Canada may need to brace for influx of undocumented immigrants if Trump becomes president

[taxme]

20 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Not sure why you put so much emphasis in skin color rather than incompatible culture (banning  criminals or those who don't believe in the equality of women for example or respect for other beliefs than theirs). Are you saying that if all those 4 millions immigrants recently arrived were from Russian mafia or Eastern Europe human or drug traffickers then since they were while then it was all right and Canada would have been in good position?

I doubt that those scumbags you mentioned above would not be able to immigrate to Canada. We have an massive  immigration problem and it needs to be rectified. The buffoon in Ottawa wants we the white folk to try and stop this so called climate crisis from driving our ICE vehicles. Yet, with millions of new immigrants and refugees being allowed into the country, that will only add more carbon into the atmosphere and then add to the climate crisis. Of course, anyone with half a brain should be able to see that this so called climate crisis is all just one big hoax. Sadly in Canada, there are plenty of dummies to go around out there for the government to easily baffle them with this stupid silly ass nonsense about climate change. Our politicians enjoy spreading lies and try to avoid telling the truth. My opinion. 

[taxme]

20 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

Not sure why you put so much emphasis in skin color rather than incompatible culture (banning  criminals or those who don't believe in the equality of women for example or respect for other beliefs than theirs). Are you saying that if all those 4 millions immigrants recently arrived were from Russian mafia or Eastern Europe human or drug traffickers then since they were while then it was all right and Canada would have been in good position?

Our Marxist liberal government in Ottawa sure likes to put more emphasis on the promotion of the non-white skin color in Canada. You cannot be that dumb that you cannot see this happening right in front of you? Approx. just three years ago black people were never seen in commercials. Now they are front and center in pretty much all commercials. White people have seem to disappeared from view these days in commercials. Just my opinion of course. 😇

[ExFlyer]

22 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Oh Noes - hes' gone full retarded and can't speak  

Usually i don't make you cry THAT hard till the evening   

I don't mean to use such big words on you but I think you can Goofle the ones you don't understand. LOL

[CITIZEN_2015]

1 hour ago, taxme said:

Our Marxist liberal government in Ottawa sure likes to put more emphasis on the promotion of the non-white skin color in Canada. You cannot be that dumb that you cannot see this happening right in front of you? Approx. just three years ago black people were never seen in commercials. Now they are front and center in pretty much all commercials. White people have seem to disappeared from view these days in commercials. Just my opinion of course. 😇

What do you mean by commercials you say is taken over by black people?

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

I don't mean to use such big words on you but I think you can Goofle the ones you don't understand. LOL

You didn't use any words. That was kind of the point!  lol!

How many days have you been crying over this so far? 2 or is it 3? Man you are a fragile emotional little thing aren't you

[I am Groot]

21 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Not going to argue that the immigration system is broken. It very much seems to be.

I think th e Notwithstanding clause is applicable to Canadians and governments only.

The Notwithstanding clause is required to bring in new legislation to stop migrants at the borders and forbid them from applying for asylum when they've come from a safe country or have torn up their documents and flushed them while en route. Otherwise, the courts are going to want them subject to multi-year-long hearings and appeals.

[ExFlyer]

10 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

The Notwithstanding clause is required to bring in new legislation to stop migrants at the borders and forbid them from applying for asylum when they've come from a safe country or have torn up their documents and flushed them while en route. Otherwise, the courts are going to want them subject to multi-year-long hearings and appeals.

I think you are wrong. It cannot halt immigration or birder crossing or refugees from being admitted. It cannot bring in "new" legislation.

"The notwithstanding clause, or Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, gives parliaments in Canada the power to override certain portions of the charter for five-year terms when passing legislation."

"Once invoked, section 33 effectively precludes judicial review of the legislation under the listed Charter sections. A section 33 declaration is only valid for 5 years. After this time period, it ceases to have any effect unless it is re-enacted."

