gatomontes99 Posted October 31, 2024 Report Posted October 31, 2024 Quote https://nypost.com/2024/09/24/business/nancy-pelosis-husband-sold-500k-in-visa-stock-before-dojs-antitrust-suit/ Nancy Pelosi’s husband unloaded more than $500,000 worth of Visa stock — less than three months before the credit card giant was slapped with federal antitrust charges, public documents show. Visa was hit with a lawsuit on Tuesday that alleged the company has illegally monopolized the debit card market — the culmination of a years-long review conducted by the Justice Department’s antitrust unit. The swamp doing what the swamp do. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted October 31, 2024 Report Posted October 31, 2024 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: The swamp doing what the swamp do. The Pelosis' record of investing with Visa has been impeccable. It's almost like she has a crystal ball inside 'er trading app on her phone. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
robosmith Posted October 31, 2024 Report Posted October 31, 2024 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: The swamp doing what the swamp do. Was the year's long DoJ investigation SECRET? IF it wasn't, the trading wasn't non-public info. Duh Quote
WestCanMan Posted October 31, 2024 Report Posted October 31, 2024 Pelosi's original Visa scandal, right from CNN: https://www.ccn.com/throwback-thursday-nancy-pelosis-2008-quid-pro-quo-visa/ Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
gatomontes99 Posted October 31, 2024 Author Report Posted October 31, 2024 (edited) 27 minutes ago, robosmith said: Was the year's long DoJ investigation SECRET? IF it wasn't, the trading wasn't non-public info. Duh Trump paid hookers to pee on a bed, was a spy for Russia and beholden to China you believe. But, Pelosi, who has acces to federal investigations, just happens to make a perfectly timed trade just before it was made public that there was an investigation and that is incrediulous? Edited October 31, 2024 by gatomontes99 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
WestCanMan Posted October 31, 2024 Report Posted October 31, 2024 9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Trump paid hookers to pee on a bed, was a spy for Russia and beholden to China you believe. But, Pelosi, who has acces to feferal investigations, just happens to make a perfectly timed trade just before it was made public that there was an investigation and that is incrediulous? What's going on inside of robo's head has nothing to do with reality. He seems to profit while others are experiencing loss. He must be an undertaker or something. Business "booms" when there are wars, economic hardship, drug addiction and homelessness. That's why he likes the Dems. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Aristides Posted October 31, 2024 Report Posted October 31, 2024 Well then they screwed up because it is up 2.5% since then. Quote
robosmith Posted October 31, 2024 Report Posted October 31, 2024 43 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Trump paid hookers to pee on a bed, was a spy for Russia and beholden to China you believe. You don't get to tell me what I believe. Duh 43 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: But, Pelosi, who has acces to federal investigations, just happens to make a perfectly timed trade just before it was made public that there was an investigation and that is incrediulous? It was a "years long review" and three months before charges were filed. YOUR CITE: Quote the culmination of a years-long review conducted by the Justice Department’s antitrust unit. Any number of sources may have leaked a DoJ investigation. Public KNOWLEDGE July 26, 2023 Duh: DOJ Continues to Probe Visa Over Debit Cards, Other ... PYMNTS.com https://www.pymnts.com › antitrust › doj-continues-pro... Jul 26, 2023 — Visa is reportedly under continued scrutiny by the US Department of Justice. A new civil investigative demand, similar to a subpoena, was filed May 2. Anyone could have guessed that charges were imminent during "a years-long review" . Duh Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 31, 2024 Author Report Posted October 31, 2024 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: You don't get to tell me what I believe. Duh It was a "years long review" and three months before charges were filed. YOUR CITE: Any number of sources may have leaked a DoJ investigation. Public KNOWLEDGE July 26, 2023 Duh: DOJ Continues to Probe Visa Over Debit Cards, Other ... PYMNTS.com https://www.pymnts.com › antitrust › doj-continues-pro... Jul 26, 2023 — Visa is reportedly under continued scrutiny by the US Department of Justice. A new civil investigative demand, similar to a subpoena, was filed May 2. Anyone could have guessed that charges were imminent during "a years-long review" . Duh I'm not telling you what you believe. You told me. And you didn't deny it. She didn't need anyone to leak it. She just waited for the call. She knew. She didn't guess. She didn't get lucky. She told her husband what she knew and he made the trade. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted November 1, 2024 Report Posted November 1, 2024 (edited) 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: I'm not telling you what you believe. You told me. And you didn't deny it. I didn't say I believe the things you claim, LIAR. 6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: She didn't need anyone to leak it. She just waited for the call. She knew. She didn't guess. She didn't get lucky. She told her husband what she knew and he made the trade. You HAVE NO PROOF of ^this, LIAR I posted PROOF that the investigation was public knowledge long before Pelosi sold the stock. DUH Edited November 1, 2024 by robosmith Quote
