CNN, Robosmith and Hodad Prove The Left is Batsh1t Crazy

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

He's still subservient to Putin, as demonstrated by his appearance with Zelenskyy. You are too. 😂 

LOL i know.  Lying  to yourself so that you can live with your self delusions is a huge part of what it means to be a democrat supporter.

[gatomontes99]

32 minutes ago, Hodad said:

What's the premise? I asked if you disputed any of those facts identified in our official government reports on the subject. 

But apparently you didn't have the cajones to answer. 

And it's pretty plain to see why. If you can't dispute the facts it makes it hard to pretend that collusion didn't happen without looking like gullible fool. So you dodge and dodge again. 

The false premise is that those tidbits are damning to Trump.

[Hodad]

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

The false premise is that those tidbits are damning to Trump.

Again, do you dispute any of those "tidbits" (your pet name for facts that are a matter of public record?) or not? 

Because the evidence against Manafort, Trump's campaign manager, is utterly damning. 

If you don't dispute those facts, the only refuge for Trump is that he didn't know what his campaign manager was doing with Russia to help him win.

Is that what you'd like to claim?

Oh, and as a bonus can I assume that you'd like to claim that he didn't know what Roger Stone was doing either?

[User]

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Again, do you dispute any of those "tidbits" (your pet name for facts that are a matter of public record?) or not? 

Because the evidence against Manafort, Trump's campaign manager, is utterly damning. 

If you don't dispute those facts, the only refuge for Trump is that he didn't know what his campaign manager was doing with Russia to help him win.

Is that what you'd like to claim?

Oh, and as a bonus can I assume that you'd like to claim that he didn't know what Roger Stone was doing either?

Yeah... OK, lets provide all the facts. 

He was Trumps campaign manager for 2 months. Trump basically fired him BECAUSE they found out he was not being honest about his contacts and what he was doing with them. 

But you keep hiding from me and the truth like the coward you are. 

 

[gatomontes99]

20 minutes ago, User said:

Yeah... OK, lets provide all the facts. 

He was Trumps campaign manager for 2 months. Trump basically fired him BECAUSE they found out he was not being honest about his contacts and what he was doing with them. 

But you keep hiding from me and the truth like the coward you are. 

 

He doesn't care. He just doesn't. All he cares about is "getting" Trump. And I've been letting him go on and on about his because he's making my case for me.

[Hodad]

53 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

He doesn't care. He just doesn't. All he cares about is "getting" Trump. And I've been letting him go on and on about his because he's making my case for me.

So you are prepared to admit that Manafort, on Trump's campaign, colluded with Russian intelligence?

Again, easy question.

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Hodad said:

So you are prepared to admit that Manafort, on Trump's campaign, colluded with Russian intelligence?

Again, easy question.

Nope. Not as part of his campaign

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

The false premise is that those tidbits are damning to Trump.

They clearly ARE, and you've got nothing but denial by 5 RepubliCON Senators.

[gatomontes99]

9 hours ago, Hodad said:

So you are prepared to admit that Manafort, on Trump's campaign, colluded with Russian intelligence?

Again, easy question.

How long did Manafort work for Trump and why was he fired?

 

What's sad is that you keep going down this path and it is reinforcing the thesis of my first post.

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

They clearly ARE, and you've got nothing but denial by 5 RepubliCON Senators.

And BBC and CNN and every single normal person. It didn't happen.

[Hodad]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

How long did Manafort work for Trump and why was he fired?

 

What's sad is that you keep going down this path and it is reinforcing the thesis of my first post.

And BBC and CNN and every single normal person. It didn't happen.

Can you acknowledge that as a matter of public record, Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort colluded with Russian Intelligence Services? 

Again, super easy question. You're avoiding it like crazy, moving on to defending Trump. Can you do it? Can you acknowledge the basic, farking facts of this situation?

[gatomontes99]

3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Can you acknowledge that as a matter of public record, Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort colluded with Russian Intelligence Services? 

Again, super easy question. You're avoiding it like crazy, moving on to defending Trump. Can you do it? Can you acknowledge the basic, farking facts of this situation?

I'm not answering because the premise is that Manafort's actions are Trump's actions. They are not. Since you can't acknowledge it, Manafort worked for 2 months and got fired for what he did. To assert that what he did was somehow sanctioned by the campaign (and thus Trump) is batsh1t crazy.

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

I'm not answering because the premise is that Manafort's actions are Trump's actions. They are not. Since you can't acknowledge it, Manafort worked for 2 months and got fired for what he did. To assert that what he did was somehow sanctioned by the campaign (and thus Trump) is batsh1t crazy.

You won't even acknowledge the basic facts of what Manafort did, so who else knew or participated is miles beyond you. 

It's more important to you to be partisan than to be honest about a basic matter of public record. So weird and hacky.

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

And BBC and CNN and every single normal person. It didn't happen.

BBC and CNN didn't do the research of the Senate Intel Committee.

Where is your data for the poll you took of "every single normal person," LIAR.

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

I'm not answering because the premise is that Manafort's actions are Trump's actions. They are not. Since you can't acknowledge it, Manafort worked for 2 months and got fired for what he did. To assert that what he did was somehow sanctioned by the campaign (and thus Trump) is batsh1t crazy.

