Carney admits there are only two genders and also confirms that this is Canada for some reason.

[CdnFox]

 

When PP answered this the same way the media and the left went Nanners for a week. 

[CouchPotato]

QueenMandy said he couldn't vote for Poilievre because of this.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

 

When PP answered this the same way the media and the left went Nanners for a week. 

Did he even answer the part about protecting women's sports, bathrooms, etc? 

He seemed to Biden-out there for a while. 

[CouchPotato]

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Did he even answer the part about protecting women's sports, bathrooms, etc? 

He seemed to Biden-out there for a while. 

He hasn't actually said there are two genders. He said "in terms of sex there are two". The left sees sex and gender as distinct.

Edited April 17 by CouchPotato

[WestCanMan]

12 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

He hasn't actually said there are two genders. He said "in terms of sex there are two". The left sees sex and gender as distinct.

I noticed that, but what I didn't see was him answering the question about protecting women's sports, bathrooms, etc. He said some mumbo-jumbo and walked away. 

I don't see how Carney's answer was at all in-line with conservative viewpoints on the topic. 

Which still doesn't mean anything, because even if Carney did give an answer, we'd be fools to take him at his word. 

[CouchPotato]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I noticed that, but what I didn't see was him answering the question

Sure he did. He said "This is Canada uhm uhm uhm."

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Did he even answer the part about protecting women's sports, bathrooms, etc? 

He seemed to Biden-out there for a while. 

He said Generally speaking yes no canada.  Soooo..   i dunno, it must mean SOMEthing....

[TreeBeard]

4 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

He said "in terms of sex there are two".

Why would I need to know this from a politician?  Especially when they’re clearly incorrect.  Generally there are 2 biological sexes, but there are obviously exceptions. Medical conditions, of which Carney is not knowledgeable, make his statement untrue.  

[CouchPotato]

3 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

Why would I need to know this from a politician?  

It may come as a surprise to you but the world does not revolve around you and your feelings about what you need to know. There are other people. Were you criticizing CBC when they asked Pierre the same question?

Quote

Especially when they’re clearly incorrect.  Generally there are 2 biological sexes, but there are obviously exceptions. Medical conditions, of which Carney is not knowledgeable, make his statement untrue.

Are you referring to intersex, for example?

Edited April 17 by CouchPotato

[TreeBeard]

4 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

Are you referring to intersex, for example?

Yes. 

[CouchPotato]

1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

Yes. 

What makes one intersex?

[WestCanMan]

7 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

Why would I need to know this from a politician?  Especially when they’re clearly incorrect.  Generally there are 2 biological sexes, but there are obviously exceptions. Medical conditions, of which Carney is not knowledgeable, make his statement untrue.  

What's untrue is the scenario that leftards present to children: "you can change sexes if you want to".

Do you think that little children see the great distinction between sees and genders that you do, TreeBeard? 

If you talk to a little boy he thinks of his mommy when offered the chance to switch, but he can never be a mommy. 

If you talk to a little girl she thinks of her daddy when offered the chance to switch, but she can never be a daddy. 

Leftards are so vile that they even try to ban the words mother and father in public spaces. "You have to see xhe xhey but you're not allowed to say 'mother'"... 😂 Truth is I'm allowed to say whatever the f I wanna say, and I don't give two shits about any leftard m0r0n's feelings. 

[TreeBeard]

1 hour ago, CouchPotato said:

What makes one intersex?

I don’t care what you think on the topic.  Point is, biological sex is not binary.   There are exceptions. 

[blackbird]

8 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

Generally there are 2 biological sexes, but there are obviously exceptions. Medical conditions, of which Carney is not knowledgeable, make his statement untrue.  

Point is, biological sex is not binary.   There are exceptions. 

So you believe in more than two genders?   Does the Devil have fun with you.

Edited April 17 by blackbird

[TreeBeard]

1 minute ago, blackbird said:

So you believe in more than two genders?   Does the Devil have fun with you.

You’re denying that there are cases where someone is born with both male and female genitalia, for instance?

Edited April 17 by TreeBeard

[blackbird]

4 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

You’re denying that there are cases where someone is born with both male and female genitalia, for instance?

