American capitalism

[Marocc]

On 4/29/2020 at 2:15 AM, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Start here....

The Middle East leads the world in income inequality

The topic is capitalism, not income inequality, though, but if you have something to say of that, go ahead.

[bush_cheney2004]

Just now, Marocc said:

The topic is capitalism, not income inequality, though, but if you have something to say of that, go ahead.

 

OK...capitalism in the Middle East leads the world for income inequality.

[New World Disorder]

On 4/28/2020 at 7:15 PM, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Start here....

The Middle East leads the world in income inequality

The War on Terror was a complete success!

[Tdot]

53 minutes ago, Marocc said:

No

Yes, it is. Everything you posted, can all be remedied if the USA stopped White-racists from violating those citizens' rights under CRA'64. Not Capitalism.

Do you have proof, that those businesses only did it for profits? Because most of them lost money, and tho they might receive a GOVT subsidy for [covid 19 production] overhead, that still won't replace lost revenues.

Edited April 30, 2020 by Tdot

[cannuck]

On 4/27/2020 at 11:38 AM, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Actually, Obama doubled down on "capitalism" and gave Big Insurance and Big Pharma even bigger profits.

Wall Street loved Obama...and Clinton.

Obama and Klinton doubled down on Wall Street (i.e. Casino Capitalists) at the express expense of Main Street (actual Capitalists).   Seems that when you have key cabinet members responsible for economic and monetary that come from the Street, and usually Goldman SUCKS, the legislative and regulatory tilt of the country tends to favour those who own the government lock, stock and barrel.  (had to use a firearms analogy so you, and an American, could understand).

[WestCanMan]

On 4/29/2020 at 5:39 PM, New World Disorder said:

The War on Terror was a complete success!

Terrorism in the US is a lot lower under Trump than it was under Obama.

[New World Disorder]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Terrorism in the US is a lot lower under Trump than it was under Obama.

What about outside of the USA?

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, New World Disorder said:

What about outside of the USA?

Islamic state is 1/10th of what it was. Terrorist leaders are getting killed. Suleimani was dead within hours of sending troops to attack an American embassy. The world is on high alert - Trump is Texas personified. 

When Obama was Prez, and terrorists attacked, the message was "It's too early to call it a terrorist attack even though the perpetrator yelled a couple words over and over again while he was killing people. This is just an example of why we need tougher gun laws!" (even though AK-47's were illegal in the US).

[Marocc]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

"It's too early to call it a terrorist attack even though the perpetrator yelled a couple words over and over again while he was killing people

Saying words doesn't make an attack a terrorist attack. It is defined according to the motive.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Marocc said:

Saying words doesn't make an attack a terrorist attack. It is defined according to the motive.

This is what the left wing media and alt-leftists idiots blamed the Pulse Nightclub shooting on:

 

[Marocc]

45 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

This is what the left wing media and alt-leftists idiots blamed the Pulse Nightclub shooting on:

 

Can one say they're entirely wrong? More often than not, surely, there are multiple parties to blame.

Edited May 3, 2020 by Marocc

[Guest]

On 4/28/2020 at 5:58 PM, godzilla said:

whataboutism

Usually an accusation of whataboutism is just an admission of hypocrisy.  As in, my guy can do this, but yours can't.

[Guest]

59 minutes ago, Marocc said:

Saying words doesn't make an attack a terrorist attack. It is defined according to the motive.

The words just help with identification.

[WestCanMan]

11 minutes ago, Marocc said:

Can one say they're entirely wrong? More often than not, surely, there are multiple parties to blame.

Yes, they are entirely wrong lol.

The gun used was totally illegal and Republicans never tried to make it legal. Not even the NRA wants that gun legalized.

Also, Republicans don't advocate for violence against homosexuals or any other Americans, let alone murder. 

What the Pulse shooter did was in-line with the traditions of several ME countries, where his family is from, and with the traditions of his religion of choice. He yelled platitudes from his religion. He made a point of spelling out his reasons, crystal clear. If an Indo-Canadian wears a turban it's not likely because of something to do with the CPC. More likely it's because of his religion or his parents' culture. 

If someone killed your child Marocc, would you want the attacker to take the blame, and serve the punishment, or would you be OK with the CBC or a group of people from a different city assigning the blame to whomever they wanted?

IMO it's extremely to put blame where it lies, you owe it to the 49 dead people. For CNN and the LGBTQ community to use the deaths of those 49 people for political spin is the same as spitting on their graves. Those dead people deserve at least to have their story told. 

 

[Marocc]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

If an Indo-Canadian wears a turban it's not likely because of something to do with the CPC. More likely it's because of his religion or his parents' culture. 

That's narrow-minded and I wonder if you believe it yourself.

