A Study of the CURRENT State of Liberal and Conservative Ideologies

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

I wasn't talking about people who deny climate change...but you knew that didn't you.

You were talking about a serious discussion on political ideology and you started from the perspective of a wingnut.

Therefore: Dismissed!

Easy enough.

[eyeball]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Was the FBI, CIA and other government agencies telling social media what to propagate and what to ban? Yes.

So its hundreds of people doing the telling, how many people are being told thousands?

Do you have any stats on this?

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, bcsapper said:

You were talking about a serious discussion on political ideology and you started from the perspective of a wingnut.

Therefore: Dismissed!

Easy enough.

OK so this is another problem. You're not discussing or even debating. You're just interested in scolding for your percetion of being slighted.

Why don't you just name your term and we can discuss that? Here...I'll start.

I thought some about how to term people with a seemingly overwhelming need to save the world...which in essence is what climate control advocates are trying to do...and are perfectly willing to impose hardships on the population in order to achieve their goal. Their overriding belief...hence their "religion".

Edited March 5, 2023 by Nationalist

[Guest]

18 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

OK so this is another problem. You're not discussing or even debating. You're just interested in scolding for your percetion of being slighted.

Why don't you just name your term and we can discuss that? Here...I'll start.

I thought some about how to term people with a seemingly overwhelming need to save the world...which in essence is what climate control advocates are trying to do...and are perfectly willing to impose hardships on the population in order to achieve their goal. Their overriding belief...hence their "religion".

You can call them whatever you want.  What you shouldn't do is pretend you want to have a rational, non-partisan discussion about ideologies.

If you start with a conspiracy minded position that is driven by right wing denial of the science on the subject, you don't instill any confidence that any other subject broached will be treated any differently.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

So its hundreds of people doing the telling, how many people are being told thousands?

Do you have any stats on this?

Some...

"Between January 2020 and November 2022, there were over 150 emails between the FBI and former Twitter Trust and Safety chief Yoel Roth,” Taibbi wrote, referring to the executive who helped suppress The Post’s reporting on first son Hunter Biden’s extensive overseas business interests."

 

[Nationalist]

9 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

You can call them whatever you want.  What you shouldn't do is pretend you want to have a rational, non-partisan discussion about ideologies.

If you start with a conspiracy minded position that is driven by right wing denial of the science on the subject, you don't instill any confidence that any other subject broached will be treated any differently.

Lol...so you don't want to discuss or debate. Just scold.

Understood.

[Guest]

Just now, Nationalist said:

Lol...so you don't want to discuss or debate. Just scold.

Understood.

Good.

[Nationalist]

8 hours ago, bcsapper said:

You can call them whatever you want.  What you shouldn't do is pretend you want to have a rational, non-partisan discussion about ideologies.

If you start with a conspiracy minded position that is driven by right wing denial of the science on the subject, you don't instill any confidence that any other subject broached will be treated any differently.

What conspiracy are you talking about?

[Guest]

45 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

What conspiracy are you talking about?

But you said you understood!

[Nationalist]

9 hours ago, bcsapper said:

But you said you understood!

No you don't understand. 

I understand that you are unable to discuss climate change, or even a term for those people freaked out by it.

I must assume you already know the current path being taken is quite ridiculous and unjustifiable. 

[Guest]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

No you don't understand. 

I understand that you are unable to discuss climate change, or even a term for those people freaked out by it.

I must assume you already know the current path being taken is quite ridiculous and unjustifiable. 

You seem to be freaked out by the current path. 

Try meditation.

[Nationalist]

45 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

You seem to be freaked out by the current path. 

Try meditation.

I do meditate. I call it "praying". Perhaps you've heard if it?

Now...sorry my term hurt your feelings. You may run along now and play.