gatomontes99 Posted November 1, 2024 Author Report Posted November 1, 2024 5 hours ago, robosmith said: I didn't say I believe the things you claim, LIAR. You HAVE NO PROOF of ^this, LIAR I posted PROOF that the investigation was public knowledge long before Pelosi sold the stock. DUH Weird. You didn't need proof for all those things above. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted November 1, 2024 Author Report Posted November 1, 2024 6 hours ago, robosmith said: I didn't say I believe the things you claim, LIAR. Really? Then why did you post these things? Clear findings of collusion: On 9/27/2024 at 11:30 PM, robosmith said: Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election AKA clear findings of COLLUSION between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence, as detailed in Chapters 4-6 of the full committee report. (u)report Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (.gov) https://www.intelligence.senate.gov › documents PDF Aug 18, 2020 — ... Russia interfered in .the 2016 U.S. election. vi. COMMITTEE SENSITIVE-RUSSIA INVESTIGATION ONLY. Page 7. COMMITTEE SENSITIVE - RUSSIA ... 966 pages But gatomontes99 pretends that one paragraph authored by 5 RepubliCON Senators which was NOT agreed to by other committee members like the above conclusions, takes precedence and in desperation calls posters who point that out "batshit crazy." When HE'S LOSING THE DEBATE, it is gatomontes99 who goes batshit crazy. Russia scandal wasn't made up: On 4/19/2024 at 9:42 PM, robosmith said: The Media Did Not Make Up Trump’s Russia Scandal Of course, ^this truth won't stop the DESPERATE DENIAL by the MAGA CULT here. 🤮 Trump beholden to China: On 3/21/2024 at 11:41 AM, robosmith said: Working for the Chinese government is NOT illegal. We all know that Trump has taken millions from Communist China. OTOH, selling classified documents is blatantly illegal. But thanks for inventing another creative way to EVADE answering the question. Thanks for demonstrating your lDIODIC PARTISAN HACKERY once again. The Steel Dossier was the source of the pee tape rumor and you claim that wasn't disproven: On 8/27/2024 at 12:05 PM, robosmith said: Show us "information that disproved the Steele dossier." YOU'VE CITED NOTHING to support your bogus CLAIM. So, exactly how did I lie? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Aristides Posted November 1, 2024 Report Posted November 1, 2024 (edited) Which means they sold in August when it was at its yearly low of $253. Yesterday it closed a $289, up $33 since they sold. It took a $3 hit when the suit was announced and has since gone up $8. Looks like they panicked because of the sinking price at the time, not some inside info. I have VISA in my US portfolio. I don't remember when we bought it but it's up 450% since then. Perhaps another reason to sell. Much easier to jump on some kind of conspiracy theory than actually do some research. Edited November 1, 2024 by Aristides Quote
ironstone Posted November 1, 2024 Report Posted November 1, 2024 This never gets old. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Aristides Posted November 1, 2024 Report Posted November 1, 2024 VISA is up another 1/4% so far today. Quote
ironstone Posted November 1, 2024 Report Posted November 1, 2024 To be fair, a lot of politicians on both sides do very well when it comes to investing. They do have a big 'inside' advantage over the regular folks. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/members-congress-outperformed-p-500-182024981.html?guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABVCYBMEwvIzRzEldvfoxNRyY43jqkX49NJS9UziqAoea1nGPhos4-XH1ThKTupgG3sCUgG9MH9t3GialtmZ4B5JrD6p63OMztBR_WLkdp5W4HOh2_-ivZck6rVnhUoTHvBIs2B4peV6VYKap4iVEuwrAtKK2Ds4UtOBdG69wOw4&_guc_consent_skip=1730473917 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Aristides Posted November 1, 2024 Report Posted November 1, 2024 (edited) Visa pays a crap dividend, less than 1% so capital gain is the only reason to buy it. If they bought around 10 years ago like I did, they had already made a bundle. Maybe they wanted the cash to invest in something else, maybe Mama wants a new Ferrari. They aren't getting any younger and you can't take it with you. Who knows why people sell. Edited November 1, 2024 by Aristides Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.