Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

yes, it is! I'll ask it of you once again: "are you usurping the position/authority of the DND to analyze and provide assessment on the level of RCN combat readiness?" If not, as repeatedly stated, your personal opinion has been noted and acknowledged.

As I said, no.....I'm certain said report was representative of potential readiness problems DND could have faced going forward, from the timeline from which the report was written.

Again, you'll need to wait for DND's next iterative effort in this regard; you'll have to wait to see if your myopic fixation will have any bearing on the next DND review/report.

I'm certain at such a point it will be confirmed that the RCN will no longer face problems associated with operating the now retired ships, coupled with readiness issues that stem from the operation of four older, manpower intensive, vessels.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 467
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Russia is once again making noises about claims in the far north, and has announced it will build 13 new airfields and radar stations. It's spending billions on northern ports, and is constructing three huge new nuclear powered icerbreakers which can operate year round in the arctic and smash through ice four meters thick. Canada, of course, will instantly respond with its powerfu northern uh... we have some natives with rifles up there, don't we?

Harper announced big powerful armed icebreakers would be ordered too but they were never built nor are there any plans to ever build any. He announced a huge new expansion of our more northern base at Nunavut, but that got pared down to a few new outbuildings. New sub base and listening posts and drones? Uh... oh well. At least we're supposed to build some 'slushbreakers' but the PBO is saying there isn't nearly enough money set aside for them.

Parliamentary Budget Officer Jean-Denis Frechette said there's little chance the government can afford to buy between six and eight vessels on a budget of $3.1 billion. Frechette said that's only enough money to pay for four Arctic patrol ships — and even then, there's only a 50 per cent chance the vessels get built on that budget.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/arctic-patrol-ships-budget-insufficient-to-buy-6-vessels-pbo-1.2815446

So I guess we'll just write the Russians an angry letter.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/10/31/russia-warns-its-coming-for-the-arctics-oil-including-an-area-canada-claims-as-its-own/

http://o.canada.com/news/while-canada-makes-fanciful-claims-russia-acts-to-secure-its-position-in-the-arctic

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Defending the North has been on the table for over 15 years. The Liberals did nothing. Harper talked a big game and had a chance to do something. Ultimately, history will show that Harper lost us the North.

Posted (edited)

Defending the North has been on the table for over 15 years. The Liberals did nothing. Harper talked a big game and had a chance to do something. Ultimately, history will show that Harper lost us the North.

And unfortunately there's no alternative to him. The idea Mulcair or Trudeau would do any better in this regard is quite literally laughable.

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

He actually had done some things. The exercises and the research station are not insignificant. He simply needs to do more.

Posted

Do more with what though? Moscow has the raw power to pretty much do whatever it wants. It's not so much a matter of what a state can do but how it does things. This being the case it may be that the only thing we can do is to concentrate more power in Ottawa so that maybe one day it will be able to compete in a similar fashion.

We need more galvanizing events.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

He actually had done some things. The exercises and the research station are not insignificant. He simply needs to do more.

You mean the research stations in the north he shut down?
Posted

He's shut down a hell of a lot more science than he is trying to open. PEARL, Interlake etc. I think this CHARS thing is just another CPC ruse. It will be studying the type of science that doesn't affect his plans for arctic development. Maybe spending a few bucks to get some ships in the water to patrol the place might be better use of funds.

Posted

oh really! Have you ever... ever... "criticized" your boy, your favoured party, without throwing equal/greater negative emphasis on/toward past Liberal leaders/governments? You've done exactly that in your latest posts this morning in the 2 currently active threads in this forum. Like I said/implied... you simply can't find fault/criticism with your boy/party without first/also mentioning something along the lines of "he/they're bad... but their sure better than those past Liberals". Right Argus... you're balanced - fer sure!

See this is part of the problem in this site it seems it is always mine is bigger than yours. We as the people of this great country should realize the mainly three party system is antiquated and we need something different.

I thought the whole purpose of government was to push this country ahead and make it an even greater place for us to live. So what if instead of untold millions spent on elections we have the best of the best from all parties work together to make Canada a true leader and innovator of government.

I know why would actual thinking men work together when they can have access to ego inflating job titles.

Posted

He's shut down a hell of a lot more science than he is trying to open. PEARL, Interlake etc. I think this CHARS thing is just another CPC ruse. It will be studying the type of science that doesn't affect his plans for arctic development. Maybe spending a few bucks to get some ships in the water to patrol the place might be better use of funds.

This is true and very sad for all of us.

Posted

I would like to tell you I was working in Cambridge bay and they may say they shut those stations down but there are military personnel at the station there , Doing what I don't know .

I'm in Cambridge Bay right now (Did you ever go to the Elk's club?) and the former DEW line site out towards the airport is apart of the current replacement for the DEW line...........

Posted

He's shut down a hell of a lot more science than he is trying to open. PEARL, Interlake etc. I think this CHARS thing is just another CPC ruse. It will be studying the type of science that doesn't affect his plans for arctic development. Maybe spending a few bucks to get some ships in the water to patrol the place might be better use of funds.

No, CHARS will be studying various topics of research and will start housing scientists later this Spring.........And of course, the "water around the place" is currently frozen.........enough that the Canadian Coast Guards current polar icebreaker was unable to free the last supply barge of the season.....patrols can now be done by snowmobile.

  • 7 months later...
Posted

Harper is definitely getting under putins skin. Harper spent the nite on a frigate and putin had two Russia ships follow it while harper was on board.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

The problem is the focus on keeping the North has been mostly military... and that is guaranteed not to work.

If we want to keep the North we need to start developing it. Opening it up for mining, oil and gas exploration, and encouraging the existance of communities there. If we arent going to use it someone else will, and a few stupid little boats is not going to make any difference.

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...