Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The Brits used to hack each other to death with swords, maces and axes and shoot each other with long bows. They grew out of that to.

Americans aren't British and they sure ain't Canadian. We grew out of that too.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

  • Replies 269
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Americans aren't British and they sure ain't Canadian. We grew out of that too.

You conveniently neglected to ignore the per capita issue that Wilber pointed out, even though he thought you could figure that out. And you can't grow out of something you never grew into.

Posted

Mentally ill? Yes, but most likely driven to violence by an ill society with easy access to the weapons that are required to act out his violence.

Was a gun ban going to make Mr. Rodgers mentally well?
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

Was a gun ban going to make Mr. Rodgers mentally well?

Am thinking it probably would have kept him from shooting people? It's not just access to guns that's the problem. As our resident Yankee troll unwittingly demonstrates, it's the culture of guns and their treatment as fetish objects, sacred totems, penis proxies that's part of the problem.

Posted

Am thinking it probably would have kept him from shooting people? It's not just access to guns that's the problem. As our resident Yankee troll unwittingly demonstrates, it's the culture of guns and their treatment as fetish objects, sacred totems, penis proxies that's part of the problem.

Banning guns would not have done much good for the people he stabbed to death, or the people he ran over with his BMW. I guess we need to start calling on the ban of knives and BMW's now as well.

I am thinking that proper diagnosis and tratment of mental illness might be a more efficient solution

Posted

BTW. 500 US children a year are killed by accidental firearms discharges, vs how many mass murders prevented by packing citizens?

Yeah, and over 300 US children are killed each year in agricultural accidents, compared with how many potential starving related deaths?

Posted

Banning guns would not have done much good for the people he stabbed to death, or the people he ran over with his BMW. I guess we need to start calling on the ban of knives and BMW's now as well.

How fatuous.

I am thinking that proper diagnosis and tratment of mental illness might be a more efficient solution

tumblr_inline_n2dzf8LgOo1r1ign5.gif
Posted

Whenever I think about banning guns I always remember how successful banning drugs has been.

Posted

Am thinking it probably would have kept him from shooting people? It's not just access to guns that's the problem. As our resident Yankee troll unwittingly demonstrates, it's the culture of guns and their treatment as fetish objects, sacred totems, penis proxies that's part of the problem.

Am I the "resident Yankee troll"? I hope not.

As we saw in a recent (yes, U.S.) incident a student went on a pretty serious knife rampage recently.

What I think this comes down to (and I may but can't promise a thread on this issue) is a need for people generally to keep better track of their neighbors and acquaintances. Someone, particularly the administration, faculty or other students at the "college" he was attending should have noticed this guy's spiraling decline. Likewise James Holmes, Jared Lochner and other recent mass killers. The Newtown slayer may have been genuinely inaccessible but most are not.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

How so? Even his parents admit there were red flags overlooked and missed opportunities to intervene that would have prevented this. Banning guns however, would unfortunately not have.

Well, no one has spoken of actually banning guns for starters. Also your complaint about how no one wants to ban cars in spite of their damaging nature overlooks both the essential utility of cars over guns (the latter being specifically designed to kill) and the fact that cars are already heavily regulated, arguably even more so than guns.

Finally the mere fact that people will die by means other than guns is not a convincing argument against regulating guns.

Posted

No one has said that. But what gun control can do is minimize the amount of damage crazies can inflict.

How's that working out? Similar to the Lanza case, these firearms were legally obtained. Only difference is that it was Lanza's mother who owned the firearms and not Lanza himself.

But yet we see another incident and it surprises me this time to see the mental issue being pushed to the front as it should be with all these cases.

Posted

Finally the mere fact that people will die by means other than guns is not a convincing argument against regulating guns.

Also a government run operation like Fast and Furious. Weapons given to Mexican drug cartels to trace and track the guns and the people, only to find those guns crossing the border back into the US and used to commit crimes.

The gun control does nothing to address government negligence in this type of operation.

Posted

Yeah, and over 300 US children are killed each year in agricultural accidents, compared with how many potential starving related deaths?

That only makes sense if you don't understand the essential difference between farm machinery and guns. A subsistence hunter might use that argument but coming from anyone else it just sounds rediculous.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

How's that working out? Similar to the Lanza case, these firearms were legally obtained. Only difference is that it was Lanza's mother who owned the firearms and not Lanza himself.But yet we see another incident and it surprises me this time to see the mental issue being pushed to the front as it should be with all these cases.

If you limit the number of guns lying around, you make it more difficult for the crazies to obtain them. It will never be impossible but Lanza's mother hadn't had that arsenal available to him, things might have gone in a different direction.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Well, no one has spoken of actually banning guns for starters.

Sorry, I must have missed something...

Was a gun ban going to make Mr. Rodgers mentally well?

Am thinking it probably would have kept him from shooting people

Also your complaint about how no one wants to ban cars in spite of their damaging nature overlooks both the essential utility of cars over guns (the latter being specifically designed to kill) and the fact that cars are already heavily regulated, arguably even more so than guns.

I don't advocate for the banning of vehicles any more than I do the banning of guns.

Posted

How's that working out? Similar to the Lanza case, these firearms were legally obtained. Only difference is that it was Lanza's mother who owned the firearms and not Lanza himself.

Maybe that is a sign that it's too easy for people to get guns legally.

But yet we see another incident and it surprises me this time to see the mental issue being pushed to the front as it should be with all these cases.

You mean cases where the shooter is a white guy.

Posted

Sorry, I must have missed something...

Speaking offhand. Banning certain types of firearms should probably be considered. Heavily regulate the rest.

I don't advocate for the banning of vehicles any more than I do the banning of guns.

Speaking to your silly analogy.
Posted

That only makes sense if you don't understand the essential difference between farm machinery and guns. A subsistence hunter might use that argument but coming from anyone else it just sounds rediculous.

I agree, it sounds ridiculous.

I guess it's not so much the tool used, but the intent to which it's used for.

Posted

If you limit the number of guns lying around, you make it more difficult for the crazies to obtain them. It will never be impossible but Lanza's mother hadn't had that arsenal available to him, things might have gone in a different direction.

These are LEGALLY obtained firearms.

Posted

Maybe that is a sign that it's too easy for people to get guns legally.

Even easier to get one illegally. Criminals will still find a way. This only hampers the overall right to own a firearm. Which is always in the cross hairs of the government.

You mean cases where the shooter is a white guy.

I don't care what colour of skin the guy has. It's not relevant overall. As in many other cases. Race is not something that needs to be brought into this gun debate thing. It's a really divisive item that does not get to the root of the problem.

The media was complicit in facilitating the racial issue with the Zimmerman shooting of Martin. We don't need it, it's not productive, it is more of a distraction.

Posted

Race is not something that needs to be brought into this gun debate thing. It's a really divisive item that does not get to the root of the problem.

The media was complicit in facilitating the racial issue with the Zimmerman shooting of Martin. We don't need it, it's not productive, it is more of a distraction.

I disagree - it's quite relevant, and I think a lot of African Americans would agree. Probably more relevant than having Canadians discuss an American issue, for that matter, since they actually live there.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...