Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Jack9000 said:

I  ain't the biggest fan of pipelines but yea these people need to be found and arrested  .

Is it becasue you don't like heat in the winter or driving your car, maybe it's becasue it is safer than taking it by road,/ train and people hate safety.

  • Like 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
48 minutes ago, West said:

Didn't he say he supports black lives matter? 

The group that cause 1-2 billion in damages? 

So he supports the cause of Black Lives mattering, and that means he supports vandalism...because there was some vandalism at some protests...in the USA.  

By that logic, I suppose that means that Pierre Polievre is a racist for supporting trucker's protest...because there was a swastika somewhere in there, and some of the members/leadership had been linked to far right extremism in the past.  

Both claims are moronic.  Think it through.    
 

  • Thanks 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

So he supports the cause of Black Lives mattering, and that means he supports vandalism...because there was some vandalism at some protests...in the USA.  
 

Well by his "you protest where someone was carrying a swastika therefore you love nazis" logic, yes.

Edited by West
Posted
10 minutes ago, West said:

Well by his "you protest where someone was carrying a swastika therefore you love nazis" logic, yes. 

It's structurally the same garbage reasoning.  If you could calm yourself down for a moment and break both statements down, you'd see they're based on the same faulty logic. 

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
27 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Of course we can't count on terrorism charges. We can count on the PM understanding them and addressing their issues though. 

News flash, the PM doesn't dictate charges laid by Crown.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

It's structurally the same garbage reasoning.  If you could calm yourself down for a moment and break both statements down, you'd see they're based on the same faulty logic. 

Yet one group is getting arrested and having their accounts seized... thats the point.. 

One group he supports. The other he calls a bunch of nazis and calls in the police to clear out through unilateral emergency powers

Edited by West
Posted
1 hour ago, Jack9000 said:

big difference lol  they are controlling a downtown for 3 weeks and making  everyone who lives there lives miserable lol.

miserable, that would depend on your definition of miserable,  the people of Afghanistan lives were miserable , they faced daily IED strikes, suicide bombers attacks on  markets, schools, police stations , taliban targeting their own people to drive home the point  etc ... .. that was miserable,

The people of Ottawa may have been inconvenienced at most. your buying into all this media hype, and rhetoric coming from the liberal government, and yes some of the convoy guys guilty as fuc* of doing the same , my point miserable is not the word i would use to describe this whole ordeal...

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

News flash, the PM doesn't dictate charges laid by Crown.

Unless your SNC, then they dictate not to charge anyone...

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Aristides said:

I support the idea behind BLM, I don't support any violence committed in its name.

What's the difference between a black person getting roughed up by the police and someone getting coerced into taking an injection that injures them? 

Both are forms of state violence imo

Posted
Just now, Army Guy said:

Unless your SNC, then they dictate not to charge anyone...

Trudeau was found to have violated ethics because he tried. Why would he support people blowing up a pipeline when he just bought one?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, West said:

What's the difference between a black person getting roughed up by the police and someone getting coerced into taking an injection that injures them? 

Both are forms of state violence imo

No, the black person didn't become black by choice. That elementary fact continues to escape you.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Aristides said:

Trudeau was found to have violated ethics because he tried. Why would he support people blowing up a pipeline when he just bought one?

According to the justice minister those actions are illegal, not to be handled by the ethics commissionaire, but rather the courts... unless some how your the PM or MP and above the law...

and i was posting to your remarks, and he did dictate to the justice minister to dismiss all charges, to save jobs, but he still dictated to the chief justice to lay off.... And why would he waste the peoples tax dollars to purchase a pipeline not worth anything really even the company that owned it knew that.... Was it to save Justins face for lack of action,  or to save the company that owned it... 

 

Quote

 News flash, the PM doesn't dictate charges laid by Crown.

 

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Aristides said:

No, the black person didn't become black by choice. That elementary fact continues to escape you.

So vaccines injuries are acceptable to you?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Aristides said:

No, the black person didn't become black by choice. That elementary fact continues to escape you.

