Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

CBC obtained a heavily-censored analysis of the Aboriginal Affair's department's funds and allocations from the Privy Council Office, the prime minister's department, under the Access to Information Act.

It disclosed that the department held back $1B in funding for social services to Aboriginal communities. These funds were to help to provide clean, running water, programs to address violence, addictions and support of education programs.

Why isn't there an outcry from the non-native Canadians?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/perry-bellegarde-national-chief-calls-on-government-to-meet-obligations-to-first-nations-1.3103299

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/aboriginal-affairs-1b-spending-shortfall-hits-quebec-association-hard-1.3103266

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

It disclosed that the department held back $1B in funding for social services to Aboriginal communities.

This has to be the most pathetic example of ideology driven "news" on the CBC that I have seen in a while. This is not a story until someone reports *why* the the money was not spent. Chances are the money was not spent because they could not find enough projects with adequate accounting/management oversight and the dept did not want to get blamed if the money is misused. If this is the case then the department is acting responsibly and should be commended. Edited by TimG
Posted

This has to be the most pathetic example of ideology driven "news" on the CBC. This is not a story until someone reports *why* the the money was not spent. Chances are the money was not spent because they could not find enough projects with adequate accounting oversight. If this is the case then the department is acting responsibly and should be commended.

It would be helpful if they provided that information, and a list of the other departments that have "lapsed" spending.

Posted

I believe that there was a recent story that DND couldn't spend over $1B every single year. Where's her thread on that?

Posted

OR... the money was not spent because the pay cheques for ALL federal workers comes out of the "general revenues" and the general revenues are not as full as they once were. The cuts in GST and corp. taxes are shrinking the revenues and the MPs pensions also comes out of there. Then, again, I could be wrong.

Posted

I believe that there was a recent story that DND couldn't spend over $1B every single year. Where's her thread on that?

Virtually all departments have money left over at the end of the budgetary year. Some of them have been known to go on last minute splurges of buying in order to bring that surplus down, but I understand Harper frowns on this. Mind you, you wouldn't want to be the minister or deputy minister who goes OVER his budget by even a tiny amount. You'll be flayed alive.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

We see this every year. The money is there, readily available for FNs to use as long as they can document where it is spent. Many reserves will not allow even that level of financial scrutiny, so they never even apply for the money.

Posted

This has to be the most pathetic example of ideology driven "news" on the CBC that I have seen in a while. This is not a story until someone reports *why* the the money was not spent. Chances are the money was not spent because they could not find enough projects with adequate accounting/management oversight and the dept did not want to get blamed if the money is misused. If this is the case then the department is acting responsibly and should be commended.

If you and Shady had bothered to read the links, one of them discusses this:

"The Quebec Native Women's Association recently lost $175,000 in federal funding, which has jeopardized its ability to continue offering services to aboriginal people within the province."

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

If you and Shady had bothered to read the links, one of them discusses this:

That anecdote does not address the point. The money was allocated but not used for a reason. Until we hear the reasons this is not news because chances are there are good reasons for not spending the money.
Posted

"The Quebec Native Women's Association recently lost $175,000 in federal funding, which has jeopardized its ability to continue offering services to aboriginal people within the province."

And what exactly did they did? The Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs had their money cut to the bone. It probably has nothing to do with the fact that they spend 98% of their time criticizing the government that funds them.

Posted

That anecdote does not address the point. The money was allocated but not used for a reason. Until we hear the reasons this is not news because chances are there are good reasons for not spending the money.

How can there possibly be good reasons for not spending money when FN communities are in dire need of funds to address their needs. It's appalling that this money has been held back and it's a disgrace for Canadians. If Canadians don't react to this report than it is truly sad to say that Canadians simply don't care about First Nations.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

Wow, bad reporting.

This is how it works (simply stated):

The First Nation is responsible for spending the money on the projects that they have applied for with AANDC.

If the money is not fully spent then they can often apply to carry the funding into the next year to be spent on the project.

There are many reasons the money is not spent: the project is meant to take more than one fiscal year, the project starts late in the fiscal year so must straddle into the next one, the FN is in the middle of nowhere so this adds extra time as engineers and other workers must travel etc etc.

Often the FN itself is not meeting even basic management practices for management and accounting for the projects. This is certainly partially the fault of AANDC since they provide little funding for bands to hire professional people including guys like me who are hired to audit their financial statements.

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted

How can there possibly be good reasons for not spending money when FN communities are in dire need of funds to address their needs.

There can be many possible reasons. If they don't qualify for it, if they don't actually formally apply for it, if they refuse to provide documentation of how it will be spent. You can't just "spend" and make problems go away. funding has to be targeted, and it has to be documented.

It's appalling that this money has been held back and it's a disgrace for Canadians. If Canadians don't react to this report than it is truly sad to say that Canadians simply don't care about First Nations.

There is no evidence that is the case.

Posted

How can there possibly be good reasons for not spending money when FN communities are in dire need of funds to address their needs. It's appalling that this money has been held back and it's a disgrace for Canadians. If Canadians don't react to this report than it is truly sad to say that Canadians simply don't care about First Nations.

They shouldn't need or care if I care about them, and if you cant be trusted to spend the money correctly, or if you have nothing legitimate to spend it on, why should it be given? it is my money, and im not appalled, but i know, im not a real Canadian.

Posted (edited)

As I recall, last year the government proposed bill C33 which was to address aboriginal education and poverty. It would have cost about $1.9 billion. It created disagreement between chiefs and eventually rejected by the aboriginal community. That caused the AFN chief Shawn Atleo to resign and that money was never spent. Maybe that is why the $1 billion is sitting there.

Perhaps if those local Chiefs got their act together and came up with a consensus and a united front they may get that money.

Edited by Big Guy

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

Posted

"The planned budget for Aboriginal Affairs is to shrink by $1 billion by 2017-18 from current levels, to $7 billion, according to the department's fiscal blueprint tabled earlier in the spring."

They're lapsing funding in prep for a big cut, I say.

Bizarre.

Posted

"The planned budget for Aboriginal Affairs is to shrink by $1 billion by 2017-18 from current levels, to $7 billion, according to the department's fiscal blueprint tabled earlier in the spring."

They're lapsing funding in prep for a big cut, I say.

Bizarre.

Every department has downsized.

Posted

I'm OK with downsizing the bureaucracy, but not funding for public services to people.

.

And how do you know which has happened?

Posted (edited)

CBC obtained a heavily-censored analysis of the Aboriginal Affair's department's funds and allocations from the Privy Council Office, the prime minister's department, under the Access to Information Act.

It disclosed that the department held back $1B in funding for social services to Aboriginal communities. These funds were to help to provide clean, running water, programs to address violence, addictions and support of education programs.

Why isn't there an outcry from the non-native Canadians?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/perry-bellegarde-national-chief-calls-on-government-to-meet-obligations-to-first-nations-1.3103299

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/aboriginal-affairs-1b-spending-shortfall-hits-quebec-association-hard-1.3103266

Is that the funds supposed to go to residential schools? Cause that was supposed to be social help too. Edited by Freddy

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,919
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Milla
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...