Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 12/12/2022 at 7:03 PM, Michael Hardner said:

2. More exaggeration.  Why do you think that I should listen when you exaggerate ?  

Calling it exaggeration is kind.  

On 12/12/2022 at 1:16 PM, I am Groot said:

The only social problem we have is progressives inventing racism everywhere and doing their best to tell every visible minority that they should hate white people while inciting resentment and anger in white people.

This is just angry ranting.  There's not a calm or objective thought to be seen here.  

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
33 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Calling it exaggeration is kind.  

This is just angry ranting.  There's not a calm or objective thought to be seen here.  

And yet so deep is your sense of self-righteousness you felt the desperate need to comment anyway.

"A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton

Posted

Yes, I'm soo desperate about it. ?

Let us count how many threads I've started about race on this forum in my 14 year history posting here, and then compare it to how many you've started in the last two weeks.  That should give us a good indication of whose more invested in the topic!  

 

  • Like 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
47 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Yes, I'm soo desperate about it. ?

Let us count how many threads I've started about race on this forum in my 14 year history posting here, and then compare it to how many you've started in the last two weeks.  That should give us a good indication of whose more invested in the topic!  

 

This isn't a topic about race. Nor, I believe, have any other topics I've started been about race. It's just that you're interpreting everything through the prism of the critical race nonsense you were indoctrinated with.

"A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton

Posted
41 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

This isn't a topic about race. Nor, I believe, have any other topics I've started been about race. It's just that you're interpreting everything through the prism of the critical race nonsense you were indoctrinated with.

Everything you've said in this thread has been about race! ?

From (tongue-in-cheek) white supremacy, all of the "institutions" apparently "indoctrinating" white people to think they're racist, to even now where you're bringing up critical race theory - these are all topics centering around race.  

Wow.  

 

 

  • Like 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, herbie said:

Oh FFS you started a thread titled with white supremacy and then claim it's not about race. Forget your meds today or what?

I'm sorry. I keep overestimating the intelligence of the left and that seems to confuse the issue.

No, this topic is not about race. There is a subtle but easily discernable difference between talking about race and talking about the religion of the progressive left. What this topic is about is the behaviour of institutions guided by this new religion and its various books of revelations. Canada doesn't have a problem with race. It has a problem with progressives.

 

Edited by I am Groot
  • Downvote 1

"A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton

Posted
17 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Everything you've said in this thread has been about race! ?

Nope. Try again. 

"A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, I am Groot said:

No, this topic is not about race. There is a subtle but easily discernable difference between talking about race and talking about the religion of the progressive left.

You can't whine about a so-called religion that, as you would describe it, is obsessed with issues of racism, and then proceed to tell us the discussion has nothing to do with race.  That's ridiculous.  The distinction you're drawing is nonsensical and the degree of separation you're attempting to conjure is fantasy.  

2 hours ago, I am Groot said:

I'm sorry. I keep overestimating the intelligence of the left and that seems to confuse the issue.

The only thing you're overestimating is your ability to dissemble.  The fact that you can't speak on these issues without lapsing into hyperbole and dumb rhetoric is evidence of your own intelligence level (or maybe just your emotional maturity?), rather than that of the vague "Left" or "Progressives" you like to rant about.  

Edited by Moonbox
  • Like 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
On 12/9/2022 at 11:34 AM, Moonbox said:

This is a really goofy thread.  It's not even worth commenting on beyond ?.

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.” Attributed to Abraham Lincoln in Golden Book

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
On 12/9/2022 at 11:58 AM, ExFlyer said:

Again, what nonsense are you espousing?

It is the liberals that are the racists and white supremacists? Check the names of racist and white supremacist groups background. I think you will find very few liberal backgrounders.

Your links prove nothing other than disclaimers from groups and organizations companies etc.

Well...there's Joe Biden and there was Lyndon Johnson...I hear the Clintons are pretty "white meat".

And if all the educational institutions have been racist all these years...who made them that way?

Certainly wasn't a bunch of blue-collar guys wavin' "Don't Tread On Me" flags...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Well...there's Joe Biden and there was Lyndon Johnson...I hear the Clintons are pretty "white meat".

And if all the educational institutions have been racist all these years...who made them that way?

Certainly wasn't a bunch of blue-collar guys wavin' "Don't Tread On Me" flags...

There was no American links.

Whatcha talkin about???

You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.

Posted
37 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

There was no American links.

Whatcha talkin about???

Look it up lazy-bones. Pretty simple.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Look it up lazy-bones. Pretty simple.

My point to you was the topic is "liberal people in Canada are white supremacists?"

You bring up American presidents and a State motto.

Pretty simple. Don't need to look it up when your post content is off topic.  

You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.

Posted
56 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

My point to you was the topic is "liberal people in Canada are white supremacists?"

You bring up American presidents and a State motto.

Pretty simple. Don't need to look it up when your post content is off topic.  

Point for you.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
9 hours ago, Moonbox said:

You can't whine about a so-called religion that, as you would describe it, is obsessed with issues of racism, and then proceed to tell us the discussion has nothing to do with race.  That's ridiculous.  The distinction you're drawing is nonsensical and the degree of separation you're attempting to conjure is fantasy.  

No. The separation is patently obvious. If we talk about race it would be another conversation. We're talking about your religious beliefs that say everyone is nothing but an extension of their racial, ethnic, or other identity group, and that any offense given or taken by any such member is blaspheme and must be punished.

Example: An elderly woman who is a bit dotty questions some Black British woman who dresses as if she's from Africa and is named as an African and unintentionally insults her by asking repeatedly where in Africa she's from. The progressive world is aghast with horror. The incident becomes international news! The elderly woman is abruptly cancelled. And then trotted out after a couple of weeks to issue a groveling apology.

Now in talking about that I'm not talking about race. I'm talking about how progressives wildly overreact, like humourless, unforgiving religious zealots, refusing to take it as just some old lady being confused but insist on elevating it to the religious crime of heresy racism, and punishing the sinner. Then demand she recant her heresy. 

I doubt you understand, being a devotee, but that's just how I see it.

 

 

"A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,024
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    portman123
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...