gatomontes99 Posted October 12, 2024 Report Posted October 12, 2024 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: Yes. He's saying that we, and i mean we ALL, and by all i mean all of we, must consider the significance of the moment in which Westcan, and by westcan i mean westcanman, and by westcanman i mean WCM, has communicated the essence of the statement that he felt the moment in time, and by time i mean the magazine, which is very significant, imparted so that we could grow in our understandingness. I thought that was very obviously implied. I like cauliflower crusted pizza. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted October 12, 2024 Report Posted October 12, 2024 4 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: I like cauliflower crusted pizza. Well now I'm REALLY Not voting for you. 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted October 12, 2024 Report Posted October 12, 2024 It's ol, I've canceled out your vote with your great great great grandparents' votes. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted October 12, 2024 Report Posted October 12, 2024 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: It's ol, I've canceled out your vote with your great great great grandparents' votes. Goddamit! That's just what he would do too, he always was a big cauliflower fan. Curse you! You may have tied up the Cruciferous vegetable vote and won this round but i'll be back! Cauliflower on pizza is barely one step up from people who put salt on cantaloupe and i WILL not let that stand!!! 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted October 14, 2024 Author Report Posted October 14, 2024 On 10/11/2024 at 2:10 PM, gatomontes99 said: Does anyone know what this id1ot is rambling on about? Clearly you lDIOT is rambling about your FAILURE to understand the subject of this thread. You see, back when I first started posting here, I told WCM he's a fool to believe Trump due to the 30,000+ LIES he's told as documented by WAPO. He then pretended to prove that one of the LIES was actually true and that negated ALL of the REST CLAIMED. AKA they were all true statements. He pretended an ABC NEWS video posted showed Trump's dry hair and that proved it didn't rain just like Trump LIED about. But later I showed him the RAINDROPS on a chair in the SAME VIDEO and of course told him about the LOGICAL FALLACY of pretending that one of the LIES being a true statement negated the entire rest of the claimed LIES. IF @WestCanMan REALLY WANTS to LOGICALLY BELIEVE Trump, YOU HAVE TO PROVE the vast majority of the 30,000 documented LIES are actually true statements. Otherwise the only LOGICAL CONCLUSION is Trump is a pathological LIAR. Quote
Nationalist Posted October 14, 2024 Report Posted October 14, 2024 On 10/10/2024 at 6:25 PM, robosmith said: Didn't ask you, troll. Your posts always lack substance. LOL!!! Now that's funny. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted October 14, 2024 Report Posted October 14, 2024 (edited) On 10/10/2024 at 12:09 AM, robosmith said: Trying to defend Trump's 30,000+ lies did not go well for WCM WCM thought he could neutralize the dishonesty of Trump's 30,000+ LIES documented by WAPO by proving one of the first 2 was actually a true statement. But then HIS EVIDENCE proved that Trump's LIE was in FACT FALSE and it did rain at Trump's inauguration. Now that it's clear he FAILED with that strategy, there are still 30,000+ Trump lies, none of which have been proven true statements. Yet WCM keeps nitpicking away at Kamila Harris's minor miscues while ignoring the FACT of the orders of magnitude more of Trump's. What is the bible says about criticizing the mote in another's eye when there is a LOG in their own? "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?" Trump's exaggerations are the least of Americas problems. We've got a democrat problem that's metastasized into wokeness cancer. It started with the Clintons, then it flared up during Hussein & Michael Obama's occupation; now it's a full blown epidemic. It is America's duty to vote these cultists out before the entire country is overrun by drug lords and marxist homosexuals. Edited October 14, 2024 by Deluge Quote
