hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 9 minutes ago, Omni said: Nor do I. How did you get to be so gullible? And did you science class a lot? Never a lick of evidence from Omni, the guy who doesn't even know the story/events/science for the side he is supporting. Sheeple to the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 4 minutes ago, hot enough said: Never a lick of evidence from Omni, the guy who doesn't even know the story/events/science for the side he is supporting. Sheeple to the end. Evidence that proves you wrong, so you conspiracy theorists close your eyes and put you hands over your ears and probably dance around going la, la , la ,la la. But I can't help making you scream over and over. Perhaps if you sat down and actually read some of the evidence provided to you, you would be able to relax a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, Omni said: Evidence that proves you wrong, So what scientists put together that goofy little video that you posted that you were totally confused on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal 9000 Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Wasn't there a CIA operative woman that came out with a tell all book that suggested that everyone knew it was gonna happen and also that a crew wired the building with explosives over a 10 day period? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 8 minutes ago, Hal 9000 said: Wasn't there a CIA operative woman that came out with a tell all book that suggested that everyone knew it was gonna happen and also that a crew wired the building with explosives over a 10 day period? If there is I'm sure it's on HE's shelf. 10 days to wire up 3 large buildings. Yep, sounds like something he'd believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 23 minutes ago, Hal 9000 said: Wasn't there a CIA operative woman that came out with a tell all book that suggested that everyone knew it was gonna happen and also that a crew wired the building with explosives over a 10 day period? Yes, there was, Hal, her name was Susan Lindauer. "You guys have no idea what actually happened, the lies are so much bigger than what you know." Susan Lindauer Notice how Omni immediately moves to try to discredit everything. Someone who was really interested in finding out the truth wouldn't do this but this has been Omni's dog and pony show from the beginning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 23 minutes ago, hot enough said: her name was Susan Lindauer. Yet another of HE's "troother" heroes. Susan Lindauer (born July 17, 1963) is an American antiwar activist and former U.S. Congressional staffer who was charged with "acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government" and violating U.S. financial sanctions during the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. She was incarcerated in 2005 and released the next year after two judges ruled her mentally unfit to stand trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altai Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 (edited) 6 hours ago, hot enough said: You really nailed them, described them to a T with this one, Altai. Yup, that is the lot of them, sheeple to the core. Actually these people want to be enemy against Muslims, this is why they dont want to use their thinking power. They are like "No no its done by Muslims, dont speak I dont want to hear la la la la la laa haaa ha haaa hooo ho hoooo I dont hear you, its done by Muslims lalala lalala" Edited August 6, 2017 by Altai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altai Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 6 hours ago, hot enough said: You really nailed them, described them to a T with this one, Altai. Yup, that is the lot of them, sheeple to the core Look what I remember. Recently there was a march done by government oppenent party in Turkiye and police caught four ISIS guys in a truck just 200 meters away from the march planning to crash people walking in the march. So I mean they are killing themselves to justify their illegal actions. All of these artificial terror organizations are produced in labs by some countries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 9 hours ago, hot enough said: You really nailed them, described them to a T with this one, Altai. Yup, that is the lot of them, sheeple to the core. You actually take pride in your group? Well birds of a feather I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, Omni said: You Omni, Mr Skunkwork100, ignores the things that prove he is a compulsive liar. What scientific background does Mr Skunkwork100 have, Omni? Why do you ignore that from NIST's Shyam Sunder and the 911 Commission? The 911 Commission says, " ... the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds". That is 0.8 seconds below free fall. That is impossible according to the laws of physics, which you, MrSkunkwork100 knows nothing about. Shyam Sunder - "The measurements have indicated that tower one collapsed in about eleven seconds and tower two collapsed in about nine seconds" Your lousy little video lied, which is what you always do Omni/MrSkunkwork100. Tower two collapsing in less than free fall time and tower one at accelerating speed. Do you understand what impossible means, Omni/MrSkunkwork100? Your little goofy video was a terrible lie. Shyam Sunder - " As a result, the entire top of the building came down pretty much in free fall." NIST Final Report of the Collapse of the Twin Towers - "Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance, ... the building section above came down essentially in free fall." "Pretty much in free fall". Eighty thousand tons of structural steel does not provide "little resistance". The only way that those towers could have come down at those speeds is by controlled demolition. The eighty thousand tons of structural steel had to be removed. Where did all the energy come from, Mr Skunkwork100, to pulverize all the concrete, every desk, chair, office cubicle, the drywall, the steel forming pans, the computers, the ... . Have you got another of your goofy, totally unscientific videos, Mr Skunkwork100? How does someone like you who denies reality with such a vengeance, function day to day? Who dresses you? Who feeds you? Edited August 6, 2017 by hot enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, hot enough said: The 911 Commission says, " ... the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds". Get your stopwatch out and watch the video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 12 minutes ago, Omni said: Get your stopwatch out and watch the video. That illustrates the level of your, MrSkunkwork100, "science". Don't you trust NIST, Mr Skunkwork100? Experts, scientists, engineers, ... have made the measurements already, Mr Skunkwork100. It has been determined that the twin towers fell at an accelerating rate and WTC7 fell at free fall speed, admitted by NIST, for the first 2.25 seconds, 105 feet, 8 storeys. From stasis [that means from a condition of no movement or change, Mr Skunkwork100] to free fall. Free fall can only occur with no structural resistance below, which Shyam Sunder himself described, and then NIST admitted free fall had occurred. Only controlled demolition can remove such structural resistance. That would be the nanothermite found in WTC dust which caused the molten/vaporized steel. Stasis is what you do, you sit with nothing, zero science, denying stark reality, because you are Omni, Mr Skunkwork100. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Just now, hot enough said: Free fall can only occur with no structural resistance below, Correct. And that's why the buildings fell as slowly as they did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Omni said: Correct. And that's why the buildings fell as slowly as they did. Omni/Mr Skunkwork 100 is denying reality again. A perpetual state for Mr Skunkwork 100. The 911 Commission says, " ... the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds". That is 0.8 seconds below free fall. That is impossible according to the laws of physics, which you, MrSkunkwork100 knows nothing about. Shyam Sunder - "The measurements have indicated that tower one collapsed in about eleven seconds and tower two collapsed in about nine seconds" Your lousy little video lied, which is what you always do Omni/MrSkunkwork100. Tower two collapsing in less than free fall time and tower one at accelerating speed. Do you understand what impossible means, Omni/MrSkunkwork100? Your little goofy video was a terrible lie. Shyam Sunder - " As a result, the entire top of the building came down pretty much in free fall." NIST Final Report of the Collapse of the Twin Towers - "Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance, ... the building section above came down essentially in free fall." Edited August 6, 2017 by hot enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 13 minutes ago, hot enough said: As a result, the entire top of the building came down pretty much in free fall. "The entire top", and "pretty much", but not the rest of the floors. And there is obvious reason for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 2 hours ago, Omni said: "The entire top", and "pretty much", but not the rest of the floors. And there is obvious reason for that. You know you are lying, Omni/MrSkunkwork100. Why do all your dishonest conswearvative friends allow you to lie repeatedly even when the facts stare you and them squarely in the face? Both buildings came down in what was essentially free fall. READ, The 911 Commission says, " ... the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds". That is 0.8 seconds below free fall. That is impossible according to the laws of physics, which you, MrSkunkwork100, know nothing about. Numerous scientists have determined, using actual science, something NIST never did, that the towers would have self arrested within two to three floors. Shyam Sunder - "The measurements have indicated that tower one collapsed in about eleven seconds and tower two collapsed in about nine seconds" You are denying science, you are denying the laws of physics. You are saying, MrSkunkworks100, that a Volkswagen, in a head on collision with a stationary semi truck and trailer loaded with concrete blocks will keep plowing thru the stationary semi truck and trailer and pulverize everything, including the concrete. You know that is absolute nonsense and still you keep on with your childish, exceedingly juvenile comments that never address the science, never address the evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 6, 2017 Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, hot enough said: Both buildings came down in what was essentially free fall. The actual timing says they didn't. But I'm still waiting for you to answer my question as to how all that explosive got planted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Quote The actual timing says they didn't. The actual timing of everyone, people who actually know things says that you don't know your ass from your elbow. This isn't something that anyone at MLW doesn't know, ie. you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. NIST, the 911 Commission, all the scientists who have studied this know the collapse times and you don't know a thing, you can't discuss a thing, you post disjointed nonsense because you know that your stunning ignorance will be highlighted as soon as you speak anything but your usual doublespeak drivel. Quote But I'm still waiting for you to answer my question as to how all that explosive got planted. You know you are lying. You know that you aren't the least bit interested in discussing things in a scientific fashion, in a manner that the MLW guidelines encourage people to do. You know that you are only trying to cause distractions. You know this, as does everyone else because you know nothing about the events or the science and this is why your replies are so childish, so juvenile, so ephebic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2017 Scientist 2 who found nanothermite in WTC dust. Jeff Farrer - Physicist - Found nanothermite in WTC dust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal 9000 Posted August 7, 2017 Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 Even if it was a controlled demolition, wouldn't there still be resistance when they fell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 7, 2017 Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 6 minutes ago, Hal 9000 said: Even if it was a controlled demolition, wouldn't there still be resistance when they fell? The fantasy revolves around the idea that the tons of explosives drilled into the walls all went off at the same time so as to disconnect the "floorboards" all at the same time to create free fall. Still waiting to hear how that explosive got installed. I'm sure we never will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Hal 9000 said: Even if it was a controlled demolition, Not "it", Hal, there were three controlled demolitions - WTC 1, 2 & 7. The first two fell at close to free fall and WTC7 fell at free fall. Quote wouldn't there still be resistance when they fell? That all depends on how much is demolished by explosives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted August 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Omni said: Still waiting to hear how that explosive got installed. I'm sure we never will. Sure you will, when the new, real investigation takes place. But don't worry your pseudo-science brain about that. You know that you are using this silly nonsense as a distraction. You also know nothing about nanothermite or anything else and you are too scared to find out. That's because you are an ardent science denier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omni Posted August 7, 2017 Report Share Posted August 7, 2017 14 minutes ago, hot enough said: Sure you will, when the new, real investigation takes place. But don't worry your pseudo-science brain about that. You know that you are using this silly nonsense as a distraction. You also know nothing about nanothermite or anything else and you are too scared to find out. That's because you are an ardent science denier. It's fun to make you dance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts