WestCanMan Posted April 5 Report Posted April 5 www.fakenews.com/joe-can't-know If this is true, it's a scandal for the ages. A WH intern may have accidentally texted actual war plans to Joe Biden while he was president, instead of his fake daily briefing. "A WH intern may have accidentally texted actual war plans to Joe Biden while he was president, instead of his fake daily briefing." - no one The plans could have easily been shared with his Chinese banking associates, or he may have even tried to launch "nukuler weppins" on Ukraine, while not even knowing what continent it's on. "This is nonsense!", an angry Adam Schiff fired back. "His phone was never plugged in!" 2 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
herbie Posted April 5 Report Posted April 5 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: www.fakenews.com/joe-can't-know If this is true, it's a scandal for the ages. The illiterati strike again.... 1 1 2 Quote
WestCanMan Posted April 5 Author Report Posted April 5 32 minutes ago, herbie said: The illiterati strike again.... 😂 Try to click that, genius. It's not even an actual link. I made that whole thing up, including that url, and you were the only person dumb enough to believe it was real. Most people realized that when they saw the toy phone... 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
herbie Posted April 5 Report Posted April 5 No, dummy. By posting that as a topic it made YOU look like a dummy for using a fakenews.com as a reference. Include [/sarc] or unless the reader is so oblivious they've never heard of beaverton or theonion.com it's a lame DUH I was 'joking' after comment. With your history of posting the stupidest most bullshit topics it merely looks like another. Quote
robosmith Posted April 6 Report Posted April 6 9 hours ago, WestCanMan said: 😂 Try to click that, genius. It's not even an actual link. I made that whole thing up, including that url, and you were the only person dumb enough to believe it was real. Most people realized that when they saw the toy phone... Everyone knew it was fake cause baby talk gave it away. Quote
WestCanMan Posted April 6 Author Report Posted April 6 9 hours ago, herbie said: No, dummy. By posting that as a topic it made YOU look like a dummy for using a fakenews.com as a reference. Include [/sarc] or unless the reader is so oblivious they've never heard of beaverton or theonion.com it's a lame DUH I was 'joking' after comment. With your history of posting the stupidest most bullshit topics it merely looks like another. 😂 Nothing that you said made sense. Sorry I used that picture of your phone without permission. 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Everyone knew it was fake cause baby talk gave it away. That was an actual quote from Biden. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
CdnFox Posted April 6 Report Posted April 6 (edited) 10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: 😂 Nothing that you said made sense. Sorry I used that picture of your phone without permission. That was an actual quote from Biden. Well. I see you managed to hook a couple of bottom fish pretty good there At this rate you're going to need a bigger boat And btw, Not only was biden's phone never plugged in but his laptop computer was the latest generation that didn't even NEED to be plugged in. It didn't run on conventional power at all. Fortunately i understand that it was "wiped" regularly. Edited April 6 by CdnFox 1 Quote
robosmith Posted April 6 Report Posted April 6 10 hours ago, WestCanMan said: That was an actual quote from Biden. Biden NEVER emulated your baby talk. Duh Quote
WestCanMan Posted April 6 Author Report Posted April 6 3 hours ago, robosmith said: Biden NEVER emulated your baby talk. Duh Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
robosmith Posted April 6 Report Posted April 6 26 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: ^Not baby talk. Only you type baby talk. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 4 hours ago, robosmith said: ^Not baby talk. Only you type baby talk. You just typed baby talk. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 On 4/5/2025 at 4:23 PM, herbie said: No, dummy. By posting that as a topic it made YOU look like a dummy for using a fakenews.com as a reference. Include [/sarc] or unless the reader is so oblivious they've never heard of beaverton or theonion.com it's a lame DUH I was 'joking' after comment. With your history of posting the stupidest most bullshit topics it merely looks like another. OH MY GAWD! YOU FELL FOR THAT? BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH 1 3 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 31 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: OH MY GAWD! YOU FELL FOR THAT? He considers CNN a "news source". I'd be more surprised if he didn't fall for it. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
CdnFox Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 (edited) 15 hours ago, WestCanMan said: He considers CNN a "news source". I'd be more surprised if he didn't fall for it. He considers the voices in his head a news source. If two of them say the same thing then he considers the story corroborated Edited April 7 by CdnFox 1 Quote
Hodad Posted Sunday at 11:56 PM Report Posted Sunday at 11:56 PM Holy shit. Hegseth, the fool, also texted classified information to his family and friends! He cannot possibly keep the job--for which he is entirely unqualified--any longer. Not even in this clown show of an administration. What an utter embarrassment. The Guardian Before the US launched military strikes on Yemen in March, Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, sent detailed information about the planned attacks to a private Signal group chat that he created himself, which included his wife, his brother and about a dozen other people, 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 12:15 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:15 AM 19 minutes ago, Hodad said: Holy shit. Hegseth, the fool, also texted classified information to his family and friends! He cannot possibly keep the job--for which he is entirely unqualified--any longer. Not even in this clown show of an administration. What an utter embarrassment. The Guardian Before the US launched military strikes on Yemen in March, Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, sent detailed information about the planned attacks to a private Signal group chat that he created himself, which included his wife, his brother and about a dozen other people, Why didn't you include the part that said it was an unnamed source? 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted Monday at 12:21 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:21 AM 5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Why didn't you include the part that said it was an unnamed source? Find out if he's mad because the information was sent to a family member, or if he's mad because the family member wasn't actually selling the information like hunter did Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 12:28 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:28 AM 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: Find out if he's mad because the information was sent to a family member, or if he's mad because the family member wasn't actually selling the information like hunter did He's not mad. No one cares if he said "hey guys, we have some jets taking off to bomb the shìt out of some terrorists." to his friends or family. @Hodad doesn't care about that. What he cares about is that Petey is breaking the DEI and trans bullshit that infected our military and decapitated it. The military is rapidly reforming into a fighting machine and that scares Hodad. What he wants to do is try to get us to call for Pete to resign or be fired because he knows no one will ever listen to him. He is trying to drive a wedge between conservatives, Trump and Hegseth in hopes that someone less effective will run the DOD. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted Monday at 12:32 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:32 AM 17 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Why didn't you include the part that said it was an unnamed source? Nice try. It's confirmed by multiple outlets. Quote
Hodad Posted Monday at 12:35 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:35 AM 4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: He's not mad. No one cares if he said "hey guys, we have some jets taking off to bomb the shìt out of some terrorists." to his friends or family. @Hodad doesn't care about that. What he cares about is that Petey is breaking the DEI and trans bullshit that infected our military and decapitated it. The military is rapidly reforming into a fighting machine and that scares Hodad. What he wants to do is try to get us to call for Pete to resign or be fired because he knows no one will ever listen to him. He is trying to drive a wedge between conservatives, Trump and Hegseth in hopes that someone less effective will run the DOD. No, you're a partisan without principles, so I have no expectation that you would let gross negligence and incompetence nudge you off the part line. As long as you think you are getting your way, you cannot be bothered about the corners cut to get there. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 12:38 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:38 AM 1 minute ago, Hodad said: Nice try. It's confirmed by multiple outlets. It's confirmed that it's an unnamed source? In case your reading comprehension skills are lacking, the Guardian only confirmed the existence of a chat between family members. That isn't confirmation of the some classified information leak. I think it is safe to say that everyone here has at least 10 group chats on their phones. It is also safe to say that none of those group chats have the same information in them. But, let's wait and see what the real story is. This is the same playbook as 16-20. Release some wild asś headline, back it with anonymous sources and move on when it is proven false. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 12:45 AM Report Posted Monday at 12:45 AM (edited) 13 minutes ago, Hodad said: No, you're a partisan without principles, so I have no expectation that you would let gross negligence and incompetence nudge you off the part line. As long as you think you are getting your way, you cannot be bothered about the corners cut to get there. Yes. Actually. I'm about getting my way. These politicians are either a +1 or a -1. Hegseth is a +1 because we need a strong military and soft little bìtches that dress like girls don't meet that need. Also, recruiting is way up. Edited Monday at 12:49 AM by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted Monday at 01:12 AM Report Posted Monday at 01:12 AM (edited) 27 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes. Actually. I'm about getting my way. These politicians are either a +1 or a -1. Hegseth is a +1 because we need a strong military and soft little bìtches that dress like girls don't meet that need. Also, recruiting is way up. The "soft little bìtches" are you gutless wonders, who lack both courage and conviction. Who will sell out the American experiment entirely just to get your way. Pete Hegseth is a haircut. And, evidently, a massive security risk. If you think putting someone utterly unqualified--and dangerously so--in charge of the military makes it a "strong military," you're even dumber than you seem. I'd take a trans service person with strength of character over you creeps any day. They're worth 10 of you. Edited Monday at 01:12 AM by Hodad 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted Monday at 01:14 AM Report Posted Monday at 01:14 AM 1 minute ago, Hodad said: The "soft little bìtches" are you gutless wonders, who lack both courage and conviction. Who will sell out the American experiment entirely just to get your way. Pete Hegseth is a haircut. And, evidently, a massive security risk. If you think putting someone utterly unqualified--and dangerously so--in charge of the military makes it a "strong military," you're even dumber than you seem. I'd take a trans service person with strength of character over you creeps any day. They're worth 10 of you. You just couldn't resist proving me right, could you? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Legato Posted Monday at 01:15 AM Report Posted Monday at 01:15 AM 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Holy shit. Hegseth, the fool, also texted classified information to his family and friends! He cannot possibly keep the job--for which he is entirely unqualified--any longer. Not even in this clown show of an administration. What an utter embarrassment. The Guardian Before the US launched military strikes on Yemen in March, Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, sent detailed information about the planned attacks to a private Signal group chat that he created himself, which included his wife, his brother and about a dozen other people, Petard hoist. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.