They are Trump's Campaign actions, cause he was the MANAGER. Duh

[robosmith]

4 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You won't even acknowledge the basic facts of what Manafort did, so who else knew or participated is miles beyond you. 

It's more important to you to be partisan than to be honest about a basic matter of public record. So weird and hacky.

Not so weird; in fact it's consistent for that partisan HACK.

[gatomontes99]

9 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You won't even acknowledge the basic facts of what Manafort did, so who else knew or participated is miles beyond you. 

It's more important to you to be partisan than to be honest about a basic matter of public record. So weird and hacky.

Look in the mirror boss. I addressed it.

[Legato]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Not so weird; in fact it's consistent for that partisan HACK.

Hackney carriages were a large transport network in Victorian London. They transported  a lot of people to parties an such.

[WestCanMan]

On 9/27/2024 at 6:37 AM, gatomontes99 said:

“three Biden-leaning kids spontaneously brought up Hitler when talking about Donald Trump,” according to Landrum’s analysis.

Who was the other one? 

You only mentioned robo and Hodad. 

[gatomontes99]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Who was the other one? 

You only mentioned robo and Hodad. 

Lol

[WestCanMan]

18 hours ago, robosmith said:

They got nothing from Manafort cause Trump was PROMISING A PARDON. Duh

The FBI never should have been trying to coerce false testimony from Manafort in the first place.

Quote

Trump made it public to play the victim like he always does.

Trump WAS a victim, stupid. The FBI committed crimes in order to get warrants to spy on his campaign, dummy.

Quote

You're LYING.

So weird that you always say that but you never even try to provide any evidence of it. 

FYI that says a lot about you.

Quote

BULLSHIT.

When you're following your leftard drivel template, and it says "[insert bullshit here]" that doesn't mean for you to just write the word 'bullshit' there. It means that you're supposed to regurgitate some more CNN lies and slander, dumbass. 

[WestCanMan]

18 hours ago, Hodad said:

Fast of mouth and slow of thought as you are, not surprised that you can't track your own post, but yes, feeding strategic information to the foreign intelligence service that is using such information in an operation intended to help you win an election is exactly what collusion is. 

Now, you could argue that Manafort didn't know, but that would make him even dumber than you. Improbable.

You're talking about "polling data", not "strategic information", wriggler.

His job is to help people win elections. How do you know that he wasn't sharing polling data just to show how good he is at his own job? IE, pimping his services abroad?

No one has ever found any evidence that Trump colluded with anyone from a foreign country to help win the election in 2020. It is as simple as that. The FBI even said that was "no evidence", in no uncertain terms. 

Muller could only offer an opinion that he felt like there must be some evidence somewhere, but he had no other choice: he couldn't admit that the FBI cast aspersions on the duly elected POTUS, committed all those crimes, and wasted all that money based on zero actual evidence. 

Edited September 28, 2024 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

18 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

He's still subservient to Putin, as demonstrated by his appearance with Zelenskyy. You are too. 😂 

Tell us what you'd do about the war in Ukraine if you were POTUS, Chrissy. 

[WestCanMan]

On 9/27/2024 at 10:00 AM, Chrissy1979 said:

How would you know what I am? My political discussions have centered mostly on how I find far right men to be impotent, gutless cowards 

That's not true at all.

Almost everything that you've ever said on this forum just fits into the category of "CNN's daily screed", and they don't call cisgender white men cowards, they call them extremists and violent.

For you to call them gutless cowards would be to go against the grain and you don't have it in you to defy orders.

Quote

Russian patriots say that. Patriots in the West don't.

Patriots in the west say that the Dems and Libs are sellouts. I've served in the military. I don't know any leftards from there. 

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Hodad said:

Can you acknowledge that as a matter of public record, Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort colluded with Russian Intelligence Services? 

Again, super easy question. You're avoiding it like crazy, moving on to defending Trump. Can you do it? Can you acknowledge the basic, farking facts of this situation?

He didn't "collude". There's no "collusion"

Do ANY of you know what that word means?

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

You're talking about "polling data", not "strategic information", wriggler.

His job is to help people win elections. How do you know that he wasn't sharing polling data just to show how good he is at his own job? IE, pimping his services abroad?

No one has ever found any evidence that Trump colluded with anyone from a foreign country to help win the election in 2020. It is as simple as that. The FBI even said that was "no evidence", in no uncertain terms. 

Muller could only offer an opinion that he felt like there must be some evidence somewhere, but he had no other choice: he couldn't admit that the FBI cast aspersions on the duly elected POTUS, committed all those crimes, and wasted all that money based on zero actual evidence. 

Sensitive campaign polling and strategy. Read the reports. 

And yes, we all know your theory that "well, yeah, he did it, but no big deal." If Manafort wasn't doing anything wrong, why the elaborate tradecraft to hide it? Why lie to the FBI?

What's very evident is that Manafort gave Russian Intelligence the information the Russians needed to align to the Trump campaign. 

[Hodad]

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Look in the mirror boss. I addressed it.

No, deflected and dodged. You can't bring yourself to say the words, to acknowledge the plain facts.

Look, it's easy.

Bob Menendez accepted bribes. 

Hunter Biden lied on his gun paperwork. 

Paul Manafort colluded with Russian intelligence.

 

All three are plain facts. But as a rabid partisan you simply cannot acknowledge the third. Bizarre.