Get Ready for the Biggest Wave of Propaganda in the History of the World

[Five of swords]

23 minutes ago, User said:

Your continued dishonesty was expected. That is not all that was shown here... and now you are playing the moving the goal posts game, only contradicting yourself. First you questioned the existence of a mass grave and now you claim it exists, but it is slaves from the tectonic wars of the 16th century. And I suppose you have some made up lies about why all those slaves were buried, dug up, burned, and then buried again? All conveniently right where a NAZI concentration camp was that they tried to cover up? All conveniently there to match up to all the other physical evidence and testimony for the mass killing of the Jews? 

It is not merely a matter of your being ignorant, this goes beyond that, it is pure diabolical deception you are engaged in. Which is why you refuse to answer the repeated questions. 

 

 

Oh...so you deny that anyone was killed in the night of st George uprising? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_George's_Night_Uprising#:~:text=On Saint George's Night

[User]

8 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Oh...so you deny that anyone was killed in the night of st George uprising? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_George's_Night_Uprising#:~:text=On Saint George's Night

Nope. This was not a discussion on if "anyone" was killed in the night of St George uprising. 

Seriously, if you really believe the garbage you are posting, lets see you be honest enough to defend it honestly. Come on now. Can you do it?

[Five of swords]

20 minutes ago, User said:

Nope. This was not a discussion on if "anyone" was killed in the night of St George uprising. 

Seriously, if you really believe the garbage you are posting, lets see you be honest enough to defend it honestly. Come on now. Can you do it?

Im Just following your logic. Bodies are there, so therefore they were killed in the st George uprising. Correct? Therefore they cannot be jews.

[User]

21 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Im Just following your logic. Bodies are there, so therefore they were killed in the st George uprising. Correct? Therefore they cannot be jews.

That was never my logic or argument, that so generally bodies were there...  Yet again, you argue dishonestly. 

 

[CdnFox]

17 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

The fact you have to ask me whether I believe gas chambers existed proves that your entire premise is a lie. If I made my position on that so clear then why would you have to ask the question?

The fact you can't answer the question is what proves who's the liar here kiddo. 

 

Quote

What I was actually saying...and all I was I sitting on...is that we don't actually have any physical evidence for the holocaust.

Sure we do. There's tonnes of it. Combined with document history and eye witnesses. 

So what you REALLY were actually saying is you don't think the holocaust happened. It did. 

Which you'd know if you actually read anything, instead of just "knowing" history

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

What's with the fascination for black women in the Demonrat party?

They're only about 7% of the population and they've never fought in any wars or built anything....

Why not black men, or Asian men/women, or native Americans? Why don't they matter?

(I'm not even going to bother talking about the concept of merit with a leftist...)

The democrat party has for some time now functioned on the idea of dividing people and turning them against each other, then collecting those groups who are fool enough to believe that hte dems care about them into a big 'intersectional coalition'.   So you have to segregate people by race, sex, sexual preference and gender, and by anything else you can, Then you see which groups you can trick into thinking of themselves as victims and say "there there, mommy democrat party kiss your boo boo better and go yell at that mean old white man for you". 

Turns out black women are pretty easy to convince. 

[CdnFox]

42 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Im Just following your logic. Bodies are there, so therefore they were killed in the st George uprising. Correct? Therefore they cannot be jews.

Jezuz kid -  what kind of people have you been arguing with before coming here to think such a dumb argument would look anything but stupid?

You can't possibly think you're doing well or that this is going good for you.  It's a child's argument. You're literally arguing "all cats have four legs, my dog has  four legs, therefore my dog is a cat". 

[Five of swords]

7 minutes ago, User said:

That was never my logic or argument, that so generally bodies were there...  Yet again, you argue dishonestly. 

 

That is exactly your argument. There is a room, therefore jews died. There are bodies therefore jews died.

