WestCanMan Posted April 26 Author Report Share Posted April 26 22 hours ago, impartialobserver said: You keep responding... I know why. Second, you assumed that I was in agreeance with them. Assumptions are for the lazy. Well.. your secret is out. Your posts rely on assumptions and if someone points them out, you start with the name-calling and such. Because surely if someone is not you.. they fit your narrowly defined boxes. Now.. where is your usual line about CNN. Oh look, another io post that's not about the thread topic. Can you address the topic that leftist posters are constantly sucked in by false narratives or not? How legit were the "gentle giant" narratives that caused widespread violence and racial division? The Sandman narrative, no inflation, transitory inflation, awesome Afghanistan withdrawal, no Americans were left behind, the laptop is Russian disinformation, Russian collusion, mostly peaceful protests, the gov't was almost overthrown on Jan 6th, seditious mobs, Jussie Smollett, don't say BSL4, kids need covid jabs, pandemic of the unvaccinated, etc...? How is it that leftists always end up on the retarded side of history? A lot of leftists are educated, yet they shriek the dumbest, most debunked BS I've ever heard in my life. How did anyone with an IQ over 80 ever end up being so wrong for so long about the above topics - in the face of all evidence - if they're not just cultists? And make no mistake, they were 100% wrong all along and that's established fact now. Can you make the case that they're all that stupid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 (edited) On 4/26/2024 at 8:33 AM, WestCanMan said: Oh look, another io post that's not about the thread topic. Can you address the topic that leftist posters are constantly sucked in by false narratives or not? How legit were the "gentle giant" narratives that caused widespread violence and racial division? The Sandman narrative, no inflation, transitory inflation, awesome Afghanistan withdrawal, no Americans were left behind, the laptop is Russian disinformation, Russian collusion, mostly peaceful protests, the gov't was almost overthrown on Jan 6th, seditious mobs, Jussie Smollett, don't say BSL4, kids need covid jabs, pandemic of the unvaccinated, etc...? How is it that leftists always end up on the retarded side of history? A lot of leftists are educated, yet they shriek the dumbest, most debunked BS I've ever heard in my life. How did anyone with an IQ over 80 ever end up being so wrong for so long about the above topics - in the face of all evidence - if they're not just cultists? And make no mistake, they were 100% wrong all along and that's established fact now. Can you make the case that they're all that stupid? Everything written above is full of assumptions and purely subjective. Therefore there is no proving/disproving. Being wrong in politics is purely subjective. In short.. someone who does not give you affirmation is off topic. Edited April 29 by impartialobserver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 1 hour ago, impartialobserver said: Everything written above is full of assumptions and purely subjective. Therefore there is no proving/disproving. Being wrong in politics is purely subjective. In short.. someone who does not give you affirmation is off topic. Awww, just give him the affirmation! Anyone who is 24/7 rage posting about the same handful of personal grievances is clearly very, very lonely. (Nobody wants to live with that!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impartialobserver Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 2 minutes ago, Hodad said: Awww, just give him the affirmation! Anyone who is 24/7 rage posting about the same handful of personal grievances is clearly very, very lonely. (Nobody wants to live with that!) probably should. If he was rational.. he would get the hint that I do not agree with him and never will. There is this definition of insanity... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 30 Author Report Share Posted April 30 3 hours ago, impartialobserver said: Everything written above is full of assumptions and purely subjective. Therefore there is no proving/disproving. Being wrong in politics is purely subjective. In short.. someone who does not give you affirmation is off topic. Everything you wrote is a vague generalization, and I don't just mean the latest one. Man up for once. Make a declarative statement instead of just spewing more whiny ad-hominem drivel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted April 30 Author Report Share Posted April 30 1 hour ago, impartialobserver said: probably should. If he was rational.. he would get the hint that I do not agree with him and never will. There is this definition of insanity... I don't expect any leftards to admit to anything or say anything intelligent, I just want you to try to make an on-point comment so that I can make fun of your stupidity instead of your cowardice for once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted May 9 Author Report Share Posted May 9 One of the left's biggest vote-getters is climate change. Alt-left politicians are trying to scare kids into voting for them by telling them that they'll all die if they don't