?Impact Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 Maxime Bernier has changed his tune on supply management, saying it is in conflict with the principals of free markets that the Conservative party support. He represents a rural riding in Quebec, and has vigorously defended supply management in the past. Now that he is a leadership candidate for the party he is rethinking his position. I agree this is an important topic that should be discussed, both in Parliament and here (where opinions may not count, but often are well considered). Some of the issues we should look at are: 1. The Australian model, they moved off of supply management. Has it worked? Is their model right for Canada (being right next to the major US producers)? 2. What about food labeling? My position is that if we import dairy, then it should be clearly labeled if they contain growth hormones or antibiotics, etc. Perhaps something similar to the labels on cigarette cartons. 3. What about the quota's that farmers currently have? Should they be compensated? Is this a similar issue to TAXI's and their plates? Quote
-1=e^ipi Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 It needs to die. Glad to see Maxime Bernier has come around to reason. Too bad Martha Hall Findlay didn't win the liberal leadership contest. She was truly principled and recognized the stupidity of supply management. Quote
PIK Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 Beef and pork farmers don't have it, why should they? Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
Argus Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 (edited) Supply Management's only purpose is political, and in this case designed to ensure the political party in power doesn't see angry opposition, demonstrations and protests from the Quebec dairy industry. http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/john-ivison-tory-leadership-candidate-maxime-bernier-no-longer-a-lightweight Edited June 1, 2016 by Argus Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
PIK Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 I have not decided on who i want as leader, but bernier just scored some pts with me. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
overthere Posted June 1, 2016 Report Posted June 1, 2016 It will boil down to how many seats won or lost to keep or reject the supply management system in dairy, eggs and poultry. The biggest losers are in Quebec and Ontario, but I don't see loads of Liberal seats at risk in rural parts of either. Quite possible that the Libs will pre-empt Bernier and dump it. It costs Canadian consumers something like $2.5 billion extra per year. It is also possible that dumping supply management will mean that our markets are flooded with much cheaper product from the USA. Quote Science too hard for you? Try religion!
Topaz Posted June 2, 2016 Report Posted June 2, 2016 So the question is, do Canadians support their own or buy imports and which matters price or quality? I'd buy Canadian first. Quote
overthere Posted June 2, 2016 Report Posted June 2, 2016 So the question is, do Canadians support their own or buy imports and which matters price or quality? I'd buy Canadian first. That is a bit of a false dichotomy. The choice is not between overpriced , quota driven local products and not buying Canadian. There are lots of Canadian farmers that would be delighted to compete for the CDN market. They simply do not have that option now. Quote Science too hard for you? Try religion!
August1991 Posted July 7, 2016 Report Posted July 7, 2016 So the question is, do Canadians support their own or buy imports and which matters price or quality? I'd buy Canadian first. Canadian first? Fer gawdsakes, why? Do you make your own clothes? Do you make your own telephone? ====== Ordinary Canadians - heck, ordinary people around the world - are better off because they can buy inexpensive blouses and can now phone/talk to their friends with an easy. Who would want to return to the 1968 world of payphones and nylon shirts that cost 38$? I'm certain that even people in China and Vietnam would not want such a world. Heck, who would want to return to a 1758 world without penicillin, Mozart and Adam Smith? Quote
?Impact Posted July 7, 2016 Author Report Posted July 7, 2016 (edited) It costs Canadian consumers something like $2.5 billion extra per year. Any supporting facts for your argument? Are you comparing Canada to the US? Is it the same product, or is the US milk loaded with growth hormones? Have you looked at Australia & New Zealand? Australia has a wider price range than Canada, but on average is 10% cheaper, New Zealand is about 10% more expensive, the US is about 30% cheaper. Net farm receipts in Canada for dairy total $6 billion, you are suggesting that we are $2.5 billion or 72% overpriced. I don't think your numbers add up at all. Do you not consider that everything else is considerably higher cost in Canada but dairy is 100% the fault of supply management? Do you include the massive subsidies the dairy farmers in the US receive from taxpayers? I think it is good to have a discussion on supply management, but let's not make wild unsubstantiated claims. Edited July 7, 2016 by ?Impact Quote
Archduke al-Qaddafi Posted July 7, 2016 Report Posted July 7, 2016 Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think Bernier has ever supported supply management, beyond towing party line I suppose. The biker chick thing ten years ago was just a convenient excuse to fire a popular Quebec minister from cabinet, he has always had ideas that were a far cry from the Harper agenda. Bernier has my full support, both with my money and my vote. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.