 

I was not even trying to make a claim about whether the hocaust happened or not, I was simply making a claim about ehat physical evidence exists for it. You don't seem to have a concept of what 'physical evidence' even means.

[User]

1 minute ago, Five of swords said:

That is exactly your argument. There is a room, therefore jews died. There are bodies therefore jews died.

How are you this dishonest?

You tried to claim there was no mass grave at treblinka. Dared me to google. I did, I showed you that there was clear evidence of this there, then you moved the goal posts and tried to claim that no, it was slaves from hundreds of years before. I challenged the stupidity of your assertion and then you tried to claim I was denying that anyone ever died during some event... and now you you are here making up some garbage about how my argument is that just because there is a room jews died. 

That was never my argument. You have dishonestly taken us here ignoring all your other repeated failed attempts to try to say this never happened. 

 

5 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

I was not even trying to make a claim about whether the hocaust happened or not, I was simply making a claim about ehat physical evidence exists for it. You don't seem to have a concept of what 'physical evidence' even means.

Yes, physical evidence exists. They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this. 

You are the one who who ignores pictures of gas chambers and then lies about what they were and then lies about a source saying they were not gas chambers... 

The physical evidence is abundant. You ignore it. Because you are dishonest. 

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, User said:

That was never my argument. You have dishonestly taken us here ignoring all your other repeated failed attempts to try to say this never happened. 

This is it in a nutshell.  Every time he's disproved and his nonsense is called out he tries to shift the focus dishonestly and in a way that's so clumsy i can only assume his previous debate partners were all toddlers. 

[Five of swords]

15 minutes ago, User said:

How are you this dishonest?

You tried to claim there was no mass grave at treblinka. Dared me to google. I did, I showed you that there was clear evidence of this there, then you moved the goal posts and tried to claim that no, it was slaves from hundreds of years before. I challenged the stupidity of your assertion and then you tried to claim I was denying that anyone ever died during some event... and now you you are here making up some garbage about how my argument is that just because there is a room jews died. 

That was never my argument. You have dishonestly taken us here ignoring all your other repeated failed attempts to try to say this never happened. 

 

Yes, physical evidence exists. They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this. 

You are the one who who ignores pictures of gas chambers and then lies about what they were and then lies about a source saying they were not gas chambers... 

The physical evidence is abundant. You ignore it. Because you are dishonest. 

I did not say there was no grave at treblika. Try again.

[User]

2 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

I did not say there was no grave at treblika. Try again.

You said:

"There have even been people willing to help the narrative out. For example, according to the holocaust story, there should be 400k jews buried in a mass grave near treblinka. Some dumb goy actually offered to exude some body and use forensics to prove once and for all that this mass grave exists. So of course the rabbis had to step in and insist he do not do this, because it would violate jewish burial rites."

Enough of your dishonesty. 

 

 

[Five of swords]

9 minutes ago, User said:

You said:

"There have even been people willing to help the narrative out. For example, according to the holocaust story, there should be 400k jews buried in a mass grave near treblinka. Some dumb goy actually offered to exude some body and use forensics to prove once and for all that this mass grave exists. So of course the rabbis had to step in and insist he do not do this, because it would violate jewish burial rites."

Enough of your dishonesty. 

 

 

I am not dishonest at all. Here...I did thr Google search for you. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16657363

 

Pay close attention to this quote from that article: "No excavation was carried out and the ground was not disturbed, which would be a violation of Jewish law and tradition, banning the exhumation of the dead."

 

Oh. That's exactly what I said.

 

Gee...it's weird how everyone who believes the holocaust is always caught lying, isn't it?

[CdnFox]

16 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

I did not say there was no grave at treblika. Try again.

If you have to spend this much time denying what you said previously and 'unsaying' it, maybe you should be more careful about what you say in the first place 

[User]

4 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

I am not dishonest at all. Here...I did thr Google search for you. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16657363

 

Pay close attention to this quote from that article: "No excavation was carried out and the ground was not disturbed, which would be a violation of Jewish law and tradition, banning the exhumation of the dead."

