Jump to content

Create GENERAL DISCUSSION section?


betsy

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, hot enough said:

And you know full well that you US government supporting conspiracy theorists wouldn't dare to start a USGOCT thread because you know you can't provide any proof/evidence for that terribly lame conspiracy theory. The opportunity has been there for months on end and not one believer of the USGOCT has offered one iota of evidence/proof. 


LoL this is why I asked to uncle Michael that who is going to decide whether something is conspiracy or not because its highly possible that any topics questions 9/11 or similar events is going to be placed in "Conspiracy Theories" section by mods. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Altai said:


LoL this is why I asked to uncle Michael that who is going to decide whether something is conspiracy or not because its highly possible that any topics questions 9/11 or similar events is going to be placed in "Conspiracy Theories" section by mods. 
 

Yes, the irony is overwhelming, Altai. These are the very people who hold themselves out as always open to totally free discourse adults.

Edited by hot enough
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Altai said:

...its highly possible that any topics questions 9/11 or similar events is going to be placed in "Conspiracy Theories" section by mods. 
 

That remains to be seen, but if most people see it as a conspiracy theory what would you have done with the topic ?  It's not 'news'.  I would relegate it to its own forum, and hopefully that will reduce duplicate postings, spam and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hot enough said:

Yes, the irony is overwhelming, Altai. These are the very people who hold themselves out as always open to totally free discourse adults.

Yes, free discourse....but that doesn't mean forcing your discourse on someone's own thread!  You're practically hijacking most of the threads! 

There are moments when I do enjoy bantering with you, but you're hurting the board when you're turning all discussions to be about the same thing!

If you want to talk about something - create your own thread for it.

 

 

 

Edited by betsy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

That remains to be seen, but if most people see it as a conspiracy theory what would you have done with the topic ?  It's not 'news'.  I would relegate it to its own forum, and hopefully that will reduce duplicate postings, spam and so on.

Democracy is nonsense. Most of the people generally makes their decisions based on their fanatical feelings and not based on logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

That remains to be seen, but if most people see it as a conspiracy theory what would you have done with the topic ?  It's not 'news'.  

It's not politics, either, and really shouldn't be in on a sub forum dedicated to politics. That includes both Canadian politics and US politics. There really is no existing suitable topic where something like 9/11 properly fits.

Edited by Argus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Non sequitur.

Altai said: Democracy is nonsense. Most of the people generally makes their decisions based on their fanatical feelings and not based on logic.

You called this a non sequitur because Altai described you to a T and you don't want to have to address it.

Your feelings, and therefore your "discussion" about the 911 issue are nothing but fanatical because you outright deny reality, you categorically deny science, you refuse to address so much because you actually know your position is fatuous. That is the very definition of a fanatic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hot enough said:

when it gets a little hot for you

C'mon.  It's obviously not hot enough.

(am I really the first one to say that??)

 

I propose three new threads in their own section:

1) The USA is EVIL

2) 911 Was a Sham

3) Denying Science (Have You No Morals?)

 

That should clean things up a bit.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Hydraboss said:

C'mon.  It's obviously not hot enough.

(am I really the first one to say that??)

Nobody thinks they are as witty as you think you are. 

Quote

I propose three new threads in their own section:

1) The USA is EVIL

2) 911 Was a Sham

3) Denying Science (Have You No Morals?)

That should clean things up a bit.

That's what intellectual cowards would do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, hot enough said:

Altai said: Democracy is nonsense. Most of the people generally makes their decisions based on their fanatical feelings and not based on logic.

1. You called this a non sequitur because Altai described you to a T and you don't want to have to address it.

2. Your feelings, and therefore your "discussion" about the 911 issue are nothing but fanatical because you outright deny reality, you categorically deny science, you refuse to address so much because you actually know your position is fatuous. That is the very definition of a fanatic. 

1. No, I said so because it didn't follow the discussion of how to classify such stories.

2. I have addressed all the points, but if you ask the same questions over and over I will just refer you to my previous responses.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hydraboss said:

I propose three new threads in their own section:

1) The USA is EVIL

2) 911 Was a Sham

3) Denying Science (Have You No Morals?)

 

That should clean things up a bit.

I second your proposal.  But we still have the problem of posters mis-categorizing their posts into legitimate forums instead of putting them in the three proper playpens allocated to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

I second your proposal.  But we still have the problem of posters mis-categorizing their posts into legitimate forums instead of putting them in the three proper playpens allocated to them.

Ban them.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,742
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    CrazyCanuck89
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • DACHSHUND went up a rank
      Rookie
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      First Post
    • aru earned a badge
      First Post
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • User earned a badge
      Posting Machine
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...