Everything you said is just hysterical bullshìt. Don't get mad at me for calling you out on it. Get mad at PMSNBC for lying to you about what was going on. 30 minutes ago, Hodad said: You have an infantile understanding of what constitutes refutation. If infants understand refute to mean using factual evidence to counter emotional drivel then, yes, I have an infantile view of what refuting is. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 34 minutes ago, Hodad said: You chickenshits simply know that you can't compete on a level playing field, so will fight tooth and nail to prevent any leveling. You are the one hiding from me... Quote
Aristides Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 3 hours ago, Legato said: Sounds like a plot for a Netflix Movie. Who is going to stop them when you remove all the oversight and checks the constitution provides. Quote
Aristides Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 2 hours ago, User said: There is no powers to put people in concentration camps and gulags. No there aren't, that's why they are shipping them to prisons outside the country beyond the reach of Congress and the courts. But hey, as long as it isn't you or someone you know, that kind of thing is fine by you. 1 Quote
User Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 4 minutes ago, Aristides said: No there aren't, that's why they are shipping them to prisons outside the country beyond the reach of Congress and the courts. But hey, as long as it isn't you or someone you know, that kind of thing is fine by you. Once again, there was a law used to do this which is now working through the courts as it is being challenged. No one is currently being shipped as you describe. What is not fine by me is letting illegal aliens continue to evade deportation in sanctuary cities or other schemes by the left that leaves them here to rape, murder, and harm Americans even after they have already been arrested for other crimes. Is letting an illegal alien go, so they can rape - murder - and harm Americans fine by you? 13 minutes ago, Aristides said: Who is going to stop them when you remove all the oversight and checks the constitution provides. Who is going to care about that when we are all enslaved by an alien invasion? Quote
robosmith Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 17 hours ago, Deluge said: This is unbelievable. How stupid does one have to be? Can you even say "illegal alien"? We are going after illegal aliens, not goddamn migrants. Biden let illegal aliens into this country and now Trump is removing them. It's a simple process, yet also very satisfying. When an immigration judge schedules an asylum hearing, THEY ARE NOT HERE ILLEGALLY, DELUGINAL LIAR. DUH 1 Quote
robosmith Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 4 hours ago, Aristides said: I’m not saying don’t deport them but entering homes without warrants and hauling people out to be shipped to foreign prisons with no recourse is Gestapo stuff, not worthy of a civilized country. And a Federal judge in Texas just ruled that the AEA does NOT negate the requirement for DUE PROCESS. 3 hours ago, Legato said: Sounds like a plot for a Netflix Movie. ^Sounds like TROLLING. Quote
Aristides Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 (edited) 19 minutes ago, User said: Once again, there was a law used to do this which is now working through the courts as it is being challenged. No one is currently being shipped as you describe. What is not fine by me is letting illegal aliens continue to evade deportation in sanctuary cities or other schemes by the left that leaves them here to rape, murder, and harm Americans even after they have already been arrested for other crimes. Is letting an illegal alien go, so they can rape - murder - and harm Americans fine by you? Who is going to care about that when we are all enslaved by an alien invasion? Who is talking about letting anyone go? They may be avoiding deportation but an illegal alien who rapes or murders will be subject to the same laws as a legal resident. "Enslaved by an alien invasion". Now you are just pulling shit out of your ass. Edited May 5 by Aristides Quote
User Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 1 minute ago, Aristides said: Who is talking about letting anyone go? They may be avoiding deportation but an illegal alien who rapes or murders will be subject to the same laws as a legal resident. Now you are just pulling shit out of your ass. Talking about? It is what was already happening before Trump took over. It is what left wing judges and cities controlled by left wing people are STILL doing right now to thwart ICE and federal agents from deporting criminal illegal aliens. Those illegal aliens folks like you support avoiding deportation even after they are caught breaking other laws, are then going off to rape, murder, and harm more Americans. You don't care about that though. Quote