jump in line. Just like they did with covid. Does the "YOU'RE ALL GONNA DIE!" shtick sound familiar? It's the cultist rallying cry. Once you convince people that their lives are on the line you have them hook, line and sinker. They're cultists. Here's a pre-eminent climatologist, one Dr Judith Curry, from May 04 2024, explaining how hard politicians are pushing scientists to conform to the global warming agenda: Mixing politics and science is inevitable on issues of high societal relevance, such as climate change. However, there are some really bad ways to do this, and we’re seeing all of these with the climate change issue. Policy makers misuse science by demanding scientific arguments for desired policies, funding a narrow range of projects that support preferred policies, and using science as a vehicle to avoid ‘hot potato’ policy issues. Scientists misuse policy-relevant science by playing power politics with their expertise, conflating expert judgment with evidence, entangling disputed facts with values, and intimidating scientists whose research interferes with their political agendas. Dems/Libs: "THE SKY IS FALLING, DUMMIES! EAT BUGS TO MAKE THE WEATHER GOODER!" Leftards: "Oh, yes, thank you Mr Trudeau! Thank you Mr. Biden!" How did all those votes for Trudeau and Biden work out? Did they save us all from Climate Change? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted May 9 Report Share Posted May 9 13 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Does the "YOU'RE ALL GONNA DIE!" shtick sound familiar? It's the cultist rallying cry. Fear and anger are the two easiest ways to motivate people. All cults use a blend of that to keep their people in line but so does virtually every other 'snake oil peddler' out there like peta or tides or any of the left wing 'activist' groups. Get mad get scared take action - been that way since religion was invented. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted May 15 Author Report Share Posted May 15 Today, cultists are saying that an adult showering with their young kids, when they feel like it is inappropriate, is still pretty normal. Would even one person here let Joe babysit their kids? Not necessarily now, when he's beyond incompetent, I mean if he was 40 years younger. If so, just say: "I'd let Joe, the creepy kid-sniffer who took inappropriate showers with his young daughter, babysit my young child." 🤣 None of them would trust them with a child, but they trust him as POTUS, even when they know that him and his kid do side deals with China. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted May 17 Author Report Share Posted May 17 Now leftard cultists are upset that Trump is freeing Jan 6thers, most of whom did nothing wrong. Here's who Clinton released: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rosenberg Quote Susan Lisa Rosenberg (born October 5, 1955)[1] is an American activist, writer, advocate for social justice and prisoners' rights. Oh, wait, that's not so bad... But it's not the truth. That's not what she really is. From the late 1970s into the mid-1980s, Rosenberg was active in the far-left terrorist[2][3][4] May 19th Communist Organization ("M19CO") which, according to a contemporaneous FBI report, "openly advocate[d] the overthrow of the U.S. Government through armed struggle and the use of violence".[5] M19CO provided support to an offshoot of the Black Liberation Army, including in armored truck robberies, and later engaged in bombings of government buildings, including the 1983 Capitol bombing.[6] Bombed the capitol building. Hmmm, is that worse than "Walked through a door that the cops opened for you"? Not done trying to destroy America, Rosenberg was involved in funding BLM https://www.yahoo.com/news/exposing-black-lives-matters-ties-005752013.html This is the kind of person that leftists let out of jail, and none of them are talking about her. It's a cult. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted Friday at 09:16 PM Author Report Share Posted Friday at 09:16 PM So a Soros judge, who's also a Biden donor, tries Trump for alleged crimes that are well past their statute of limitations, so this state judge tries him on the federal charges - which isn't a thing - he takes witness statements from a known perjurer and a disgruntled ex but prevents the most qualified witness in North America from testifying, and ALL of the cultists here are on-side. And all this after the DOJ was already caught committing crimes against trump during their collusion witch hunt. There isn't a single leftist on this site who sees the damage this has done to democracy. Verdict: CULT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted Friday at 09:36 PM Report Share Posted Friday at 09:36 PM 17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: So a Soros judge, who's also a Biden donor, tries Trump for alleged crimes that are well past their statute of limitations, so this state judge tries him on the federal charges - which isn't a thing - he takes witness statements from a known perjurer and a disgruntled ex but prevents the most qualified witness in North America from testifying, and ALL of the cultists here are on-side. And all this after the DOJ was already caught committing crimes