 

Oh. That's exactly what I said.

 

Gee...it's weird how everyone who believes the holocaust is always caught lying, isn't it?

That is not exactly what you said. Your implication was that there was no mass grave because there was no excavation. They don't have to do an excavation... as I already linked to that article and quoted for you:

"Any doubts about the existence of mass graves at the Treblinka death camp in Poland are being laid to rest by the first survey of the site using tools that see below the ground, writes forensic archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls."
 

[Five of swords]

3 minutes ago, User said:

That is not exactly what you said. Your implication was that there was no mass grave because there was no excavation. They don't have to do an excavation... as I already linked to that article and quoted for you:

"Any doubts about the existence of mass graves at the Treblinka death camp in Poland are being laid to rest by the first survey of the site using tools that see below the ground, writes forensic archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls."
 

Wrong. Nothing wad 'implied' at all. I said quite directly that no forensics was allowed to be done on any bodies that would provide actual physical evidence that they are in fact jews who died at the correct time. Without that, you got nothing. Even if you find bodies there, you cannot claim they were jews...because no forensics will be done.

 

So your 'physical evidence' for thr holocaust remains at a big fat zero. No murder weapon, no body, and not even a motive because all the suggestions for a motive rely on nsdap high command using 'coded language'. So nothing. Just eyewitness accounts. And eyewitness accounts do not actually count as 'physical evidence.

 

Furthermore, you have the mystery that rabbis insist on not doing forensics and settling this case once and for all. Is it because they know the science won't go their way? It's an obvious question...

 

So you can just keep lying and strawmanning and I will just keep on pointing it out 

[CdnFox]

17 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

So you can just keep lying and strawmanning and I will just keep on pointing it out 

"So you just keep putting out that fist and i will just keep punching it with my face!"

LOL - pure comedy gold   I'll run and fetch some popcorn  

[User]

14 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Wrong. Nothing wad 'implied' at all. I said quite directly that no forensics was allowed to be done on any bodies that would provide actual physical evidence that they are in fact jews who died at the correct time. Without that, you got nothing. Even if you find bodies there, you cannot claim they were jews...because no forensics will be done.

Yes, you were questioning that there was even a mass grave at all. Then you claimed it was slaves from some other battle. Even now, you claim there is no physical evidence... but yet you try to claim it was slaves from some other time? You try to have it both ways.  

This is not nothing:

"Any doubts about the existence of mass graves at the Treblinka death camp in Poland are being laid to rest by the first survey of the site using tools that see below the ground, writes forensic archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls."

 

16 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

So your 'physical evidence' for thr holocaust remains at a big fat zero. No murder weapon, no body, and not even a motive because all the suggestions for a motive rely on nsdap high command using 'coded language'. So nothing. Just eyewitness accounts. And eyewitness accounts do not actually count as 'physical evidence.

This is not a big fat zero:

"At Treblinka it is clear that the ash contains many bones. Bone fragments can still be seen on the surface of the ground, especially after rain."

17 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Furthermore, you have the mystery that rabbis insist on not doing forensics and settling this case once and for all. Is it because they know the science won't go their way? It's an obvious question...

 

So you can just keep lying and strawmanning and I will just keep on pointing it out 

This is not a mystery. 

"Yes, physical evidence exists. They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this. "

 

 

[Nationalist]

Wow...this thread has become a 3-some...giggle...

Sooo...BiBi's speech is done. Now he goes to see Brandon and Kamala...and then Donny-Boy.

I noted 2 of his IDF heroes were coloured. I wondered why they would make the tallest of them a tank regiment commander.

Not as much of the typical Zionist humna humna. I found that refreshing. It was a lot o' alliance talk. The USA and Israel are apparently best friends. Meh...I was never really able to agree with the Zionists and the way they took Israel. But...we Northern Euros took America (and are giving it away...). I wonder if Israel has all the reps in the hall bought already?

