Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There is a question of legality with the ongoing by-elections, although engagecanada has not, and says it does not intend, to register as a third party. Not registering gets them around the spending limits, but how can they get away with not registering as a third party I don't know.

They can't, hence why Elections Canada is currently investigating the PACs, likewise the reason the Tories ran away from the HarperPAC.........why would they want to involve themselves with possible election fraud, before the writ is even dropped..........

I also wouldn't be surprised if further light is shed upon NDP satellite offices and other "irregularities" once the House of Commons administrators start the collection process of $2.7 million in improper NDP expense claims on July 1st......of course the NDP is refusing to pay back the owed money, as a result, legal action will proceed later this Summer ;)

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

I don't know what imaginary union you paid dues to....or imagine its a parliamentary democracy. Most unions directly elect their executive and they do have referenda on major policy decisions that are dictated in their constitution. Just so you know if you are in such a union....know how you get a good one......"elect" members who will push constitution changes.

Well I can tell you that PSAC is not like that. You vote for your local representatives. Your local representatives will then choose individuals to go to a convention to select higher levels. No major policy decisions aside from strike votes and contract approvals are ever put to the general membership. Issues like that are decided at conventions which are attended only by activists.

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Well I can tell you that PSAC is not like that. You vote for your local representatives. Your local representatives will then choose individuals to go to a convention to select higher levels. No major policy decisions aside from strike votes and contract approvals are ever put to the general membership. Issues like that are decided at conventions which are attended only by activists.

Well you quit a shitty union. You elect members......if they don't advance and propose constitutional change......who's that a reflection on? Kinda like how we run our gov't I guess.

Posted

Shouldn't the reason to shut it down be the same as that which was used to pressure HarperPAC to shutdown?

When will Engage Canada stop using Mulcair's name..... or... something.

Posted

I looked but could find nothing approaching this comment.

The Tories get corporate funds, but so what? The NDP/Liberals get union funds. At least the corporations are producing something, including jobs, as opposed to collecting off the work of others.

Corporations produce nothing without workers doing the work.

Posted (edited)

They can't, hence why Elections Canada is currently investigating the PACs, likewise the reason the Tories ran away from the HarperPAC.........why would they want to involve themselves with possible election fraud, before the writ is even dropped..........

Why would the CPC want to involved itself in election fraud. Oh god. hahahahahaha. You're kidding right? Like that's never happened before. They have more than one conviction under their belts now.

Edited by cybercoma
Posted

Corporations produce nothing without workers doing the work.

Agreed.

Corporations produce jobs and product.

Unions produce neither jobs, nor product. They cannot protect your job. The only thing they can 100% (at least in Canada, where we don't have work to rule) guarantee you is the fact you will have to pay union dues.

Posted

Why would the CPC want to involved itself in election fraud. Oh god. hahahahahaha. You're kidding right? Like that's never happened before. They have more than one conviction under their belts now.

As do the Libs.

Posted

The solution isn't to ban unions et al from expressing their views. Rather Union membership needs to be made voluntary through right to work laws so those who disagree with the advertising aren't forced to fund it.

Businesses also get tax deductions for advertising and lobbying efforts. The difference is that businesses are using their own money while unions essentially have a taxation power over their members. It's this power to confiscate income to fund advertising that needs to end

Can't ban unions from expressing their views first of all.

Union membership is already voluntary but not paying dues because a court already ruled that dues are used for the benefit are members.

Much way that taxes are supposed to be used for the benefit of the people who pay them ;)

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

Posted

Taxpayers lose about $1 billion per year in lost income tax revenue due to the allowance for unionists to deduct union dues from gross income. . That has to stop.

Ya you don't get how money is made in Canada.

If you tell a group of people that they can not write off an expense, then that group is going to take the government to court and easily prove discrimination because every other business and person filling taxes is claiming expenses!

You really hate the economy and want to destroy it!

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

Posted

Corporations produce nothing without workers doing the work.

Don't forget the economic playing field that governments tilt in their direction. Our government and especially the PMO and Cabinet are like a virtual union for many corporations - an advocate that's capable of wielding an influence over economic outcomes that real unions could only dream of bringing to their members.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

Agreed.

Corporations produce jobs and product.

Unions produce neither jobs, nor product. They cannot protect your job. The only thing they can 100% (at least in Canada, where we don't have work to rule) guarantee you is the fact you will have to pay union dues.

Corporations do not produce jobs nor do they produce product. Employees produce products and sell corporations their labour.
Posted

Don't forget the economic playing field that governments tilt in their direction. Our government and especially the PMO and Cabinet are like a virtual union for many corporations - an advocate that's capable of wielding an influence over economic outcomes that real unions could only dream of bringing to their members.

Exactly. The government is the corporate union.
Posted

They can't, hence why Elections Canada is currently investigating the PACs, likewise the reason the Tories ran away from the HarperPAC.........why would they want to involve themselves with possible election fraud, before the writ is even dropped..........

I also wouldn't be surprised if further light is shed upon NDP satellite offices and other "irregularities" once the House of Commons administrators start the collection process of $2.7 million in improper NDP expense claims on July 1st......of course the NDP is refusing to pay back the owed money, as a result, legal action will proceed later this Summer ;)

Let me guess, you got a talking point from Paul Calandra. You know don't you that he is paid to sound stupid.

Posted

Look at the manufacturing , unions have chased most of that away and in 10 yrs we will not be building cars in this country.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Look at the manufacturing , unions have chased most of that away and in 10 yrs we will not be building cars in this country.

The unions chased away manufacturing or free trade agreements that were designed to bust unions did?
Posted

Well you quit a shitty union. You elect members......if they don't advance and propose constitutional change......who's that a reflection on? Kinda like how we run our gov't I guess.

I have no reason to believe it is any different among the rest of the large public service unions.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

look at leachers or teacher I mean, the highest paid and still not happy. That is what unions do, they make it sound that they have it so tough and their members are actually doing well. 2 friends of mine are both PS in the federal government and it makes you sick at times to listen how tough they have it. To hear anyone say how the middle class is hurting is a fool.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Corporations do not produce jobs nor do they produce product. Employees produce products and sell corporations their labour.

Corporations do not produce jobs? How then do employees sell corporations their labour. You know that's what a job is.

I've heard all these arguments before, and we can argue semantics all day.

Fact is, corporations employ people, however you want to slice it up.

They pay them, whether you want to call it a job or selling your labour.

Posted

Corporations do not produce jobs? How then do employees sell corporations their labour. You know that's what a job is.

I've heard all these arguments before, and we can argue semantics all day.

Fact is, corporations employ people, however you want to slice it up.

They pay them, whether you want to call it a job or selling your labour.

Who pays the corporations?
Posted

The unions chased away manufacturing or free trade agreements that were designed to bust unions did?

Odd then that Mexico, which has free trade agreements with 45 different countries is being inundated with union driven car companies.

Posted (edited)

There's no job if there's nobody to do the work either. Go ahead and keep ignoring that. It's a mutual relationship that you keep trying to pass off as one sided.

Edited by cybercoma
Posted

There's no job if there's nobody to do the work either. Go ahead and keep ignoring that. It's a mutual relationship that you keep trying to pass off as one sided.

People take jobs that corporations offer because the corporations create the conditions that make the job and the money that comes from it possible.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...