How stupid does one have to be to vote for Kamala Harris?

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Rebound said:

70 percent of Americans believe that a woman has the right to choose whether to have an abortion. 

But about the same percent feel there should be limits on it and it shouldn't just be up to the moment their head peaks out. 

And that's the issue. 

[impartialobserver]

not a matter of intelligence as to why someone votes Trump or Harris. It comes down to values, economic situation, and geography. 

[Deluge]

On 9/11/2024 at 11:41 AM, impartialobserver said:

not a matter of intelligence as to why someone votes Trump or Harris. It comes down to values, economic situation, and geography. 

It mostly comes down to "Who can help make my life better?". And that, of course, is where Donald Trump comes in, which is why this race is in a dead heat despite all the bullshit the banana Marxists have been unloading on him. 

The hope is that enough moderates will pull their heads out of their asses and vote for Trump. 

[impartialobserver]

12 minutes ago, Deluge said:

It mostly comes down to "Who can help make my life better?". And that, of course, is where Donald Trump comes in, which is why this race is in a dead heat despite all the bullshit the banana Marxists have been unloading on him. 

The hope is that enough moderates will pull their heads out of their asses and vote for Trump. 

So you admit that it is not about intelligence. Good to hear. If I had my way.. I would have neither of them in the race and we would have candidates who rely less on emotion. 

[Deluge]

11 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

So you admit that it is not about intelligence. Good to hear. If I had my way.. I would have neither of them in the race and we would have candidates who rely less on emotion. 

Are you saying intelligence has nothing to do with personal well-being? Are you trying to tell me that you're an intelligent masochist? 

[Five of swords]

On 9/6/2024 at 10:54 AM, Deluge said:

The DEI slut brings nothing to the table other than more pain and misery for Americans, so what's the attraction? 

Who would be stupid enough?

 

An American, of course.

[Deluge]

23 hours ago, Five of swords said:

Who would be stupid enough?

 

An American, of course.

A Democrat American, of course. 

[I am Groot]

On 9/6/2024 at 10:54 AM, Deluge said:

The DEI slut brings nothing to the table other than more pain and misery for Americans, so what's the attraction? 

She's not Donald Trump.

[I am Groot]

On 9/6/2024 at 12:02 PM, Deluge said:

I mean, what would a Kamala Harris presidency get you? 

Well, more of this for sure: 

 

I have to admit, the stupidity of the Democrats in embracing the idea that prosecuting criminals is somehow unjust and even 'racist' (a theory Justin Trudeau eagerly embraces) is one of the leading reasons why people cling to the big orange diaper boy. It's not even like Trump did anything about this when he was president. He was too busy slurping KFC, watching FOX and getting into twitter wars with celebrities.

But the way Democrats at all levels, especially municipal (the home of terrible government) have opposed the laws and enforcement of them that are necessary for a secure environment for people is just insane. The downtowns of many cities are filled with shuffling, glassy eyed addicts who'll steal anything not nailed down and attack anyone just cuz. And the local and state Democrats are far more interested in attacking police than the criminals.  In fact, their continuous attacks on police have left every major force short-staffed, including the NYPD, as veterans leave in droves and new people are reluctant to sign up.

It's absurd that stuff like this, a secure border, and two genders - things which Democrats used to be in nearly 100% agreement on - are what might well put that decrepit, senile, vicious twat Trump back in power. 

[Five of swords]

45 minutes ago, Deluge said:

A Democrat American, of course. 

They are all equally intelligent, though. They just consume different media.

Edited September 13, 2024 by Five of swords

[Five of swords]

3 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

I have to admit, the stupidity of the Democrats in embracing the idea that prosecuting criminals is somehow unjust and even 'racist' (a theory Justin Trudeau eagerly embraces) is one of the leading reasons why people cling to the big orange diaper boy. It's not even like Trump did anything about this when he was president. He was too busy slurping KFC, watching FOX and getting into twitter wars with celebrities.

But the way Democrats at all levels, especially municipal (the home of terrible government) have opposed the laws and enforcement of them that are necessary for a secure environment for people is just insane. The downtowns of many cities are filled with shuffling, glassy eyed addicts who'll steal anything not nailed down and attack anyone just cuz. And the local and state Democrats are far more interested in attacking police than the criminals.  In fact, their continuous attacks on police have left every major force short-staffed, including the NYPD, as veterans leave in droves and new people are reluctant to sign up.

It's absurd that stuff like this, a secure border, and two genders - things which Democrats used to be in nearly 100% agreement on - are what might well put that decrepit, senile, vicious twat Trump back in power. 

In practice Trump did the opposite. Criminal reform was HIS pet projrct...thr platinum plan etc. And all the blacks released for covid etc. All under him. Literally Obama was better at fighting crime than Trump, and Obama was not good at it.

[WestCanMan]

On 9/12/2024 at 11:06 AM, impartialobserver said:

So you admit that it is not about intelligence. Good to hear. If I had my way.. I would have neither of them in the race and we would have candidates who rely less on emotion. 

Trump's ability to handle the economy better is purely a function of his higher intelligence.

Kamala doesn't even understand why the Biden/Harris inflation was so high with the benefit of hindsight. 

It's not just inflation, she doesn't understand what went wrong at the border, either. Her and Biden got rid of Trump policies at the border as fast as they could, and illegal immigration spiked right away. They sold of pre-fabricated sections of border wall and raw materials for pennies on the dollar, and now her new border plan calls for the construction of that exact type of wall. 