Hodad Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Ok. What would you call a program that considers race as an important factor in hiring? Is it not racist to discriminate based on skin color? And no one had to sell me on anything. It is quite obvious that any program that biases decisions based on skin color is racist. That's not what "racist" means, nor is DEI racist. Being aware of and consciously counteracting what are sometimes even subconscious biases has nothing to do with racial superiority nor antagonism. If you have a general-purpose organization that consolidates power around any one demographic characteristic, it is, by definition, not reflective of the population is serves, and is therefore not serving them as well as it could. If it's all white, that's a problem. If it's all men, that's a problem. Such organizations are dysfunctional, in that they cannot effectively serve a diverse population. <-- those are both realistic and common, but hypothetically the same would be true of general-purpose organizations dominated exclusively by other demographics. A diverse group better represents the population. It better incorporates a full spectrum of viewpoints. And it gets better results because of those things. Equity is about fair treatment. Inclusion means being welcoming of the myriad on non-harm variations in our society, so that everyone is free to speak up absent fear and intimidation. <-- and every single one of those things makes an organization stronger. White men who have enjoyed centuries of unearned hegemony in organizations large and small are, somewhat understandably, resentful of the erosion of our privilege. That's why a scared subset of white men have engineered this virulent backlash to basic decency and common sense. It's not to their advantage, so they will fight it. But it certainly is to the advantage of society as a whole. Quote No one is erasing history. One thing was on loan and its time had run. The other is in a different spot. Everything you said is just hysterical bullshìt. Don't get mad at me for calling you out on it. Get mad at PMSNBC for lying to you about what was going on. It's not just one thing, though that's what you chose to talk about. They chose to dismantle that exhibit. The person to whom the artifacts are being returned is upset about it. It was neither expected nor welcome news. But of course the owners of such artifacts see value in a truthful telling of Black history and will be understandably upset by the concerted effort to whitewash and sanitize the experience. Quote
User Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 16 minutes ago, robosmith said: When an immigration judge schedules an asylum hearing, THEY ARE NOT HERE ILLEGALLY, DELUGINAL LIAR. DUH People here illegally can only apply for asylum up to a certain point, then they are not eligible. Getting a hearing doesn't change the fact that they did enter illegally or stayed here illegally. They are still illegal aliens here illegally, all an asylum hearing is, is a chance to stay lawfully IF they win. Quote
User Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 8 minutes ago, Hodad said: That's not what "racist" means, nor is DEI racist. Being aware of and consciously counteracting what are sometimes even subconscious biases has nothing to do with racial superiority nor antagonism. If you have a general-purpose organization that consolidates power around any one demographic characteristic, it is, by definition, not reflective of the population is serves, and is therefore not serving them as well as it could. If it's all white, that's a problem. If it's all men, that's a problem. Such organizations are dysfunctional, in that they cannot effectively serve a diverse population. <-- those are both realistic and common, but hypothetically the same would be true of general-purpose organizations dominated exclusively by other demographics. A diverse group better represents the population. It better incorporates a full spectrum of viewpoints. And it gets better results because of those things. Equity is about fair treatment. Inclusion means being welcoming of the myriad on non-harm variations in our society, so that everyone is free to speak up absent fear and intimidation. <-- and every single one of those things makes an organization stronger. White men who have enjoyed centuries of unearned hegemony in organizations large and small are, somewhat understandably, resentful of the erosion of our privilege. That's why a scared subset of white men have engineered this virulent backlash to basic decency and common sense. It's not to their advantage, so they will fight it. But it certainly is to the advantage of society as a whole. Wow, its times like these I wish you were not such a coward hiding from me. Oh man, what a load of left wing BS this was. I would enjoy watching you flounder around trying to defend it when I start pointing out all the stupidity you typed up here. Quote
Aristides Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 1 hour ago, User said: Talking about? It is what was already happening before Trump took over. It is what left wing judges and cities controlled by left wing people are STILL doing right now to thwart ICE and federal agents from deporting criminal illegal aliens. Those illegal aliens folks like you support avoiding deportation even after they are caught breaking other laws, are then going off to rape, murder, and harm more Americans. You don't care about that though. Why don't you think they will be deported after serving time for rape or murder. Prisons aren't sanctuary cities. You just make stuff up. Quote
User Posted May 5 Report Posted May 5 46 minutes ago, Aristides said: Why don't you think they will be deported after serving time for rape or murder. Prisons aren't sanctuary cities. You just make stuff up. After? The issue is why don't you want to deport them BEFORE they rape and muder? 1 Quote
