Kamala's Massive Miscalculation

[WestCanMan]

Kamala has been dodging the media ever since she has gotten the nomination from fallen president Joe Biden, but with the ME heating up, her first media sessions could come at a far more heated and stressful time than it is right now.

Sure, she'll have to answer to all of Biden's failed policies no matter when that first interview occurs, and she'll have to explain why her first two policy announcements are 

1. complete reversals of Biden policy and
2. mirror images of Trump's own policy (tips and border strength)

but at least the topic of a massive escalation in the ME is still just a maybe. She will also have to talk about Walz's stolen valour incident, which no one even knew about ten days ago. What else will happen between now and then? 

God forbid more US forces are killed in the ME. There were 3 killed in January, and dozens injured - which no one really talks about - but there have been literally HUNDREDS of attacks on US troops in the ME since Oct 7th. It has been a routine occurrence for almost a year now. 

If US troops are killed, or dozens more are wounded, can the press secretary really continue to do all the talking? Isn't it time for a leader to step up to the microphone?

The longer she waits for that first interview, the tougher it's gonna get. 

Edited August 13, 2024 by WestCanMan

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Kamala has been dodging the media ever since she has gotten the nomination from fallen president Joe Biden, but with the ME heating up, her first media sessions could come at a far more heated and stressful time than it is right now.

Sure, she'll have to answer to all of Biden's failed policies no matter when that first interview occurs, and she'll have to explain why her first two policy announcements are 

1. complete reversals of Biden policy and
2. mirror images of Trump's own policy (tips and border strength)

but at least the topic of a massive escalation in the ME is still just a maybe. She will also have to talk about Walz's stolen valour incident, which no one even knew about ten days ago. What else will happen between now and then? 

God forbid more US forces are killed in the ME. There were 3 killed in January, and dozens injured - which no one really talks about - but there have been literally HUNDREDS of attacks on US troops in the ME since Oct 7th. It has been a routine occurrence for almost a year now. 

If US troops are killed, or dozens more are wounded, can the press secretary really continue to do all the talking? Isn't it time for a leader to step up to the microphone?

The longer she waits for that first interview, the tougher it's gonna get. 

You're expecting her to have all her ducks in a row in 3 weeks when she ALSO had to vet 6 candidates and pick a VP and prepare for the Democratic National Convention? LMAO

Got news for you: Harris is NOT responsible for Joe's policies.

[CouchPotato]

14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Got news for you: Harris is NOT responsible for Joe's policies.

Which ones did she oppose?

Seeing as Joe has been mentally disabled for a few years now, I don't think he was responsible for his policies, either. Somebody had to be running the ship. It will be the same situation with Kamala, because she clearly isn't all that bright.

Edited August 13, 2024 by CouchPotato

[robosmith]

17 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Which ones did she oppose?

You're a fool if you believe she has announced policies of the POTUS she opposed.

17 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Seeing as Joe has been mentally disabled for a few years now,

Or you have....

17 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

I don't think he was responsible for his policies, either.

No one cares.

17 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Somebody had to be running the ship. It will be the same situation with Kamala, because she clearly isn't all that bright.

Sure. What have you done with YOUR great insight and intelligence? State's Attorney for the most populous US state? VP?

AKA, you have NO CREDIBILITY TO JUDGE HER.

I don't understand why you believe your judgement should be taken seriously by ANYONE beyond your mom.

[CouchPotato]

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're a fool if you believe she has announced policies of the POTUS she opposed.

Not really an answer, but whatever.

You have really emotional reactions to posts. I suspect that's because deep down you know you are wrong, but you've already dug your trench and you will die there.

Someone else will be making policy decisions for this woman.

Edited August 13, 2024 by CouchPotato

[robosmith]

20 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Not really an answer, but whatever.

It is an answer: you are unreasonable to expect ANY VP to announce that she disagrees with her POTUS, cause that's NOT her job.

20 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

You have really emotional reactions to posts. I suspect that's because deep down you know you are wrong, but you've already dug your trench and you will die there.

No, it's because I know you're a simpleton and wrong, and can't even understand that when it's explained to you.

20 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Someone else will be making policy decisions for this woman.

^Still arrogance with NO wisdom. Not even enough to stop believing a Murdock tabloid rag. 

