Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Sus.. is just a cowards way of making an accusation but putting in some wiggle room. To show some integrity.. you would say, "because I have absolutely no evidence to connect the two, going to leave it at that"

I think the bigger issue at play is America's idol worship of celebrities and politicians needing to gather endorsements from them to win elections than my post. 

Edited by West
Posted
21 minutes ago, West said:

I think the bigger issue at play is America's idol worship of celebrities and politicians needing to gather endorsements from them to win elections than my post. 

Why did you not simply say that instead of making accusations that you can't back up? Running your mouth and having verbal diarrhea tells me that you are more emotional than logical. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

Why did you not simply say that instead of making accusations that you can't back up? Running your mouth and having verbal diarrhea tells me that you are more emotional than logical. 

What? I thought that's what we are supposed to focus on in the new age of politics 🤔 

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Who told you to focus on emotional instead of logical?

Every democrat ever

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
14 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Please tell us how many dollars this man raised for Kamala Harris, or admit that you just made up yet another lie.

That should be a question you are asking Kamala.

Do you not think she should be transparent about her relationship with Diddle-y? Looks like he was campaigning for her in 2020

Posted
2 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

At the end of the day.. the verbal diarrhea of the OP is commonplace and has infiltrated all of politics. Can't blame the guy for running his mouth and not having any evidence or anything to back up the "sus". 

Yes. Trump gets tied to Randoms whether it be Richard Spencer or David Duke. That's true 

Posted
9 minutes ago, West said:

Yes. Trump gets tied to Randoms whether it be Richard Spencer or David Duke. That's true 

Clearly, Trump knows Sean Combes. And they were friends.  
But I’m not an ldiot, like the Republicans are, and I think it’s safe to say that it’s very unlikely that Trump knew anything of Combes’ criminal activities, just as Kamala Harris did not know.  So this sort of “guilt by association” reasoning which launched this thread is ridiculous.  
 

Epstein is another story: Trump’s on record saying he knew that Epstein liked very young girls, yet he continued to socialize with him. Not good  


IMG_2362.thumb.jpeg.27b85f2578cd3335ca4cf63c81bfe47a.jpeg

  • Like 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...