Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 304
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Well hello there. I have some more news for anyone who wants to understand the Obama-Iran connection.

Bam Bam Obama appointed Thomas J. Pickering to investigate Iran’s nuclear program.

Say now who is this man....oh come on guess....

he served on the board of the American-Iranian Council whose president is, Hooshang Amirahmadi, a former registered candidate in Iran’s presidential election.

Hooshang claims to be "unofficial lobby for Iran. Heres a quote from Hooshang:


“There is clash between various regional [Middle East] lobbies. Israelites will fast gather around Obama . Arabs will also spend their money to get close to Obama. Unfortunately, Iran is very lonely in Washington, and those few, like us, who defend the Iranian rights, are subject of unkind hostility in Tehran. These gentlemen [in Iran] do not truly understand what they do, and how they weaken our position. As a result the field is left wide open for Israelis and Arabs and enemies of Iran. Firstly, Iran should realize that, and empower its friends in Washington, especially in the next one to two months, which is the time [to do it].

Iranian leaders should pay attention to what is going on, and strengthen their friends. They [iranian leaders] should have confidence in, energize, and trust their friends [in Washington] so they enter the arena. This is very important. Therefore the next two or three months are the time to conquer Obama’s heart and mind and that of his teams. Anyone who acts faster will rest trouble free for the next 8 years. Anyone who does not go to that bazaar [marketplace] now, will have a tough time entering that bazaar in future.”

So Hooshang is out in the open as to what his agenda is and now you know that someone sitting on his council like Mr. Pickering would have preconceived biases in favour of the Iranian regime.

Wow what a surprise.

Now just so you know,

Hooshang Amirahmadi, has also stated" “Unfortunately, a large part of the problems between Iran and the US are not based in reality, but are based on myths. The problem of terrorism is a true myth. Iran has not been involved in any terrorist organization. Neither Hezbollah nor Hamas are terrorist organizations.”

Posted

You know you have a winner, when you're quoting pamelageller.com. Quoting anything from her is admitting that you don't value credibility.

She is one of the dirtiest Zionists around. She's a racist and will make up crap until Rue is foaming at the mouth.

Here is snip from an article about Geller and her reaction to the Norway attack. It demonstrates how she works:

On Friday, anti-Islamist blogger Pamela Geller pounced on news of a massacre in Oslo. "Jihad in Norway?" she asked. She posted a second item—"You cannot avoid the consequences of ignoring jihad"—and linked to a previous one: "Norway: ALL Rapes in Past 5 Years Committed by Muslims." As the Oslo body count grew, she piled on: "if I hear another television or radio reporter refer to muhammad as 'the Prophet Muhammad,' I think I am going to puke. He's not your prophet, assclowns."

Then things went horribly wrong. It turned out that the suspected terrorist in Norway wasn't a Muslim. He hated Muslims. And he admired Geller.

In a manifesto posted online, the admitted killer, Anders Behring Breivik, praised Geller. He cited her blog, Atlas Shrugs, and the writings of her friends, allies, and collaborators—Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch, Islam Watch, and Front Page magazine—more than 250 times. And he echoed their tactics, tarring peaceful Muslims with the crimes of violent Muslims.

When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they can seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall. Think of it--always. Gandhi

Posted (edited)

Here is snip from an article about Geller and her reaction to the Norway attack. It demonstrates how she works:

.

No it does not demonstrate how she works Hudson Jones, it demonstrates how you work. It demonstrates how you went to a web site and found someone who is pro Iranian who presented a subjective series of name calling against her and personally attacked her as a person and then you come on the board and resort to the same caling her a dirty Zionist and racist.

You yet again demonstrate you ignore the issues raised about the NIAC or the other points I made and think you can avoid them by throwing out some name calling.

So this demonstrates in fact how you work Hudson Jones. When presented with issues you have no idea how to debate, you name call to avoid debating.

Go on continue-that was credible, dirty Zionist. Racist. You forgot poo poo head.

Yes Sir you want to be credible on this forum, call someone a dirty Zionist. Lol.

Slam and dunk.

Edited by Rue
Posted (edited)

Once again we see Marcus and Guyser on this board calling Netanyahu a liar. Neither however offers anything to indicate he lied. The sound bite Marcus offered in his latest response provides no proof of a lie.

So how do Marcus or Gusyer come on this board and claim Netanyahu is a liar.

Will they share their intelligence reports? Lol.

Once again we see the anti Israel entourage engage in name calling with nothing to offer but that.

