Jump to content

Canadian Catholic student arrested for saying men are different from women.


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Contrarian said:

I know a specimen like this which does not talk to his family members over politics for years because he just could not accept someone won an argument.

I have zero symphaty for such peple. Politcs over Family?!

I worked with a person like this. They were so strong on their political views, while all others at work kept their views to themselves for the most part. They demanded to know if you were a leftist or "right winged". They saw anyone who disagreed with their views, as "right winged" and "needing correction"

They were more than happy to end relationships or make you a mortal enemy for any form of disagreement.

I mean, I'm conservative and my sibling is very liberal. We however, both value common sense and logic. We strongly disagree on politics, but its not lost on us, that they're just that. It doesn't make one better or worse than the other.

Also, most importantly--we've grown up together and are family. If something so trivial can get between otherwise very close siblings, then to me its insanely sad and a testament as to how political division and reading too closely into alliances can blind you.

American Antifa sounds exactly like that co-worker of mine.

I.E Scolding all their co-workers for somehow being immoral, despising Trump, but if you were to correct any of their hypocritical behavior, they would feel "attacked".

I.E Scolding a co-worker for throwing their plastic bag in the garbage, and in their typical condescending tone and talking points: "Do you not realize that plastic is recyclable? You're increasing global warming".

Or from me laughing at a joke a co-worker made when they saw an old Asian woman and told me "hey, there's your wife"! I laughed as this woman was in her 90's, and old enough to be my wife's grand mother. Also, at how dumb the joke was.

This same co-worker, cornered me the next day, demanding to know why I didn't condemn the behavior: "Uh, he was joking, albeit it being a dumb joke..." No! Racism is wrong! You being silent to racism, is you accepting racism.

I ended the argument with: "Have you ever experienced racism?" No, but you being quiet to it is ridiculous. I just smiled and said okay, internally laughing at how me subtly questioning their IQ went way over their heads.

Keep in mind, am black and that person was white.

Just the lack of logic that these people operate with, is mind boggling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

See, this is what I mean. Dr Seuss wasn't cancelled. What actually happened is the Seuss corporation decided to stop publishing five books out of their discography of hundreds. These books are super old, most people didn't even know they existed. There was no "woke mob" calling for the books to be banned, it was simply a corporation deciding the books weren't worth publishing anymore. You can actually still buy those books online, it's not like they've been banned.

Now, compare that to Republicans using government force to ban books from public libraries. Which of these two things is authoritarian? A private company making a personal decision about their own content? Or the government banning people from renting out books in libraries and schools?

Even freedom of speech has its limitations. I agree that porn shouldn't be available in schools or libraries. But saying you can't learn about Marxism in public schools is extremely authoritarian. You're basically saying, I don't agree with this thing, so it should be banned. That's what China does.

High schools aren’t being prevented from storing information about Marxism; they’re being prevented from teaching kids to be Marxists.  Those are two very different things.  That’s what the ban on CRT is about, preventing Derek Bell’s ideas that particular races are by definition oppressive from being treated as facts in the public education of children.  It’s there in a lot of EDI training and it’s there in recent curriculum.  Some theorists and educators discuss this pseudoscience as though it’s factual.  Read John McWhorter’s Woke Racism.  He’s a brilliant black linguist out of Columbia University.

Edited by Zeitgeist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

Yes, that's why I said that conservatives were against freeing the slaves, not Republicans.

 

I don't agree with affirmative action. The Democrats only do shit like that to distract from the fact that we need real systemic change based around class and economics. But to say Republicans care about equality under the law is beyond parody. This is the party that spent years enabling Donald Trump. Yes, both parties are corrupt, but the Republicans are infinitely more corrupt. Plus, when it comes to policy, Democrats walk a line between helping the workers and helping the rich, whereas the Republicans only care about helping the rich.

 

As much as I don't like the Democrats, they're not reactionary or authoritarian, but the Republicans are. And while neither party is run by nazis, the Republicans know that many of their supporters are nazis, so they will dog whistle nazism constantly. They may not be pushing for nazism like they're pushing for fascism, but they are normalizing both.

The Republicans are more the party of equal opportunity and maximum opportunity for all.  The Democrats buy votes from select groups by offering to take care of them like babies by giving them handouts.  It leads to cycles of dependence on the state and erodes individual freedom, autonomy, and opportunity.  It makes people weaker. That’s not to say that there isn’t value in a social safety net, but it always runs the risk of incentivizing poverty and dependency.  

