Trump hid a 19million dollar loan from S. Korea

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Yes.

On the laptop they found an email that a Burisma exec sent to Hunter, he was asked to get Joe to come to Ukraine. Joe was there less than a month later. 

EVEN IF true, it could have easily been a coincidence since Ukraine was in Joe's wheelhouse.

Now MAYBE if you had an email in which Hunter responded to that email with an email to Joe....

But none of ^this even HINTS at a CHANGE in US policy to serve Burisma interests, so no evidence that "access" was corrupting.

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

If that's a fact then why did the new prosecutor, who was unilaterally appointed by Joe, leave Burisma alone, and allow the old CEO to come back?

What was wrong with "the old CEO"?

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Lol, sure.

That's an opinion. But it's a fact that the new prosecutor left Burisma alone ?

It not a "fact" until you post some evidence (like I did which included the statements of the Ukrainian official Shoken). Until then it's JUST your allegation.

[robosmith]

[robosmith]

One thing that has to be considered is WHY Trump FAILED to report the loan.

Such dishonesty is almost always a calculation that the penalty for dishonesty is not as bad for Trump as revealing the truth and complying with the LAW.

That is why claims made here that it was no big deal, helps cover up the BIGGER DEAL that was being hidden at the time.

Just like Trump's continual claims that he would release his taxes AFTER the "audit." Obviously a lame and stupid attempt to get the IRS to BACK OFF which of course didn't work.

Now they are released, we will (eventually) see the BIGGER DEAL which made Trump hide his taxes.

[Nationalist]

15 hours ago, sharkman said:

And reams of evidence of these crimes are on Hunter’s laptop.  Which is why Twitter was told to censor, ban and the like.

Old Joe is a pro…

Old Joe now resembles the proverbial deer staring into the headlights of an on coming car.

Only now, do the democrats begin to realize the consequences of the last decade. All the mudslinging...the deceit...all of it...come home to its creator.

Oh I am gonna enjoy watching the new republican congress do its thing.

Edited December 9, 2022 by Nationalist

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Old Joe now resembles the proverbial deer staring into the headlights of an on coming car.

Only now, do the democrats begin to realize the consequences of the last decade. All the mudslinging...the deceit...all of it...come home to its creator.

Oh I am gonna enjoy watching the new republican congress do its thing.

This has nothing to do with Trump breaking the law… AGAIN… by failing to disclose the $19 million loan. 

[Nationalist]

11 minutes ago, Rebound said:

This has nothing to do with Trump breaking the law… AGAIN… by failing to disclose the $19 million loan. 

He had a loan and paid it back. So what?

[Rebound]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

He had a loan and paid it back. So what?

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE LAW

[Nationalist]

14 minutes ago, Rebound said:

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE LAW

OK...you guys go ahead and see how that works out.

We'll roast Joe.

[Rebound]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

OK...you guys go ahead and see how that works out.

We'll roast Joe.

Breaking laws is fine with you people. we get it. 

https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/registering-candidate/other-agency-requirements/

He lied under oath  about $19 million. That’s perjury, and $19 million isn’t chicken scratch. But please tell us about the big  scandal of AOC going to a party. 

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, Nationalist said:

OK...you guys go ahead and see how that works out.

We'll roast Joe.

[Nationalist]

7 hours ago, Rebound said:

Breaking laws is fine with you people. we get it. 

https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/registering-candidate/other-agency-requirements/

He lied under oath  about $19 million. That’s perjury, and $19 million isn’t chicken scratch. But please tell us about the big  scandal of AOC going to a party. 

So go ahead. Roast Trump yet again. I'm not sure how much I care anymore. Y'always miss anyway.

But Joe...Nancy...Christopher...Schiff...

This is gonna be such fun to watch.

[Rebound]

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

So go ahead. Roast Trump yet again. I'm not sure how much I care anymore. Y'always miss anyway.

But Joe...Nancy...Christopher...Schiff...

This is gonna be such fun to watch.

You cannot even name one law any of those four are accused of breaking. 

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Do it.

Because I don't think this is gonna stop.

[Nationalist]

10 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You cannot even name one law any of those four are accused of breaking. 

You mistake me for someone who cares. I told you...we've learned from you. We'll just find charges for each of them. Like...

Perjury.

[Hodad]

On 12/9/2022 at 10:21 PM, Nationalist said:

You mistake me for someone who cares. I told you...we've learned from you. We'll just find charges for each of them. Like...

Perjury.

1. Perjury is a legitimate crime.

2. If you think Republicans have somehow "learned from" the Democrats how to investigate and persecute officeholders over bullsh*t, made-up charges, you have a remarkably short memory. See Clinton impeachment circa 1998.

3. There is nothing made up or trivial about either of the Trump impeachments. He was unquestionably guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors--particularly in the first impeachment--but most of the Republicans voted politics instead of principle, so he was not convicted.