Yet...what Hamas did was...nothing short of sickening. They deserve what's happened and I pray the Gazan people realize that Hamas has destructive and impossible goals. Following them will only bring death.

And for you religious zealots out there...Hey, ya ever wonder who might wake-up if pure hatred, lots of death and tanks full of human blood...light "The Holy Land" on fire?

Please do continue boys...

[Five of swords]

16 minutes ago, User said:

Yes, you were questioning that there was even a mass grave at all. Then you claimed it was slaves from some other battle. Even now, you claim there is no physical evidence... but yet you try to claim it was slaves from some other time? You try to have it both ways.  

This is not nothing:

"Any doubts about the existence of mass graves at the Treblinka death camp in Poland are being laid to rest by the first survey of the site using tools that see below the ground, writes forensic archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls."

 

This is not a big fat zero:

"At Treblinka it is clear that the ash contains many bones. Bone fragments can still be seen on the surface of the ground, especially after rain."

This is not a mystery. 

"Yes, physical evidence exists. They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this. "

 

 

You are just lying, lol. I said nothing at all about whether there is a mass grave near treblinka. What I said was that whether there is one or not, you could not insist they are necessarily jewish victims of the holocaust if you refuse to perform forensics. There would be no more evidence of than than, hypothetically, them being slavs killed by the teutonic knights.

 

And oh. You think the fact that train stations exist counts as evidence for the holocaust...lol

Edited July 24, 2024 by Five of swords

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

You are just lying, lol. I said nothing at all about whether there is a mass grave near treblinka. What I said was that whether there is one or not, you could not insist they are necessarily jewish victims of the holocaust if you refuse to perform forensics. There would be no more evidence of than than, hypothetically, them being slavs killed by the teutonic knights.

There is a mass grave, we know they're the jews, you lied about it to try to stick up for your weirdo hitler worship which you've exhibited since you got here. 

You've literally been wrong about everything right down to the colour of the walls in a gas chamber.  Remember that? Remember when you said the gas chamber wasn't a gas chamber?  LOLOL

[User]

1 minute ago, Five of swords said:

You are just lying, lol. I said nothing at all about whether there is a mass grave near treblinka. What I said was that whether there is one or not, you could not insist they are necessarily jewish victims of the holocaust if you refuse to perform forensics. There would be no more evidence of than than, hypothetically, them being slavs killed by the teutonic knights.

Yes, you did. 
"Some dumb goy actually offered to exude some body and use forensics to prove once and for all that this mass grave exists."

There is more evidence. Again:

"Yes, physical evidence exists. They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this. "



 

[Five of swords]

35 minutes ago, User said:

Yes, you did. 
"Some dumb goy actually offered to exude some body and use forensics to prove once and for all that this mass grave exists."

There is more evidence. Again:

"Yes, physical evidence exists. They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this. "



 

So like I said the bodies will not be exhumed....are you even trying?

[Black Dog]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The democrat party has for some time now functioned on the idea of dividing people and turning them against each other, then collecting those groups who are fool enough to believe that hte dems care about them into a big 'intersectional coalition'.   So you have to segregate people by race, sex, sexual preference and gender, and by anything else you can, Then you see which groups you can trick into thinking of themselves as victims and say "there there, mommy democrat party kiss your boo boo better and go yell at that mean old white man for you". 

Turns out black women are pretty easy to convince. 

lol, again, I really hope the GPP makes this message a core part of their pitch to the electorate.

2 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

So like I said the bodies will not be exhumed....are you even trying?

F*ck off back to 8chan or whatever toilet you emerged from, Nazi.

[User]

4 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

So like I said the bodies will not be exhumed....are you even trying?

That is not all you said. 

You keep ignoring my repeated comments like this one:

"Yes, physical evidence exists. They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this. "