CdnFox Posted October 14, 2024 Report Posted October 14, 2024 9 hours ago, robosmith said: IF @WestCanMan REALLY WANTS to LOGICALLY BELIEVE Trump, YOU HAVE TO PROVE the vast majority of the 30,000 documented LIES are actually true statements. Otherwise the only LOGICAL CONCLUSION is Trump is a pathological LIAR. No he doesn't. He just has to believe that they're not substantially true or not relevant. He doesn't have to show anything. You lie all the time robosmith. Like constantly. Yet you would probably disagree with the statement that this means you're a pathological liar. Biden and Kamala like all the time even when proof has been provided that what they're saying is wrong. Does that make them pathological liars? You seem to be a bit of a hypocrite when it comes to this Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted October 14, 2024 Author Report Posted October 14, 2024 5 hours ago, Nationalist said: LOL!!! Now that's funny. Now ^that's BANKRUPT, AGAIN. 4 hours ago, Deluge said: Trump's exaggerations are the least of Americas problems. We've got a democrat problem that's metastasized into wokeness cancer. It started with the Clintons, then it flared up during Hussein & Michael Obama's occupation; now it's a full blown epidemic. It is America's duty to vote these cultists out before the entire country is overrun by drug lords and marxist homosexuals. Go back to sleep, ^MAGA CULT MAN. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 14, 2024 Report Posted October 14, 2024 11 hours ago, robosmith said: Clearly you lDIOT is rambling about your FAILURE to understand the subject of this thread. You see, back when I first started posting here, I told WCM he's a fool to believe Trump due to the 30,000+ LIES he's told as documented by WAPO. He then pretended to prove that one of the LIES was actually true and that negated ALL of the REST CLAIMED. AKA they were all true statements. He pretended an ABC NEWS video posted showed Trump's dry hair and that proved it didn't rain just like Trump LIED about. But later I showed him the RAINDROPS on a chair in the SAME VIDEO and of course told him about the LOGICAL FALLACY of pretending that one of the LIES being a true statement negated the entire rest of the claimed LIES. IF @WestCanMan REALLY WANTS to LOGICALLY BELIEVE Trump, YOU HAVE TO PROVE the vast majority of the 30,000 documented LIES are actually true statements. Otherwise the only LOGICAL CONCLUSION is Trump is a pathological LIAR. You are talking about the WAPO mischaracterization of what a lie is. Ok, now we are getting somewhere. Trump uses a lot of words colloquially. He described the economy as the best in history. The best is subjective and debateable. But WAPO decided that there were 3 better economies. So, every time Trump said it was the best economy ever, they called it a lie. Quote Among the most repeated false claims that Trump spread was that he was responsible for the greatest economy in history. As the Post notes, former Presidents Eisenhower, Johnson and Clinton all were responsible for larger economic growth than Trump when using modern metrics. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/535081-wapost-counts-30573-false-or-misleading-claims-in-four-years-by-trump/ Now, the Hill is wrong in not mentioning the Reagan economy that dwarfs the Clinton and Johnson economies. Does that make them a liar or does it just show they are biased in their opinion of what is a good economy? It shows their bias. Since the majority of the lies were about how much he loved his economy, in his opinion, the majority of the 30k lies is debunked. Many of the others are very similar in their characteristics. Trump, the realtor, loves to brag about his stuff being the best. They are opinions, but the WAPO called them lies because their opinion differed. It was TDS on full display. Frankly, I'm not surprised you fell for it. Even after the Steele Dossier has been resounding dismissed as fiction, the lies about a blood bath and fine people have been revealed you still repeat them as if they are truth. The irony of you....YOU...caring about honesty is just thick. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted October 14, 2024 Author Report Posted October 14, 2024 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: You are talking about the WAPO mischaracterization of what a lie is. Ok, now we are getting somewhere. WAPO said "lie or misleading statements." Only difference is the POSSIBILITY of being unaware of the falseness, of which I will not give the benefit of the doubt. 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Trump uses a lot of words colloquially. He described the economy as the best in history. The best is subjective and debateable. But WAPO decided that there were 3 better economies. So, every time Trump said it was the best economy ever, they called it a lie. There are reasonable and ACCEPTED metrics for "the best economy." YOU are stretching to defend Trump when the patterns of behavior do NOT justify that. 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Now, the Hill is wrong in not mentioning the Reagan economy that dwarfs the Clinton and Johnson economies. Does that make them a liar or does it just show they are biased in their opinion of what is a good economy? It shows their bias. Did they say their list of better economies was EXCLUSIVE. I don't believe they did and you didn't say they did, so again you are STRETCHING. 