An individual is influenced on countless of ways during their life time. Yet, I think, if a particular individual under discussion was poor, had been fired multiple times, lost all his friends and family, drinks away his life and steals to survive, you would be able to make dozens excuses in his defense for just about anything he may have done. You could blame the parents, the society, the friends, the boss, excessive alcohol use in the world in general, capitalism, some other country etc., but if it's a foreigner and not Caucasian — you'll make no excuses but instead you look for extra faults.

[Moonlight Graham]

Capitalism is the best economic system in human history.  Discuss.

[Tdot]

2 hours ago, Marocc said:

That's narrow-minded and I wonder if you believe it yourself.

Do you believe him, though? Where he said it is unfair and immoral, for the Dems and their MSM to deceive the public about those deaths?  

[Rue]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Capitalism is the best economic system in human history.  Discuss.

Is that like a riddle?

Question: When do you discuss kama sutra with a Muslim fundamentalist, pimple faced virgin  and chronic masterbator (troll)?

Answer:  After they pay me. That shit is not covered by OHIP.

 

Edited May 4, 2020 by Rue

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Marocc said:

That's narrow-minded and I wonder if you believe it yourself.

An individual is influenced on countless of ways during their life time. Yet, I think, if a particular individual under discussion was poor, had been fired multiple times, lost all his friends and family, drinks away his life and steals to survive, you would be able to make dozens excuses in his defense for just about anything he may have done. You could blame the parents, the society, the friends, the boss, excessive alcohol use in the world in general, capitalism, some other country etc., but if it's a foreigner and not Caucasian — you'll make no excuses but instead you look for extra faults.

What? I'm not a leftist who plays the blame game. I'm a law and order person. The laws are clear and easy to follow.  

Do you know what the CPC is? The Conservative Party.....

I would assume that if an indo-Canadian was wearing a turban it would be because they were a Sikh. I don't give a crap about turbans. They don't bug me. If ppl want to ride motorbikes with a turban on I think that the Indian community earned that right when they fought on our side, in WWII, wearing turbans instead of metal helmets. I've said as much here before.

 

There's one reason to yell to allah when you commit a murder, and that's because you think that you are in his good graces at the time. 

Do you think that when a pedophile priest has sex with a little boy he yells "Hey God, check this out!!!!" 

[Rue]

On 4/27/2020 at 2:31 PM, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Then why do you inject Trump into every thread ?

 

Same reason Tdot and Maroc are on this forum. You should have discerned a repeating and common script and agenda in all 3  by now. 

These are scripts  to incite anti American sentiment on the forum and people take the bait.

They fish. What they fish for they will not catch. The same reason the Grand Banks is not so grand anymore. Overkill.  They need to take their fleets back home now or go destroy someone else's fishing grounds.

Nothing here to catch.  

 

[Tdot]

1 hour ago, Rue said:

...Tdot ...

 

 

[Moonlight Graham]

1 hour ago, Rue said:

Is that like a riddle?

Question: When do you discuss kama sutra with a Muslim fundamentalist, pimple faced virgin  and chronic masterbator (troll)?

Answer:  After they pay me. That shit is not covered by OHIP.

You teach courses right?  I need to take your class.

[Marocc]

6 hours ago, Tdot said:

Do you believe him, though? Where he said it is unfair and immoral, for the Dems and their MSM to deceive the public about those deaths?  

I don't believe the division between the "dems" and the republicans to be of significant importance. I.e. I don't care.

[Marocc]

5 hours ago, Rue said:

These are scripts  to incite anti American sentiment on the forum

Let's be fair here — the entire purpose and fuel of the forum is inciting antimulticultural and

anti-religious sentiment in addition to promoting inequality, racism, capitalism, injustice and bullying.

[Tdot]

3 hours ago, Marocc said:

I don't believe the division between the "dems" and the republicans to be of significant importance. I.e. I don't care.

lol

oh, you must mean ... like how:

• the Dems want the USA overrun by illegal immigrants, but the Repubs want them all removed from the nation. 
• the Dems want wealthy entities to pay the brunt of all tax revenues, whereas the Repubs want the non-wealthy entities to pay it.
• the Dems want our LGBT brethren to control the USA, whereas the Repubs want...well...lets just say -------the exact opposite?
• the Dems prefer Christianity banned from the USA in favor of atheism, whereas Repubs frown upon atheism.
• the Dems want the future USA population to mainly consist of lightskin/bi-racial humans, whereas the Repubs want it to be only Negroids and Euro-Caucasoids.
• the Dems love China and support China for hurting us w/ COVID 19. Repubs want to turn the world against China.
• the Dems want to facelift the entire, racist Criminal Justice System, whereas any racist Repub wants it undisturbed.
• the Dems want women to be able to have abortions if they choose to, Repubs want all abortions to be illegal.

 

Are those the type of divisions you find not to be of significant importance?? Or you had other things in mind? 

Edited May 4, 2020 by Tdot