Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Welp, this is what happens when you speak out against a female's right to slaughter its unborn child. 

 

It's kind of a sad argument to say "win it at the ballot box". 

Part of raising awareness to injustice is to protest. The FACE act in and of itself is a violation of the first ammendment in the US. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, West said:

It's kind of a sad argument to say "win it at the ballot box". 

Part of raising awareness to injustice is to protest. The FACE act in and of itself is a violation of the first ammendment in the US. 

democrats hate the 1st Amendment, so you see what we're up against. 

Posted

I agree that the ballot box is where you enact change. But where you garner support occurs in various places. Protesting at a clinic is a right. Blocking access to legal services is not.

That said, that should be a ticket, maybe a couple of nights. Look at what happened to Columbia students that blocked access to legal services based on religious bigotry. Did they get 41 months in prison? They didn't even get suspended.

The disproportionate use of the criminal code that seems to align with political affiliation is a serious problem. Hopefully we are in the final days of that ugly chapter of American history.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
48 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I agree that the ballot box is where you enact change. But where you garner support occurs in various places. Protesting at a clinic is a right. Blocking access to legal services is not.

That said, that should be a ticket, maybe a couple of nights. Look at what happened to Columbia students that blocked access to legal services based on religious bigotry. Did they get 41 months in prison? They didn't even get suspended.

The disproportionate use of the criminal code that seems to align with political affiliation is a serious problem. Hopefully we are in the final days of that ugly chapter of American history.

Exactly. 

This alone should be a crime and violation of human rights

Posted
4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I agree that the ballot box is where you enact change. But where you garner support occurs in various places. Protesting at a clinic is a right. Blocking access to legal services is not.

That said, that should be a ticket, maybe a couple of nights. Look at what happened to Columbia students that blocked access to legal services based on religious bigotry. Did they get 41 months in prison? They didn't even get suspended.

The disproportionate use of the criminal code that seems to align with political affiliation is a serious problem. Hopefully we are in the final days of that ugly chapter of American history.

"blocked access to legal services" is in no way similar to blocking access to medical services.

One is hugely time critical, and other is NOT. 

That's why you don't see vehicles with lights flashing on the road to take you to your lawyer's office. Duh

And that's why your post is OBVIOUSLY completely agenda driven.

Posted
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

"blocked access to legal services" is in no way similar to blocking access to medical services.

One is hugely time critical, and other is NOT. 

That's why you don't see vehicles with lights flashing on the road to take you to your lawyer's office. Duh

And that's why your post is OBVIOUSLY completely agenda driven.

Not legal services as in a lawyer. Legal services as in services that are legal. More-on.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Not legal services as in a lawyer. Legal services as in services that are legal. More-on.

Oh, so you mean JUST any kind of SERVICES. AKA freedom to walk where you want.

You should say THAT.

Too bad that's not illegal in all cases. In MOST CASES, the person can just come back after the protest ends.

Or find a different path....

Posted
26 minutes ago, herbie said:

People wishing to impose their will on others deserve to suffer.

Do you realize what you're saying? That's the left's whole stick. Your personal entire existence is based around you trying to impose your will on others.

Your hypocrisy could power a large city. If we could find a way to harness it You would be the ultimate renewable resource

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Honestly I Am of two minds

Yes I believe there is a huge double standard and that is absolutely morally reprehensible. I think the democrats should go to jail or go to hell or both for propagating that.

No, I don't think it's your right to protest wherever you want. I do believe that the government has the right to put bubble zones around areas where your protest interferes with the rights of others. People have the right to medical servces even if you disagree with those services and you should not be allowed to interfere in any way shape or form with that.

I agree 100% that the place to make change is the valid box not these ignorant Childish protests that we see all the time. People now think that they're unhappy they should go protest and it's wrong when the left does it and it's wrong when the right does it. Organize and pass a law or strike a law down if that's what you want

If you are a single stay at home mother who's critical to your family then if you go and deliberately and knowingly break the law and get arrested and get the book thrown at you you have no one to blame but yourself. I have absolutely no sympathy considering she deliberately broke the law knowing what the consequences are. If you don't want to do the time don't do the crime.

If you feel the law is unconstitutional, you do have the legal right to go and deliberately break that law, be arrested, and then challenge the constitutionality of that law in court. That level of civil disobedience is recognized by Canadian law. But you better have your act together and your lawyers ready to go before you start. If you just get caught doing something and then show up later at court and demand that it's civil disobedience  then it isn't.

I would actually like to see more bubble zones. I would like to see a law that says you cannot protest within 100 m of the Prime Minister for example or even any political person. Our politicians are not there to be personally abused. I wouldn't tolerate someone coming out and behaving threateningly to one of my workers why should I allow it for one of my politicians even if it is someone is scummy as Trudeau.

Posted
25 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Do you realize what you're saying? That's the left's whole stick. Your personal entire existence is based around you trying to impose your will on others.

Your hypocrisy could power a large city. If we could find a way to harness it You would be the ultimate renewable resource

I was going to write just about the exact same thing. Holly cow. They have no self awareness.

  • Thanks 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,857
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Tony Eveland
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...