TRUMP CATCHES HARRIS IN NATIONAL POLLING!

[User]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

And the only time I've referenced polls before that was to correct others who were using polls to try and paint a rosy picture of Trump's chances. Sorry sweetie, no cookie today.

So, polls are good when they support your position... meaningless when they don't. ROFL

Thanks for confirming what I just said. 

 

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's an edited podcast. You can see it's edited right? You think they're going to leave anything that make shim look bad in there? Holy shit dude, lmao.

You didn't watch it, Dummy. Just admit that much.

You don't have a reasonable critique of it so you're running your mouth now.

Black Dummy: "Oooh, don't you see this thing? If you don't see this thing then I will mock you, buddy!"

No, I don't see the big edits that you're talking about. Not at all.

Edits that matter are like when 60 minutes asks Kamala 6 or 7 questions and then eliminates the first 30 seconds of her answers to some of them.

Kamala's entire interviews are bad. They're just a series of easy questions with rambling, incoherent, off-topic replies which eventually offend the interviewers to the point where they start taking shots at her. 

I'll tell you this: it always becomes evident while watching a Kamala interview that her interviewers start liking her less and less. At some point they start to hate her. 

If you were sitting there trying to lob softball questions to her and she was refusing to just give the easy answers with a bit of sincerity and clarity, and then she even started getting rude, you'd eventually feel like "enough is enough. If this b1tch wants to ignore my questions and then bark at me, I'm gonna stick her with some real questions that she can't answer."

I bet you that it wasn't AC's intention to make Kamala look like a dummy going into that interview. His j-o-b was to make Kamala look good. She was supposed to have a candidacy-defining moment and jump ahead in polling, never to look bad. 

CNN has thousands of hours invested in making Kamala president. The last thing they wanted was for AC to ask her point blank: "But you're spending $650M on building walls now. Are they still stupid?"

A low-IQ liar like yourself, with your precious iron dome confirmation bias, might not realize how damning that question was, but the president's job is always to do smart things. That's the main responsibility of a leader. But those guys took the materials that Trump had already purchased and sold them off for pennies on the dollar, now Kamala's new plan is to buy all of that stuff again and continue with Trump's "stupid" plan. 

They bought that stuff, sold it all for cheap, and now they have to buy it all again. Not only that, those walls should have been up for the past 4 years. So in addition to the fact that they're re-purchasing all that stuff, they just went 4 years without it. 

That's catastrophically stupid. And then Kamala pretended that she couldn't think of any mistakes that they made. FFS, there were dozens. She laughed inappropriately at the worst moments, she didn't visit the border, she didn't raise awareness of Joe's cognitive inability, obviously the whole border wall fiasco, the litany of Trump border protections that they got rid of, spending their way to runaway inflation, etc, etc. 

She just can't be real. The reason that she has to say things like 'her border experience includes prosecuting trans-national gangs' is because whatever experience that gave her, it didn't help her secure the border for the last 4 years. She failed. FAAAAAY-ullllled.

You're hopeless.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Alternate reality shit right here.

Actually reality shit.  But - of course for you reality IS your alternate reality  

Quote

Sorry to tell you Sigmund Fraud, but all it means is i think it would be funny if you were dead. I'm only saying what your parents are thinking.

We all know what it actually means little guy    Hope you feel better  

Quote

Save some copium for the rest of you people.

Can't - been handing it out to you lefties in bucketfulls. Seems like you really need it these days  

Quote

There's actually lots of doubt considering even the polls show it's a coin flip and that's assuming the polls are right (and they aren't).

There's not much doubt and if you know how to read the polls it's looking very very bad for Kammy.  Anything can happen in an election but i think vegas has her at about a 39 percent chance and falling.

 

And everything that's happening is exactly as I predicted. And I gave my reasons for my predictions which haven't changed.

You never know, trump could do something absolutely insane and blow it, or someone could find a notebook or the like on october 28th, we've seen it before. But barring a near miracle, she's done. 

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

 

And the only time I've referenced polls before that was to correct others who were using polls to try and paint a rosy picture of Trump's chances. Sorry sweetie, no cookie today.

She can't approved him right there. The reference the poll And basically said it's actually good news because Biden needed less to beat him. And you said the poles were heavily skewed not that they don't matter. So you obviously felt that they do matter

So he was right. And you literally posted the proof of it

You been doing that a lot lately  

[Deluge]

16 hours ago, Black Dog said:

lol a lot of you dummies are gonna be shocked when you see how bad the poll numbers were off after election day.

Trump's campaign is a mess, his public appearances are increasingly shambolic, his ground game is in the hands of incompetent grifters and we're expected to believe he's gaining ground because a bunch of polls with 300 person sample and a 1% response rate are gassing him up? Watch the game, nerds.

That's interesting, braindead dog. 

