Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Peter F said:

and again no knowledge of the cases approved or rejected. You have a gut feeling, a suspicion, but no facts. 

Just logic and the definition of what constitutes a refugee - which is not applicable to Haiti - or, for that matter, Somalia. What, you think these people are neutral and unbiased? Unaffected by the government of the day? Why do you think the acceptance rate has skyrocketed since Trudeau came to power? Coincidence?

Edited by Argus
  • Thanks 1

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/5/2017 at 6:54 AM, capricorn said:

The Liberal government was warned by senior immigration staff that a crisis was looming with regard to refugees and our ability to handle it. Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen was cautioned that there will be a need to review refugee related policies in response to the growing number of refugees entering Canada. Couple this with Trudeau's open invitation to the world that Canada will welcome one and all with open arms.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ahmed-hussen-migrants-briefing-1.4235843

If we are so well prepared to absorb hundreds, soon to be thousands, of refugees streaming in from the US, how come we have to house them in a sports arena like so many head of cattle.

Mixed messages have been emanating from the Liberal government on this matter. Is it to much to ask that the government develop cohesive policies and take decisive action on this pressing situation?

An update seeing that no one here will nor the media or the RCMP anymore will but so far this year in Canada there has now been over 35,000, I repeat 35,000 of these so-called refugees that have entered Canada illegally. That is up from 24,000 in 2016. Of the 13,000 refugee claims being filed by these criminal migrants, only 300 have been processed this year. Half of these illegal criminals have been granted refugee status while they all wait for their hearings. These illegals have been granted work permits, and have access to health care. It 's no wonder our medicare and social services are pretty much bankrupt, and jobs for some Canadians jobs are difficult to find. Guess who is taking some of those jobs? Your tax dollars at work, folks. 

It amazes me again as to why so many members here were all concerned and oh so worried about Trump when all this criminality was going on and which should have been the main topic of conversation in Canada. And than there are people who knock me for visiting alternative news websites where without them I would not know about the amount so far as to how many criminal illegals have entered Canada. We are being swamped and invaded by foreigners who should have never been allowed into this country. It's bloody shocking, and a crime. 

Source: Right Edition.  Try visiting that website and learn something for a change rather than keep listening to the fake and phony left wing liberal media like the CBC/CTV/Global who refuse to keep us informed about all these criminals entering Canada. Anyway, there you have it.  

Posted
On 17/11/2017 at 10:39 AM, AngusThermopyle said:

Don't know about the sky falling, but taxes sure are rising. Gotta pay for all this crap some how dontcha know.

Taxes are rising because of refugees?

Prove that.

Posted
3 minutes ago, jacee said:

Taxes are rising because of refugees?

Prove that.

Refugees and taxes are rising for the very same fundamental reason, our means of controlling how our governments behave is completely inadequate - we simply don't have the tools we need to do so.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

There are other ways to help people besides importing them to Canada. They can also be helped by providing appropriate aid in their homeland. Obviously if that's not possible they have a case to become a refugee, but otherwise we should be selective in allowing too many people in as refugees who don't properly qualify. That is misguided if not blatant abuse of the system, and it's not in the interests of Canada.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

There are other ways to help people besides importing them to Canada. They can also be helped by providing appropriate aid in their homeland. Obviously if that's not possible they have a case to become a refugee, but otherwise we should be selective in allowing too many people in as refugees who don't properly qualify. That is misguided if not blatant abuse of the system, and it's not in the interests of Canada.

All of the refugees admitted to Canada have been screened in the camps in  Europe and again here.

https://www.thestar.com/news/immigration/2017/02/24/refugee-vetting-in-us-and-canada-already-extreme-experts-say.html

Edited by jacee
Add link
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Yes security is all fine and well but do they "qualify as refugees", as mentioned?

Obviously that's part of the screening process.

Look it up.

Edited by jacee
Posted
2 hours ago, jacee said:

Obviously that's part of the screening process.

Look it up.

The question was raised here about people running away from deportation in the US, like the Haitians for example, are they eligible for claiming refugee status.

Posted
7 hours ago, jacee said:

Taxes are rising because of refugees?

Prove that.

Are you saying refugees don't cost anything? That we can feed, house, clothe and look after the health care and other necessities of tens of thousands of third world people who don't speak English and have no job skills for nothing?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
5 hours ago, jacee said:

All of the refugees admitted to Canada have been screened in the camps in  Europe and again here.

https://www.thestar.com/news/immigration/2017/02/24/refugee-vetting-in-us-and-canada-already-extreme-experts-say.html

Nonsense. The screening is done in a haphazard fashion and largely consists of taking their word for where they come from and that they aren't and haven't been fighters for any particular group. Unless they have a record with some western agency there's little to contradict them. You can't screen forty thousand people in a couple of months with any real credibility. Can't be done. Refugee panels, just like immigration officers, are under intense pressure to achieve numeric goals for admittance. Refusal takes a lot more time and documentation.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
3 hours ago, jacee said:

Obviously that's part of the screening process.

Look it up.

Explain how Syrians (except for Christians or Yazidis), Somalians or Haitians qualify under the UN definition of refugees.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
2 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

The question was raised here about people running away from deportation in the US, like the Haitians for example, are they eligible for claiming refugee status.

Read the link I posted above.

Posted
3 minutes ago, jacee said:

Read the link I posted above.

Here is, once again, the actual definition of refugees. Clearly Haitians don't qualify. Nor do Somalians.

"A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it."

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
18 minutes ago, Argus said:

Here is, once again, the actual definition of refugees. Clearly Haitians don't qualify. Nor do Somalians.

"A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it."

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugees/inside/apply-who.asp

More info there.

I am not sure whether those arriving are being processed as refugees, or as regular immigrants.

It would be good to clarify that.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, jacee said:

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugees/inside/apply-who.asp

More info there.

I am not sure whether those arriving are being processed as refugees, or as regular immigrants.

It would be good to clarify that.

 

Everything on that cite says that Haitians and Somalians should not be recognized as refugees, except in a very, very few, unusual circumstances. Yet we're hearing that the mostly Haitians who crossed the border at Quebec who have gotten hearings have been accepted at a 70% rate. Since Haiti is not at war and there is only one race/religion and the place is basically run by the UN I fail to see how they're qualifying.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
On 11/19/2017 at 3:04 PM, OftenWrong said:

The question was raised here about people running away from deportation in the US, like the Haitians for example, are they eligible for claiming refugee status.

Even more so IMO.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
23 hours ago, AngusThermopyle said:

Are you saying that refugee's don't cost Canadians anything?

Who cares? We have more money than we know what to do with so...Pile it on.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...