Do you have a subscription to Nat Enquirer, too? LMAO

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You're expecting her to have all her ducks in a row in 3 weeks when she ALSO had to vet 6 candidates and pick a VP and prepare for the Democratic National Convention? LMAO

Got news for you: Harris is NOT responsible for Joe's policies.

She's been in the WH for 4 years and doesn't know what needs to be done? And you support that?

[robosmith]

33 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

She's been in the WH for 4 years and doesn't know what needs to be done? And you support that?

 

Who said she doesn't know what needs to be done? Not me.

It's you who doesn't know that priorities don't put talking to the press at #1 when you have to vet and hire staff to win the campaign.

I think you right wingers are just worried that her prioritizing campaigning will BEAT Trump.

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Kamala has been dodging the media ever since she has gotten the nomination from fallen president Joe Biden, but with the ME heating up, her first media sessions could come at a far more heated and stressful time than it is right now.

Sure, she'll have to answer to all of Biden's failed policies no matter when that first interview occurs, and she'll have to explain why her first two policy announcements are 

1. complete reversals of Biden policy and
2. mirror images of Trump's own policy (tips and border strength)

but at least the topic of a massive escalation in the ME is still just a maybe. She will also have to talk about Walz's stolen valour incident, which no one even knew about ten days ago. What else will happen between now and then? 

God forbid more US forces are killed in the ME. There were 3 killed in January, and dozens injured - which no one really talks about - but there have been literally HUNDREDS of attacks on US troops in the ME since Oct 7th. It has been a routine occurrence for almost a year now. 

If US troops are killed, or dozens more are wounded, can the press secretary really continue to do all the talking? Isn't it time for a leader to step up to the microphone?

The longer she waits for that first interview, the tougher it's gonna get. 

That's a very real possibility. The chances of something flaring up somewhere and kamala having to wear biden's response is strong. And more and more scandals may be uncovered as they go, that's how these things tend to work.  Trump is 'pre-scandaled', there's nothing more the dems can say about him that anyone will care about. 

[gatomontes99]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

 

Who said she doesn't know what needs to be done? Not me.

It's you who doesn't know that priorities don't put talking to the press at #1 when you have to vet and hire staff to win the campaign.

I think you right wingers are just worried that her prioritizing campaigning will BEAT Trump.

Of course we are worried she will win. This country can't handle 4 more years of these policies. Everyone knows that, including Kamala. That's why she's running as Donald Trump. All of a sudden she wants fracking, no tax on tips and a secure border when she spent the last decade plus railing against fracking, she was the deciding vote to track down tips and tax them and was the border czar that opened the doors and welcomed everyone in.

[CouchPotato]

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

It is an answer: you are unreasonable to expect ANY VP to announce that she disagrees with her POTUS, cause that's NOT her job.

The question was "What policies does she oppose?"

Quote

^Still arrogance with NO wisdom. Not even enough to stop believing a Murdock tabloid rag. 

Do you have a subscription to Nat Enquirer, too? LMAO

I don't have to read any news source to realize this. It's plainly visible. Biden has been mentally unfit for a few years. The media lied to you about this. The White House and the Democrat party lied to you about this. Biden could not have been making his own decisions. People had to physically lead him around half the time.

Kamala says a lot of gobbledeegook without saying anything. She has no plans. She's a ditz.

 

Edited August 13, 2024 by CouchPotato

[Deluge]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're expecting her to have all her ducks in a row in 3 weeks when she ALSO had to vet 6 candidates and pick a VP and prepare for the Democratic National Convention? LMAO

Got news for you: Harris is NOT responsible for Joe's policies.

No, we're expecting the silly b*tch to ALREADY have her ducks in a row, as she served as VP for the past four years. 

Don't you stupid cucks know anything? 

Edited August 13, 2024 by Deluge

[Legato]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're expecting her to have all her ducks in a row in 3 weeks when she ALSO had to vet 6 candidates and pick a VP and prepare for the Democratic National Convention? LMAO

Got news for you: Harris is NOT responsible for Joe's policies.

Ha yes lets see.

The "will be " duck next to the "unburdened" duck after the "what has been duck" and before the "not today" duck, that should work. Hey wait a minute, those ducks look suspiciously like cockerels. Oh dear, where's the egg basket.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Of course we are worried she will win. This country can't handle 4 more years of these policies. Everyone knows that, including Kamala. That's why she's running as Donald Trump. All of a sudden she wants fracking, no tax on tips and a secure border when she spent the last decade plus railing against fracking, she was the deciding vote to track down tips and tax them and was the border czar that opened the doors and welcomed everyone in.

The country is just fine. Certainly in far better shape than when Trump was mismanaging the pandemic with all his super-spreader events. 🤮

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, CouchPotato said:

The question was "What policies does she oppose?"

Are you an lDIOT? I know the question, and explained to you WHY it's the ANSWER.

Think about it, and if you still don't understand, I'll spoon feed ya.

1 hour ago, CouchPotato said:

I don't have to read any news source to realize this. It's plainly visible. Biden has been mentally unfit for a few years. The media lied to you about this. The White House and the Democrat party lied to you about this. Biden could not have been making his own decisions. People had to physically lead him around half the time.

Kamala says a lot of gobbledeegook without saying anything. She has no plans. She's a ditz.

You're not a doctor, and thus completely unqualified to judge Joe's mental capacity.

Thanks for proving your Dunning Kruger ARROGANCE again.

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

No, we're expecting the silly b*tch to ALREADY have her ducks in a row, as she served as VP for the past four years. 

Don't you stupid cucks know anything? 

Far more than you, cause you're just a CHILD with juvenile insults. Duh

[gatomontes99]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The country is just fine. Certainly in far better shape than when Trump was mismanaging the pandemic with all his super-spreader events. 🤮

You are in the super minority in that opinion.

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/state-of-the-union/direction-of-country

 

If the country was doing well, Kamala wouldn't be running from her border policies, fracking policies, and copying Trump's no tax on tips.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Ha yes lets see.

The "will be " duck next to the "unburdened" duck after the "what has been duck" and before the "not today" duck, that should work. Hey wait a minute, those ducks look suspiciously like cockerels. Oh dear, where's the egg basket.

You should be banned for being an unserious TROLL.

Just now, gatomontes99 said:

You are in the super minority in that opinion.

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/state-of-the-union/direction-of-country

^Appeal to popularity FALLACY.

Just look at the MAGA CULT INCOMPETENCE.

Just now, gatomontes99 said:

If the country was doing well, Kamala wouldn't be running from her border policies, fracking policies, and copying Trump's no tax on tips.

LMAO

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Far more than you, cause you're just a CHILD with juvenile insults. Duh

What's Harris been doing for the past four years? 

Talk about it, numbnuts....

[CouchPotato]

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Are you an lDIOT? I know the question, and explained to you WHY it's the ANSWER.

So you don't know any policy differences she has with Joe Biden. That's the answer.

Quote

You're not a doctor, and thus completely unqualified to judge Joe's mental capacity.

A five year-old could have pointed out that something was wrong with Joe a few years back. You guys just refused to believe it.

[gatomontes99]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You should be banned for being an unserious TROLL.

 

Project much?

Quote

 

^Appeal to popularity FALLACY

 

 

Is a poll that says 90% of people believe the world is round an appeal to popularity fallacy? No. Why? Because it is true. The truth is that our country is heading down the wrong track.
 

Quote

 

Just look at the MAGA CULT INCOMPETENCE.

LMAO

 

Couldn't counter the thesis so you decided to resort to personal attacks?

[Legato]

47 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You should be banned for being an unserious TROLL.

 

Quack!

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You should be banned for being an unserious TROLL.

^Appeal to popularity FALLACY.

Just look at the MAGA CULT INCOMPETENCE.

LMAO

LOL - all you DO is troll   But we don't want you banned - you're hilarious to watch  

[WestCanMan]

13 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

Which ones did she oppose?

Suddenly their best defence is "Kamala doesn't really do anything" lol.

Well, she certainly had her chance to run the border and she failed that miserably. 

[reason10]

14 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're expecting her to have all her ducks in a row in 3 weeks when she ALSO had to vet 6 candidates and pick a VP and prepare for the Democratic National Convention? LMAO

Got news for you: Harris is NOT responsible for Joe's policies.

And she is NOT going to win in November. As far left an 1diot Biden was, he is a centrist compared to KKKamala.

Enjoy those fake news polls while they last.  She  and Tampon Tim are going to LOSE.

[CouchPotato]

14 minutes ago, reason10 said:

And she is NOT going to win in November.

I hope you are right, but I don't like to count my chickens before they are hatched. They elected a vegetable last time around.