Should Americans be checking into that transaction? Did someone buy huge sections of border wall for dirt cheap, just to sell it back at a massive profit to the same administration? 

Here, buy this table off of me for $20, and then I will buy it back for $900 in 3 years...

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Five of swords said:

In practice Trump did the opposite. Criminal reform was HIS pet projrct...thr platinum plan etc. And all the blacks released for covid etc. All under him. Literally Obama was better at fighting crime than Trump, and Obama was not good at it.

Trump wasn't the one who cleared prisons during covid, that was Kamala's crew. They wanted more rioters back on the streets. 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, Five of swords said:

They are all equally intelligent, though. They just consume different media.

Democrats consume the wrong media - it's why they're leftists, not liberals. 

 

[Five of swords]

Just now, Deluge said:

Democrats consume the wrong media - it's why they're leftists, not liberals. 

 

What is the 'correct' media supposed to be? Lol

24 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Trump wasn't the one who cleared prisons during covid, that was Kamala's crew. They wanted more rioters back on the streets. 

Trump was president. Kamala had no jurisdiction to do that.

 

And even if you are saying Trump wished he had enough power as president to enforce the law, but he was si.ply too weak....well Trump accuses Kamala of throwing too many black people in prison

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

I have to admit, the stupidity of the Democrats in embracing the idea that prosecuting criminals is somehow unjust and even 'racist' (a theory Justin Trudeau eagerly embraces) is one of the leading reasons why people cling to the big orange diaper boy. It's not even like Trump did anything about this when he was president. He was too busy slurping KFC, watching FOX and getting into twitter wars with celebrities.

I see, so you're trying to say that illegal immigration in the US was always like this. Can you link any sources to prove this or are you just going to sit there with your head lodged up the Left's ass? 

[Deluge]

10 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

What is the 'correct' media supposed to be? Lol

Well, if you can go to an outlet that refrains from negative talk about Trump or MAGA you're already on a good track. 

ANY outlet that covers illegal immigration would be a good place to start since a welcome mat has been rolled out to foreign invasders for the past 3.5 years. 

Edited September 13, 2024 by Deluge

[Five of swords]

27 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Well, if you can go to an outlet that refrains from negative talk about Trump or MAGA you're already on a good track. 

ANY outlet that covers illegal immigration would be a good place to start since a welcome mat has been rolled out to foreign invasders for the past 3.5 years. 

Well as a thought expirament, let's say you were living under some regime with tight thought control...like say under Stalin.

 

Then any media the state doesn't shut down is probably unacceptably bad. Right?

[impartialobserver]

On 9/12/2024 at 11:20 AM, Deluge said:

Are you saying intelligence has nothing to do with personal well-being? Are you trying to tell me that you're an intelligent masochist? 

What a way to misconstrue something... almost intentional. I am saying that the  choice to vote for Harris or not is based on one's intelligence. 

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, Five of swords said:

What is the 'correct' media supposed to be? Lol

Trump was president. Kamala had no jurisdiction to do that.

 

And even if you are saying Trump wished he had enough power as president to enforce the law, but he was si.ply too weak....well Trump accuses Kamala of throwing too many black people in prison

They weren't pardoned by the president, dude, and those people weren't federal prisoners. They were under the jurisdiction of their states, and it was the AGs who let them out and the DAs who refused to prosecute.

In some cases, where prisoners couldn't be released outright, people like Kamala helped raise bail money to get rioters back on the streets. 

You seem new to all this.

[Five of swords]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

They weren't pardoned by the president, dude, and those people weren't federal prisoners. They were under the jurisdiction of their states, and it was the AGs who let them out and the DAs who refused to prosecute.

In some cases, where prisoners couldn't be released outright, people like Kamala helped raise bail money to get rioters back on the streets. 

You seem new to all this.

Sure. Presidents can't do anything about multiple cities being burned down. That just isn't in the job description of the president.

 

And actually yes he did pardon various blm types. Although he seemed mainly to focus on pardoning foreign spies and people who committed large scale fraud

[I am Groot]

13 hours ago, Deluge said:

I see, so you're trying to say that illegal immigration in the US was always like this. Can you link any sources to prove this or are you just going to sit there with your head lodged up the Left's ass? 

Illegal immigration has been a major problem in the US for decades. It's grown of late due to the internet and cell phones. Now everyone down south can see what life looks like up north. Both here and in Europe.

[Deluge]

12 hours ago, Five of swords said:

Well as a thought expirament, let's say you were living under some regime with tight thought control...like say under Stalin.

 

Then any media the state doesn't shut down is probably unacceptably bad. Right?

Right. 

[Deluge]

18 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Illegal immigration has been a major problem in the US for decades. 

And it's gotten a lot worse under Biden. Now we need to shut it down completely. The goal needs to be ZERO illegal aliens per day, not 3,000. 

[Deluge]

13 hours ago, impartialobserver said:

What a way to misconstrue something... almost intentional. I am saying that the  choice to vote for Harris or not is based on one's intelligence. 

Yes, that's true, but the question isn't how intelligent does one have to be to vote for Harris; the question is, how STUPID does one have to be to vote for Harris, and the answer is, pretty f*cking stupid; a lot more stupid than someone who would vote for Trump. In fact, in this case, one would be smart to vote for Trump, because Trump isn't pushing for marxism and trying to flood the country with illegal aliens.