Crawford projected winner over Schimel in SCOWI blow to Muskrats $MILLIONS

[User]

27 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Are you so stupid you don't know Justice Crawford was running a campaign for her SCOWI seat?

I donated $25 to her CAMPAIGN 3 days ago. What is it you believe I (and Muskrat) was doing? LMAO

Musk did not donate 20 million to the campaign.

The only ignorance here is yours and Aristides.

Musk spent money in support of the campaign, there are laws and limits on how much can be given to a campaign.

 

 

 

[robosmith]

9 minutes ago, User said:

Musk did not donate 20 million to the campaign.

The only ignorance here is yours and Aristides.

Musk spent money in support of the campaign, there are laws and limits on how much can be given to a campaign.

He donated $20M that was used in the campaign and that is a distinction without a difference. AKA you're NITPICKING and LYING.

[Aristides]

56 minutes ago, User said:

No, they don’t. 

Ya they do. The money came from his own PAC.

[Nationalist]

It's amusing that the Libbies are so happy about a lower level judge. At the same time the Republicans strengthened their hold on congress.

It's all just a tad comical.

[User]

7 hours ago, Aristides said:

Ya they do. The money came from his own PAC.

But did not go to the campaign. 

That is what you claimed. 

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

He donated $20M that was used in the campaign and that is a distinction without a difference. AKA you're NITPICKING and LYING.

No, it is a very important fact when you guys are trying to argue he is buying an election and my position is that he was engaged in free speech. 

His money was used to engage in speech in support of candidates and policies he supports. 

Pointing this out doesn't make me a liar. 

[Aristides]

9 hours ago, User said:

No, they don’t. 

Yes they do, Whenever evidence is presented that contradicts you, just deny it exists. Another MAGA trait.

You can bob and weave and split hairs but the bottom line is you approve of billionaires trying to buy elections, if they are candidates you support.

Edited April 3 by Aristides

[User]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Yes they do, Whenever evidence is presented that contradicts you, just deny it exists. Another MAGA trait.

You can bob and weave and split hairs but the bottom line is you approve of billionaires trying to buy elections, if they are candidates you support.

You have presented no evidence that contradicts me. 

Musk is no more buying an election than some dude standing on a street corner is by using his time, money, and resources to support a particular campaign or policy issue. 

 

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

It's amusing that the Libbies are so happy about a lower level judge. At the same time the Republicans strengthened their hold on congress.

It's all just a tad comical.

She is SCOWI. Highest state judge. Duh

It is pathetic that you believe that is "lower level." 

Just shows how desperate you are since Muskrat was wiped out.

[Nationalist]

Just now, robosmith said:

She is SCOWI. Highest state judge. Duh

It is pathetic that you believe that is "lower level." 

Just shows how desperate you are since Muskrat was wiped out.

you wiped out a muskrat? is your mate wearing its fur?

The judge is going to realize real fast that she's a lower level pee-on.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

you wiped out a muskrat? is your mate wearing its fur?

The judge is going to realize real fast that she's a lower level pee-on.

She is high enough to prevent Wisconsin gerrymandering that gave RepubliCONS lopsided representation in an evenly divided state.

Of course, it doesn't matter what YOU SAY. 👋

[Nationalist]

21 minutes ago, robosmith said:

She is high enough to prevent Wisconsin gerrymandering that gave RepubliCONS lopsided representation in an evenly divided state.

Of course, it doesn't matter what YOU SAY. 👋

then why do you reply?

Hatred?

[robosmith]

Just now, Nationalist said:

then why do you reply?

Hatred?

For those who are tempted to believe your BULLSHIT.

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

For those who are tempted to believe your BULLSHIT.

Well...then they should know that this Libbie judge is soon going to be put in her place.

She'll get b1tchy and redistrict the state...or try to...the Republicans will still win Wisconsin...because the Democrats run around lying and whining...just like you...and the people are sick of your constant hissy-fits.

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Well...then they should know that this Libbie judge is soon going to be put in her place.

She'll get b1tchy and redistrict the state...or try to...the Republicans will still win Wisconsin...because the Democrats run around lying and whining...just like you...and the people are sick of your constant hissy-fits.

Thanks for demonstrating you don't know CRAP about what's going on here. You need to get your head out of the FOS LIES BULLSHIT.

[Nationalist]

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for demonstrating you don't know CRAP about what's going on here. You need to get your head out of the FOS LIES BULLSHIT.

Yes dear

[Deluge]

On 4/1/2025 at 9:06 PM, robosmith said:

$Billions only buys you so much. Strategic error of handing $M checks to buy votes.

I wish the democrats would stop rigging elections. It's un-American. 

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

She is high enough to prevent Wisconsin gerrymandering that gave RepubliCONS lopsided representation in an evenly divided state.

Of course, it doesn't matter what YOU SAY. 👋

Wisconsin's going red. 

Face it, robowoke, your breed is going extinct. 

[robosmith]

56 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Yes dear

^Pu$$y whipped reflex. LMAO

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^Pu$$y whipped reflex. LMAO

yes dear...

[impartialobserver]

This was a surprise to me. Was pleased to see Crawford win but I thought that she would lose when battling Musk. 

[WestCanMan]

On 4/1/2025 at 8:06 PM, robosmith said:

$Billions only buys you so much. Strategic error of handing $M checks to buy votes.

You actually are a cultist, robo. It's sickening the way you carry on. 

On 4/2/2025 at 12:04 PM, Aristides said:

So you have no problem with billionaires trying to buy elections.

Soros's money appointed pro-crime judges all over the US.

Is that a problem?

[robosmith]

35 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You actually are a cultist, robo. It's sickening the way you carry on. 

You don't even know what "cult" means.

So who do you believe is my cult leader? We know who der leader of the MAGA CULT is.

There is NO EQUIVALENT TO Trump in the Democratic Party. Duh

AKA, no cult.

[Nationalist]

On 4/2/2025 at 1:04 PM, Aristides said:

So you have no problem with billionaires trying to buy elections.

You mean like Soros?

What comes around goes around.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You don't even know what "cult" means.

So who do you believe is my cult leader? We know who der leader of the MAGA CULT is.

There is NO EQUIVALENT TO Trump in the Democratic Party. Duh

AKA, no cult.

Your cult leader is CNN, dummy.

What's the last thing that CNN ever said that you questioned? 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Your cult leader is CNN, dummy.

Just cause YOU ARE OBSESSED with CNN doesn't mean that anyone else is.

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

What's the last thing that CNN ever said that you questioned? 

I haven't watched CNN in MONTHS, dummy.

You've been CONNED.

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Just cause YOU ARE OBSESSED with CNN doesn't mean that anyone else is.

I haven't watched CNN in MONTHS, dummy.

You've been CONNED.

You're so dumb you don't even know that all of your media outlets draw from the same sewer. 

Do you think that MSNBC, CNN, WashPo, NYT, etc are independent news outlets, each covering stories without external influence/guidance/control?