Did Libs Start Hating Musk When He Bought Twitter?

[gatomontes99]

Robosmith disagrees that this is common knowledge, so let's find out:

[robosmith]

26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Robosmith disagrees that this is common knowledge, so let's find out:

Stop LYING a-hole. I said nothing about "libs hating Musk." Duh

And what I said was about his policy of "free speech for me, but not for thee." AKA HYPOCRITICALLY firing Lemon for his criticism of Musk.

Here's a clue for YOU: if you can't post a cite that shows what others believe, then STFU.

 

Edited July 31, 2024 by robosmith

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Stop LYING a-hole. I said nothing about "libs hating Musk." Duh

And what I said was about his policy of "free speech for me, but not for thee." AKA HYPOCRITICALLY firing Lemon for his criticism of Musk.

Here's a clue for YOU: if you can't post a cite that shows what others believe, then STFU.

 

Do you not know there is a quote feature? You said:

17 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're LYING, snowflake. Only meltdown was when Musk fired Lemon who was given a show on X after Musk didn't like what Lemon said about HIM. 

"Freedom of speech for me, but not for thee." -Musk 

In response to:

19 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Are we supposed to be surprised? Remember, the left had a melt down when Elon said all opinions are welcome on Twitter. What would they do if Facebook and screwgle were to be fair, they'd face hell from the left wing fascists.

You denied (without a cited source mind you) that libs started hating Musk after he bought Twitter and that that didn't happen until he deplatformed (I subbed in the correct word, fired is incorrect) Don Lemon.

It's all right there.

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Do you not know there is a quote feature? You said:

In response to:

You denied (without a cited source mind you) that libs started hating Musk after he bought Twitter and that that didn't happen until he deplatformed (I subbed in the correct word, fired is incorrect) Don Lemon.

It's all right there.

I made no such ABSOLUTIST statement. Musk firing Lemon was just the most egregious example. Duh

The hatred for Musk has a far more nebulous cause than what YOU ARE STATING. "The libs" are NOT a block like YOU'RE CLAIMING. 

As usual, you are VERY BAD at INTERPRETING what others say and should stop pretending you're not.

"after he bought Twitter" and "completely trashed Twitter policies" are TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS.

Go back to your Twitter/X SEWER.

 

 

[User]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And what I said was about his policy of "free speech for me, but not for thee." AKA HYPOCRITICALLY firing Lemon for his criticism of Musk.

Since you are cowardly hiding from me... let me spell this out for you again:

It is not hypocrisy. 

Lemon is still free to use X and speak all he wants to there. Musk did not ban him from the app, he fired him. That is not silencing him, that is not paying him. 

 

[gatomontes99]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I made no such ABSOLUTIST statement. Musk firing Lemon was just the most egregious example. Duh

The hatred for Musk has a far more nebulous cause than what YOU ARE STATING. "The libs" are NOT a block like YOU'RE CLAIMING. 

As usual, you are VERY BAD at INTERPRETING what others say and should stop pretending you're not.

"after he bought Twitter" and "completely trashed Twitter policies" are TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS.

Go back to your Twitter/X SEWER.

 

 

Libs aren't a bloc? That is the most laughable statement yet. But we can't address that now. I'm not getting off topic.

I said libs started hating Musk When he bought Twitter. You claimed it had something to do with Lemon. Now you claim it was the policy changes, and not the purchase. Bullspit. He said, from the day he made the offer, that he'd make the policy changes. Even then, all you libs/progressives/socialist/NAZI/fascists (I know I was being redundant) starting melting down. And yes, you are a voting bloc that will mindlessly vote and support anyone.

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Robosmith disagrees that this is common knowledge, so let's find out:

Gee, liberals didn’t hate Jack Dorsey, or other social media or tech CEO’s, and a lot of them adored him as Tesla CEO, so it must be his weird jumping off the rails that upset liberals.  Like when he made anti-Jewish comments.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/elon-musk-antisemitic-comments-x-post-actual-truth/

[Fluffypants]

They started to hate him when they found out he was for free speech.

They went to nuclear hate after he bought twitter and exposed their bias and refused to do their bidding anymore.

 

Edited July 31, 2024 by Fluffypants

[CouchPotato]

I seem to recall it started when he began talking about buying Twitter.

[WestCanMan]

It's a bit more extreme than that. Musk was a hero to the left, because his cars were saving the earth.

When he started talking about buying Twitter, essentially breaking the left's stranglehold on MSM and social media, he instantly became public enemy number 1.

Lying pieces of crap like robo will pretend they always hated Elon, but they're just following their marching orders. They don't think for themselves.

[CouchPotato]

34 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Gee, liberals didn’t hate Jack Dorsey, or other social media or tech CEO’s, and a lot of them adored him as Tesla CEO, so it must be his weird jumping off the rails that upset liberals.  Like when he made anti-Jewish comments.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/elon-musk-antisemitic-comments-x-post-actual-truth/

So, in the liberal mindset, it is anti-Semitic to be critical of the ADL, but "from the river to the sea" is perfectly copacetic?

[WestCanMan]

36 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Gee, liberals didn’t hate Jack Dorsey, or other social media or tech CEO’s, and a lot of them adored him as Tesla CEO, so it must be his weird jumping off the rails that upset liberals.  Like when he made anti-Jewish comments.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/elon-musk-antisemitic-comments-x-post-actual-truth/

He was already the owner of X at that point, dummy. 

Hate for Elon started the second he went to break the left's monopoly on social media giants.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, CouchPotato said:

So, in the liberal mindset, it is anti-Semitic to be critical of the ADL, but "from the river to the sea" is perfectly copacetic?

Overtly racist statements, like the ones made by Nick Cannon for example, are perfectly ok. They do a party affiliation before they decide whether or not they're offended by racist comments.

[CouchPotato]

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Overtly racist statements, like the ones made by Nick Cannon for example, are perfectly ok. They do a party affiliation before they decide whether or not they're offended by racist comments.

This is just it. It's like George Soros. If you are critical of him it automatically means you are anti-Semitic. You are told you are perpetuating a Jewish conspiracy theory because Soros happens to be Jewish. One guy. But then they argue that it is ok to be critical of Israel. And I agree, it is ok to be critical of Israel. I support Israel, but I don't think criticism automatically makes one an anti-semite. Racism is like a game to the left. They want to play this game, and they want to make all the rules.

Edited July 31, 2024 by CouchPotato