against trump during their collusion witch hunt. There isn't a single leftist on this site who sees the damage this has done to democracy. Verdict: CULT I feel we shouldn't rule out 'self delusional' so quickly. Also you forgot the judge's daughter is currently making millions as an activist against trump. And that one of the prosecutors worked directly for the dems and then was sent to work for the prosecutor's office and a month or so later the charges appeared 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted Saturday at 12:21 AM Author Report Share Posted Saturday at 12:21 AM 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: Also you forgot the judge's daughter is currently making millions as an activist against trump. Millions? Seriously? How does she do that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted Saturday at 12:35 AM Report Share Posted Saturday at 12:35 AM 3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Millions? Seriously? How does she do that? She's a fundraiser executive for a number of democrats and she's using the 'My dad is putting trump in jail' card to raise massive amounts of money and advance her own organization's position. The control various pac's and super pac's including some stuff for joe biden. There's a bunch of gag orders preventing trump from talking about it much but it's one of the things that's really pee'd him off about the judge's refusal to recuse himself, him sending trump to jail will literally mean major bucks for his daughter and for her fundraising for the dems. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted Saturday at 06:29 AM Report Share Posted Saturday at 06:29 AM (edited) 6 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Millions? Seriously? How does she do that? Oh, she very likely does. She's CEO of a notable political digital advertising and influence company. But Merchan properly submitted the question for ethics review and it was confirmed that the employment status of a Judge's relatives is not disqualifying. She doesn't live in his household. If that still bothers you, I'll be waiting for your diatribe about Ginni Thomas, whose very similar work brings money directly into the Thomas household while her husband has political questions before the court. Eh? Edited Saturday at 06:49 AM by Hodad 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted Saturday at 07:47 AM Report Share Posted Saturday at 07:47 AM 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Oh, she very likely does. She's CEO of a notable political digital advertising and influence company. But Merchan properly submitted the question for ethics review and it was confirmed that the employment status of a Judge's relatives is not disqualifying. She doesn't live in his household. If that still bothers you, I'll be waiting for your diatribe about Ginni Thomas, whose very similar work brings money directly into the Thomas household while her husband has political questions before the court. Eh? It's not about questions before the court - if she raised money specifically saying her hubby is going to put someone in jail then we'd have a problem. But nice false equivalency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted Saturday at 02:51 PM Author Report Share Posted Saturday at 02:51 PM 8 hours ago, Hodad said: Oh, she very likely does. She's CEO of a notable political digital advertising and influence company. But Merchan properly submitted the question for ethics review and it was confirmed that the employment status of a Judge's relatives is not disqualifying. She doesn't live in his household. If that still bothers you, I'll be waiting for your diatribe about Ginni Thomas, whose very similar work brings money directly into the Thomas household while her husband has political questions before the court. Eh? Is Ginni Thomas using the court as a political weapon somehow? I don't even know who she is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted Saturday at 05:31 PM Report Share Posted Saturday at 05:31 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Is Ginni Thomas using the court as a political weapon somehow? I don't even know who she is. She isn't. He's trying desperately to draw some sort of parallel but there's simply is not. She raises money and such and her husband is a judge, you've probably heard of Judge Thomas. So he's trying to say that just because she's married to a judge who sometimes may hear cases that in some way affect republicans that this is the same as a judge who got elected by saying he would go after trump and his daughter who is actively fundraising based on the fact that her father is going after trump and that he will put trump in jail so please donate. It's just the usual leftist liberal lies Edited Saturday at 05:31 PM by CdnFox 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted Saturday at 07:22 PM Report Share Posted Saturday at 07:22 PM (edited) 4 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Is Ginni Thomas using the court as a political weapon somehow? I don't even know who she is. Clarence Thomas' wife, Ginni, is in a very similar business. She takes the money with one hand while Thomas rules "impartially" with the other. Ethics be damned. If a Judge's