Critical Race Theory

[CrakHoBarbie]

19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If my whole shtick here was misusing 6-letter words and insulting people without ever contributing anything meaningful to the dialogue, then I'd be like you. 

You think presenting your moronic speculations as gospel is a valid contribution? Try again dimwit.

[West]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Not only was your answer completely wrong, you dodged important talking points to belch it out.

The person whom you so snottily replied to made good points about how the topic of slavery is talked about by CRTtards, whose screed is a lesson in revisionist history. 

Here are a few relevant facts that people who are brainwashed by CRT need to know:

1) Not all whites in the owned slaves (it's obvious, but the people credulous enough to listen to CRT would have no clue) 

2) Slave-ownership is not a uniquely white phenomenon

3) Black people have owned slaves just like every other race. The Moores, for example, had millions of slaves.

4) Black people in the United States owned slaves

5) No other race of people abolished slavery when they were the dominant culture, only whites.

As far as your beloved Dem party is concerned, they only proposed the Civil Rights Act bill to gain black votes. Their own party didn't even support it to the same extent as the Republicans did. 

I challenge you to find another bill presented anywhere in the history of democracy which received more support from across the aisle than from the party who tabled it....

https://oliverwillis.com/who-passed-the-civil-rights-act/

So, even though it was officially a Demmie bill, 39% of Dem congressmen and 31% of Dem senators voted against it. In total, 130 Dems voted against it. 

By comparison, only 20% of GOP congressmen and and 18% of GOP senators voted against it. 

The Civil Rights Act of 1957 (black voting rights) was even more one-sided, with GOP voting Yea 84 and 93% of the time, Dems were 51 and 59% in favour of it. 

The KKK was actually the Dems' own militia back in the day, and now they have Antifa and BLM doing their dirty work.

Bottom line, the Dems have always been racially divisive lowlifes, it's nothing new.

They claim there was a "switching of sides" specifically as Strom Thurmond opposed the Civil Rights bill. 

What they actually FAIL to acknowledge is that in many ways Strom Thurmond was before his time. He introduced several legislation in support of civil rights in the 1950s, and his business was one of the first to remove separate bathrooms in his store. 

Where the bogus "switched sides" argument came in and still remains to this day is that the Republican party became about preserving the Constitution and respected states rights whereas the Dummycrats wanted to centralize power. 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

MAGA is a cult. You belong to a cult.

Truth!

[robosmith]

41 minutes ago, West said:

They claim there was a "switching of sides" specifically as Strom Thurmond opposed the Civil Rights bill. 

What they actually FAIL to acknowledge is that in many ways Strom Thurmond was before his time. He introduced several legislation in support of civil rights in the 1950s, and his business was one of the first to remove separate bathrooms in his store. 

Where the bogus "switched sides" argument came in and still remains to this day is that the Republican party became about preserving the Constitution and respected states rights whereas the Dummycrats wanted to centralize power. 

No, the FACT is that all the Southern states used to support and elect Dixiecrats, but now they are SOLIDLY Republican.

ONE major reason they stay Republican, is by suppressing the vote in certain (black) neighborhoods, and lately they do this by limiting or eliminating drop boxes and vote by mail or limiting resources in those neighborhoods that creates very long lines for voting.

[West]

54 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No, the FACT is that all the Southern states used to support and elect Dixiecrats, but now they are SOLIDLY Republican.

ONE major reason they stay Republican, is by suppressing the vote in certain (black) neighborhoods, and lately they do this by limiting or eliminating drop boxes and vote by mail or limiting resources in those neighborhoods that creates very long lines for voting.

You clearly are uninformed.. 

In fact, during that time there was actually 3 parties who formed.. 

The electoral map didn't actually change to what we know today until Reagan, who won ALL BUT ONE state in 1984. EVEN THEN Bill Clinton still held many of the deep south in the 1990s. 

To suggest the south is the same now is completely void of reality and Democrat once again LIE about the BIG LIE switching sides myth

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, West said:

You clearly are uninformed.. 

In fact, during that time there was actually 3 parties who formed.. 

The electoral map didn't actually change to what we know today until Reagan, who won ALL BUT ONE state in 1984. EVEN THEN Bill Clinton still held many of the deep south in the 1990s. 

To suggest the south is the same now is completely void of reality and Democrat once again LIE about the BIG LIE switching sides myth

Really? Which "3 parties"? We have ALWAYS had several MORE than 3 parties, but only 2 get enough votes to win.

YOU are the one who is uninformed. In reality Dixiecrats caucused with the Democrats in most cases since they were NOT an official separate Party.

No one said that Southern states NEVER voted for a Democrat. GA just elected 2 Democratic Senators, AGAIN.

That was a RARE exception which proves the RULE.

[West]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Really? Which "3 parties"? We have ALWAYS had several MORE than 3 parties, but only 2 get enough votes to win.