Here boys knock yourself out with these dirty Zionist lies:

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/irans-nuclear-bomb-program-complete/

http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-now-has-nuclear-breakout-capability-us-intel-reports/

http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-already-has-a-nuclear-bomb-paper-claims/

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/02/iran_has_the_bomb.html

http://counterjihadreport.com/2015/02/02/experts-iran-now-a-nuclear-ready-state-missiles-capable-of-hitting-us/

Edited by Rue
Posted

Oh now wait. I can hear it...dirty Zionists say dirty things. The posts I presented opining Iran already has a nuclear weapon, its a dirty Zionist lie. Netanyahu is a liar.

Theres one problem though. Dismissing this as a Zionist lie is not going to work.

Go to:

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/nov/07/world/la-fg-iran-nuclear-report-20111108

Oh now look the UN must be dirty Zionist liars too.

Reporting from Washington — United Nations nuclear inspectors have concluded that Iran has acquired the technical means to design a nuclear weapon and would require about six months to enrich uranium to the quality needed for a bomb if it decided to do so, according to officials familiar with the evidence.

Evidence of advances in Iran's research is expected to emerge this week in a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N.'s Vienna-based nuclear watchdog.

The IAEA report provides no "smoking gun" proof that Iran's government intends to build a nuclear weapon, said a European diplomat. But the report is likely to add pressure on the Islamic Republic, and bolster those who have called for stiffer sanctions or military strikes in an effort to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed state.

Iran insists its nuclear program is only for civilian purposes, and Iranian officials suggest documents buttressing the U.N. report are forged.

Posted

Once again we see Marcus and Guyser on this board calling Netanyahu a liar. Neither however offers anything to indicate he lied.

Israel's own intelligence agency says Netanyahu lied and distanced itself from his comments about Iran's nuclear ability.

It must be a challenge for you to get up every day and try to challenge the truth.

Leaked cables show Netanyahu’s Iran bomb claim contradicted by Mossad

Binyamin Netanyahu’s dramatic declaration to world leaders in 2012 that Iran was about a year away from making a nuclear bomb was contradicted by his own secret service, according to a top-secret Mossad document.

It is part of a cache of hundreds of dossiers, files and cables from the world’s major intelligence services – one of the biggest spy leaks in recent times.

"What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.

Posted (edited)

Hi Marcus,

Oh it must be true then. That must be a leaked document from Mossad. Its not fake. You know why? Because its on a piece of yellow paper. Looks just like a secret document. Yes sir. Mossad leaked it. Not the US. Not Iran. Mossad did it.

Ahahah. Come on lets continue.

Knock yourself out calling this Iranian a dirty Zionist liar:

http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2012/02/iran-already-has-nuclear-weapons-according-to-.html

Now Marcus you know the source you rely on? Oh come on tell people. Why give the link you did.

Come on now it comes from:

http://www.aljazeera.com/investigations/spycables.html

Yes sir Marcus I believe you. The Spycables from Al Jazeera found this out.

Ahahah. You are funny.

Well you know Marcus if nothing else at least you and Hudson Jones are outed. Your true Iranian colours and agenda are there for as Hudon Jones would say, EVERYONE to see.

Lol. Thank God we have Spy Cables able to penetrate Mossad and leak things. Phew.

Edited by Rue
Posted

Why do I keep seeing an image of Baghdad Bob?

Jerusalem Bob?

Nothing to see here! What Mossad documents? What Netanyahu lies?

"What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.

Posted

Once again we see Marcus and Guyser on this board calling Netanyahu a liar. Neither however offers anything to indicate he lied.

Thank you for this rue.

Of course every single news outlet is reporting that what he said was proven wrong in his own countries intelligence report.

But more importantly, I put the prior post in just because I figured, like most times if not always, you come on here in your own inimitible way and do some stupid ass song and dance about "people are picking on the Jews" You did it with MH the other day. What a fickle little man you are/

You cant take any criticism about israel, you are the worst thing israel has for a friend.

Ignorant and soft skinned.

Have a nice day, dont bother with your 10,000 word essay in response, no one reads them.

Posted (edited)

Oh look who is spreadining disinformation:

http://www.aljazeera.com/investigations/spycables.htm

Oh its fun.

WHy they have oodles of info. It cant possibly be disinformation. Its all legit.

Al Jazeera is owned by the government of Qatar.

It claims it is editorially independent from the government of Qatar.

According to WikiLeaks, in 2010, the United States Department of State, claimed that the Qatar government manipulates Al Jazeera coverage to suit its own political interests.

Well of course. The US are dirty Zionist liars. Um wait, not now. They like Iran remember Marcus? Lol.