Deluge Posted May 5 Author Report Posted May 5 3 hours ago, robosmith said: When an immigration judge schedules an asylum hearing, THEY ARE NOT HERE ILLEGALLY, DELUGINAL LIAR. DUH Activist judges are not be trusted - ever. Thank God Trump is largely ignoring those a$$holes. The deportation count is just around 140k, so hopefully that number will increase dramatically over the next 100 days. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted May 6 Report Posted May 6 3 hours ago, Hodad said: That's not what "racist" means, nor is DEI racist. Really? Quote adjective discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion https://www.wordnik.com/words/racist Looks to me like it is exactly what it means. 3 hours ago, Hodad said: Being aware of and consciously counteracting what are sometimes even subconscious biases has nothing to do with racial superiority nor antagonism. What does that have to do with DEI? DEI is about using racial discrimination to create equity. It isn't about eliminating prejudice. It's about using alternative prejudices to create the perception of a fair outcome. 3 hours ago, Hodad said: If you have a general-purpose organization that consolidates power around any one demographic characteristic, it is, by definition, not reflective of the population is serves, and is therefore not serving them as well as it could. If it's all white, that's a problem. What you just posted is the most racist thing you could have said, and you think it is enlightened. You define people by skin color. You assume their traits, abilities and economic outcomes are based solely on the amount of melanin in their skin. That is absurd and racist. If you want true diversity, look for diversity of experience, education, knowledge, ideology, etc. Defining people by skin color is an outdated, illogical and liberal mindset that I just won't tolerate. 3 hours ago, Hodad said: It's not just one thing, though that's what you chose to talk about. They chose to dismantle that exhibit. They dismantle exhibits all the time and resurrect new ones. That's how they keep the museums fresh. Case in point: https://northernvirginiamag.com/things-to-do/2024/12/30/10-exhibits-coming-to-dcs-smithsonian-museums-in-2025/ Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted May 6 Report Posted May 6 4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: What does that have to do with DEI? DEI is about using racial discrimination to create equity. It isn't about eliminating prejudice. It's about using alternative prejudices to create the perception of a fair outcome. D E I is very clearly racism D E I is based on the principle that racism is bad therefore racism is the solution The whole thing is literally the proposition that contrary to common thinking, somehow two wrongs will make a right. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Matthew Posted May 6 Report Posted May 6 10 hours ago, Deluge said: Improper entry by alien What process decides if a person is here improperly? If ICE arrests someone and claims they are illegal, what process checks to see if that's factually legit? 2 Quote
Deluge Posted May 6 Author Report Posted May 6 (edited) 17 hours ago, Matthew said: What process decides if a person is here improperly? If ICE arrests someone and claims they are illegal, what process checks to see if that's factually legit? That's easy, you run through the standard checklist: 1. Black hair? Check. 2. Brown eyes and brown skin? Check. 3. Broken english, little english, or no english at all? Check. 4. No documents or paperwork? Check. 5. South American gangbanger tattoos? Check. The first 4 are enough to get you deported. The 5th is enough to get your ass landed in El Salvador. The process is quite acceptable for normal Americans, but it's the America hating psychopaths that don't get it, and don't want to get it. Edited May 6 by Deluge Quote
Deluge Posted May 6 Author Report Posted May 6 19 hours ago, Hodad said: That's not what "racist" means, nor is DEI racist. Let's talk about that. Discuss how white conservative males fit into DEI. 1 Quote
Deluge Posted May 6 Author Report Posted May 6 20 hours ago, Aristides said: Who is going to stop them when you remove all the oversight and checks the constitution provides. Who is going to stop the lower courts when they neutralize executive powers? The answer is nobody. That's why the Executive Branch needs to investigate the lower judges for treason and other crimes. Only a complete a$$hole would try to stop deportations of illegal aliens - especially violent illegal aliens - and now the President has to waste time chasing down corrupt judges. Quote
CdnFox Posted May 6 Report Posted May 6 19 minutes ago, Deluge said: Let's talk about that. Discuss how white conservative males fit into DEI. Exactly. They might as well have called it LWR instead. Legalized white-male racism. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
User Posted May 6 Report Posted May 6 16 hours ago, Matthew said: What process decides if a person is here improperly? If ICE arrests someone and claims they are illegal, what process checks to see if that's factually legit? First, how disingenuous are you being here? Folks like you only care about "due process" here in as much as you don't care about any process that enforces our border and stops illegal immigration. You want open borders madness. Second, we already have expedited removal processes. If someone is observed illegally crossing the border by border patrol, we do not have to arrest them and spend the next 2 years going through ACLU appeals to deport them. They were observed crossing illegally, have no ability to prove they are citizens, they get deported. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.