Edited by Zeitgeist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

High schools aren’t being prevented from storing information about Marxism; they’re being prevented from teaching kids to be Marxists.  

This literal nazi conspiracy theory is wrong, "cultural marxism" is not a thing. But I'm not even talking about teaching marxism, I'm saying Republicans are banning books from libraries and schools. If you think a book should be banned from a public library just because you disagree with what it teachers, you're being authoritarian.

Quote

Those are two very different things.  That’s what the ban on CRT is about, preventing Derek Bell’s ideas that particular races are by definition oppressive from being treated as facts in the public education of children.  

That's not taught in CRT. CRT actually teaches the opposite, that these racial categories are artificially created in order to oppress people. White people can't be oppressive by nature, because there are no "white people" or "black people" according to CRT, just human beings with different physical features.

The beliefs you have about CRT were created by Christopher Rufo, who basically admitted he was lying. He once tweeted: "The goal is to have the public read something crazy in the newspaper and immediately think ‘critical race theory.’ We have decodified the term and will recodify it to annex the entire range of cultural constructions that are unpopular with Americans." So in short, he created a moral panic in which anything bad is CRT. It's the same thing Republicans did with WOKE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

The Republicans are more the party of equal opportunity and maximum opportunity for all.  

So how come they only support subsidies and bailouts for the rich?

If they believe in equal opportunity, how come they're against policies that lift up people born into poverty? Shouldn't kids born into poverty have the same shot at success as kids born into wealth?

Give this comic a look. It's very short, won't take you long.

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/the-wireless/373065/the-pencilsword-on-a-plate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Americana Antifa said:

I don't. The Democrats suck, but I never calls them fascists or nazis.

Actually, there was only one fascist Democrat in the entire party, Tulsi Gabbard, but then she became a Republican. Funny how she felt like the GOP was a better place for her politics.

Sure you do. See - the one person who left your clan is instantly a nazi.

You see nazi's everywhere. Everyone who's not part of your tribe is a nazi. The whole world is nothing but nazi's unless they agree with your specific beliefs.

That's not a political position - that's a sign of mental health issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Americana Antifa said:

Examples?

You. It's basically all you've done here.

Every conservative is a nazi.  Lie.  Antifa isn't violent. Lie. The democrats don't condone or excuse violence.  Lie. 

Conservatives were against freeing the slaves - lie.

In fact i can't think of any of your posts which didn't have at least one - most were nothing but. 

And on top of it every conservative is a nazi. And if someone leaves the democrats, it's because they were a nazi. Nazi nazi nazi.

You don't have a political position - you have a compulsive lying and self delusion mental heath issue that's serious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Sure you do. See - the one person who left your clan is instantly a nazi.

Where do I even begin with this one?

I said Gabbard is a fascist, not a nazi. I don't use these terms as slurs like you do, they actually mean something.

I believed Gabbard is a fascist ever since her support for Narendra Modi and Hindutva, which she started doing openly while she was still a Democrat.

Finally, the Democrats aren't my clan. Most of them are liberals and super weak in standing up to the fascists. Of course I'll vote for them because I believe in harm reduction, but they don't exactly represent anti-fascism or socialism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You. It's basically all you've done here.

Every conservative is a nazi.  Lie.  Antifa isn't violent. Lie. The democrats don't condone or excuse violence.  Lie. 

Conservatives were against freeing the slaves - lie.

In fact i can't think of any of your posts which didn't have at least one - most were nothing but. 

And on top of it every conservative is a nazi. And if someone leaves the democrats, it's because they were a nazi. Nazi nazi nazi.

You don't have a political position - you have a compulsive lying and self delusion mental heath issue that's serious. 

Cool, but this is beside the point. You said that leftists are constantly trying to get people fired like conservatives do. Do you have any examples of this?

Right now, right-wing media is making an effort to get David Pakman to lose his sponsors because they disagree with him. Do you have any examples of left-wing or liberal media doing this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Americana Antifa said:

Cool, but this is beside the point. You said that leftists are constantly trying to get people fired like conservatives do. Do you have any examples of this?

Right now, right-wing media is making an effort to get David Pakman to lose his sponsors because they disagree with him. Do you have any examples of left-wing or liberal media doing this?

