Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Prove it. You already said they were convicted. PROVE IT.

They were NOT CONVICTED of any CRIMES. Sorry your "conviction" means NOTHING.

They don't have to be convicted, numbnuts, they just have to be deported.

Since you have a problem with deporting illegal aliens, I suggest you pack your shit and get to El Salvador. Maybe you can offer support and comfort down there. ;) 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, herbie said:

Our usual MAGAtts, as with stupid people, are unable to be convinced by fact or reason.

Well, when you actually try to use facts and reason, let us know. 

  • Like 2

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Prove it. You already said they were convicted. PROVE IT.

They were NOT CONVICTED of any CRIMES. Sorry your "conviction" means NOTHING.

They were convicts. They were gang members. They are gone.

Good riddance.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, herbie said:

Our usual MAGAtts, as with stupid people, are unable to be convinced by fact or reason.

The thought of illegal immigration warms herpes' heart but numbs his brain. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

They were convicts. They were gang members. They are gone.

Good riddance.

Sorry for your disappointment but humans here are Innocent until proven guilty.

And you don't know what they were, because they had NO DUE PROCESS in COURT.

Thanks for admitting you have NO EVIDENCE for YOUR CLAIM they are "convicts."

ABC News says MANY are NOT.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Sorry for your disappointment but humans here are Innocent until proven guilty.

And you don't know what they were, because they had NO DUE PROCESS in COURT.

Thanks for admitting you have NO EVIDENCE for YOUR CLAIM they are "convicts."

ABC News says MANY are NOT.

You don't have to "convict" someone in court every time they illegally enter the country and when they are part of an organized criminal gang invasion, as the President has invoked the Alien Enemies Act, they can be removed. 

Lets be honest here, there is no due process you support that removes folks, you don't care. You want and support this madness. 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Sorry for your disappointment but humans here are Innocent until proven guilty.

And you don't know what they were, because they had NO DUE PROCESS in COURT.

Thanks for admitting you have NO EVIDENCE for YOUR CLAIM they are "convicts."

ABC News says MANY are NOT.

ABC? Ya they're believable.

They were convicts, gang members, criminals and now they're gone.

Boo Hoo.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 minute ago, herbie said:

These are the people who still think driving out the Acadians and interring Japanese Americans was a good idea.

It was DUH law....

Are you comparing the removal of violent criminal gang members to the Japanese internment?

That is a rhetorical question meant to highlight the stupidity of what you are doing. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

ABC? Ya they're believable.

Much more believable than YOU, A-HOLE.

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

They were convicts, gang members, criminals and now they're gone.

Boo Hoo.

YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE FOR ^THIS ACROSS THE BOARD GENERALIZATION, LIAR

  • Sad 1
Posted
13 hours ago, robosmith said:

Sorry for your disappointment but humans here are Innocent until proven guilty.

And you don't know what they were, because they had NO DUE PROCESS in COURT.

Thanks for admitting you have NO EVIDENCE for YOUR CLAIM they are "convicts."

ABC News says MANY are NOT.

Crossing our border illegally is also a crime, robomarx.

ALL illegal aliens are eligible for a trip to El Salvador. 

Now, why don't you get back to sewing your Ukraine flag and try to have a good weekend? 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, User said:

Are you comparing the removal of violent criminal gang members to the Japanese internment?

Yes. Nobody proved they were violent gang members, no one proved any were Japanese spies. They were merely suspected.
Won't be able to see that or be concerned in the slightest either will you?

Gonna stand up next for if you rag a boxcar you're a vandal, tag a Tesla and you're a terrorist next?
How's about when you walk into customs and they decide your papers aren't in order they lock you up for weeks instead of denying you entry? Or deny you entry cuz they found a post that Trump's a POS on your phone? Deport your own citizens for criticizing Israel?

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, herbie said:

Yes. Nobody proved they were violent gang members, no one proved any were Japanese spies. They were merely suspected.
Won't be able to see that or be concerned in the slightest either will you?

Gonna stand up next for if you rag a boxcar you're a vandal, tag a Tesla and you're a terrorist next?
How's about when you walk into customs and they decide your papers aren't in order they lock you up for weeks instead of denying you entry? Or deny you entry cuz they found a post that Trump's a POS on your phone? Deport your own citizens for criticizing Israel?

Japanese people (People of Japanese descent) were not interned because they were all accused of being spies. They were just interned for being Japanese. 

It did not matter if they were suspected of anything or not. Over 100,000 were rounded up and placed in camps just for being Japanese, even if they were Japanese American. 

You are ignorantly comparing two completely different things here. 

 

Edited by User

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, User said:

Japanese people (People of Japanese descent) were not interned because they were all accused of being spies. They were just interned for being Japanese

that might be spies!

OMG you are thick as a f*cking brick.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, herbie said:

that might be spies!

OMG you are thick as a f*cking brick.

You said:

"no one proved any were Japanese spies. They were merely suspected."

Again, no, they were not locked up for merely being suspected of being spies. No one thought all 100,000 plus Japanese Americans were spies. They were merely put into camps for being Japanese. 

It was a blanket prevention against espionage. 

This is not anywhere near the same thing as what Trump is doing... so what is your point other than making a stupid comparison?

 

 

Posted
38 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

We are sending them to the wrong country we should be sending them to Canada since you all love them so much

 

We can't even get them to pony up more $$$ and support for Ukraine, they just whine and cry about America not doing enough. 

 

 

Posted

Look at that, a fascist who claims he's not scrambling to defend the internment of the Japanese American in order to defend illegal deportations by a criminal President.
How low can you go?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, herbie said:

Look at that, a fascist who claims he's not scrambling to defend the internment of the Japanese American in order to defend illegal deportations by a criminal President.
How low can you go?

 

Can you ever engage honestly?

Nowhere was I defending the internment of Japanese Americans. I was pointing out how your comparison of deporting criminal illegal alien gang members to them was dumb. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
On 3/20/2025 at 3:51 PM, robosmith said:

Prove it. You already said they were convicted. PROVE IT.

They were NOT CONVICTED of any CRIMES. Sorry your "conviction" means NOTHING.

They don't have to be convicted to be criminals or deported in regards to immigration law:

https://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/graphics/deportation-explainer/

  • Like 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

They don't have to be convicted to be criminals

But even when they are they can still be President, eh?

Like what a f*cking logical argument you make.
Like arguing that locking people up without proving accusations against them is not like sending people to another country and locking them up there without proving accusations against them is completely different.

"How dare you call us Nazis! Those were Lutonians we sent to the gas chambers, That's completely different !"

  • Thanks 2
Posted
On 3/22/2025 at 2:21 PM, herbie said:

But even when they are they can still be President, eh?

Like what a f*cking logical argument you make.
Like arguing that locking people up without proving accusations against them is not like sending people to another country and locking them up there without proving accusations against them is completely different.

"How dare you call us Nazis! Those were Lutonians we sent to the gas chambers, That's completely different !"

We're shipping their asses out of the country, and that's the only thing that matters.

If they want to sue the US or if you want to help them sue the US then you can do it through Zoom calls or something like that. 

Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

You ever heard of "innocent until PROVEN guilty"?

Nothing in your cite says they are criminals without conviction which is why you never quoted proof of your CLAIM.

Innocent until proven guilty does not apply to immigration law, as my link describes. You can be deported without a hearing, court appearance, etc. In some instances, a Border Patrol, Customs or ICE agent can deport an individual or group.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave L went up a rank
      Contributor
    • dekker99 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dave L went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Dave L went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...