gatomontes99 Posted April 21 Report Posted April 21 (edited) This looks really fake. So I ran it through the faked or modified checker at: https://www.fakeimagedetector.com/#google_vignette . It is a fake. So where is Joe? Joe's X post: And it is the exact same suit he wore on April 12 2022 in Des Moines. https://youtu.be/aVHjxyGAAcQ?si=_XriCaad6K-nHekt Why would they photo shop it? Edited April 21 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Moonlight Graham Posted April 21 Report Posted April 21 Says its real for me Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Nationalist Posted April 21 Report Posted April 21 LOL...fake to the very end. Bye bye Joe...you mush-for-brains twit. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted April 21 Report Posted April 21 16 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: This looks really fake. So I ran it through the faked or modified checker at: https://www.fakeimagedetector.com/#google_vignette . It is a fake. So where is Joe? Joe's X post: And it is the exact same suit he wore on April 12 2022 in Des Moines. https://youtu.be/aVHjxyGAAcQ?si=_XriCaad6K-nHekt Why would they photo shop it? He was probably in timeout for misbehavior at Shady Acres Rest Home. Quote
robosmith Posted April 21 Report Posted April 21 19 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Why would they photo shop it? ^Very stupid that you can't figure that out. A. He wanted a family pick and B. He was BUSY elsewhere when the family was together. and C. DUH Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 22 Author Report Posted April 22 4 hours ago, robosmith said: ^Very stupid that you can't figure that out. A. He wanted a family pick and B. He was BUSY elsewhere when the family was together. and C. DUH Ok...you are a parody account. I can't believe I fell for it for this long. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
BeaverFever Posted April 22 Report Posted April 22 Meanwhile in real news Hegseth was caught texting war plans to his wife and brother to show off his cool new job. This what happens when you give the nation’s top jobs massively unqualified hacks who couldn’t manage as much as a McDonalds shift Wouldn't tolerate it': House Republican calls second Hegseth Signal report 'unacceptable' https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wouldnt-tolerate-it-house-republican-calls-second-hegseth-signal-report-unacceptable.amp 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 22 Author Report Posted April 22 20 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Meanwhile in real news Hegseth was caught texting war plans to his wife and brother to show off his cool new job. This what happens when you give the nation’s top jobs massively unqualified hacks who couldn’t manage as much as a McDonalds shift Wouldn't tolerate it': House Republican calls second Hegseth Signal report 'unacceptable' https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wouldnt-tolerate-it-house-republican-calls-second-hegseth-signal-report-unacceptable.amp First, there is a thread on this. Second, when you boil it down, the allegation is that some unnamed source says some unknown information was sent. That's not news. It might not even rise high enough to be classified as a rumor. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted April 22 Author Report Posted April 22 (edited) 22 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said: Says its real for me It does? Did anyone notice the random fingers over the left should of the guy on the top right (just below Joe)? Edited April 22 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.