Whaat?  Grow up. How many New York Times writers have lost their jobs over wokism?  Jewish lesbian Bari Weiss had to start a Substack.  Heh, fairness in America.  Is there no First Amendment?  Either you defend free speech for all or f@k you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Whaat?  Grow up. How many New York Times writers have lost their jobs over wokism?  Jewish lesbian Bari Weiss had to start a Substack.  Heh, fairness in America.  Is there no First Amendment?  Either you defend free speech for all or f@k you. 

Free speech means the government can't arrest you for speech. It DOES NOT MEAN that a private company owes you a platform. If I violate Youtube's TOS and they ban me, my freedom of speech has not been violated.

As for "wokism," stop being stupid. That's a meaningless term that retards use for anything they don't like.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Americana Antifa said:

Free speech means the government can't arrest you for speech. It DOES NOT MEAN that a private company owes you a platform. If I violate Youtube's TOS and they ban me, my freedom of speech has not been violated.

As for "wokism," stop being stupid. That's a meaningless term that retards use for anything they don't like.

 

You’re actually sadly compliant.  Ha, you’re weak.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Cool, but this is beside the point.

It is literally a specific answer to the question you asked.

Are you saying your own questions are pointless? Or that you are? Of course - two things can be true at the same time

3 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

You said that leftists are constantly trying to get people fired like conservatives do. Do you have any examples of this?

Sure -there's tonnes. In fact there's plenty of 'top 10' lists as examples if you do a quick google search :) 

but what's the point if i take the time to answer you and you then just state your questions are pointless?

3 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Right now, right-wing media is making an effort to get David Pakman to lose his sponsors because they disagree with him. Do you have any examples of left-wing or liberal media doing this?

Already answered.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Americana Antifa said:

ree speech means the government can't arrest you for speech. It DOES NOT MEAN that a private company owes you a platform. If I violate Youtube's TOS and they ban me, my freedom of speech has not been violated.

Ahhh  another example of a common twisting of the truth by the left.  What you said WOULD be True - but if the TOS is applied in an uneven basis based on politics then it IS in fact prejudice. In canada they certainly would be held to account by a human rights tribunal  for that

So if youtube bans someone because they're defending republican values - or arranges it's algorithms to repress right wing posters in favor of left wing ...  well that IS in fact a violation of rights.

It is in fact an infrigement on free speech  in such cases. Is it ok for businesses to say they won't do business with black people? Or with businesses to say they won't do business with Muslims?  Or that women cant shop somewhere without their husbands with them?

Nope.  So.  looks like your example is a pretty bad one after all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It is literally a specific answer to the question you asked.

Nope. The question was about leftists or liberals who try to get people fired as part of the "cancel culture" narrative.

31 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sure -there's tonnes. In fact there's plenty of 'top 10' lists as examples if you do a quick google search :) 

If you make the claim, it's on you to present the evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Ahhh  another example of a common twisting of the truth by the left.  What you said WOULD be True - but if the TOS is applied in an uneven basis based on politics then it IS in fact prejudice. In canada they certainly would be held to account by a human rights tribunal  for that

Nope, you're wrong again. Freedom of speech is entirely about the law. As in, you can't be legally prosecuted for speech. A private company is allowed to deplatform or fire you, even if you feel it's unfair, over speech.

There are some exceptions, of course. If you're fired for talking about your religion at work, but other people regularly talk about their religion and don't get fired, you can sue for discrimination. But even there, you would have to make the claim that you were discriminated against based on your religion, which is a protected class in Canada and America. And even then, they would take into account exactly what you were saying. You can't demand human sacrifice and then claim it's just part of your religion.

However, a private company can have a policy of not allowing any religion talk on the premise. Plus, if it's a religion-based company, they can have more leeway with firing people of other religions.

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So if youtube bans someone because they're defending republican values - or arranges it's algorithms to repress right wing posters in favor of left wing ...  well that IS in fact a violation of rights.

Nope. As a private company Youtube can do that. They don't, I wish they did, but they could if they wanted to.

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It is in fact an infrigement on free speech  in such cases. Is it ok for businesses to say they won't do business with black people? Or with businesses to say they won't do business with Muslims?  Or that women cant shop somewhere without their husbands with them?

Nope.  So.  looks like your example is a pretty bad one after all.

No, because race, religion, and gender are all protected classes. Political affiliation is not. If you walk into a restaurant wearing your nazi uniform, you'll probably get kicked out, even if you claim that's discrimination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Nope. The question was about leftists or liberals who try to get people fired as part of the "cancel culture" narrative.