Here is what is even more hilarious. This Spycables network is in association with the Guardian.

Hey now, thats the same Guardian that In September 2012, reported that Al Jazeera's editorial independence came into question because the channel's director of news, Salah Negm, at the last minute ordered a two minute video to be shown covering a UN debate over the Syrian civil war to showcase oh guess who...you guessed it, the leader of Qatar, Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani who started Al JAzeera.

You bet they better show Big Daddy. He runs the show and guess who he is aligned with. Oh come on now guess. Drum roll please......Hamas. Qatar openly finances Hamas, ISIL and other Sunni terrorist organizations. Bias against Israel oh come on now, he does not like Iran much better than he does Israel but you know push come to shove, come on now Hamas is numero uno so much so that both the Palestinian Authority and Israel both equally complained of pro Hamas reporting during the last uprising with Hamas. But hey the PA are dirty Zionist liars.

But hang on, one other thing, that sameGuardian also claimed in September 2012 that Qatar consolidated control of Al Jazeera English.

Get out.

Now I know. I mean who better to trust to not provide disinformation.

Lol.

But hey now everyone is in on the act with fronting Arab media these days check this list out:

Al Mayadeen funded by Persian Gulf countries

Al Arabiya (Saudi Arabian)

Al Hurra (American financed)

Al Alam (Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting)

Rusiya Al-Yaum (Russian)

BBC Arabic Television (British)

Deutsche Welle (German)

Euronews in Arabic on 12 July 2008

So come on EVERYONE. Find a news feed to match your political agenda and quote it.

Edited by Rue
Posted

Thank you for this rue.

Of course

But more importantly, I put the prior post in just because I figured, like most times if not always, you come on here in your own inimitible way and do some stupid ass song and dance about "people are picking on the Jews" You did it with MH the other day. What a fickle little man you are/

You cant take any criticism about israel, you are the worst thing israel has for a friend.

Ignorant and soft skinned.

Have a nice day, dont bother with your 10,000 word essay in response, no one reads them.

Say now Guyser you said, every single news outlet is reporting that what he (Netanyahu) said was proven wrong in his own countries intelligence report.

So go on then, provide the news outlets and their reports.

Also show where I stated people are picking on Jews. That is as you know a fabricated false quote.

Lol. Thats the best you can do in a response make up false quotes?

Posted

Say now Guyser you said, every single news outlet is reporting that what he (Netanyahu) said was proven wrong in his own countries intelligence report.

Yup pretty much

Also show where I stated people are picking on Jews. That is as you know a fabricated false quote.

Lol. Thats the best you can do in a response make up false quotes?

I went to the rue school of faux debating.

Lesson #1- Dont talk shit about the PM of Israel or any of the policies of same country.

Lesson #2- read #1 again or face the wrath of 10,000 word boring posts castigating one for daring to question the Holy land.

Posted (edited)

Jerusalem Bob is still in denial. What does the terrorist news outlet, The Guardian, say about the documents?

The documents, almost all marked as confidential or top secret, span almost a decade of global intelligence traffic, from 2006 to December last year. It has been leaked to the al-Jazeera investigative unit and shared with the Guardian.

The cache, which has been independently authenticated by the Guardian, mainly involves exchanges between South Africa’s intelligence agency and its counterparts around the world.

"Say now", nothing to see her folks!

Edited by marcus

"What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.

Posted

Its scary how much we have come to rely on leaks to prevent pieces of filth like this guy from lying us into war.

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Posted

Bibi's "lying" pales in comparison to Iran's lying. Whether it's a month, 6 months, or a year, you're all focused on the wrong thing. Well, the pro-Iranian crowd. Which is usually the anti-West crowd. It's all the same.

Posted

Jerusalem Bob is still in denial. What does the terrorist news outlet, The Guardian, say about the documents?

The documents, almost all marked as confidential or top secret, span almost a decade of global intelligence traffic, from 2006 to December last year. It has been leaked to the al-Jazeera investigative unit and shared with the Guardian.[/size]

The cache, which has been [/size]independently authenticated by the Guardian[/size], mainly involves exchanges between South Africa’s intelligence agency and its counterparts around the world.[/size]

"Say now", nothing to see her folks!

who is Jerusalem Bob?
Posted

Bibi's "lying" pales in comparison to Iran's lying. Whether it's a month, 6 months, or a year, you're all focused on the wrong thing. Well, the pro-Iranian crowd. Which is usually the anti-West crowd. It's all the same.

Israel has attacked nuclear facilities in.... Syria, Iraq and Iran. Wonder if the threat is as big as Israel claims it is.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...