adult daughter working in politics upsets you then you'll surely be apoplectic about the Thomases. Edited Saturday at 07:25 PM by Hodad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted Saturday at 07:40 PM Report Share Posted Saturday at 07:40 PM Hmmm Probably a sex cult with Bill Clinton getting a BJ in his office by his intern and Biden molesting other women as secretary, forcing them to defect the country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted Saturday at 10:31 PM Author Report Share Posted Saturday at 10:31 PM (edited) 3 hours ago, Hodad said: Clarence Thomas' wife, Ginni, is in a very similar business. She takes the money with one hand while Thomas rules "impartially" with the other. Ethics be damned. If a Judge's adult daughter working in politics upsets you then you'll surely be apoplectic about the Thomases. Is Ginni somehow benefitting from Clarence Thomas's dirty deeds? There doesn't appear to be a connection here... 2 hours ago, West said: Hmmm Probably a sex cult with Bill Clinton getting a BJ in his office by his intern and Biden molesting other women as secretary, forcing them to defect the country. How old are these "women" that Biden's molesting? Do they have pubic hair yet? (He calls those ones "cougars") Edited Saturday at 10:33 PM by WestCanMan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted Saturday at 10:52 PM Report Share Posted Saturday at 10:52 PM 14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Is Ginni somehow benefitting from Clarence Thomas's dirty deeds? There doesn't appear to be a connection here... Really? You can't see any way that Ginni leading and collecting money from the "Stop the steal" nonsense intersects with Clarence's ability to be objective ruling on matters related to the Stop Steal attack on the Capitol? To Trump's complicity? Etc. How could he possibly be impartial sitting in judgment related to the direct activities of his wife--activities that put food on his table and money in his pocket? That's absurd. So I say again, if a Judge's adult daughter working in the political sector feels outrageous to you, you should be shitting yourself over the adventures in the Thomas household. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted yesterday at 01:38 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 01:38 AM 6 hours ago, Hodad said: Clarence Thomas' wife, Ginni, is in a very similar business. She takes the money with one hand while Thomas rules "impartially" with the other. Ethics be damned. If a Judge's adult daughter working in politics upsets you then you'll surely be apoplectic about the Thomases. But doesn't use her husbands court cases to promote her fundraising. What a lying sack of crap you are. 2 hours ago, Hodad said: Really? You can't see any way that Ginni leading and collecting money from the "Stop the steal" nonsense intersects with Clarence's ability to be objective ruling on matters related to the Stop Steal attack on the Capitol? To Trump's complicity? Etc. Show me a case were it would have. Point to one and say 'there - see, that's a ruling she used to further her own benefits. " We can all point to one in THIS case, so you point to one for Ginni. No? Nothing? Not a single case? Can't show ANYTHING similar to this? Imagine that. The left are born liars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted yesterday at 04:05 PM Author Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:05 PM (edited) 14 hours ago, CdnFox said: But doesn't use her husbands court cases to promote her fundraising. What a lying sack of crap you are. "Merchan's daughter has a job, and Ginni also has a job. So they're totally the same, right?" - cultist 🤡s To cultists, the fact that Merchan's daughter relies on his abuse of the legal system to make money is just a minor distraction, like when the FBI commits crimes, or when the Bidens get millions of dollars from the Chinese gov't. TBH, this is a lot like the China scam, where the Biden's work for China and they just find a way to get money back to Biden & Co. Merchan is doing the dirty work here, and Demonrats find ways to funnel money back to the family. Edited yesterday at 04:07 PM by WestCanMan 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted yesterday at 05:30 PM Report Share Posted yesterday at 05:30 PM 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: "Merchan's daughter has a job, and Ginni also has a job. So they're totally the same, right?" - cultist 🤡s ROFMAO - well that's exactly how the think Quote To cultists, the fact that Merchan's daughter relies on his abuse of the legal system to make money is just a minor distraction, like when the FBI commits crimes, or when the Bidens get millions of dollars from the Chinese gov't. TBH, this is a lot like the China scam, where the Biden's work for China and they just find a way to get money back to Biden & Co. Merchan is doing the dirty work here, and Demonrats find ways to funnel money back to the family. You are 100 percent correct. The dems are less like cultists and more like mafia these days. Break the laws, and make sure everyone in the 'family' gets a taste of the action as long as they're kissing the don's ring. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.