Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Assassination plot #3?

Quote

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13864849/Cops-explosives-car-near-Trump-rally-Long-Island-second-assassination-attempt.html

Police say there is no threat to former President Donald Trump's rally site on Long Island after 'explosives' were reportedly found in a car near the site.

A spokesperson for the Nassau County Police Department confirmed to DailyMail.com that 'there was a suspicious occurrence' on Wednesday ahead of Trump's speech where thousands of MAGA fans are gathering.

But there is 'no validity' to a report that there was an 'explosive device found.' 

 

Even money that the explosives will be reported as viable within 72 hours.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
43 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Assassination plot #3?

Even money that the explosives will be reported as viable within 72 hours.

The mentality of these filthy, dishonorable Libbies.

Do they really want a civil war?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Assassination plot #3?

Even money that the explosives will be reported as viable within 72 hours.

I'll take that bet.

"We did respond to a suspicious occurrence in the vicinity of the Nassau Coliseum, however there was no validity of an explosive device being found," a public information officer told Newsweek after a report about an explosive device at the rally site circulated online.

"We're unsure where this information originated, but we can confirm that no explosives were discovered."

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-rally-suspicious-occurrence-long-island-ny-1955749

Edited by Black Dog
  • Haha 1
Posted

Someone needs to, is desperate simply to destabilize and then, destroy the democracy. Do we need to go far to figure out who would it be? Destabilizing the campaign, drowning it in fear and hatred is right from the handbook of Vlad and other dictator thugs.

Grown up people of reason, conscience and integrity need to come out now and close this chapter. It will not get better and it will destroy democracy if it's allowed.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
Quote

https://americanmilitarynews.com/2024/09/video-explosive-found-near-trump-rally-report/

“There is a person who is being questioned who may have been training a bomb detection dog near the site. The individual with the bomb dog falsely reported explosives being found and that individual is currently being detained by police.”

Lmao...now it is a "training exercise"?

Right.

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao...now it is a "training exercise"?

Right.

Why would the cops lie here? Like, I know cops lie all the time, usually to cover their own asses, but the idea that cops on Long Island would lie to cover up something like this is pretty absurd.

Edited by Black Dog
  • Thanks 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

The mentality of these filthy, dishonorable Libbies.

Do they really want a civil war?

You sure do get a lot of exercise from jumping to conclusions. LMAO

You readily believe ANYTHING which confirms your bias and even more rapidly reject EVERYTHING which disputes it (which is a LOT).

Posted
20 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Why would the cops lie here? Like, I know cops lie all the time, usually to cover their own asses, but the idea that cops on Long Island would lie to cover up something like this is pretty absurd.

So, a dog alerting on a bomb, calling in the bomb, and a press release going out was all fake, but calling it a training exercise is soooo much more believable.

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

So, a dog alerting on a bomb, calling in the bomb, and a press release going out was all fake, but calling it a training exercise is soooo much more believable.

 

You forgot NOT FINDING THE BOMB that the dog supposedly alerted. Duh

Obviously that dog NEEDS TRAINING.

Posted
6 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

So, a dog alerting on a bomb, calling in the bomb, and a press release going out was all fake, but calling it a training exercise is soooo much more believable.

1. You didn't answer the question: why would the cops lie about this?

2. What press release?

3. No one called it a training exercise. Reading the statements from the cops here, they're talking about a person (not a cop) training their own bomb sniffing dog. I'm betting it was some MAGA Boomer who took it upon themselves to bring their Shih Tzu to the rally to protect Trump lol.

So to recount: some rando brought their own dog, claimed to have found a bomb, the cops checked it out as a "suspicious incident" but found no bomb or any explosives and released that information to the media but you think they're covering up an actual bomb threat because you're mentally ill.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,914
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    MDP
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...