If you make the claim, it's on you to present the evidence.

Go read it again kiddo.

Quote

There are some exceptions, of course.

You mean the ones i metioned which are entirely relevant that you completely ignored previously? Yeah. I know. I mentioned them.

Quote

Nope. As a private company Youtube can do that.

Nope, they can't as it turns out.  That's why they deny doing it and rush to "Fix" it if they get caught at it. That's why they got hauled in front of the gov't.

It's hilarious tho that you "wish" they squished people's rights and denied them the ability to speak out  :)  Ahhhh yes - no lefties engage in cancel culture do they :) ROFLMAO!

Quote

No, because race, religion, and gender are all protected classes. Political affiliation is not. I

Sure it is. You can't say "democrats are not allowed to eat here" or "We don't provide service to democrats, you must sign a form saying you will never vote democrat to get our services".

You certainly can't in canada thats for sure - but we are a slightly more intelligent country. Or at least some parts are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You mean the ones i metioned which are entirely relevant that you completely ignored previously? Yeah. I know. I mentioned them.

The ones you mentioned were not cases where freedom of speech was violated. They also weren't case where people called on something to be cancelled.

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Nope, they can't as it turns out.  That's why they deny doing it and rush to "Fix" it if they get caught at it. That's why they got hauled in front of the gov't.

So I know you only get your news from right-wing media, but if you actually fact-checked what you hear, you'd learn that Youtube and Twitter are actually biased in favor of conservatives. The Twitter hearings showed that they actually changed the TOS so that Trump could stay on the platformed. Not only does Youtube not censor the Right, but they even let insane fascists like PragerU run commercials for other videos.

6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's hilarious tho that you "wish" they squished people's rights and denied them the ability to speak out  :)  Ahhhh yes - no lefties engage in cancel culture do they :) ROFLMAO!

Nobody has a right to a platform.

ROFLMAO!

Quote

 

Sure it is. You can't say "democrats are not allowed to eat here" or "We don't provide service to democrats, you must sign a form saying you will never vote democrat to get our services".

You certainly can't in canada thats for sure - but we are a slightly more intelligent country. Or at least some parts are.

 

Do you have an evidence to back that up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Americana Antifa said:

The ones you mentioned were not cases where freedom of speech was violated. They also weren't case where people called on something to be cancelled.

Hogwash.  Dishonesty isn't how you make a case, try something else,

1 minute ago, Americana Antifa said:

So I know you only get your news from right-wing media, but if you actually fact-checked what you hear, you'd learn that Youtube and Twitter are actually biased in favor of conservatives.

Actually the fact checks show otherwise, The ONLY people who believe that are those who completely immerse themselves in the most left wing of media.

People who look at both don't have that problem. You do.  So.. there you go.

1 minute ago, Americana Antifa said:

 

The Twitter hearings showed that they actually changed the TOS so that Trump could stay on the platformed. Not only does Youtube not censor the Right, but they even let insane fascists like PragerU run commercials for other videos.

The twitter hearings showed that there was a bias to the left over all and this was discovered to be the case when twitter changed hands. There was MASSIVE left wing favoritism in their algorithms

Then there's the policy volations. Such as when ANY news regarding hunter biden's laptop was completely squashed during the election, with even mainstream media like the new york post being threatened if they even mentioned the existence of articles about it.  Twitter claimed it was due to their policies - but that was quickly disproven and shown the story did not violate their policy.

So swing and a miss yet again little girl.

1 minute ago, Americana Antifa said:

Nobody has a right to a platform.

People do have equal rights to be treated equally under the law. Sorry if that inconveniences your efforts to repress people.

1 minute ago, Americana Antifa said:

 

Do you have an evidence to back that up?

Of course - but we've seen many many times already you don't care about evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CdnFox said:

The twitter hearings showed that there was a bias to the left over all and this was discovered to be the case when twitter changed hands. There was MASSIVE left wing favoritism in their algorithms

Source?

Just now, CdnFox said:

Then there's the policy volations. Such as when ANY news regarding hunter biden's laptop was completely squashed during the election, with even mainstream media like the new york post being threatened if they even mentioned the existence of articles about it.  Twitter claimed it was due to their policies - but that was quickly disproven and shown the story did not violate their policy.

Nope. What actually happened is the Biden campaign requested that Twitter take down nude pics of Hunter Biden. These pics being on Twitter is illegal under the "revenge porn" law.