That is a phony argument.  It has nothing to do with it.  It would be extremely rare, maybe one in a million.  It is an anomaly and proves nothing.

The subject is whether there are only two genders, male and female or more than that.  LGBTQ+ and trans probably claim there are more, which you seem to believe.  

[TreeBeard]

7 minutes ago, blackbird said:

It would be extremely rare, maybe one in a million.

No one says it’s common.  But it’s not 1 per million, it’s 1.7%.  In Canada, that means there are around 680,000 intersex people.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/

 

11 minutes ago, blackbird said:

It is an anomaly and proves nothing.

It proves that 600,000+ people in Canada do not fall under the normal two sexes. 
 

12 minutes ago, blackbird said:

The subject is whether there are only two genders

You seem confused…

Do you understand what I typed above about the exceptions to biological sex?   It means that biological sex isn’t binary.  You even said there are rare exceptions.

[CouchPotato]

1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

You’re denying that there are cases where someone is born with both male and female genitalia, for instance?

So they don't have a new third form of genitalia? Intersex is proof of the binary nature of sex. It is an extremely rare medical condition where a person is born with characteristics of one of the two sexes. It is an anomaly. Not a new sex. As I understand it most intersex people speak out against intersex being characterized as it's own sex.

Furthermore, I am not denying that these cases exist. I can fully sympathize with them. But I think you know that this is not what people who are concerned about. Only  a very small percentage of the people who claim to identify as another gender actually suffer from this extremely rare condition. The second question Carney was asked brings up the topic of women's sports. Have you ever seen that 'trans woman' in Canada that started dominating women's powerlifting? And this goes beyond sports as well. If someone can simply claim to be of another gender, and we are told things like 'trans women are real women' then the implications of that are endless.

Edited April 17 by CouchPotato

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

I don’t care what you think on the topic.  Point is, biological sex is not binary.   There are exceptions. 

No, biological sex is binary. 

Intersexed are people who exhibit characteristics of two sexes, they're not a third sex. 

Neuter is when someone has no sex. 

Soowweeeee. Two sexes kiddo. 

[CouchPotato]

1 hour ago, blackbird said:

The subject is whether there are only two genders, male and female or more than that.  LGBTQ+ and trans probably claim there are more, which you seem to believe.  

72 is the most common number I see.

Here is one of them. Caelgender.

Quote

Caelgender: This gender identity shares the qualities or aesthetics of outer space.

https://www.medicinenet.com/what_are_the_72_other_genders/article.htm

[TreeBeard]

42 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Not a new sex.

So what sex are people who have that condition?

[CouchPotato]

2 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

So what sex are people who have that condition?

They are an amalgamation of the two sexes. That's why it's called intersex. And I really don't think that's what the question was about. Do you?

[blackbird]

1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

It proves that 600,000+ people in Canada do not fall under the normal two sexes. 

Haha.   You are lying again.  That figure was pure speculation and from an AMERICAN WEBSITE.  

Do you pay attention to what you look at? 

America has ten times the population of Canada.  There is no 600,000 people in Canada that are born with that abnormality.  Anyway that figure in the U.S. is false.  Some speculated and someone tried to make it sound like a fact on their website.  PUre BS.   Then you read it and said it refers to Canada????

1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

Do you understand what I typed above about the exceptions to biological sex?   It means that biological sex isn’t binary.  You even said there are rare exceptions.

Of course biological sex is binary.  An abnormal birth does not change basic biological facts.   

If a person is born with only one working eye, it doesn't mean there is a new species of one-eyed people.

 

 

[TreeBeard]

5 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

They are an amalgamation of the two sexes. That's why it's called intersex. And I really don't think that's what the question was about. Do you?

So you say biological sex is binary, and then you go on to explain how biological sex isn’t totally binary.  

I think partisan idiocy might be colouring your answer a bit there.  There are good resources online for basic biology.  

[CouchPotato]

3 minutes ago, blackbird said:

 If a person is born with only one working eye, it doesn't mean there is a new species of one-eyed people.

Uhm, excuse me, I identify as a cyclops. Take your bigotry elsewhere.