How Evil Republicans RIG Elections.

[reason10]

Watch carefully.

 

bunch a racists!

[sharkman]

Those evil wepubwikins!

[DogOnPorch]

The obvious is that the Democrats MUST win to keep their globalist commitments. Thus they ARE going to make an attempt at rigging the election. They have to.

Thus the 'it may take days or weeks to count all those votes' comments coming from the Democrats.

[reason10]

Just now, DogOnPorch said:

The obvious is that the Democrats MUST win to keep their globalist commitments. Thus they ARE going to make an attempt at rigging the election. They have to.

Thus the 'it may take days or weeks to count all those votes' comments coming from the Democrats.

If the election is called on Election Night, that means no fraud and Republicans control Congress.

If it takes a few states a couple of weeks to certify their results that means the 2000 Mules have been working.

[DogOnPorch]

6 minutes ago, reason10 said:

If the election is called on Election Night, that means no fraud and Republicans control Congress.

If it takes a few states a couple of weeks to certify their results that means the 2000 Mules have been working.

 

Agreed.

[eyeball]

When distrust in a political system is this bad the normal thing to do is organize an impartial team of experts from other countries to hold your election for you.

Of course that would mean having the capacity to trust an international team of experts.  What are the chances of that?

I think America would be better off choosing their representatives on the Wheel of Fortune or the Price is Right.  

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, reason10 said:

Watch carefully.

 

bunch a racists!

Your meme is right; IT is a JOKE.

Republicans are working to rig elections in the future by deciding the winner in the state legislature if the Democrat gets MORE VOTES.

As the Republican candidate for Wisconsin governor Tim Michels said: 

Republican says party ‘will never lose another election’ in Wisconsin if he wins

AKA, the death of democratic elections.

 

[reason10]

21 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your meme is right; IT is a JOKE.

Republicans are working to rig elections in the future by deciding the winner in the state legislature if the Democrat gets MORE VOTES.

As the Republican candidate for Wisconsin governor Tim Michels said: 

Republican says party ‘will never lose another election’ in Wisconsin if he wins

AKA, the death of democratic elections.

 

What does that moronic biased left wing fake news rag have to do with the subject of the thread?

 

[reason10]

48 minutes ago, eyeball said:

When distrust in a political system is this bad the normal thing to do is organize an impartial team of experts from other countries to hold your election for you.

Of course that would mean having the capacity to trust an international team of experts.  What are the chances of that?

I think America would be better off choosing their representatives on the Wheel of Fortune or the Price is Right.  

We just need Republicans back in charge, where they can pass legislation that will prevent voter fraud. That's what has damaged the integrity of our elections.

[eyeball]

Just now, reason10 said:

We just need Republicans back in charge, where they can pass legislation that will prevent voter fraud. That's what has damaged the integrity of our elections.

It'll be legislation that prevents a Democratic government because that's what Republicans think is destroying America.

And it'll all be perfectly legal.

[robosmith]

26 minutes ago, reason10 said:

What does that moronic biased left wing fake news rag have to do with the subject of the thread?

 

It's a Republican candidate for governor declaring he will not allow Democrats to ever win in Wisconsin again if he's elected.

Are you denying he said that? There are hundreds of other sources quoting him saying that.

Just because you found a meme does not mean the Republicans are not planning to cheat their voters in future elections.

Right now they have a case before the SCOTUS testing whether state legislatures can declare the winner of an election without interference from their courts nor a veto by the governor. ?

Moore v Harper

[reason10]

14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It's a Republican candidate for governor declaring he will not allow Democrats to ever win in Wisconsin again if he's elected.

Are you denying he said that? There are hundreds of other sources quoting him saying that.

Here is the exact text.

Quote

 

The Republican candidate for governor in Wisconsin told supporters at a campaign event that if he is elected his party “will never lose another election” in the state.

Tim Michels’ opponent next Tuesday, the incumbent Democrat Tony Evers, said the comment, which was released by a left-leaning group, showed the Republican was “a danger to our democracy”.

Michels, a construction company owner, is endorsed by Donald Trump. He has repeated the former president’s lie that his defeat by Joe Biden in 2020 was the result of electoral fraud, and refused to say if he would certify results in a presidential election if he was governor and a Democrat won Wisconsin.

In a debate with Evers last month, Michels did not say he would accept the result of his own election. He later said he would.

Republican candidates in other swing states have cast doubt on whether they will accept results next week.

Fred Wertheimer, president of the non-partisan group Democracy 21, told the Guardian this week: “There’s great danger that the Trump ‘big lie’ is going to spread to states all over the country.

“If election deniers lose their elections by narrow margins we can expect that they will reject the results and refuse to accept them.”

The Wisconsin governor’s race remains extremely tight. On Wednesday, the polling website FiveThirtyEight.com gave Michels a 1.6-point lead. The Cook Report, a non-partisan outlet, rated Wisconsin a toss-up.

On Tuesday night, the Republican Wisconsin senator Ron Johnson, locked in his own tight fight with the Democrat Mandela Barnes, declined to commit to accepting that result.

“We’ll see what happens,” Johnson said. “I mean, is something going to happen on election day? Do Democrats have something up their sleeves?”

The Barnes campaign said it would accept the result.

A spokesperson for Michels said the candidate’s remark about never losing an election was not an indication the Republican would seek to thwart the will of the people.

“While revving up supporters to get out and vote, Tim was referring to winning and leading and then being rewarded by voters for doing a good job,” the spokesperson said.

An Evers spokesperson said: “Democracy is on the ballot. Tim Michels has made it clear he will do anything in his power to make it harder for Wisconsinites to vote and could even overturn the fair results of our elections if he doesn’t like the outcome.”

