Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wishing EVERYONE a Merry Christmas!🎅 Even if you've been naughty(the left) or nice(conservatives)😉

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
On 12/24/2024 at 6:29 AM, West said:

Why is it that you are so quick to attack Gaetz but will not even entertain the very real evidence of Joe selling out America to the Chinese and the contents of the hunter laptop? Sad. 

Because YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE of wrongdoing by Joe.

There is multiple SWORN testimonies against Gaetz.

On 12/24/2024 at 6:44 AM, Nationalist said:

Don't worry. I have a sneaking suspicion the Trump team is gonna drag a whole bunch of people through the courts. It won't matter if anyone gets convicted. It'll be the "Flynn Play". Drag them through court, bankrupt them and ruin their reputations.

Flynn LIED to the FBI. That is ILLEGAL, doofus.

  • Sad 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Because YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE of wrongdoing by Joe.

There is multiple SWORN testimonies against Gaetz.

Flynn LIED to the FBI. That is ILLEGAL, doofus.

Flynn didn't lie to the FBI. The FBI threatened to jail his son. He then signed an affidavit that he lied.

Quote

Powell and other champions of Flynn’s cause have long claimed he did not lie to investigators — a claim supported by the interviewing FBI agents, who concluded that Flynn had not made intentional misstatements, just failures of recollection, which are common. Instead, they maintain that Flynn was coerced into pleading guilty nearly a year later by special counsel Robert Mueller’s team of hyper-aggressive prosecutors. Prosecutors did this, Powell argues, by threatening that if he refused to plead, they would prosecute his son. The son, also named Michael Flynn, worked in Gen. Flynn’s private intelligence firm, which Team Mueller was scrutinizing over its alleged failure to register with the government as a foreign agent — a dubious allegation that was rarely handled as a criminal offense before Mueller’s probe.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/495366-something-seems-rotten-in-flynns-case-and-maybe-others-too/

Even more to the point, the "lie" was considered a common error by the investigators. The investigators did not seek any charges. They even said so publicly.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Because YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE of wrongdoing by Joe.

There is multiple SWORN testimonies against Gaetz.

Flynn LIED to the FBI. That is ILLEGAL, doofus.

The main bad actors against Gaetz is DOING A PRISON SENTENCE. Just like Avenatti is doing a prison sentence for extortion. 

Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Flynn didn't lie to the FBI. The FBI threatened to jail his son. He then signed an affidavit that he lied.

Even more to the point, the "lie" was considered a common error by the investigators. The investigators did not seek any charges. They even said so publicly.

He was charged and pled guilty to two of them. Trump pardoned him.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

The main bad actors against Gaetz is DOING A PRISON SENTENCE. Just like Avenatti is doing a prison sentence for extortion. 

Gaetz is the main bad actor in Gaetz behavior. Along with his bestie Greenberg. Two peas in a pod. 🤮

Posted
26 minutes ago, Aristides said:

He was charged and pled guilty to two of them. Trump pardoned him.

But the prosecutors forced Flynn to sign the paperwork by threatening to go after his son. What would you have done?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Go after his son for what?

Acting as a foreign agent while working with his dad.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
30 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Gaetz is the main bad actor in Gaetz behavior. Along with his bestie Greenberg. Two peas in a pod. 🤮

Allegedly*

And it was alleged from a criminal now doing prison time. Sad

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Well that’s what you are accusing Hunter Biden of.

The difference is the Flynns didn't hide what they do. The Biden's did and they had an office to use as leverage.

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

The difference is the Flynns didn't hide what they do. The Biden's did and they had an office to use as leverage.

Hid what? 