Justin did just that , 3 times , i could not resist sorry.

 

  • Haha 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
16 minutes ago, West said:

So vaccines injuries are acceptable to you?

Doesn't matter, not being black is not a choice for a black person. Vaccination, or not, is a choice. Injuries from the disease itself are also a choice for the unvaccinated.

Posted
Just now, Aristides said:

Doesn't matter, not being black is not a choice for a black person. Vaccination, or not, is a choice. Injuries from the disease itself are also a choice for the unvaccinated.

Blaming the victim bs.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

According to the justice minister those actions are illegal, not to be handled by the ethics commissionaire, but rather the courts... unless some how your the PM or MP and above the law...

and i was posting to your remarks, and he did dictate to the justice minister to dismiss all charges, to save jobs, but he still dictated to the chief justice to lay off.... And why would he waste the peoples tax dollars to purchase a pipeline not worth anything really even the company that owned it knew that.... Was it to save Justins face for lack of action,  or to save the company that owned it... 

 

The pipeline is worth quite a bit. The existing line has operating revenues of over 700 million a year and BC would grind to a halt without it.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Aristides said:

So people who don't have choices because of their skin colour aren't victims but people who do have choices are.

No. State violence is state violence. Doesn't matter their motivation.. 

You agree?

Posted
21 minutes ago, West said:

What's the difference between a black person getting roughed up by the police and someone getting coerced into taking an injection that injures them? 

So in your mind, the horror of being fined/penalized for not following public health guidelines and getting a needle that's been proven safe around the world is every bit as awful as being beat up or shot senselessly by police.

Okay dude.  

 

 

   
 

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
1 minute ago, West said:

No. State violence is state violence. Doesn't matter their motivation.. 

You agree?

No. The state is not committing any violence. Not being vaccinated is a choice. There are consequences for those choices but none of them are violent.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Aristides said:

News flash, the PM doesn't dictate charges laid by Crown.

News flash, the PM's narrative has everything to do with whether or not the RCMP gos after people, regardless of whether they're criminals or not.

The Turd said that the Freedom Convoy are terrorists, and whaddyaknow, cops find some guns in a house and charge 13 people with crimes, the charges are broadcasted by all the regular propaganda outlets, and it's a wrap! 

You know what they did? Someone "made a call to action". on their iPhone: "Go to the border, get some photos and video of cops committing crimes." 

When was the last time that you heard of 13 people being criminally charged for talking about "recording RCMP officers breaking the law"?

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

So in your mind, the horror of being fined/penalized for not following public health guidelines and getting a needle that's been proven safe around the world is every bit as awful as being beat up or shot senselessly by police.

Okay dude.  

 

 

   
 

Dude 1 in 10000 are getting injured from the thing. 

So a large employer of about 10000 people forces all his employees to line up along the wall. Uses a handful of firearms holding just one single bullet. You don't know which one will be shot but you know one of them will causing either injury or death. Injuries include anything from needing surgery to a minor flesh wound. One by one "click" "click" "click". 

He tells all his employees if you don't stand along the wall and allow him to pull the trigger that they will lose their jobs. 

People use the law of probability.. there's a "low chance" of the bullet going off when they are against the wall. They like their job and decide to go along with it. 

Some people aren't willing to go along with it so he fires them.

You think this little experiment would be ethical?

Edited by West
Posted
1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

News flash, the PM's narrative has everything to do with whether or not the RCMP gos after people, regardless of whether they're criminals or not.

The Turd said that the Freedom Convoy are terrorists, and whaddyaknow, cops find some guns in a house and charge 13 people with crimes, the charges are broadcasted by all the regular propaganda outlets, and it's a wrap! 

You know what they did? Someone "made a call to action". on their iPhone: "Go to the border, get some photos and video of cops committing crimes." 

When was the last time that you heard of 13 people being criminally charged for talking about "recording RCMP officers breaking the law"?

Trudeaus rhetoric was harmful, I do agree. the rest of your post is crap.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...