Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Good point. The U.S. was a basketcase under Trump. They apparently couldn't even run an election or manage their own public health officers.

Are the feds in charge of running the elections?

I heard they went smoothly in red states :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

I think it's good news. A lot of people want ANY better option. Trump and Vance is an extremely unlikeable ticket so really any halfway normal decent person will do.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, sharkman said:

Perhaps you should revisit the 2016 election under Obama’s administration.  Apparently that election was a mess as well.  Russian hackers, Rioting and looting, Hilary declaring that Trump was an illegitimate president.  I even remember newscasters fearfully declaring that they didn’t know what they would tell their children.

Or maybe your whole premise is  off base.

Obama isn't running again. But Obama didn't send a mob to the Capitol that left many law enforcement officers dead and injured, did he? So whining that you're a victim too doesn't really work, baby.

Posted
1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Obama isn't running again. But Obama didn't send a mob to the Capitol that left many law enforcement officers dead and injured, did he? So whining that you're a victim too doesn't really work, baby.

True...ish...

But winning the election, fixing all the broken sh1t Brandon has produced and watching Libbies scream at the sky works good for me.

Do enjoy the election...

  • Like 2

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
56 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

True...ish...

But winning the election, fixing all the broken sh1t Brandon has produced and watching Libbies scream at the sky works good for me.

Do enjoy the election...

Do you not weed your yard or clean your ass because it makes libbies mad too?

Posted
3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Obama isn't running again. But Obama didn't send a mob to the Capitol that left many law enforcement officers dead and injured, did he? So whining that you're a victim too doesn't really work, baby.

NONE of the law enforcement officers died, quit the left wing lies.

Only one person died and it was tiny woman who was unarmed who was shot by a capital police officer for scaring him.

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Do you not weed your yard or clean your ass because it makes libbies mad too?

??? Why would not weeding his yard make libbies mad??   Are dandelions considered  homophobic or something? Like "He had an upside down flag AAAAANNNNDDD he had a bunch of dandelions, his family were slave owners for sure!!!"

Edited by CdnFox
  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
11 hours ago, Matthew said:

I think it's good news. A lot of people want ANY better option. Trump and Vance is an extremely unlikeable ticket so really any halfway normal decent person will do.

They don't have a halfway normal person to put forward. 

It needs to be someone who's got at least enough name band recognition to have a chance - there's 4 months left, its a little too late to be introducing a no name.  And who've they got that's normal and not far left? Not much.  

I think if i were them i'd make peace with the fact they're going to lose the main election and start thinking about the congress and senate. They can pick a candidate that would show trump in a negative light and even if that candidate loses they might drive a lot of people to the dem senators and congress as a 'counterbalance'. 

If trump gets in controlling both those houses - the dems will be mauled in the whirlwind. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
5 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Obama isn't running again. But Obama didn't send a mob to the Capitol that left many law enforcement officers dead and injured, did he? So whining that you're a victim too doesn't really work, baby.

Unable to think clearly where Trump is concerned, TDS.  You are moving the goalposts and throwing in a straw man at the same time.  
Come back when you can debate with some integrity…

Posted
4 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Do you not weed your yard or clean your ass because it makes libbies mad too?

Huh? Silly Libbie...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, sharkman said:

Unable to think clearly where Trump is concerned, TDS.  You are moving the goalposts and throwing in a straw man at the same time.  
Come back when you can debate with some integrity…

I know you have to deny the existence of the dead and injured law enforcement ofgicers, because otherwise you'd have to admit you're a piece of shit for supporting a riot.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I know you have to deny the existence of the dead and injured law enforcement ofgicers, because otherwise you'd have to admit you're a piece of shit for supporting a riot.

Seriously, you called me baby.  Who does that?  Should I start calling you honey?

Edited by sharkman
Spelling
  • Confused 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, sharkman said:

Seriously, you called me baby.  Who does that?  Should I start called you honey?

 

Telly Does. 

Stream Who Loves Ya, Baby? by Kojak | Listen online for free ...

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
6 hours ago, sharkman said:

Seriously, you called me baby.  Who does that?  Should I start calling you honey?

Baby pretended the officers getting beaten in the Jan. 6 videos were actors so he could keep some self-respect?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Baby pretended the officers getting beaten in the Jan. 6 videos were actors so he could keep some self-respect?

First you pretend to be telly sevalas, now you're pretending to be the sucker?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

First you pretend to be telly sevalas, now you're pretending to be the sucker?

You tell yourself the videos aren't real? Or do you just refuse to watch them so you can pretend they aren't there? 

Posted
5 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You tell yourself the videos aren't real? Or do you just refuse to watch them so you can pretend they aren't there? 

No, i'm telling YOU that your 'baby talk' and claim about the other person makes you look like a child.  I should have thought that was obvious.  I guess it wouldn't be to a child now that i think about it. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No, i'm telling YOU that your 'baby talk' and claim about the other person makes you look like a child.  I should have thought that was obvious.  I guess it wouldn't be to a child now that i think about it. 

Ah...so you just change the subject when faced with the reality that there's video of law enforcement officers being assaulted during Trump's insurrection attempt.

Posted
Just now, Chrissy1979 said:

Ah...so you just change the subject when faced with the reality that there's video of law enforcement officers being assaulted during Trump's insurrection attempt.

No, the subject i originally addressed was you calling someone baby and the question 'who does that'.  

Followed up with the observation that you now look less like kojack and more like his sucker :) 

I never commented on or discussed any videos. 

Look... this will probably go faster if you just pay attention from the start. No wonder others keep making you look foolish, just focus a bit and  you won't have these problems. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

I was talking about you're denying the existence of the dead and injured law enforcement officers, even though there is video of them being assaulted by Trump's mob. Now change the subject again to how you're a big baby.

Posted
3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I was talking about you're denying the existence of the dead and injured law enforcement officers, even though there is video of them being assaulted by Trump's mob. 

Ummm...  when did i do that precisely?  I never mentioned anything about law enforcement officers, dead or alive?

Are you sure you're not talking to one of the voices in your head or something? It sure wasn't me. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
6 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Ah...so you just change the subject when faced with the reality that there's video of law enforcement officers being assaulted during Trump's insurrection attempt.

What reality?

Listen...Chrissy Baby...

No cops died on January 6th. None. A few did die...couple ODs...and a female military veteran of that military you Libbies love to hate.

There was no insurrection.! Try being at last semi-realistic.

Now...Chrissy Baby...run along and play. Your friends have made a mess and the adults have to clean it up.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)

District of Columbia Chief Medical Examiner Francisco J. Diaz reported that “all that transpired played a role” in Brian Sicknick's death, which happened immediately after he was sprayed with chemicals by MAGA rioters incited by Trump in his FAILED insurrection attempt. 

Look it up. There's even video of him getting sprayed.

 

 

Edited by Chrissy1979
Posted
3 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

If English were your first language and you were following the conversation, you would understand that you called me a sucker for believing law enforcement officers were injured on Jan. 6.

Glad to help, baby.

If you were over the age of 7 and capable of basic comprehension you would realize that '

a) no, i didn't.  and 

b) you have to be 31 different flavours of stupid to think that you know what i said better than i do :)   Congratulations, you are officially "Baskin Robins" stupid. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...