 

Here's the statement

A spokesperson for Michels said the candidate’s remark about never losing an election was not an indication the Republican would seek to thwart the will of the people.

“While revving up supporters to get out and vote, Tim was referring to winning and leading and then being rewarded by voters for doing a good job,” the spokesperson said.

 This statement doesn't say Democrats will not be allowed to win. It says that Republican will do such a good job that they will be reelected.

 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, reason10 said:

Here is the exact text.

Here's the statement

A spokesperson for Michels said the candidate’s remark about never losing an election was not an indication the Republican would seek to thwart the will of the people.

“While revving up supporters to get out and vote, Tim was referring to winning and leading and then being rewarded by voters for doing a good job,” the spokesperson said.

 This statement doesn't say Democrats will not be allowed to win. It says that Republican will do such a good job that they will be reelected.

 

You mean the cleanup by "A spokesperson for Michels" SAID THAT LATER.

Contradictory statements only mean one of them is LYING.

[sharkman]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

It'll be legislation that prevents a Democratic government because that's what Republicans think is destroying America.

And it'll all be perfectly legal.

I’m not sure what Republicans think is destroying America, probably a dozen different things, starting with Democrats.    And Democrats think Republicans are destroying America.  And so it’s been for a hundred years or more.

I would have assumed that you knew America is not a democracy.  Never was supposed to be one, by their Constitution.

[DogOnPorch]

2 minutes ago, sharkman said:

I’m not sure what Republicans think is destroying America, probably a dozen different things, starting with Democrats.    And Democrats think Republicans are destroying America.  And so it’s been for a hundred years or more.

I would have assumed that you knew America is not a democracy.  Never was supposed to be one, by their Constitution.

 

The Constitution is to avoid the tyranny of the majority...something they were aware could happen.

[robosmith]

8 minutes ago, sharkman said:

I’m not sure what Republicans think is destroying America, probably a dozen different things, starting with Democrats.    And Democrats think Republicans are destroying America.  And so it’s been for a hundred years or more.

I would have assumed that you knew America is not a democracy.  Never was supposed to be one, by their Constitution.

It was ALWAYS supposed to be democratic CHOICE of representatives. And it was made MORE democratic in 1913 when Senators were first democratically elected.

 

[robosmith]

9 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

The Constitution is to avoid the tyranny of the majority...something they were aware could happen.

Only by the protections it gives for individual rights. Like the the right to VOTE.

[DogOnPorch]

Just now, robosmith said:

Only by the protections it gives for individual rights. Like the the right to VOTE.

 

Actually, it's by the checks and balances thing that doesn't give any single branch of government as well as the people too much power at once.

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Actually, it's by the checks and balances thing that doesn't give any single branch of government as well as the people too much power at once.

"The people" do not exercise ANY power except through their representatives in the government and the FEW states which allow voter initiatives.

However in some Republican run states, they've been known to just ignore or overrule the voters' choices.

In FL, felons were given the right to vote by voter initiative, but the legislature and executive sabotaged that by adding a bunch of arbitrary and superfluous requirements ON TOP of the voters CHOICE. Just like Jim Crow made it very difficult for black people to vote. ?

[sharkman]

13 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It was ALWAYS supposed to be democratic CHOICE of representatives. And it was made MORE democratic in 1913 when Senators were first democratically elected.

 

Whatever.  It’s a republic.  

[eyeball]

16 minutes ago, sharkman said:

I’m not sure what Republicans think is destroying America, probably a dozen different things, starting with Democrats.    And Democrats think Republicans are destroying America.  And so it’s been for a hundred years or more.

I would have assumed that you knew America is not a democracy.  Never was supposed to be one, by their Constitution.

Sure ok, this is all normal.

[ironstone]

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

It'll be legislation that prevents a Democratic government because that's what Republicans think is destroying America.

And it'll all be perfectly legal.

Legislation that enhances election integrity, like asking for ID, should be a no-brainer. Democrats oppose just about all of these requirements. That speaks volumes about their real intentions.

I agree with some of the previous posts above, if results are not all in on election night and it takes days or weeks to count all the ballots in key swing states then those will go to the Democrats.

I didn't post this video because of PJW's prediction but he talks about a news website that sounds pretty interesting. Showing what stories are covered by left and right news outlets.

Breaking News Headlines and Media Bias | Ground News

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, sharkman said:

Whatever.  It’s a republic.  

It is a democratic republic. Look up the definition of republic. It INCLUDES democratic elections of representatives.

That is the part that makes it  hybrid of democracy and representation.

[robosmith]

3 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Legislation that enhances election integrity, like asking for ID, should be a no-brainer. Democrats oppose just about all of these requirements. That speaks volumes about their real intentions.

Voter impersonation fraud is virtually non-existent. Everyone KNOWS the only viable way to steal an election is CORRUPTING the COUNT. AKA, poll workers or machine corruption.

The one thing voter ID requirements are good for is disqualifying voters, which is what the Republicans want. AKA voter suppression.

Particularly in certain neighborhoods, and that is why the lines are LONG there, and Republicans oppose vote by mail and drop boxes.

Did you hear that Texas SoS declared ONLY ONE drop box per county?

Not too much of a burden on rural counties, but Harris county has a population of 4.7M. Know who lives there and why Republicans in Texas want to make it harder for them to vote?

 

 

[eyeball]

15 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Legislation that enhances election integrity, like asking for ID, should be a no-brainer. 

It'll be legislation that enhances Republican control of elections at the state level that will protect America from Democrats.

Blue States will have to separate to be independent which will cause Red States to declare war against succession.

Edited November 5, 2022 by eyeball