Edited December 12, 2022 by Hodad

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Hodad said:

1. Perjury is a legitimate crime.

2. If you think Republicans have somehow "learned from" the Democrats how to investigate and persecute officeholders over bullsh*t, made-up charges, you have a remarkably short memory. See Clinton impeachment circa 1998.

3. There is nothing made up or trivial about either of the Trump impeachments. He was unquestionably guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors--particularly in the first impeachment--but most of the Republicans voted politics instead of principle, so he was not convicted.

Even an order of magnitude MORE the 2nd impeachment.

If attempting to violently overthrow election results to cling to power is not a "high crime," nothing is.

[Nationalist]

8 hours ago, Hodad said:

1. Perjury is a legitimate crime.

2. If you think Republicans have somehow "learned from" the Democrats how to investigate and persecute officeholders over bullsh*t, made-up charges, you have a remarkably short memory. See Clinton impeachment circa 1998.

3. There is nothing made up or trivial about either of the Trump impeachments. He was unquestionably guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors--particularly in the first impeachment--but most of the Republicans voted politics instead of principle, so he was not convicted.

Lol...2 separate impeachments both based on horseshit.

Well the Republicans have learned. No impeachment of Joe. An investigation. An expose...in public.

[Rebound]

On 12/9/2022 at 10:21 PM, Nationalist said:

You mistake me for someone who cares. I told you...we've learned from you. We'll just find charges for each of them. Like...

Perjury.

Ok, perjury is an actual crime. It is a felony. 
What did any of those people say under oath which would constitute a felony? When do you recall that any of them ever gave testimony under oath?  

[Nationalist]

12 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Ok, perjury is an actual crime. It is a felony. 
What did any of those people say under oath which would constitute a felony? When do you recall that any of them ever gave testimony under oath?  

Let's start with Dorsey.

Then let's drag the POTUS in to testify just how he had nothing to do with Hunter's business affairs.

Hunter...clothed preferably.

That unbelievable twit Mayorkas.

FAUCI!!!

Wray.

Burns.

Schiff.

Pelosi.

You Libbies never seem to learn. Ya wanna tear it all down? You'd better succeed...before Conservatives tear you down.

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Let's start with Dorsey.

Then let's drag the POTUS in to testify just how he had nothing to do with Hunter's business affairs.

Hunter...clothed preferably.

That unbelievable twit Mayorkas.

FAUCI!!!

Wray.

Burns.

Schiff.

Pelosi.

You Libbies never seem to learn. Ya wanna tear it all down? You'd better succeed...before Conservatives tear you down.

So ALL you got is a list of FANTASY testimonies. As usual.

Of course like Trump, if there is ANYTHING false about what they've said, they will plead the fifth under oath.

Don't hold your breath.

[Nationalist]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

So ALL you got is a list of FANTASY testimonies. As usual.

Of course like Trump, if there is ANYTHING false about what they've said, they will plead the fifth under oath.

Don't hold your breath.

Dorsey already perjured himself.

As for the rest...by 2024 they'll all be either under investigation, convicted, fired, or covered in mud.

That goes double for that horny, wire-headed freak from FTX.

Edited December 14, 2022 by Nationalist

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Dorsey already perjured himself.

As for the rest...by 2024 they'll all be either under investigation, convicted, fired, or covered in mud.

That goes double for that horny, wire-headed freak from FTX.

No reason to believe ^this opinion. FTX crimes have nothing to do with your list of fantasy testimonies.

Of course your predictions are worth as much as the one about the midterm "red wave," that you childishly kept pointing to on your calendar.

[Rebound]

11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Dorsey already perjured himself.

As for the rest...by 2024 they'll all be either under investigation, convicted, fired, or covered in mud.

That goes double for that horny, wire-headed freak from FTX.

Who is Dorsey? When did he testify?

Edited December 14, 2022 by Rebound

[Nationalist]

26 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No reason to believe ^this opinion. FTX crimes have nothing to do with your list of fantasy testimonies.

Of course your predictions are worth as much as the one about the midterm "red wave," that you childishly kept pointing to on your calendar.

Did I predict a "red wave"? I don't think so, Pinocchio. 

And what do you mean, 'No reason to believe ^this'?

Do you think anyone outside your li'l posse take you seriously? Who are you telling not to believe things? Is it a desperate attempt to "cancel" things you find...revealing about Libbies?

I tried to reason with all sorts of bots like you. But you wanted to play dirty. OK. In your arrogance you refused to consider the consequences of your actions.

Welcome...to the consequences. 

Edited December 14, 2022 by Nationalist

[Nationalist]

16 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Who is Dorsey? When did he testify?

https://nypost.com/2022/12/10/jack-dorsey-told-congress-under-oath-twitter-was-not-shadow-banning/