Omni Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 1 hour ago, hot enough said: You're the one who made the admission that you are dishonest, that you have been fabricating/prevaricating. Not that it wasn't always clear that's what you were doing, but your admission just clarified it for everyone. Still waiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, Omni said: Still waiting. You are wallowing in your dishonesty, Mr UN ambassador. You provided a video that lied about collapse times. When it was pointed out to you that it was all a lie, you defended MisterSkunkwork, knowing full well that it was lies. Then you admitted that your whole plan is only one of deception, fabricating, lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: You are wallowing in your dishonesty, Mr UN ambassador. You provided a video that lied about collapse times. When it was pointed out to you that it was all a lie, you defended MisterSkunkwork, knowing full well that it was lies. Then you admitted that your whole plan is only one of deception, fabricating, lying. The video is quite clear on the timing. Still waiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, Omni said: The video is quite clear on the timing. Still waiting. You are lying again. MrSkunkwork and Omni are prevaricators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: You are lying again. MrSkunkwork and Omni are prevaricators. Still waiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 19 minutes ago, Omni said: Still waiting. No, you aren't, you are lying, Omni. That you can't see that only speaks to your patent dishonesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, hot enough said: No, you aren't, you are lying, Omni. That you can't see that only speaks to your patent dishonesty. Still waiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 1 hour ago, Omni said: Still waiting. There was US proprietary nanothermite found in WTC dust, molten and vaporize steel, eutectic steel from the nanothermate. They got it in the buildings and they blew them up. You know, even with your poor sense of science that Arab hijackers couldn't do that, only the US government could. Jeff Farrer, PhD, with a specialty in analyzing the type of steel found at WTC, confirmed all this for you in the video that you are too frightened to watch, dishonest person that you are, prevaricator that you are, UN attache that you are, made up hero that you have pretended to be, pretend pilot. =========== Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2: 7-31Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen3(NH) Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark. Electronic publication date 3/4/2009[DOI: 10.2174/1874412500902010007] Abstract: We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic. https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCPJ-2-7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 1 minute ago, hot enough said: There was US proprietary nanothermite found in WTC dust Totally false....this contention is without merit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: Totally false....this contention is without merit. All these top scientists say you are full of your usual BS. Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen The lady/man who can never provide any evidence, advances another of his/her famous lies. Bring on your evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, hot enough said: All these top scientists .... The usual suspects...and Troofers. The claim is false and without merit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 14 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: Totally false....this contention is without merit. Another PhD who will show you that you are full of BS, that you have always been full of BS, that you have never once addressed any science on 911. Why I stopped believing the official 911 story- London April 30th 2013 (part 1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: The usual suspects...and Troofers. The claim is false and without merit. Typical b_c2004 BS "evidence". Your standing as a know nothing remains solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: Another PhD..... Ed Asner ? The claim is false and without merit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: Ed Asner ? The claim is false and without merit. You illustrate your dishonesty, which you didn't need to do as your BS is well known. All these top scientists describe in their first paragraph that you are a liar. Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen Where is your evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: You illustrate your dishonesty, Ed Asner is not a scientist....he was Mary's boss on an American television show. The claim is false and without merit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 15 minutes ago, hot enough said: There was US proprietary nanothermite found in WTC dust, Dust that was at least 6 years old without any record of custody. Can you say in consequential? But you still completely shy away from my question. Put up or STFU. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 There was US proprietary nanothermite found in WTC dust, molten and vaporize steel, eutectic steel from the nanothermate. They got it in the buildings and they blew them up. You know, even with your poor sense of science that Arab hijackers couldn't do that, only the US government could. Nine top scientists say you are full of Omni fabrications/diversions, but we don't need them to know that you are a major prevaricator, a guy who lies about his job. A British PhD did a quick calculation that shows that if every bit of energy from the collapses went into heating the steel, it would only rise by 20 degrees C. He gave every opportunity to the official fable to increase that value. If he had used NIST data, the temperature rise would have been a mere 8 degrees C. You have never explained where all the molten steel, molten molybdenum, vaporized lead, iron microspheres came from Omni. That's also indicative of your deep dishonesty, that is Omni prevaricating/fabricating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 17 minutes ago, Omni said: Can you say in consequential[sic]? Can you spell? Evidently not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Omni said: Dust that was at least 6 years old without any record of custody. WTC dust of any age cannot, legally/legitimately, possibly have US government proprietary nanothermite in it and yet it did. How do you think a major prevaricator like you missed this? These are world class scientists, Omni, supported by thousands of other scientists, architects, engineers, physicists, ... and all you are is a, we don't know what, beyond being a major prevaricator, because you have shown, time and again, that you can't be trusted. Edited August 8, 2017 by hot enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 6 minutes ago, hot enough said: Can you spell? Evidently not. That's the best you can do, a spelling error? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, hot enough said: WTC dust of any age cannot, legally/legitimately, possibly have US government proprietary nanothermite in it and yet it did. How do you think a major prevaricator like you missed this? These are world class scientists, Omni, supported by thousands of other scientists, architects, engineers, physicists, ... and all you are is a, we don't know what, because you can't be trusted. Nobody in their right mind would accept your magic nano nano dust as valid evidence. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Omni said: That's the best you can do, a spelling error? More blatant prevarication from Omni. Your poor spelling only indicates that you are a show boat who knows nothing about science. Your direct avoidance of all the other material just highlights your great proclivity to prevarication. Edited August 8, 2017 by hot enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, Omni said: Nobody in their right mind would accept your magic nano nano dust as valid evidence. Sorry. Says Omni the known fabricator. When measured against the scientists, engineers, architects, physicists, even a prevaricator like you knows full well that you are out to lunch, a wild fabricator, a science denier, a rabid anti-truther. Still you seek to embarrass yourself. Knock yourself out, Omni. I actually feel a little sorry for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, hot enough said: More blatant prevarication from Omni. Your poor spelling only indicates that you are a show boat who know nothing about science. Your direct avoidance of all the other material just highlights your great proclivity to prevarication. That's a big word for you to spell. Did mommy help you with that? And I'm still waiting for the answer to my very old question you fear to try and answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts