PIK Posted November 22, 2016 Report Posted November 22, 2016 (edited) What we need is Harper. Edited November 22, 2016 by PIK Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
Argus Posted November 22, 2016 Author Report Posted November 22, 2016 (edited) 15 minutes ago, PIK said: What we need is Harper. Never was a big fan. What we need is a new conservative government which is actually conservative. Harper had the idea that if he was as moderate as possible, and ignored conservative beliefs, including a balanced budget, the media and leftists would hate him less. They didn't. They despised him as much as they would have if he was the arch conservative they continue to claim he was. Edited November 22, 2016 by Argus Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
eyeball Posted November 22, 2016 Report Posted November 22, 2016 3 minutes ago, overthere said: You could save the waste of many pixels by just repeating "I blame Harper" over and over. Doing that without a reason would be a waste. So why doesn't the Federal Accountability Act work as advertised? My guess is because it was always a sham. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
PIK Posted November 24, 2016 Report Posted November 24, 2016 On 11/22/2016 at 3:15 PM, Argus said: Never was a big fan. What we need is a new conservative government which is actually conservative. Harper had the idea that if he was as moderate as possible, and ignored conservative beliefs, including a balanced budget, the media and leftists would hate him less. They didn't. They despised him as much as they would have if he was the arch conservative they continue to claim he was. But he understood want was going on in the world and today you can't just be a conservative in this country and expect to win. And with trump now coming in to power. Harper is the man we need to go up against him. Trudeau has already screwed us by showing his hand, something Harper never would have done. And look at the pay to play going on, show me where harpers gov ever did that. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
mowich Posted November 24, 2016 Report Posted November 24, 2016 Chuck Strahl, a former Conservative MP, resigned from a directorship of the Trudeau Foundation because the Liberals were invoking his name when unsuccessfully trying to extricate their leader from charges of influence peddling. “While I have always supported the goals of the foundation to promote discussion of and education in the humanities, I am unwilling to be used as a foil for the Liberal Party of Canada, who has chosen to use my participation in foundation activities as some sort of cover for their own questionable conduct,” Mr. Strahl told foundation president Morris Rosenberg. " http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ex-mp-chuck-strahl-resigns-from-trudeau-foundation/article33014375/ Grasping at straws they are.........those liberals. Quote
Argus Posted November 25, 2016 Author Report Posted November 25, 2016 14 minutes ago, mowich said: Grasping at straws they are.........those liberals. The interesting thing is the Liberals are using the Donald Trump defense. He says that the president can't be in a conflict of interest because there's no law against it. The Liberals essentially say the same thing. If it's not actually illegal, then it's not a conflict. Which is ridiculous. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
?Impact Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 (edited) 18 minutes ago, mowich said: Grasping at straws they are.........those liberals. While I can understand Strahl wanting to get away from the centre of this political fiasco, blaming it in the liberals only is laughable. It is the idiots who are trying to link a $250k donation to a worthy cause (ok, the $50k for erecting a status is a bit over the top) to the Liberals are just as bad as the Liberals trying to defend it by invoking Strahl. The continual calling it a $1 million donation is just more proof that the idiots are really that, because it was a $250k donation. Edited November 25, 2016 by ?Impact Quote
Argus Posted November 25, 2016 Author Report Posted November 25, 2016 (edited) 3 minutes ago, ?Impact said: While I can understand Strahl wanting to get away from the centre of this political fiasco, blaming it in the liberals only is laughable. It is the idiots who are trying to link a $250k donation to a worthy cause (ok, the $50k for erecting a status is a bit over the top) to the Liberals are just as bad as the Liberals trying to defend it by invoking Strahl. The continual calling it a $1 million donation is just more proof that the idiots are really that, because it was a $250k donation. You don't think it's idiotic to pretend this doesn't violate Trudeau's letters to ministers demanding there be no access for cash nor even the appearance of access for cash? Edited November 25, 2016 by Argus Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
?Impact Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, Argus said: You don't think it's idiotic to pretend this doesn't violate Trudeau's letters demanding there be no access for cash nor even the appearance of access for cash? I have no problem with highlighting that, but calling it a $1 million donation is a gross lie and demonstrates that those idiots are only partisan turkeys. The Trudeau Foundation has nothing to do with the Liberal party, yes there may be some bad optics but what do you suggest? Should all charitable foundations that are somehow related to a politician be terminated? Quote
mowich Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 1 hour ago, Argus said: The interesting thing is the Liberals are using the Donald Trump defense. He says that the president can't be in a conflict of interest because there's no law against it. The Liberals essentially say the same thing. If it's not actually illegal, then it's not a conflict. Which is ridiculous. 1 hour ago, ?Impact said: Should all charitable foundations that are somehow related to a politician be terminated? No. The foundation is just an aside to the real story which is the fact that the PM sees no apparent need to follow the rules he himself outlined concerning pay-for-play. It would also be refreshing if he would stick around to face the music himself instead of leaving to the other members of his government........who so far are doing a really poor job. Quote
eyeball Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 2 hours ago, ?Impact said: I have no problem with highlighting that, but calling it a $1 million donation is a gross lie and demonstrates that those idiots are only partisan turkeys. The Trudeau Foundation has nothing to do with the Liberal party, yes there may be some bad optics but what do you suggest? Should all charitable foundations that are somehow related to a politician be terminated? Whatever it takes. Influence peddling is the one crime where I'd support the death penalty, for both parties. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