Quote

 

Since early 2019, Hunter and his father Joe Biden have been the subjects of false and baseless claims of corrupt activities in a Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory pushed by then-U.S. president Donald Trump and his allies.[63] Trump and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani claimed in 2019, without evidence, that Joe Biden had sought the dismissal of Shokin in order to protect his son and Burisma Holdings. Actually, it was the official policy of the United States and the European Union to seek Shokin's removal.[64][54][56][65][66]There has also been no evidence produced of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden in Ukraine.[67][68] The Ukrainian anti-corruption investigation agency stated in September 2019 that its current investigation of Burisma was restricted solely to investigating the period from 2010 to 2012, before Hunter Biden joined Burisma in 2014.[69] Shokin, in May 2019, claimed that he was fired because he had been actively investigating Burisma,[70] but U.S. and Ukrainian officials have stated that the investigation into Burisma was dormant at the time of Shokin's dismissal.[48][70][71] Ukrainian and United States State Department sources note that Shokin was fired for failing to address corruption, including within his office.[65][55][72]

 

Wikipedia

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Sworn testimony before the committee. Duh

Duh The guy had no problem committing a crime..why do you think he wouldn't committ a lesser crime of perjury knowing the Democrats are just as Crooked as he is and have a history of covering up criminal acts?

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Hid what? 

Wikipedia

Lmao...wikipedia? Really? The same Wikipedia that the Indian government said was too biased? Yeah. Try again.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/wikipedia-put-on-notice-by-govt-over-bias-inaccuracies-here-s-what-we-know-so-far/ar-AA1tw9kY

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao...wikipedia? Really? The same Wikipedia that the Indian government said was too biased? Yeah. Try again.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/wikipedia-put-on-notice-by-govt-over-bias-inaccuracies-here-s-what-we-know-so-far/ar-AA1tw9kY

Wow, put on notice by Modi. A government known to interfere in our elections and planned or carried out assassinations of political opponents in both our countries. Most would consider that a badge of honour.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/u-s-assassination-attempt-charges-confirm-trudeau-s-claims-about-india-had-real-substance-former-national-security-advisers-say-1.6670673

Edited by Aristides
  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/23/2024 at 8:38 AM, Politics1990 said:

even his own party people dislike him

Well, that's where the line of responsibility is drawn. Liking and dis, doesn't work in the matters of this significance and impact. If you think and know that it shouldn't happen you have to act to stop it, prevent it from happening and nothing less works or means anything. It had to be the act and it didn't happen. And so what we have in the residue, is the history and the precedents. Next time, or maybe just around the corner it will be worse still. Why wouldn't it? What's there (left) to prevent it?

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Wow, put on notice by Modi. A government known to interfere in our elections and planned or carried out assassinations of political opponents in both our countries. Most would consider that a badge of honour.

Oh this is glorious. Are you telling me that the Indian government assassinated someone on American soil? Really? Who was that and when?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Oh this is glorious. Are you telling me that the Indian government assassinated someone on American soil? Really? Who was that and when?

Try reading the link I posted.

Quote

The indictment of an Indian national for the attempted assassination of a Sikh separatist and dual U.S.-Canadian national “validates” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s allegations that the Indian government may have been involved in the killing of a Canadian citizen as having “real substance,” according to two of Canada’s former national security advisers.

On Wednesday, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it charged Indian national Nikhil Gupta in June in connection with a failed attempt to assassinate a Sikh separatist leader on U.S. soil.

Gupta was also allegedly connected to and working under the direction of an Indian government employee in said “murder-for-hire,” according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Try reading the link I posted.

 

You added the link after I replied. The time tags on the posts prove that.

Now, you implied they inteferred in our election by assassinating someone. They didn't assassinate anyone and it had nothing to do  with our election.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You added the link after I replied. The time tags on the posts prove that.

Now, you implied they inteferred in our election by assassinating someone. They didn't assassinate anyone and it had nothing to do  with our election.

I said they interfered in our election. They assassinated a Sikh separatist in Canada and your own DoJ charged an Indian national with ties to the Indian government with attempting to assassinate a Sikh separatist leader on US soil, which they connected to the assassination in Canada.

Posted

This:

4 hours ago, Aristides said:

Wow, put on notice by Modi. A government known to interfere in our elections and planned or carried out assassinations of political opponents in both our countries. Most would consider that a badge of honour.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/u-s-assassination-attempt-charges-confirm-trudeau-s-claims-about-india-had-real-substance-former-national-security-advisers-say-1.6670673

Does not mean that:

30 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I said they interfered in our election. They assassinated a Sikh separatist in Canada and your own DoJ charged an Indian national with ties to the Indian government with attempting to assassinate a Sikh separatist leader on US soil, which they connected to the assassination in Canada.

Maybe that is what you meant to say. But that isn't what you said.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...