Show me the REAL poll.  

[Fluffypants]

12 hours ago, User said:

So, polls are good when they support your position... meaningless when they don't. ROFL

Thanks for confirming what I just said. 

 

What a lot of people don't know is that polls originally werent publicized they were all internal to see where they stand now everyone and their grandma has a poll all with different methodologies, now it's a fight over who was oversampled and who was conducting the poll.

Honestly i take them all with a grain of salt in 2016 and 2020 the polls were way off in favor of the Democrat candidate. Does that mean it is going to happen this year? Maybe they overcorrected and now they favor Trump or maybe that it is just right where they will be close.

All polls are to me are just bets on the outcome and the one that comes closest will become the polling darling until the next election.

Edited October 25, 2024 by Fluffypants

[User]

3 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

All polls are to me are just bets on the outcome and the one that comes closest will become the polling darling until the next election.

Polls are like weather forecasts. They are not always accurate, but they provide a good indication of what is likely to happen. They also give an indication of momentum or direction. 

The more polls you have, the better, which is where the averages of all the polling agencies really help too. 

Still, not gospel to live by, but one of the better things we have to have any idea of what is going on. 

[Black Dog]

15 hours ago, User said:

So, polls are good when they support your position... meaningless when they don't. ROFL

Thanks for confirming what I just said. 

I see your reading comprehension and argument skills have not improved. Oh well, guess I'll check back on you in a few months.

[User]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

I see your reading comprehension and argument skills have not improved. Oh well, guess I'll check back on you in a few months.

Is that when you will flip-flop and start using polls to support your position?

 

[Black Dog]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You didn't watch it, Dummy. Just admit that much.

I'm not watching 90 minutes of some d-list comics sucking off trump, it's true.

Quote

You don't have a reasonable critique of it so you're running your mouth now.

LOL you used a heavily edited podcast episode to demonstrate Trump's mental fitness and ignore the obvious signs of his declined which you see whenever he isn't in a friendly environment has to speak extemporaneously. Dolt.

Quote

 

Black Dummy: "Oooh, don't you see this thing? If you don't see this thing then I will mock you, buddy!"

No, I don't see the big edits that you're talking about. Not at all.

 

 

It's literally edited into different segments.

Quote

 

Edits that matter are like when 60 minutes asks Kamala 6 or 7 questions and then eliminates the first 30 seconds of her answers to some of them.

Kamala's entire interviews are bad. They're just a series of easy questions with rambling, incoherent, off-topic replies which eventually offend the interviewers to the point where they start taking shots at her. 

I'll tell you this: it always becomes evident while watching a Kamala interview that her interviewers start liking her less and less. At some point they start to hate her. 

If you were sitting there trying to lob softball questions to her and she was refusing to just give the easy answers with a bit of sincerity and clarity, and then she even started getting rude, you'd eventually feel like "enough is enough. If this b1tch wants to ignore my questions and then bark at me, I'm gonna stick her with some real questions that she can't answer."

I bet you that it wasn't AC's intention to make Kamala look like a dummy going into that interview. His j-o-b was to make Kamala look good. She was supposed to have a candidacy-defining moment and jump ahead in polling, never to look bad. 

CNN has thousands of hours invested in making Kamala president. The last thing they wanted was for AC to ask her point blank: "But you're spending $650M on building walls now. Are they still stupid?"

A low-IQ liar like yourself, with your precious iron dome confirmation bias, might not realize how damning that question was, but the president's job is always to do smart things. That's the main responsibility of a leader. But those guys took the materials that Trump had already purchased and sold them off for pennies on the dollar, now Kamala's new plan is to buy all of that stuff again and continue with Trump's "stupid" plan. 

They bought that stuff, sold it all for cheap, and now they have to buy it all again. Not only that, those walls should have been up for the past 4 years. So in addition to the fact that they're re-purchasing all that stuff, they just went 4 years without it. 

That's catastrophically stupid. And then Kamala pretended that she couldn't think of any mistakes that they made. FFS, there were dozens. She laughed inappropriately at the worst moments, she didn't visit the border, she didn't raise awareness of Joe's cognitive inability, obviously the whole border wall fiasco, the litany of Trump border protections that they got rid of, spending their way to runaway inflation, etc, etc. 

She just can't be real. The reason that she has to say things like 'her border experience includes prosecuting trans-national gangs' is because whatever experience that gave her, it didn't help her secure the border for the last 4 years. She failed. FAAAAAY-ullllled.

You're hopeless.

 

When will you learn: ain't no one reading all that bullshit. I'll also add I bet none of that has anything to do with Trump's obvious cognitive decline.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, User said:

Is that when you will flip-flop and start using polls to support your position?

 

Absolutely - and his position will be Trump stole the election because he did better than the polls said and that's proof