So basically, the phony outrage over Democrats trying to get info on Hunter Biden pulled was really just Democrats trying to get illegal nudes pulled. Don't worry, you can still find pics of Hunter's dick.

Just now, CdnFox said:

People do have equal rights to be treated equally under the law. Sorry if that inconveniences your efforts to repress people.

Yes, but the law allows private companies to discriminate, as long as it's not discrimination based on protected class.

Again, when you put on your nazi uniform, that you usually only wear at the meetings, and go to the local bar, you get kicked out. It doesn't matter that nazism is your political belief, because that's not a protected class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Americana Antifa said:

Source?

Why its the same one you provided to prove your statement.  Ohhh.... wait...

LOL - typical leftie - refuses to provide proof but demands it when the discussion goes against them.

Then tries to discredit proof if you provide it any way they can rather than address it

Let me guess - now you'll post a bunch of irrelevant stories which don't address the issue and claim you've provided proof right? LOL - so predictable :)

Just now, Americana Antifa said:

Nope. What actually happened is the Biden campaign requested that Twitter take down nude pics of Hunter Biden. These pics being on Twitter is illegal under the "revenge porn" law.

AAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!!1 HOLY SHIT - do you think ANYONE in the universe will believe that crap attempt at rewriting history?!?!?  ROFLMAO!!!!

Wow - tell me you're a delusional sack of garbage without telling me :)

No - nobody wants to see hunter biden's nude pics :) The notebook was found - it had emails and incriminating information on it, the mainstream media reported on it and were immediately shut down and threatened by twitter.  And twitter said they would insta-ban anyone who even mentioned it :)  
Nice try tho :)

But the fact you have to lie THAT BADLY about it should prove to you that you are on the wrong side of politics these days.

Just now, Americana Antifa said:

Yes, but the law allows private companies to discriminate, as long as it's not discrimination based on protected class.

Sure it is.

Just now, Americana Antifa said:

Again, when you put on your nazi uniform, that you usually only wear at the meetings, and go to the local bar, you get kicked out. It doesn't matter that nazism is your political belief, because that's not a protected class.

Actually there have been people who challenged that and won.

Sorry kiddo. I know you think it should be ok to repress and hate on people based on their beliefs but it's really not

Just like i know you believe that it should be ok to hate men, and to hate white people.  As  you've mentioned before

But in fairness you consider others who don't hold your views to be sub human and lesser people, so .. no surprise. You're just like every single bigot and racist in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Why its the same one you provided to prove your statement.  Ohhh.... wait...

LOL - typical leftie - refuses to provide proof but demands it when the discussion goes against them.

My statement was that leftists and liberals very rarely try to get people fired. The fact there you don't have examples of them doing do is what proves my point.

Atheists don't have to present evidence that there are no gods. It's up to Theists to present the evidence, since they believe god/gods exist. It's the same thing here. I don't believe there is evidence that leftists and liberals try to get people "cancelled." If you disagree, present some evidence.

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

AAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!!1 HOLY SHIT - do you think ANYONE in the universe will believe that crap attempt at rewriting history?!?!?  ROFLMAO!!!!

https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-files-show-biden-campaign-asked-remove-tweets-hunter-biden-2022-12

ROFLMAO!!!!

You didn't actually watch the Twitter Files hearings, did you?

 

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Actually there have been people who challenged that and won.

Source?

Like I said, there are exceptions, but there are reasons for them. You can discriminate based on religion if your business is religion-oriented. I'm sure there are also exceptions for political discrimination in which it's illegal. But generally, it is legal to deplatform or kick out people based on politics.

4 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Just like i know you believe that it should be ok to hate men, and to hate white people.  As  you've mentioned before

WTF? When did I say that was okay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

My statement was that leftists and liberals very rarely try to get people fired. The fact there you don't have examples of them doing do is what proves my point.

there's tonnes of examples.  You didn't address my point did you.

2 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Atheists don't have to present evidence that there are no gods. It's up to Theists to present the evidence, since they believe god/gods exist.

Nonsense - by definition their beliefs are held to be valid based on faith.  it would be up to the athiests to prove they were wrong if anyone had to prove anything.

2 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

It's the same thing here. I don't believe there is evidence that leftists and liberals try to get people "cancelled." If you disagree, present some evidence.

You won't anyway. We've discussed this.

Lets put it this way - if i give you one example of a leftist or liberal trying to get someone cancelled,  will you agree that leftists or liberals do this? Or will you complain you need more or that those people aren't liberal enough to be REAL liberals?

IF all you're going to do is sealion about it then there's not much point. We both know that there's tonnes of examples that will pop up with a simple google search and so it makes your motives suspect.

2 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-files-show-biden-campaign-asked-remove-tweets-hunter-biden-2022-12

ROFLMAO!!!!

You didn't actually watch the Twitter Files hearings, did you?

AAAAAHHAHAHAHAA - YOU are truly retarted! - that wasn't even ABOUT the notebook!!!!!!!!!!!!

Holy crap - not only did you not watch the hearings YOU DIDN"T READ THE ARTICLE!!!! LOL

Well thanks for proving the point :)  Lefties lie.

Here ya go:

https://news.yahoo.com/twitter-exec-suppressed-hunter-biden-161210852.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAA3y-KOOn-QPqnKIRA6aw-ED4BgOHO7aLShmzwwss4qz8-_z-cwtYpe7flndnMUwWG459um7s08AAtewz-X4YkpHpDE_o3jY3he3kbJzfuuxO-p06PkOiaG74PLQjKMY3cqZvoa_0vzdzKsexyodQ5EwIAbKK9n6uqXv2M6a3ZUU

Quote

Roth was intimately involved in the effort to censor the New York Post’s exclusive stories on Hunter Biden’s shady foreign business dealings ahead of the 2020 election. Twitter prevented users from sharing the story publicly and from privately messaging the link to other users. Mainstream publications, including the Washington Post and the New York Times, later confirmed the authenticity of much of the content derived from the computer, which was abandoned at a Delaware repair shop in April 2019.

Whooopsie doodle -  i was right and you were wrong - which you knew :)  This guy already admitted to it, it's public knowledge.

2 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

 

Like I said, there are exceptions,

Right. Exeptions.

2 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

 

WTF? When did I say that was okay?

Several times actually. 

I've said it before - you don't seem like a very good person. Bigoted, sexist, racist, and supportive and dismissive of violence that people you consider like minded do.  You out and out said Conservatives were ALL lesser people as well, don't know if i got that in there.

History isn't going to judge your side any better than it does the KKK, the brownshirts, or any other group that advocates for hatred and exclusion as yous does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

there's tonnes of examples. 

I'm listening.

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nonsense - by definition their beliefs are held to be valid based on faith.  it would be up to the athiests to prove they were wrong if anyone had to prove anything.

Atheism isn't a belief, it's the lack of a belief. If you believe in something, it's on you to present evidence for it. So when it comes to Theism, it would be on the Theist to present evidence to the Atheist.

And when it comes to this propaganda idea that the Left is trying to have tons of shit deplatformed or banned, it's up to the people who believe this to present evidence for it.

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Lets put it this way - if i give you one example of a leftist or liberal trying to get someone cancelled,  will you agree that leftists or liberals do this? Or will you complain you need more or that those people aren't liberal enough to be REAL liberals?

Well I already agree that in any population there will be fringe elements. What I'm saying is that it's not common among the Left or the Center, certainly not nearly as common as it is among the Right. 

In order to change my mind, you'd have to give examples like the attempted cancellation of David Pakman. In that situation, there are mainstream right-wing politicians and pundits calling on people to get him cancelled. There is an actual crazed mob contacting Pakman's sponsors and demanding they drop him. 

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

that wasn't even ABOUT the notebook!!!!!!!!!!!!

To be fair, I can't keep up with all of the right-wing conspiracy theories. But that article did prove my point. The Democrats contacted Twitter over content that shouldn't have been there in the first place.

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Oh, this was a different issue. Yeah, they were correct for not allowing this also.

And either way, it doesn't prove your point. Twitter regularly suppresses stories that they suspect are disinformation. They didn't suppress all Hunter Biden stories, even many of the conspiracy theories were regularly discussed on Twitter. 

Also, they never changed the TOS to benefit Democrats. They only did that for Republicans. I think the reason you're getting mad is because I keep bringing this up. 

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Right. Exeptions.

Several times actually. 

Do you have any evidence or are you lying again? I know conservatives are disconnected from reality, but when you're talking to someone who isn't conservative, you have to expect to be called on your lies.

So, when did I say it was okay to hate men or white people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,714
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    wopsas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Venandi went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...