Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I posted this on the abortion thread but...I felt it necessary to make a thread about it because...well...just watch Kamala shine.

 

The same bullshit from the debate. She grew up in a middle class neighborhood where they loved their lawns.

What a blithering id1ot!

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
Quote

Will the real Kamala Harris please expose herself

Yes.  If you'll give her a promotion. 

 

Also I will add this to the ever growing list of crap you've said that's kept me up with nightmares over the years.

Edited by CdnFox
  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
15 hours ago, Nationalist said:

That's right Libbies. Ignore her stupidity and hope nobody notices. 

The m0ron is doomed.

Wow. I heard she just trounced some fool in a televised debate. If she's stupid then I can't imagine how unbelievably brainless that sucker must be.🤷‍♀️

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

^FOS LIES. No matter how many times they LIE, right wingers keep eating their BULLSHIT.

Really? What part was a lie what she said now or what she said then?

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
6 hours ago, Hodad said:

Wow. I heard she just trounced some fool in a televised debate. If she's stupid then I can't imagine how unbelievably brainless that sucker must be.🤷‍♀️

When did she debate Tampon Tim?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

I've noticed that the usual suspects will make dozens of threads about Kamala Harris, in order to draw attention  away from the fact that she slaughtered Trump in the debate. The exact same thing happened when Tim Walz was chosen as VP. The MAGA posters lost their minds, and created 25 threads about Walz, which served no real purpose other than to clutter the forum with junk. 

Posted
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

^FOS LIES. No matter how many times they LIE, right wingers keep eating their BULLSHIT.

So you think it's not legitimate to point out that Harris changes positions as the wind blows?

Where exactly does she stand on these issues now? She was very adamant about them in the past.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
15 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

I've noticed that the usual suspects will make dozens of threads about Kamala Harris, in order to draw attention  away from the fact that she slaughtered Trump in the debate. The exact same thing happened when Tim Walz was chosen as VP. The MAGA posters lost their minds, and created 25 threads about Walz, which served no real purpose other than to clutter the forum with junk. 

I've noticed that the usual suspects will make dozens of threads about Donald Trump in order to draw attention away from the fact that she was slaughtered by Trump in the debate. The exact same thing happened when J.D. Vance was chosen as VP. The TDS posters lost their minds, and created 25 threads about Vance, which served no real purpose other than to clutter the forum with junk. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Legato said:

I've noticed that the usual suspects will make dozens of threads about Donald Trump in order to draw attention away from the fact that she was slaughtered by Trump in the debate. The exact same thing happened when J.D. Vance was chosen as VP. The TDS posters lost their minds, and created 25 threads about Vance, which served no real purpose other than to clutter the forum with junk. 

What is it like to smoke meth while posting? 

Posted
22 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

What is it like to smoke meth while posting? 

Prey tell, you being an expert and all.

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...