YOU are the one who is uninformed. In reality Dixiecrats caucused with the Democrats in most cases since they were NOT an official separate Party.

No one said that Southern states NEVER voted for a Democrat. GA just elected 2 Democratic Senators, AGAIN.

That was a RARE exception which proves the RULE.

This was the 1968 electoral college map little boy with the Republicans, Democrats and American Independence party. The FACTS are SOME the "dixiecrats" as you call them formed the American Independence Party. Others CHOSE to remain in the Democrat Party. 

These are the facts

 

The FACTS are Republicans have NEVER supported Jim Crow no matter how much far left loonies suggest otherwise

Edited January 10, 2023 by West

[West]

Mike is laughing at the truth. Quelled surprise

[herbie]

2 hours ago, reason10 said:

White privilege instruction teaches students that, if they’re white, the successes they experience are not primarily achieved through personal effort but are bestowed upon them because of the colour of their skin.

No it doesn't.

[robosmith]

59 minutes ago, West said:

This was the 1968 electoral college map little boy with the Republicans, Democrats and American Independence party. The FACTS are SOME the "dixiecrats" as you call them formed the American Independence Party. Others CHOSE to remain in the Democrat Party. 

These are the facts

 

The FACTS are Republicans have NEVER supported Jim Crow no matter how much far left loonies suggest otherwise

Like I said, there have ALWAYS been MORE than 3 Parties, but ONLY 2 ever get enough to win.

Just because Republicans never publicly acknowledge their support of Jim Crow, does not mean their MEMBERS' ACTIONS do not support Jim Crow. Esp the Wallace voters who mostly vote Republican NOW.

[West]

51 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Like I said, there have ALWAYS been MORE than 3 Parties, but ONLY 2 ever get enough to win.

Just because Republicans never publicly acknowledge their support of Jim Crow, does not mean their MEMBERS' ACTIONS do not support Jim Crow. Esp the Wallace voters who mostly vote Republican NOW.

You continue to show your stubborn streak.. the FACTS are the "dixiecrats" formed the American Independence Party, retired, or stayed in the Democrat Party. 

Nice try tho...

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, West said:

You continue to show your stubborn streak.. the FACTS are the "dixiecrats" formed the American Independence Party, retired, or stayed in the Democrat Party. 

Nice try tho...

Nope, most vote Republican because Republicans appealed to them with Nixon's Southern strategy which he employed to compete with Wallace.

Everyone else knows about that except you Canadians.

[West]

15 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope, most vote Republican because Republicans appealed to them with Nixon's Southern strategy which he employed to compete with Wallace.

Everyone else knows about that except you Canadians.

I just gave you the electoral map

 

Yet Nixon voted for the civil rights act and AGAINST school segregation while Democrats ie Joe Biden opposed desegregation schools because he didn't want to turn them into a "racial jungle" lol.. 

And the southern strategy was ACTUALLY a slight against the hippies who opposed the vietnam war, nothing to do with race ?

Edited January 11, 2023 by West

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, West said:

I just gave you the electoral map ?

That was ONE election. I'm talking about ever SINCE. 

You know, like NOW. There was some variance, but mostly all the Southern states vote Republican (except for recent GA Senators). Like 2012 election:

 

 

[West]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

That was ONE election. I'm talking about ever SINCE. 

You know, like NOW. There was some variance, but mostly all the Southern states vote Republican (except for recent GA Senators). Like 2012 election:

 

 

You must be a special kind of dumb to believe what you just posted.. 

[WestCanMan]

33 minutes ago, West said:

You must be a special kind of dumb to believe what you just posted.. 

Yup. 

Fla has been a GOP state for the past ten years. 

It's in "the south" technically, but it's a coastal state like Cali, which is by far the best comp for it.

[reason10]

6 hours ago, herbie said:

No it doesn't.

Yes it does. That's ALL you goose steppers have been throwing in our faces, while you try to hold white people today accountable for something done by people who have been dead for over a century.

[reason10]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

That was ONE election. I'm talking about ever SINCE. 

You know, like NOW. There was some variance, but mostly all the Southern states vote Republican (except for recent GA Senators). Like 2012 election:

 

 

Apparently your sources are high on meth. Florida hasn't been blue since the turn of the Century.

[herbie]

No No! All of YOU are wrong! (reason does his Curly impression again)

 

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, West said:

You must be a special kind of dumb to believe what you just posted.. 

No, I am the special kind of much smarter than you. And you proved that again with ^this totally LAME "argument."

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, reason10 said:

Apparently your sources are high on meth. Florida hasn't been blue since the turn of the Century.

FL is NOT technically the South due to all the Northerners who live in S FL. But rural FL is very much Southern esp the panhandle and near the GA border. I've spent time in all parts of FL including living in the Space Coast.

[reason10]

3 hours ago, Contrarian said:

??? Amazing.

Nope. You people are just stupid.