DogOnPorch Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 It's good to be King. ---Mel Brooks: History of the World Pt II ---HRH Justin Trudeau the First Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
?Impact Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 7 minutes ago, eyeball said: Influence peddling is the one crime where I'd support the death penalty, for both parties. What makes this influence peddling? The crazy assed stories from the political opponents? Quote
eyeball Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 (edited) No, a ridiculously powerful politician receiving money from a ridiculously wealthy person. Edited November 25, 2016 by eyeball Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
?Impact Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 1 hour ago, eyeball said: No, a ridiculously powerful politician receiving money from a ridiculously wealthy person. What politician received any money? Quote
Derek 2.0 Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, ?Impact said: What politician received any money? From what is public to date, the Trudeau Foundation and the BC Liberals. Quote
Derek 2.0 Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 4 hours ago, ?Impact said: I have no problem with highlighting that, but calling it a $1 million donation is a gross lie and demonstrates that those idiots are only partisan turkeys. The Trudeau Foundation has nothing to do with the Liberal party, yes there may be some bad optics but what do you suggest? Should all charitable foundations that are somehow related to a politician be terminated? A donation to a foundation......after said Billionaire had a private Dinner with the Prime Minister. Quote
?Impact Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, Derek 2.0 said: From what is public to date, the Trudeau Foundation and the BC Liberals. So, what does the Trudeau Foundation have to do with anything? No politicians involved, just a bunch of crazy assed partisans with their filthy, stinky, innuendo. The scuzballs who are trying to link this to the Prime Minister are human filth. Quote
Derek 2.0 Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, ?Impact said: No politicians involved, just a bunch of crazy assed partisans with their filthy, stinky, innuendo. The scuzballs who are trying to link this to the Prime Minister are human filth. You understand the Prime Minister, he's a politician you see, had dinner with a rich Chinese business man that was awaiting Federal approval on setting up a private bank in Canada.....after said Dinner, his Bank is approved, and he then donates to construct a $50000 statue of our Prime Minister's father............scuzballs is right. Quote
?Impact Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, Derek 2.0 said: You understand the Prime Minister, he's a politician you see, had dinner with a rich Chinese business man that was awaiting Federal approval on setting up a private bank in Canada.....after said Dinner, his Bank is approved, and he then donates to construct a $50000 statue of our Prime Minister's father............scuzballs is right. Again the Prime Minister has absolutely nothing to do with the foundation. The slimy scuzballs in the opposition are trying to create something where nothing exists for their own partisan gain, they are nothing but lowlife. Why don't they do the job they are well paid by the taxpayer for, and not waste my tax dollars on their stupid partisan lies. They are the lowest of the low, they should be charged $10,000 per hour they waste on this bullshit. Focus on your job, or quit scuzballs. Quote
Derek 2.0 Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 2 minutes ago, ?Impact said: Again the Prime Minister has absolutely nothing to do with the foundation. So he says.......where there is smoke, there tends to be fire. I wonder how many Canadians making less then 50k a year have a statue built of their father after they grant approval of a private bank. Quote
eyeball Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, ?Impact said: Again the Prime Minister has absolutely nothing to do with the foundation. AFAIC this foundation business is just sugar-coated legalistic bullshit dreamed up by rich and powerful people who are determined to maintain a mutually beneficial relationship that is more akin to the strong nuclear force. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
?Impact Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, Derek 2.0 said: So he says.......where there is smoke, there tends to be fire. I wonder how many Canadians making less then 50k a year have a statue built of their father after they grant approval of a private bank. Again 100% fabricated lies. Where did the Prime Minister have any involvement in granting approval to a private bank? I suppose what that scuzball Ambrose was in power and her government granted provisional approval to the bank, she is a shining angle? No she is a lowlife lying scuzball. What involvement did the Prime Minister have with this approval? Lying innuendo should not be allowed to stand. Quote
?Impact Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, eyeball said: AFAIC this foundation business is just sugar-coated legalistic bullshit dreamed up by rich and powerful people who are determined to maintain a mutually beneficial relationship that is more akin to the strong nuclear force. The name on the foundation is not that of the Prime Minister, and the Prime Minister has nothing to do with the foundation. It was created after the death of his father in his fathers name, there is no involvement of the Prime Minister at all. The lying scum who want to create innuendo like this instead of doing their taxpayer funded jobs should be fined $10,000 per hour they waste, Ambrose is nothing but lowlife scum. Quote
Derek 2.0 Posted November 25, 2016 Report Posted November 25, 2016 6 minutes ago, ?Impact said: Lying innuendo should not be allowed to stand. What did I say that was a lie? -A Chinese Banker had a private dinner with Trudeau, which wasn't mentioned in his very public itinerary----This is Fact -Said banker, prior to the dinner, was waiting on Federal approval for a new bank funded with Chinese money in Canada. Trudeau is the head of the Federal Government---this is Fact ----After said Dinner, said Bank was approved by the Federal Government, of which Trudeau heads-------this is Fact ---After said approval, said banker donated the money to build a statue of the Prime Minister's father-----this is fact Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.