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Since the majority of the lies were about how much he loved his economy, in his opinion, the majority of the 30k lies is debunked. Did he use that "love" word? Again YOUR stretching is unjustified. 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Many of the others are very similar in their characteristics. Trump, the realtor, loves to brag about his stuff being the best. They are opinions, but the WAPO called them lies because their opinion differed. It was TDS on full display. Far from it. When Trump claims his tower has more floors or his penthouse is 3x larger than it really is, those are LIES. 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Frankly, I'm not surprised you fell for it. Even after the Steele Dossier has been resounding dismissed as fiction, So far only one item in the Dossier is accepted as being proven false. 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: the lies about a blood bath and fine people have been revealed you still repeat them as if they are truth. The irony of you....YOU...caring about honesty is just thick. You believing your OPINION is the definitive truth is what makes YOU THICK. The FACT is, WAPO's list is reputable and documented, and your OPINION lacks credibility. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted October 14, 2024 Report Posted October 14, 2024 1 hour ago, robosmith said: WAPO said "lie or misleading statements." Only difference is the POSSIBILITY of being unaware of the falseness, of which I will not give the benefit of the doubt. bility. Oh. So now it is misleading statements? If you weren't lying, you wouldn't have to keep moving the bar. Who wrote this? Quote Trying to defend Trump's 30,000+ lies did not go well for WCM Quote There are reasonable and ACCEPTED metrics for "the best economy." YOU are stretching to defend Trump when the patterns of behavior do NOT justify that. Ok. But what metrics are most important? Trump had tremendous wage growth among minorities. Did Johnson or Clinton? Not to the same degree. What metrics are important is subjective. Quote Did they say their list of better economies was EXCLUSIVE. I don't believe they did and you didn't say they did, so again you are STRETCHING. Did he use that "love" word? Again YOUR stretching is unjustified. If Wapo didn't want it to be exhaustive, they'd have said "among others" or "like". As for Trump's love of his economy, he doesn't have to say the word to exhibit a love of it. He bragged about it constantly and glowingly. Honestly, I think Melania was jealous. Quote Far from it. When Trump claims his tower has more floors or his penthouse is 3x larger than it really is, those are LIES. Moving the bar again? Really? Could you be any more obvious in your intellectual dishonesty? That is a lie. So what? It isnt 30,000 lies and it doesn't prove your assertion. Quote So far only one item in the Dossier is accepted as being proven false. All the major assertions were proven false. Even the NYTs admits it was largely false: Now it has been largely discredited by two federal investigations and the indictment of a key source, leaving journalists to reckon how, in the heat of competition, so many were taken in so easily because the dossier seemed to confirm what they already suspected. Quote You believing your OPINION is the definitive truth is what makes YOU THICK. The FACT is, WAPO's list is reputable and documented, and your OPINION lacks credi Your opinions didn't do anything to discredited me. If anything, you discredited yourself by moving the goal posts and refusing to acknowledge hard facts. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted October 14, 2024 Author Report Posted October 14, 2024 29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: d me. If anything, you discredited yourself by moving the goal posts and refusing to acknowledge hard facts. You clearly have NOT read this thread. Go back and read it (esp the posted evidence) if you want to have an intelligent discussion. There you will see the source of some of my claims and that no goal posts were "moved." Duh Otherwise GPS cause you're LYING. Quote
Legato Posted October 14, 2024 Report Posted October 14, 2024 10 minutes ago, robosmith said: You clearly have NOT read this thread. Go back and read it (esp the posted evidence) if you want to have an intelligent discussion. There you will see the source of some of my claims and that no goal posts were "moved." Duh Otherwise GPS cause you're LYING. Seems like you used US mail to to post your evidence as it's still stuck in the sorting office 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.