"

Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is commonly referred to as the “notwithstanding clause.” Its function is to prevent a court from invalidating a law that violates Charter provisions relating to fundamental freedoms (section 2), legal rights (sections 7-14), or equality rights (section 15).

Provincial or federal governments can use section 33 when they want to pre-emptively shield a law from judicial invalidation on these specific grounds, or when they want to revive a law that has already been invalidated by a court on these grounds. While an invocation of section 33 expires after five years (as per section 33(3)), there is no limit on the number of times that the clause can be reused for a given law (section 33(4))."

https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art33.html

Edited June 26, 2024 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

25 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You didn't use any words. That was kind of the point!  lol!

How many days have you been crying over this so far? 2 or is it 3? Man you are a fragile emotional little thing aren't you

Words not needed, the image speaks about you

But if you want words " I am sorry you're so stupid"

 

[I am Groot]

7 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

I think you are wrong. It cannot halt immigration or birder crossing or refugees from being admitted. It cannot bring in "new" legislation.

Are you just being picky about the words I used? I said, to make it clearer, that the government should bring in legislation to do this job and use the notwithstanding clause to keep the courts from throwing it out.

 

[ExFlyer]

8 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Are you just being picky about the words I used? I said, to make it clearer, that the government should bring in legislation to do this job and use the notwithstanding clause to keep the courts from throwing it out.

 

Not at all and sorry if it came out like that.

I am saying the notwithstanding clause does not make laws and legislation. It is there to prevent actions from going to court.

So yes, The government would have to change existing legislation and if provinces object, then the notwithstanding clause can be used.

[CdnFox]

18 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Words not needed, the image speaks about you

 

Conjunctions not needed, me speak like caveman!  LOLOL  Tell us again how you're  an adult  

Well i can see why you went with pictures instead of trying to talk yourself  

[CdnFox]

18 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Not at all and sorry if it came out like that.

I am saying the notwithstanding clause does not make laws and legislation. It is there to prevent actions from going to court.

So yes, The government would have to change existing legislation and if provinces object, then the notwithstanding clause can be used.

You have no clue what the notwithstanding clause is. The provinces objecting would have nothing to do with it.

It's very simple. The charter and rights and freedoms prevents certain laws from being passed because they violate people's rights and freedoms. The notwithstanding clause simply says that notwithstanding their charter rights this law is valid anyway. It basically allows governments to bypass the charter of rights and freedoms for a specific law.

It is not there to prevent things from going to court. It is there to prevent the charter of rights and freedoms from being used as a tool to invalidate a law.

It would sure help if you learned what you were talking about before you made comments. The notwithstanding clause has to be built into the law when it's crafted, you don't use it separately if someone complains

[taxme]

On 6/26/2024 at 1:16 PM, CITIZEN_2015 said:

What do you mean by commercials you say is taken over by black people?

Read what i wrote again. 

[CITIZEN_2015]

16 hours ago, taxme said:

Read what i wrote again. 

You meant TV ads. No I haven't noticed much change in the past few years.  I have noticed less black men in dance bars past three decades. 

[taxme]

4 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

You meant TV ads. No I haven't noticed much change in the past few years.  I have noticed less black men in dance bars past three decades. 

Watch some TV ads once in awhile. I was talking about TV ads. There are a hell of a lot more blacks and less whites in TV ads these days than ever before. A sign of things to come for the white folk of Canada. As the white folk approach minority status in Canada, the worse things will get. Not in bars in Toronto or Montreal will you see less blacks. Just to set the record straight i have nothing against black people. There are plenty of good black people around. Just saying. 

[August1991]

On 6/26/2024 at 1:28 PM, Army Guy said:

Are you saying Quebecor's are not hard worker honest folks.... or is it something else...

Clifford Sifton wanted to populate western Canada with anyone who was not a Roman Catholic, not from Quebec.

In the 1890s, Quebec women were bearing children at a rate unprecedented in history

Sifton made it difficult for any of these kids to go west. They went south

Today, there are people like David Plouffe. I was embrassed to hear his name as "Pluff".